Answer:
Europeans usually bought enslaved people who were captured in endemic warfare between African states. Some Africans had made a business out of capturing Africans from neighboring ethnic groups or war captives and selling them.
Answer:
Europeans acquired the Africans who were enslaved by buying them from African traders who captured them in wars or raids.
Which two statements about the us mixed market system are true
The statement about mixed market system are a. The government intervenes only to avoid a financial crisis and c. Consumers and producers are free to buy and sell as they wish.
A mixed market is one in which a free hand is given for the purchasing and selling of things. It is an economic system that combines socialism and capitalism principles. The United States uses a mixed economy, where only public firms are under government supervision and free-market activities are encouraged.
The economic system provides a framework for the transfer of commodities from businesses to society with government intervention. Individual economic freedom is also enabled, but it aims to counteract any unfavorable impacts in order to maintain or improve societal welfare. Three aspects of a market economy that safeguards private property are present in a mixed economy.
Read more about mixed-market on:
https://brainly.com/question/30338653
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Which two statements about the US mixed-market system are true?
a. The government intervenes only to avoid a financial crisis.
b. The market waits for government approval of production decisions.
c. Consumers and producers are free to buy and sell as they wish.
d. Government involvement in economic decisions is limited.
Anti-Muslim sentiment in the US also known as Islamophobia?
increased after the attacks on September 11,2001
is largely a result of an increase in European immigrations since 1960
decrease sharply after the attacks on September 11,2001
is largely a result of an increase in Asian immigration since 1960
True: Following 9/11, anti-Muslim sentiment increased in the US. False: It was mostly brought on by immigration from Europe or Asia. False: Following 9/11, Islamophobia decreased.
The first claim is accurate. Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Islamophobia—a.k.a. anti-Muslim sentiment—rose in the US. The second claim is only partially true. Although immigration from Europe has increased the diversity of the US population, it has not significantly contributed to the rise in Islamophobia.
The third claim is untrue since there has been no discernible decline in Islamophobia following 9/11. The fourth claim is incorrect as well since Islamophobia in the US has not been significantly exacerbated by Asian immigration.
Learn more about Islamophobia:
https://brainly.com/question/31588669
#SPJ4
In 1956,the SuezCrisis threatened to ingnite a multinational war. Which number respesents the area in which this crisis tooj p look ace?
The Suez Crisis took place in area number 2, the Suez Canal Zone in Egypt.
The Suez Crisis occurred in 1956 when Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, which was previously controlled by Britain and France. This action led to an invasion by Israel, followed by Britain and France, with the goal of regaining control of the canal.
The crisis raised tensions between the involved nations and had the potential to ignite a multinational war. International pressure, mainly from the United States and the Soviet Union, eventually led to a ceasefire and the withdrawal of foreign troops.
The Suez Crisis highlighted the importance of the canal as a strategic location and resource, as well as the shifting balance of power during the Cold War era.
To know more about Suez Crisis click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/509235#
#SPJ11
One of the most long-standing issues that have endured and remain central to American politics is the "proper" definition of federalism.
Select one:
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Why might isolationists oppose some or all of wilson’s fourteen points
Isolationists were largely opposed to President Wilson’s fourteen points because they believed the United States should remain separate from global affairs and not be involved in international alliances or treaties.
They argued that such involvement would lead to the US becoming entangled in foreign conflicts and wars, which could potentially put the country in danger. Isolationists also believed that American involvement in other countries' affairs would lead to a loss of independence, as the US would be subject to the rules and regulations of foreign nations.
Furthermore, isolationists feared that Wilson’s points would lead to a one-world government, weakening the US’s sovereignty and the power of the individual states.
To know more about President Wilson, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23147259
#SPJ4
What was the fundamental question addressed in each of these congressional acts? * 15 points. The Missouri Compromise The Compromise of 1850 The Kansas-Nebraska Act. O Should slave labor be allowed in new states? O Should state, be allowed to nullify federal laws? Should states be able to secede from the Union? Should the U. S. Expand westward? The States have their status in the Union, and they have no other legal status. The Union, and not themselves separately, procured their independence and
The fundamental question addressed in the Missouri Compromise was whether or not slavery should be allowed in new states being added to the Union, with the compromise allowing for Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state.
