The structure that Roosevelt uses, beginning each one with little variation of the words "Last night, Japanese forces...", is effective in A. emphasizing the brazenness of Japan's multiple attacks against the U.S. and its allies.
Why did Roosevelt phrase the speech as he did ?By repeating this phrase with little variation, Roosevelt highlights the urgency and gravity of the situation. He is emphasizing that Japan's actions were not isolated incidents but rather part of a deliberate and coordinated effort to attack the United States and its allies. This repetition also helps to build a sense of momentum and urgency, conveying the message that the United States must take decisive action in response to these attacks.
Furthermore, the repetition of this phrase helps to reinforce Roosevelt's argument that Japan's actions were unjustified and deserving of a strong response.
Find out more on Roosevelt at https://brainly.com/question/23723840
#SPJ1
14. what was the impact of these revolutionary movements on new nations in latin america? what were caudillos, and how did the revolutions lead to their rise?
The revolutionary movements in Latin America played a pivotal role in the formation of new nations, and their aftermath was led by military strongmen known as caudillos.
These caudillos were influential figures who often held authoritarian or semi-authoritarian governments in the newly-formed nations. The revolutions led by these caudillos resulted in the fragmentation of colonial states and the emergence of independent nations.
Caudillos wielded a great deal of power and influence in their respective countries. They were responsible for appointing officials, enacting new laws, and enforcing their vision for the nation. They also established patronage networks that helped them consolidate political control and maintain their power.
By controlling access to economic and political resources, caudillos were able to keep their rivals in check and establish dictatorships that had a lasting impact on their countries.
Thus, the revolutionary movements and the rise of caudillos had a significant impact on the development of Latin American nations. The authoritarian and semi-authoritarian governments that emerged as a result of these revolutions had lasting effects on the political and social structures of the new nations.
Learn more about caudillos.
https://brainly.com/question/7727788
#SPJ11
once war in Europe was over, why couldn't Americans rest?
A: they had to conquer south America
B: they were being attacked by Canada
C:War was raging in the Pacific (Asia)
D: They were under attack by Germany in Hawaii
Answer: C. War was raging in the Pacific (Asia)
Explanation: Germany had lost, but Japan didn't surrender. The Americans kept fighting in the Pacific Islands while the Japanese did kamikaze attacks. It wasn't until Nagasaki and Hiroshima got nuked that Japan surrendered.
4. The British troops in Philadelphia lacked the supplies necessary to attack Washington's troops at
Valley Forge. True or False? Explain.
The materials required to attack Washington's men at Valley Forge were indeed in the hands of the British troops in Philadelphia. In actuality, the British at the time were in a considerably better position than the Continental Army. The statement is False.
The British troops in PhiladelphiaThe British troops in Philadelphia did have the supplies necessary to attack Washington's troops at Valley Forge. In fact, the British were in a much stronger position than the Continental Army at the time. The British controlled the city of Philadelphia, the largest city in the colonies, and had access to a well-supplied port.
Washington's troops, on the other hand, were suffering from a lack of supplies and were in a weakened state. They had retreated to Valley Forge, where they faced harsh winter conditions and a shortage of food, clothing, and ammunition.
Despite their advantage, the British chose not to attack the Continental Army at Valley Forge. Instead, they remained in Philadelphia, where they enjoyed the comforts of the city and engaged in other military campaigns. This decision has been criticized by historians as a missed opportunity for the British, as a successful attack on the Continental Army at Valley Forge could have potentially ended the Revolutionary War.
Learn more on British troops in Philadelphia here: https://brainly.com/question/11629281
#SPJ1
the new kingdom began when upstart theban rulers were able to vanquish which group of people ruling in the nile delta?
The New Kingdom began when upstart Theban rulers were able to vanquish the Hyksos ruling in the Nile Delta.
What was the New Kingdom?
The New Kingdom was a period in ancient Egyptian history that began in the sixteenth century BC, following the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt and ended in the eleventh century BC. It is the era when the Egyptian pharaohs were powerful, politically and militarily, and the empire expanded to its greatest extent.