The Compromise of 1850 addressed the question of whether or not states should be able to nullify federal laws, with the compromise including provisions such as the Fugitive Slave Act and the admission of California as a free state in exchange for allowing popular sovereignty (allowing residents of territories to vote on whether or not to allow slavery) in other territories.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act addressed the question of whether or not the U.S. should expand westward and whether or not to allow slavery in new territories, with the act allowing for popular sovereignty to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska, ultimately leading to violent conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the territory.
To know more about Missouri Compromise visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14020956
#SPJ11
Why are medieval churches fire proof and have better sound
Medieval churches were built to be fireproof and have better sound due to several architectural features.
Firstly, they were constructed with thick stone walls and ceilings, which were difficult to ignite and burn. Stone was also used for the columns and arches in the interior, providing more support and stability.
Additionally, the roofs were made of materials such as clay or slate tiles, which were fire-resistant and did not easily catch fire.
The design of medieval churches also allowed for better acoustics. The high ceilings and large spaces created a natural echo, allowing for the sound to reverberate throughout the building. The use of stone also helped to amplify the sound, while the placement of the choir and organ allowed for a balanced distribution of sound.
These features were not only practical, but they also reflected the religious and cultural values of the time. Fire was seen as a symbol of destruction and hellfire, while stone was associated with strength, stability, and the divine.
The focus on sound quality also reflected the importance of music and liturgy in the religious experience.
To know more about churches refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30750644
#SPJ11
whose library formed the basis of the library of congress? abraham lincoln
The library that formed the basis of the Library of Congress was not Abraham Lincoln's, but rather Thomas Jefferson's.
Thomas Jefferson's personal library was the foundation of the Library of Congress. In 1815, after the British burned the U.S. Capitol, which housed the original Library of Congress, Jefferson offered his collection of books to rebuild the library.
His diverse collection, which included about 6,487 volumes, covered various subjects and provided the Library of Congress with a broader scope of knowledge.
As a result, the Library of Congress expanded and became a national institution, rather than just a legislative resource. Jefferson's vision for the library emphasized the importance of education and the availability of knowledge to the American public, shaping the institution we know today.
To know more about Abraham Lincoln click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14469687#
#SPJ11
what is spiritualisim?
Answer:
Spiritualism is "a system of belief or religious practice based on supposed communication with the spirits of the dead, especially through mediums," according to the Oxford Languages.
Another way to word this is,
Spiritualism is a way of thinking or acting that is created on the idea that the dead are able to be reached, especially through mediums.
I hope this helped you !!
Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
in the early 2000s, the supreme court refused certiori in the terri schiavo case, leaving laws related to
In the early 2000s, the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari in the Terri Schiavo case, which meant they declined to review the lower court's decision.
The Terri Schiavo case revolved around a woman in a persistent vegetative state, and the legal battle between her husband, who wanted to remove her feeding tube, and her parents, who opposed the decision. The case raised complex legal and ethical questions related to end-of-life decisions, patients' rights, and the role of the government in personal medical decisions.
The Supreme Court's refusal to grant certiorari left the lower court's decision intact, which allowed the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. This decision underscored the importance of legal frameworks and guidelines for handling similar cases.
Since the Supreme Court did not intervene, the existing laws and state-specific guidelines related to end-of-life decisions, living wills, and medical proxies remained unchanged.
However, the high-profile nature of the case prompted widespread discussions about these issues, leading to increased public awareness and some changes at the state level. In particular, some states passed legislation to clarify the legal process and decision-making authority in such cases, emphasizing the need for clear and comprehensive advance directives.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's refusal of certiorari in the Terri Schiavo case left existing laws related to end-of-life decisions, living wills, and medical proxies in place. However, the case highlighted the need for clearer legal frameworks and prompted state-level changes to address these complex issues.