It was a time of great prosperity and cultural development, characterized by large building projects, military campaigns, and the construction of magnificent tombs and temples. The New Kingdom is divided into three distinct periods: the 18th, 19th, and 20th Dynasties, with each dynasty having its own notable pharaohs and events.
The rise of the New Kingdom occurred after the Hyksos rulers were defeated by the Thebans, which brought an end to the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt. During the Hyksos reign, the Egyptians were subdued by their power and culture, and this was a period of turmoil and decline for Egypt. The Hyksos introduced new military and technological innovations, which the Egyptians eventually adopted and developed further.
The Hyksos were a mixed Asiatic people who ruled the Nile Delta and were forced out by the Theban forces. As a result of their expulsion, the Thebans founded the 18th Dynasty, ushering in the New Kingdom period.
To know more about Hyksos rulers refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30826448
#SPJ11
what was a common feature of life in the old northwest? multiple choice question. lack of communities abundance of labor mobility of individuals and families
A common feature of life in the Old Northwest was mobility of individuals and families.
What is the Old Northwest?The Old Northwest is a historic term for the present-day Midwest region of the United States. The term refers to the area that was settled by Europeans in the late 18th century and early 19th century. The Old Northwest was settled by people from various places, including New England, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
What was a common feature of life in the Old Northwest?The mobility of individuals and families was a common feature of life in the Old Northwest.
Many people moved to the region in search of better opportunities. Some came to start a new life, while others came to escape from economic hardship, social unrest, or political turmoil in their home states. In addition to the mobility of individuals and families, there were other common features of life in the Old Northwest.
For example, the region lacked established communities, and people had to work hard to establish their own homes and farms. Moreover, the abundance of labor was also a characteristic of life in the Old Northwest as people had to work hard to cultivate the land and build their homes.
To know more about Old Northwest, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29038507#
#SPJ11
Correnel Questions History Need Help History Part 1
Unit 5 New Nation
1. List the five reasons why the Articles of Confederation failed.
2. What were some of the challenges did this new nation face?
3. What was the name of the new plan of government?
4. How did this new government go about paying bills? Did this new system work?
5. What role did George Washington play in resolving these issues?
6. Since there were so many problems with the Articles, what was the new plan called?
7. What was the Virginia Plan, and who proposed it?
8. Explain his new plan.
9. What gift did James Madison have?
10. List the three branches and their duties.
11. Explain the Great Compromise and the splitting of the legislative branch into two.
12. What is the purpose of Sept. 17, 1787?.
13. Define the word : ratified
14. Draw the diagram “checks and balances” explaining how each branch checks the other.
15. Why did George Mason refuse to sign his name on the first draft of the constitution?
16. What are the Bill of Rights? Copy each of them. (you will be tested over them)
17. How was the issue of slavery handled?
Five reasons why the Articles of Confederation failed:
a. Weak central government with limited powers
b. Inability to levy taxes or regulate commerce
c. No executive branch to enforce laws
d. No judicial branch to interpret laws
e. Difficulty in passing laws due to the requirement of unanimous consent from all 13 states
Some of the challenges faced by the new nation included economic instability, disputes with Native American tribes, and ongoing tensions with Great Britain and other European powers.
The new plan of government was called the United States Constitution.
The new government went about paying bills by issuing paper money and borrowing from foreign governments. This system did not work well, as it led to inflation and a lack of faith in the government's ability to repay its debts.
George Washington played a significant role in resolving these issues by serving as the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention and using his influence to support the adoption of the new Constitution.
The new plan was called the Constitution of the United States.
The Virginia Plan was proposed by James Madison and called for a strong central government with three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial.
James Madison's new plan proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate. The plan also included a strong executive branch and an independent judiciary.
James Madison had a gift for political theory and was one of the leading architects of the new Constitution.
The three branches of government are: a. Legislative - makes laws b. Executive - enforces laws c. Judicial - interprets laws
The Great Compromise involved splitting the legislative branch into two bodies: the House of Representatives, which would be based on population, and the Senate, which would have equal representation for each state.