To know more about the supreme court refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29759733#
#SPJ11
Complete question :
In the early 2000s, the Supreme Court refused certiorari in the Terri Schiavo case, leaving laws related to gun control and the right to die the use of drugs to federal agencies state governments local governments.
According to Buddhist tradition, what do the Four Noble Truths describe? Suffering and how to overcome it O Dharma and the natural law O How the caste system is organized Medical knowledge and skills
According to Buddhist tradition, the Four Noble Truths describe the nature of suffering (dukkha) and path to its cessation.
What is tradition?Tradition refers to customs, beliefs, practices, and values passed down from generation to generation within a specific cultural or social group. It can include rituals, ceremonies, festivals, and other expressions of cultural identity that are deeply rooted in history and may have symbolic meanings. Traditions provide a sense of continuity and belonging to individuals and communities and help to reinforce social norms and values. They can also serve as a way to connect people across time and space, creating a shared sense of history and heritage. While traditions can be comforting and familiar, they can also evolve and change over time, reflecting shifting social, cultural, and political contexts.
To learn more about tradition, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1065362
#SPJ1
How did Progressive movement in South Carolina approach child labor differently than the Progressive movement nationwide?
The Progressive movement in South Carolina approached child labor differently than the Progressive movement nationwide by placing a greater emphasis on education and social reform.
While the national movement focused on legislative changes, such as limiting the working hours of children and enforcing minimum age requirements, the South Carolina Progressives aimed to address the root causes of child labor.
They believed that education was key to ending the cycle of poverty that drove children to work in dangerous and exploitative conditions. Additionally, they worked to improve social conditions, such as housing and healthcare, which contributed to the prevalence of child labor in the state.
Overall, the South Carolina Progressive movement sought to create long-lasting change through systemic reform rather than simply addressing the symptoms of child labor.
To know more about social reforms, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/3332629#
#SPJ11
HELP ASAPP!!!! Use your imagination to create a realistic proclamation about the Emancipation Proclamation. You are the President of the United States. It is your job to create a document that will free the slaves and save the Union. Remember you are the President if the USA. Use your notes and personal experiences to create an historical document below.
Answer:
As the President of the United States, it is my duty to uphold the Constitution and defend the Union. Yet, as we find ourselves embroiled in a bitter and bloody civil war, I cannot ignore the moral imperative to end the institution of slavery that has divided our nation for too long.
Therefore, I, as the President of the United States, do hereby proclaim that all persons held as slaves within the states in rebellion against the United States, shall be and henceforth shall be free.
Let it be known that this Emancipation Proclamation is not a mere symbolic gesture. It is a practical military measure that will help us to save the Union by undermining the economic and moral foundation of the Confederate war effort. By granting freedom to those who were once enslaved, we deprive the Confederacy of the labor force that sustains its armies and its economy.
But let us not forget that the Emancipation Proclamation is also a moral imperative. It is a recognition of the inherent dignity and worth of every human being, regardless of race or ethnicity. It is a step towards fulfilling the promise of liberty and justice for all that our nation was founded upon.
Let us now rededicate ourselves to the cause of freedom and unity. Let us work together to rebuild a stronger, more just, and more equal Union for all Americans.
War in Africa and the Eastern Front
Explain in detail how the war on the Eastern Front
was different from the war in Africa.
Answer:
Don't forget to make brainliest answer
Explanation:
The war on the Eastern Front and the war in Africa were two distinct theaters of World War II that differed in many ways. Here are some of the key differences between the two:
1. Geography: The Eastern Front was fought primarily in Europe, on the vast expanse of the Soviet Union. In contrast, the war in Africa was fought on the continent of Africa, primarily in North Africa and the Horn of Africa.
2. Terrain: The terrain of the Eastern Front was varied, ranging from forests and hills to vast expanses of flat, open land. The war in Africa was fought primarily in desert regions, with harsh environmental conditions that posed their own set of challenges.
3. Troop numbers: The Eastern Front was the largest theater of World War II in terms of troop numbers, with millions of soldiers on both sides engaged in fierce battles that often lasted for months at a time. The war in Africa, in contrast, involved much smaller numbers of troops, with the largest battles involving tens of thousands of soldiers.
4. Strategic importance: The Eastern Front was of vital strategic importance to both the Axis and Allied powers, as it represented a crucial battleground for control of Europe and the Soviet Union. The war in Africa, in contrast, was of less strategic importance, though it did play a role in securing vital shipping lanes in the Mediterranean and Red Sea.
5. Tactics and weaponry: The war on the Eastern Front was characterized by large-scale armored battles and infantry assaults, with both sides employing tanks, artillery, and aircraft in large numbers. The war in Africa, in contrast, was fought primarily by infantry and light armor, with a focus on mobility and maneuverability in the desert environment.
6. Allies: The Axis powers were primarily fighting against the Soviet Union on the Eastern Front, while the Allies were fighting against the Axis powers in Africa, primarily the German Afrika Korps led by General Rommel.
In summary, the war on the Eastern Front and the war in Africa were two distinct theaters of World War II with their own unique characteristics. While the Eastern Front was larger in scale and of greater strategic importance, the war in Africa was fought under harsh environmental conditions and required different tactics and weaponry.
If you were a member of the third estate of the french society in 1788, how would you react to the the existing system of the day?
Answer:
As a member of the third estate, I would be frustrated and angry with the existing system of the day because it was unjust and favored the nobility and clergy at our expense.
Explanation:
As a member of the third estate in 1788 France, I would likely be frustrated and disillusioned with the existing system.
The social structure, known as the Old Regime, placed the First Estate (clergy) and the Second Estate (nobility) above the Third Estate, which comprised the majority of the population, including peasants, merchants, and urban workers. This system led to unequal taxation and limited political representation for the Third Estate, resulting in economic hardship and a growing desire for change.
The third estate, which included the common people, merchants, and artisans, were burdened with heavy taxes and had little political power compared to the first and second estates. The system was unfair and unjust, with a small minority controlling the vast majority of resources and power. I would probably be advocating for reforms that would give more representation and rights to the third estate, and seeking to overthrow the existing system if necessary.
The French Revolution, which began the following year, was fueled in part by the grievances of the third estate and their desire for greater political and economic equality.
Learn more about French Revolution: https://brainly.com/question/4184817
#SPJ11
How did the movie's domestic scenes contrast with the ones focused on Langley? Which side of the characters' lives did you find most engaging? WHY?
"Hidden Figures" portrays domestic scenes showing societal obstacles and intense work scenes showcasing talent and hard work, highlighting the challenges these women faced.
The film "Hidden Figures" juxtaposes household moments with the demanding workplace at Langley Research Centre, where the main protagonists made substantial contributions to NASA's space programme. The household scenes give background for the difficulties the ladies had away from their jobs, such as overcoming social and legal barriers as Black women in the 1960s.
To defeat the Soviet Union in the space race, they worked hard and showed ability in the Langley scenes. Both locations are crucial to the overall plot of the film, emphasising the extraordinary difficulties these women encountered in both their personal and professional lives.
Learn more about societal obstacles:
https://brainly.com/question/21638098
#SPJ4
The correct question will be: How does "Hidden Figures" utilize the contrast between domestic and workplace scenes to depict the challenges faced by Black women?
In a formal paragraph, do you think that wealthier citizens should pay more taxes? Why or why not?
Answer:
Wealthier citizens should pay more taxes. This is because they have the means to do so, and in so doing, they can contribute more to the public good. By investing more, wealthy citizens can fund public services, such as schools, healthcare, and infrastructure. Moreover, higher taxes on the rich can reduce income inequality. Overall, wealthier citizens should pay more taxes. This is not only necessary to ensure that people contribute their fair share, but it can also reduce income inequality. It can also fund critical public services.
Explanation:
New Deal Era
What caused the realignment during this time period?
The Civil War, the 1896 election following an economic crisis, and the Great Depression are three significant occurrences that led to party realignments. They impacted party loyalty, which is why they had such long-lasting effects.