September 17, 1787, is the date that the Constitution was signed by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia.
Ratified means to officially approve or adopt a document or treaty.
The diagram "checks and balances" shows how each branch of government has the power to limit or check the powers of the other branches. For example, the executive branch can veto laws passed by Congress, but Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote.
George Mason refused to sign the first draft of the Constitution because it did not include a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties.
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which outline specific rights and freedoms of American citizens. They are as follows:
Amendment 1 - Freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition Amendment 2 - Right to bear arms Amendment 3 - Protection against quartering of troops Amendment 4 - Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures Amendment 5 - Right to due process of law, protection against self-incrimination, and protection against double jeopardy Amendment 6 - Right to a fair and speedy trial, to be informed of charges, to confront witnesses, and to have legal counsel Amendment 7 - Right to a trial by jury in civil cases Amendment 8 - Protection against excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment Amendment 9 - Protection of unenumerated rights retained by the people Amendment 10 - Powers not delegated to the federal government or prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people
The issue of slavery was handled in the Constitution through the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted each slave as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of determining representation in the House of Representatives. The Constitution also included provisions for the return of runaway slaves.
in losing the 2020 election, president trump became the first president since 1992 not to win re-election. which president lost his bid for re-election in 1992?
The President who lost his bid for re-election in 1992 was George H. W. Bush. George H. W. Bush served as the 41st President of the United States, from 1989 to 1993. After his single term in office, he was defeated in the 1992 election by Bill Clinton.
During his presidency, Bush sought to continue the economic prosperity of Ronald Reagan’s two terms, but economic recession hindered his efforts. Additionally, the Gulf War, a conflict that began with the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq in 1990, distracted from Bush’s domestic agenda.
Bush was also hurt by the third-party candidacy of Ross Perot, who received a larger-than-usual number of votes for a third-party candidate, taking away votes from Bush that might have otherwise gone to him. In the end, Bush was defeated by Clinton in the election, becoming the first incumbent president to lose re-election since 1976.
Although he was not re-elected, Bush left a legacy of the America he wished to leave behind. During his presidency, he was the driving force behind the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. He also supported a civil rights act that made it illegal to deny someone housing based on their race, religion, gender, disability, or familial status.
Bush was also a strong advocate for education, promoting education reform and increasing funding for education programs. He increased access to health care for low-income families and children and sought to protect the environment. Bush will forever be remembered as a great president who served his country with integrity and honor.
To know more about George H. W. Bush refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/520968
#SPJ11
what is the in which city can you find this perfectly preserved roman temple?argest island in the contiguous u.s.?
The largest island in the contiguous United States is Marthas Vineyard, located off the coast of Massachusetts. This island is roughly 20 miles long and 9 miles wide, and is one of the few islands in the region that has remained largely undisturbed by human development. It is home to a variety of wildlife and vegetation, and is a popular vacation spot.
The perfectly preserved Roman temple can be found in the city of Orange, France. This temple dates back to the 1st century and is known as the Temple of Vesta, one of the oldest and best-preserved temples in the region. It is a circular structure with a hexagonal altar in the center, made of limestone blocks and marble columns.
The temple is dedicated to Vesta, the goddess of the home, and was once a part of a larger complex. The temple is a testament to the Roman Empire's engineering prowess, and is a major tourist attraction in the area.
To know more about Roman Empire refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/7245800
#SPJ11
Fredrick flick was the owner of a huge industrial conglomerate that operated coal mines and steel mills. When he tried by the American military in the subsequent Nuremberg
I'm sorry, but there seems to be some confusion in your question. Frederick Flick was a German industrialist who was tried at the Nuremberg Trials, but he was not tried by the American military.
Flick was actually tried by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which was a joint effort of the Allied powers - the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union. The trials were held after World War II to prosecute Nazi war criminals and those who had committed crimes against humanity.