Many white, conservative Southern Democrats switched to the Republican Party following the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Democratic Party, with its roots in progressive ideologies, the South, big city machinery and the newly empowered labor unions, as well as various ethnic groups, became the majority as a result of the New Deal, holding the White House for seven out of the nine presidential terms from 1933 to 1969.
White people became republicans with the collapse of the New Deal alliance. The Civil Rights Movement marked the beginning of the realignment. After LBJ was elected in 1964, things truly changed.
To learn more about realignment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4304115
The realignment during the New Deal era was caused by the Great Depression and President Roosevelt's implementation of the New Deal policies.
The realignment during the New Deal era was primarily caused by the socioeconomic conditions and political responses to the Great Depression.
The severe economic crisis of the 1930s led to widespread unemployment, poverty, and social unrest.
In response, President Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented the New Deal, a series of programs and policies aimed at providing relief, recovery, and reform.
The New Deal initiatives, such as the creation of public works projects, labor protections, and financial regulations, garnered support from working-class Americans and minority groups who were greatly affected by the Depression.
This shift in policies and the government's interventionist approach led to a realignment, as many previously Republican-leaning voters shifted their support to the Democratic Party, which became associated with the New Deal and its efforts to address the economic hardships faced by the nation.
Thus, this realignment marked a significant transformation in American politics and the role of government in the economy.
Learn more about the realignment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29370067
#SPJ2
Which u.s. ideal would be most attractive when trying to make more friends than the soviets? explain.
The American ideal of freedom and democracy would be most attractive when trying to make more friends than the Soviets.
During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in a global struggle for influence and power, competing for the allegiance of countries around the world. To win this competition, both sides sought to promote their respective ideologies and values, and convince other nations to join their side. In this context, the U.S. ideal of freedom and democracy was a powerful tool for building relationships and winning allies.
The U.S. ideal of freedom and democracy emphasized the importance of individual liberty, equal rights, and democratic governance. These values were attractive to people around the world who sought self-determination and political representation. By promoting these ideals, the United States presented itself as a beacon of hope and a champion of human rights, in contrast to the Soviet Union's authoritarian regime and communist ideology, which were often viewed as oppressive and repressive.
To make more friends than the Soviets, the U.S. used a variety of strategies to promote its ideal of freedom and democracy. One strategy was to offer aid and assistance programs that promoted economic development, education, and social welfare. By providing tangible benefits to other countries, the U.S. demonstrated its commitment to these values and built goodwill among its partners.
Another strategy was to engage in cultural exchange programs that showcased American values and traditions. These programs brought artists, musicians, and other cultural figures to other countries, allowing people to experience American culture firsthand and promoting a positive image of the United States.
Overall, the U.S. ideal of freedom and democracy was an important tool for building relationships and winning allies during the Cold War. By emphasizing individual liberty, equal rights, and democratic governance, the United States was able to present itself as a beacon of hope and a champion of human rights, and win the hearts and minds of people around the world.
To learn more about American ideal of freedom refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30335017
#SPJ11
As part of his effort to make athens a full democracy how did clesisthenes increase the power of the assembly
As part of his effort to make Athens a full democracy, Cleisthenes increased the power of the Assembly by implementing reforms that expanded political participation and reduced aristocratic influence, allowing for more equitable decision-making.
To elaborate, Cleisthenes made several important changes to increase the power of the Assembly in Athenian society.
Firstly, he reorganized the population into ten tribes based on residence, breaking the power of the aristocratic families and encouraging citizens from different areas to work together. This fostered a sense of unity and equal representation in the Assembly.
Secondly, Cleisthenes introduced a new Council of 500, with 50 members from each tribe, who were selected by lot.
This system ensured that ordinary citizens had a chance to participate in the government, making it more inclusive and democratic. The Council of 500 prepared and proposed laws for the Assembly to debate and vote on, enhancing the Assembly's decision-making power.
Lastly, Cleisthenes instituted the practice of ostracism, allowing the Assembly to exile individuals who were deemed a threat to democracy.
This helped to further safeguard the democratic system from corruption and tyrannical rule. Overall, Cleisthenes' reforms empowered the Assembly and laid the groundwork for the Athenian democracy we recognize today.
To know more about decision-making click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31422716#
#SPJ11
Japan has a form of government.
O presidential
parliamentary
O totalitarian
Japan has a parliamentary form of government. The Japanese government operates under a constitutional monarchy system, where the Emperor serves as the ceremonial head of state, and the Prime Minister holds the executive power.
The Japanese parliamentary system consists of two main bodies: the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors.
The Prime Minister is the head of government and is appointed by the Emperor upon recommendation by the Diet, which is the Japanese parliament.
The Prime Minister is responsible for appointing Cabinet members, proposing legislation, and conducting foreign affairs. The Cabinet members serve as the executive branch and oversee the various government ministries.
The legislative branch of the Japanese government is bicameral, consisting of the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors. Members of both houses are elected through a proportional representation system.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has been the dominant party in Japan since 1955, and its leaders have served as Prime Minister for most of that time. However, other parties, such as the Constitutional Democratic Party and the Komeito party, have also won significant numbers of seats in recent elections.
In conclusion, Japan has a parliamentary form of government, with the Prime Minister serving as the head of government and the Emperor serving as the ceremonial head of state.
The Japanese parliamentary system is bicameral, with the Diet having the power to propose and pass legislation, approve the national budget, and approve international treaties.
for similar questions on form of government
https://brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ11
During WWII, depleted NFL rosters forced two teams to play as one under what name?
The Pittsburgh Steelers and the Philadelphia Eagles, two National Football League (NFL) clubs from Pennsylvania, temporarily merged to form the Steagles for the 1943 season.
In evacuation zones, there were only 8,000 people, and 15,000 people overall. A modest regional league and cup schedule was offered. Football remained a well-liked spectator sport at home, and there were also home internationals and inter-service games. Players were conscripted or called up to serve in the military.
Many of the teams were able to stay afloat by using college players or acquiring retired players. However, in Pennsylvania, Burt Bell and Art Rooney, owners of the Philadelphia Eagles and Pittsburgh Steelers, had a different idea. The two competing Pennsylvania teams were agreed to be combined, giving rise to the Steagles.
To learn more about Steagles, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30381740
#SPJ4
Asap!!!
why was the berlin airlift an important event in the early years of the cold
war?
a. it highlighted the united states' ability to project military power
across the atlantic.
b. it established clear boundaries between the democratic and
communist regions in europe,
c. it demonstrated that western powers were committed to resisting
soviet aggression.
o d. it was the first successful humanitarian effort led by the united
nations.
The reason that the berlin airlift an important event in the early years of the cold is c. it demonstrated that western powers were committed to resisting soviet aggression.
What is the berlin airlift?The Berlin Airlift was an main event in the the time when one attends compulsory school of the Cold War because it explained that the Western powers, experienced by the United States, were dedicated to resisting Soviet attitude and protecting the privilege of Western Europe.
In 1948, the Soviet Union blockaded West Berlin, that was located inside Soviet-controlled East Germany. The aim was to force the Western capacities to abandon their appearance in Berlin, which was visualized as a symbol of Western influence in Europe.
Learn more about berlin airlift from
https://brainly.com/question/1104371
#SPJ1
in Europe during the 1930s several national leaders in order to preserve peace at any cost agreed to the demands of an aggressor this policy was referred to as
Answer:
The policy that was referred to as "appeasement" was a diplomatic strategy adopted by several national leaders in Europe during the 1930s in order to preserve peace at any cost. This policy was particularly aimed at meeting the demands of aggressive nations such as Nazi Germany, which sought to expand its territory and power through military conquest. The policy of appeasement involved making concessions to such aggressors in the hope of preventing conflict and maintaining peace. However, this policy ultimately failed as it only emboldened the aggressive nations, allowing them to gain more power and influence. The failure of the policy of appeasement ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II, which was one of the deadliest conflicts in human history.
Answer: appeasement
Explanation:
This is called appeasement because it is k, just know I'm right!!
help pleaseeee
why did southern congressmen think the supreme courts decision in brown v. board of education violated the constitution ?