Flick was one of the leading figures in the German industrial complex, and his companies had used forced labor during the war. He was charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity, but was ultimately acquitted of all charges.
in historic british society, who was included in the middle class?multiple choice question.those who held prestige in the communitythose who had family wealththose with low economic meansthose who worked in professional occupations
In historic British society, the middle class typically included those who worked in professional occupations, the correct option is (d).
The middle class in historic British society was defined by one's occupation rather than family wealth or prestige in the community. Members of the middle class included professionals such as doctors, lawyers, and teachers, who earned a moderate income and had a certain level of education and social status. This was different from the working class, which made lower wages and worked in manual labor jobs, and the upper class, who were typically wealthy landowners and aristocrats, the correct option is (d).
To learn more about British society follow the link: brainly.com/question/14637206
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
In historic British society, who was included in the middle class? multiple choice questions.
a. those who held prestige in the community
b. those who had family wealth
c. those with low economic means
d. those who worked in professional occupations
olson discusses a number of alternatives to the christian belief about divine revelation. which of the following best represents what is not one of these alternatives to the christian belief about divine revelation?
One of the alternatives that does not represent Olson's discussion of alternatives to the Christian belief about divine revelation: is that divine revelation is exclusively found in one's personal experiences and emotions.
Olson presents various alternatives, including natural theology, general revelation, and progressive revelation. However, he does not argue that divine revelation is solely based on individual experiences and emotions.
Instead, he explores different ways in which divine revelation can be understood and experienced, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking and theological reflection in understanding divine revelation.
So, the belief that divine revelation is only found in personal experiences and emotions is not one of Olson's alternatives to the Christian belief about divine revelation.
To know more about Olson, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14620250#
#SPJ11
Pope Francis tells us that like the three apostles at the Transfiguration, we can experience the wonder of a personal encounter with Jesus and it will transform our lives, filling us with a joy we cannot help but share.
Cite some ways on which you commit to doing this week on how to share this joy you experience Jesus especially to those who are in need, suffering, and in despair.
We can see here that some some ways one can commit sharing this joy one experiences in Jesus are:
By sharing the gospel of salvation to them.By lending a helping hand to the needy.By interceding for those who are suffering.Who is Jesus Christ?Jesus Christ is the central figure in Christianity and is believed by Christians to be the Son of God and the Savior of the world. He was born in Bethlehem to the Mary and Joseph, and his life and teachings are recorded in the New Testament of the Bible.
Jesus lived a sinless life, performed miracles, died on the cross as a sacrifice for the sins of humanity, and rose from the dead on the third day. His teachings emphasize love, compassion, forgiveness, and service to others, and have had a profound impact on the world for over two thousand years.
Learn more about Jesus Christ on https://brainly.com/question/510889
#SPJ1
why did jarnail singh bhindranwale and his followers capture the sacred court complex in amritsar, india in 1983?
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his followers captured the sacred court complex in Amritsar, India in 1983 because they wanted to protest against the discrimination of Sikhs by the Indian government.
What was the reason behind the capture of the sacred court complex by Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his followers in Amritsar, India in 1983?Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was a Sikh leader who fought for the rights of the Sikh community in India.
He was unhappy with the way the Indian government was treating the Sikhs and wanted to protest against the discrimination of Sikhs. In 1983, he and his followers captured the sacred court complex in Amritsar, India to protest against the discrimination of Sikhs by the Indian government.
The sacred court complex in Amritsar is a religious site for Sikhs and is also known as the Golden Temple. It is considered to be the holiest shrine of the Sikh religion.
The Indian government had been discriminating against the Sikhs for a long time, and Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his followers wanted to make a statement against this discrimination. The capture of the sacred court complex by Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his followers was a major event in the history of the Sikh community in India.
To know more about Golden Temple refer here:https://brainly.com/question/14355499#
#SPJ11
How did George Washington, as president, strengthen the U.S. federal
government?
O A. By preventing immigrants from serving in government
• B. By shutting down most states' elected legislatures
• C. By encouraging rebellions against state governments
• D. By supporting plans to start a national bank
Answer: C. By encouraging rebellions against state governments. Hope this helped
'the soviet union dealt well with threats to communist control of
eastern europe in the period 1956 to 1968. - how far do you
agree with this statement?
Answer:
Between 1956 and 1968, several events occurred in Eastern Europe that threatened communist control. These included the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, the Prague Spring in 1968, and other political and social movements in Poland, East Germany, and other Eastern European countries.
The Soviet Union responded to these events by using military force and political pressure to suppress dissent and maintain communist control. In the case of Hungary, the Soviet Union sent troops to crush the rebellion, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people. Similarly, in Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union and other Warsaw Pact countries invaded the country to quell the Prague Spring movement.
While the Soviet Union was successful in maintaining communist control over Eastern Europe during this period, it came at a significant cost. The use of military force and suppression of dissent led to significant human rights violations and undermined the legitimacy of the communist governments in the region. Additionally, the Soviet Union's actions were met with widespread international condemnation and further strained relations with Western countries.
In conclusion, while the Soviet Union was able to maintain communist control over Eastern Europe during the period 1956 to 1968, it did so through the use of force and suppression of dissent. The consequences of these actions were significant and had long-lasting effects on the region and international relations.
which historical factor primarily accounts for the projected increase in the population aged 65 and older in the united states?
The historical factor that primarily accounts for the projected increase in the population aged 65 and older in the United States is the baby boomer generation.
What is a baby boomer?Baby Boomers is a term used to describe the people born between 1946 and 1964, in the aftermath of World War II. In 2019, the last year for which data is available, this group accounted for 22.9% of the total population of the United States.
The population aged 65 and older is expected to increase as the baby boomer generation ages,as a result of the sheer size of the cohort, combined with increasing life expectancy rates. However, it is important to note that this is not the only factor contributing to the aging population in the United States.
Other factors such as declining fertility rates and improved healthcare have also contributed to this demographic shift.
To know more about Baby Boomer refer this :
https://brainly.com/question/28231992#
#SPJ11
What were two government structures in France from 1919 to 1939
From 1919 to 1939, France had two different forms of government structures:
Parliamentary SystemPresidential SystemWhat is the government structures in France?Parliamentary System: France had a parliamentary system of government in which the executive power was held by the Prime Minister and his cabinet. The Prime Minister was appointed by the President and had to have the support of the National Assembly to remain in power. The National Assembly was elected by the people of France and was responsible for creating and passing laws.
Lastly, Presidential System: In 1934, France moved to a presidential system of government, which gave more power to the President. The President was directly elected by the people and had the power to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister and his cabinet. However, the President still had to work with the National Assembly to pass laws and make decisions.
Read more about government structure here:
https://brainly.com/question/1658251
#SPJ1
How did nationalism affect Russia from 1919 to 1939
What do you think was the most important change made by reconstruction state government
Answer:
Historians and scholars argue that the most important change made by the Reconstruction state governments was the ratification of three constitutional amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th) that abolished slavery, granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to African Americans, and ensured black men's right to vote. These amendments represented a significant shift away from the pre-war social and economic order and expanded the scope of civil rights and liberties for all Americans. Additionally, Reconstruction governments played a crucial role in establishing public schools, building infrastructure, and promoting land reform policies that benefited poor whites and freedmen in the South.
Which following Act's were not included in the Intolerable Acts?
The Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Quartering Act, and the Administration of Justice Act were some of these statutes. It is occasionally referred to as one of the Coercive Acts even though the Quebec Act of 1774, which had nothing to do with the Boston Tea Party, was not one.
Which Intolerable Acts constitute each of them?The British Parliament passed a number of stringent legislation known as The Intolerable Acts in the wake of the Boston Tea Party in 1774. The actions were carried out in retaliation for the colonists of Massachusetts' opposition during the Tea Party demonstrations against the Tea Act, a tax law that Parliament approved in May 1773.
What were the earliest Intolerable Acts?The Boston Port Act was the first unconscionable law to be passed. It served as the immediate response of the city of Boston to the Boston Tea Party. Until the colonists made up for the tea they had dumped into the water, the law forbade any ships from docking in Boston's harbor.