Based on polls, we can safely say that Southern congressmen thought that the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. board of education violated the constitution by interfering with the state's independence to regulate the local educational system.
How did such a decision violate the constitution?Southern Congressmen claimed that the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution asserted powers reserved and not delegated to the states and federal government.
Therefore, congressmen believed that the Supreme Court could not institute rules to the education system of each state, being the decision in brown v. board of education unconstitutional.
Find out more about Supreme Court at:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
Your reaction as a tourism professional if you have a colleague or customer who either accepts or does not accept it
As a tourism professional, my initial reaction to a colleague or customer's acceptance or non-acceptance of a particular issue would be to remain neutral and non-judgmental.
As a tourism professional, it is important to maintain a professional and respectful demeanour towards all colleagues and customers, regardless of their beliefs or opinions. Therefore, my initial reaction to a colleague or customer's acceptance or non-acceptance of a particular issue would be to remain neutral and non-judgmental.
If a colleague expresses acceptance or non-acceptance of an issue, such as a certain destination or activity, I would seek to understand their perspective and engage in constructive dialogue to gain insight into their reasoning. This can provide valuable insights and help foster mutual respect and understanding among colleagues.
When it comes to customers, I understand that everyone has different preferences and beliefs, and it is important to respect their choices. If a customer expresses acceptance or non-acceptance of a particular destination or activity, I would seek to understand their concerns and offer alternative options that may better suit their preferences.
It is also important to provide objective information to help customers make informed decisions about their travel choices.
Overall, as a tourism professional, my priority is to provide exceptional customer service and create positive travel experiences for all customers. This requires a respectful and understanding approach, even when faced with differences in opinions or beliefs.
To know more about tourism professional refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31445362#
#SPJ11
In Louisiana, what must local government correspond to? Check all that apply.
1. Village customs
2. State laws
3. The state constitution
4. The US Constitution
5. Religious commandments
In Louisiana, the local government must correspond to state laws and the state constitution. The correct options are 2,3.
In Louisiana, the local government must correspond to state laws and the state constitution. The state of Louisiana has a system of local government that is established by its constitution and state laws. Local governments in Louisiana are organized into parishes, which are the equivalent of counties in other states.
The Louisiana Constitution lays out the framework for local government in the state, including the powers and responsibilities of parish governments and other local governing bodies.
It establishes the basic structure of local government, such as the parish council and parish president, and outlines the procedures for their election and appointment.
Local governments in Louisiana are also subject to state laws, which govern their operations and provide guidance on matters such as budgeting, taxation, and public services. The Louisiana Legislature has the power to pass laws that impact local governments, and state agencies are responsible for enforcing those laws and regulations.
It is worth noting that neither village customs nor religious commandments play a role in shaping local government in Louisiana. The US Constitution also plays a role in the governance of Louisiana, as it establishes the basic framework of the federal system and outlines the powers and limitations of the federal government.
However, local government in Louisiana is primarily guided by the state constitution and state laws.
To know more about Louisiana refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19350237#
#SPJ11
An example signal statement is
a.
Keep In mind.
C.
Both of these
b
want
you to understand...
d
None of these
Answer: C
Explanation: Its just C
Evaluate the extent to which the Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975
The Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975 in a massive way.
There was much opposition to the Involvement of the US in the Vietnam War, as it not just caused death but also social riots in the country.
The Vietnam War was a prolonged military conflict that involved a cold war between many countries.
The main reason for the war was a division of Vietnam and to gain power. The United States was involved in the war fully supporting southern Vietnam.
The war just not killed my US soldiers and troops but also created riots within the country. Many of them were not happy with the involvement of the US in the war.
The war experienced many campaigns and bombings.
Learn more about Vietnam War:
https://brainly.com/question/12918391
#SPJ4
How were Julius Caesar's and Augustus' periods of rule different?
Answer:
Caesar's charisma and military prowess made it so the public below him adored him. On the other hand, Augustus was not so much loved by the public as he was well respected. Additionally, where Caesar had ruled over a war torn country, Augustus took over and implemented major reform.
Hope this helps :)
Pls brainliest...