Learn more about The Intolerable Acts: https://brainly.com/question/4235408
#SPJ1
what was the significance of the second battle of the marne? how was this different from the first battle of the marne?
The Second Battle of the Marne (July 15-August 6, 1918) was an Allied victory that stopped the last German offensive on the Western Front in World War I.
It was a decisive victory that was different from the First Battle of the Marne (September 6-12, 1914) in two major ways.
First, the Second Battle of the Marne was fought on a much larger scale.
The Allies deployed more than 1.2 million troops, while the Germans had just 800,000. Secondly, the Second Battle of the Marne saw the first widespread use of tanks, planes, and artillery in a battle, whereas the First Battle of the Marne was fought primarily by infantry.
This resulted in significantly higher casualties for the Germans. The Second Battle of the Marne ultimately marked the end of the war on the Western Front and resulted in an Allied victory.
To know more about Battle of the Marne click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/509805#
#SPJ11
in schenck v. united states (1919), justice holmes used which analogy in upholding the government's right to restrict speech that poses a clear and present danger?
In order to uphold the government's right to restrict speech that poses a clear and present danger, in Schenck v. United States (1919), Justice Holmes used the analogy of “falsely shouting fire in a theater”.
This was based on the principle that one does not have the right to shout fire in a crowded theater and create a panic, as it puts people in danger. In Holmes' opinion, the same principle applied to speech that posed a danger to the public.
He believed that such speech should be restricted as it created a “clear and present danger”. In his opinion, the government had the right to restrict this type of speech as it could potentially cause harm to the public.
Learn more about restrict speech here:
https://brainly.com/question/15070309
#SPJ11
Young female workers at mills and factories were treated well and enjoyed safe and healthy working conditions
True
False
False, Young female workers in mills and factories was treated well and had healthy and secure environments to work.
What kind of work did these mill girls have?When referring to the young Yankee women who worked in the vast cotton factories, who were often between the ages of 15 and 30, the phrase "mill girls" was occasionally used during antebellum newspapers and publications.
Females received lower hourly pay than men did. Decide which labour group each leader belongs to. For mill girls, a typical day may start with the wake-up bell and a fast first meal, then include many hours of labor, a luncheon bell, and more work until the dinner bell. The females had a little window of time after work before the board house's curfew.
To know more about mill girls visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2230996
#SPJ1
Which physical feature of the African continent lies close to the Mediterranean Sea, the Strait of Gibraltar, and the southern tip of Spain?
Responses
Mount Kilimanjaro
Mount Kilimanjaro
Mozambique Channel
Mozambique Channel
Atlas Mountains
Atlas Mountains
Cape of Good Hope
Cape of Good Hope
Answer: Atlas Mountains
carbon-14 dating is limited to organic remains that are less than _____ years old.
Carbon-14 dating is limited to organic remains that are less than __50,000___ years old. This is because the half-life of carbon-14, which is the time it takes for half of the carbon-14 to decay, is 5,730 years.
After about 50,000 years, there is not enough carbon-14 left in a sample to accurately determine its age using carbon-14 dating.Carbon-14 dating is based on the fact that carbon-14, a radioactive isotope of carbon, is constantly being formed in the atmosphere by cosmic rays.
When an organism dies, it stops taking in carbon-14 and the carbon-14 in its body begins to decay into nitrogen-14. By measuring the ratio of carbon-14 to carbon-12 in a sample, scientists can determine how long it has been since the organism died.Carbon-14 dating is a valuable tool for archaeologists and other scientists who study ancient artifacts and materials.
However, it is important to note that it is only accurate for materials that are less than 50,000 years old and that it is subject to certain limitations and sources of error. For example, carbon-14 dating may be affected by contamination from other sources of carbon, such as fossil fuels, and it may be difficult to accurately date materials that have been exposed to high levels of radiation.
For more such questions on Carbon-14 dating
https://brainly.com/question/486132
#SPJ11
after escaping captivity saint patrick returned to ireland as a ______
Answer:Saint Patrick was an enslaved worker in Ireland for six years and eventually returned to his homeland, entering the clergy. He then returned as a missionary in Ireland in 432
Explanation:
Explain how different themes of Greek Mythology are evident in Greek literature/drama like the Iliad and Odyssey.
The Iliad, which takes place during the Trojan War, describes Achilles' rage. The Odyssey narrates the tale of Odysseus' return from battle.
What function does Greek mythology serve in literary works?Greek mythology has some of the earliest stories in recorded human history, and it has a lot to teach us. These tales are a fantastic way to get kids interested in reading great literature while also instilling in them important lessons like empathy, self-assurance, and cultural values.
The Iliad and the Odyssey both have themes, what are they?It is immediately apparent from each epic's first lines that The Odyssey is about cunning while The Iliad is about power. The Odyssey revolves on a "man of twists and turns," in contrast to The Iliad, which depicts the rage of Achilles, the strongest hero in the Greek army.
Learn more about Greek mythology: https://brainly.com/question/16000352
#SPJ1
what criteria did the early church fathers use to determine which books formed the canon of the new testament
The criteria that the early church fathers used to determine which books formed the canon of the New Testament are as follows:
Criteria for determining which books were part of the New Testament canon During the first three centuries of the church's existence, a lot of written works circulated among the early Christian communities. However, only a few of them were considered inspired and suitable for use as sacred texts.
As a result, church leaders established a list of criteria to determine which books should be included in the canon of the New Testament.
These criteria are as follows:
Apostolic origin: A text must be directly connected to the apostles or individuals connected to them, such as Luke or Mark.
Orthodoxy: A book should be consistent with the established beliefs and practices of the Christian church.Agreement among churches: The book should be widely accepted and read by other churches.
Liturgical use: The book must be appropriate for use in church worship, such as the Gospels and other liturgical texts.
Universal acceptance: The book must be accepted by all major churches across the world.
How did the early church fathers determine which books were included in the canon of the New Testament?
The early church fathers used the above-mentioned criteria to determine which books formed the canon of the New Testament. The council of Carthage in 397 A.D. confirmed the official canon of the New Testament as we know it today.
The following books are included in the New Testament: Four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), Acts of the Apostles, Twenty-one Epistles (letters), and the Book of Revelation (Apocalypse).
To know more about New Testament refer here:https://brainly.com/question/15127146#
#SPJ11
. what did the various treaties signed in the first few years of the united states say about the country?
Answer:
Different parties came together and compromised. It showed that the nation came together and united. Everyone agreed on different topics.
Explanation:
toast is over cooked bread
What is the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights as causes of the Civil War? How did the Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrate this connection?
Please help me
Answer:
Answer in the Explanation!
Explanation:
Sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were all interconnected causes of the American Civil War. Sectionalism, which is the division of the country along regional lines, was fueled by differing views on the issue of slavery. The North was largely anti-slavery, while the South was pro-slavery. This division created tension between the two regions, which was further exacerbated by the issue of states' rights.
States' rights was a doctrine that held that individual states had the right to determine their own laws and policies, independent of the federal government. This doctrine was used by Southern states to defend their right to own slaves, as they argued that the federal government had no authority to interfere with their institution of slavery. This view was challenged by Northern abolitionists, who believed that slavery was a moral issue that required federal intervention.
The Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrated the connection between sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights. In that election, Abraham Lincoln, an anti-slavery candidate, won the presidency without receiving a single vote from the South. Southern states saw Lincoln's election as a threat to their institution of slavery and their way of life, and they responded by seceding from the Union.
The secession of the Southern states was based on the idea that they had the right to determine their own laws and policies, including the right to own slaves. This was a direct result of the doctrine of states' rights. The secession crisis further divided the country along sectional lines and led to the outbreak of the Civil War.
In conclusion, sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were all interconnected causes of the American Civil War. The Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrated this connection, as the secession of the Southern states was based on the idea of states' rights and the defense of slavery. The Civil War was a result of these underlying issues and the failure to reconcile the differing views and interests of the North and South.