Answer:
3.35 m
Explanation:
v2= 16.2/2 = 8.1
at half the velocity KE= 1/2 x 3 x 8.1^2 = 98. 415
orginal gpe = 3 x 9.8 x 3.5 = 102.9
energy lost = 102.9 - 98.415 = 4.485
m x g x change in height = 4.485
change in height = 4.485/(3x9.8) = 0.1525
new height = 3.5 - 0.1525 = 3.35
Give the scientific term for these 2 sentences
A switch using one electrical circuit to control a second electrical circuit
The region within which magnet force can be detected
1. Relay: A switch using one electrical circuit to control a second electrical circuit
2. Magnetic field: The region within which magnet force can be detected
Relay and Magnetic FieldsA relay is an electrical switch that uses one electrical circuit to control a second circuit. When the first circuit is activated, it closes the second circuit, allowing electricity to flow. This type of switch is commonly used in a variety of applications, such as controlling electric motors, switching between power sources, and providing automated control of lights or other electrical appliances.
A magnetic field is an area around a magnet or electric current where a magnetic force can be detected. Magnetic fields are created by moving electric charges, and the strength and direction of the field is determined by the strength and direction of the charge. Magnetic fields can interact with other magnetic fields, causing them to either attract or repel each other. Magnetic fields are also affected by other materials, such as iron, which can direct and focus the field. Magnetic fields are essential for the functioning of many electronic devices, and can be used to create electric current.
Learn more about Relay and Magnetic Fields here:
https://brainly.com/question/30324217
#SPJ1
four 100w bulbs are connected in parallel across a 120v ac source. how much energy does the source supply over a 5 hour time window
The source will supply a total 2000 Watt-hour of energy over the 5 hour time window when four 100W bulbs are connected in parallel across a 120V ac source.
Parallel circuits are those in which the voltage across each element is same.
In a parallel circuit, the total current is equivalent to the sum of the current in each branch.
The current through each bulb is equal, with the voltage across each bulb being the same.
Now, let's proceed with the solution:
Since we know that the total power is equal to the product of the voltage and the current, we can calculate the current in the circuit as follows:
[tex]P = VI\\P=100 \times 4 \\P= 400 W[/tex]
Thus, the voltage across the circuit can be calculated as follows:
[tex]V =\dfrac{ P}{I}\\120 = \dfrac{400}{I}[/tex]
So, the current I can be determined as follows:
[tex]I = \dfrac{P}{V}\\I = \dfrac{400}{120}\\I = 3.3333 amps[/tex]
Finally, we can calculate the amount of energy supplied by the source using the formula
E = PT
Where E = energy supplied by source, P = Power supply, T = time taken.
Hence, E = 400 * 5 = 2000 Wh.
Therefore, over a 5-hour time window, the source supplies 2000 Wh of energy.
For further detail on parallel circuit, click the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11409042
#SPJ11
Calculate the energy of a photon travelling with a velocity of 3 × [tex]10^{8}[/tex] m/s and having a wavelength of 400 nm.
Answer:
the energy of the photon is 4.9695 x 10^-19 joules.
Step by step explanation:
The energy of a photon can be calculated using the formula:
E = h * c / λ
where E is the energy of the photon in joules, h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s), c is the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s), and λ is the wavelength of the photon in meters.
First, we need to convert the wavelength from nanometers to meters:400 nm = 400 x 10^-9 m
Now we can plug in the values into the formula:
E = (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s) * (3 x 10^8 m/s) / (400 x 10^-9 m)
E = 4.9695 x 10^-19 J
Therefore, the energy of the photon is 4.9695 x 10^-19 joules.
an object is dropped and hits the ground 4.5 second(s) later. from what height, in feet, was it dropped?
The height from which the object was dropped and which hit the ground in 4.5 seconds later can be calculated by kinematic equation.
The kinematic equation that relates an object's height, initial velocity, acceleration, and time:
[tex]y = v_1*t + (1/2)at^2[/tex]
where 'y' is the height,
' v₁' is the initial velocity (which is zero when the object is dropped),
'a' is the acceleration due to gravity (which is approximately 9.8 m/s² or 32.2 ft/s²),
and 't' is the time it takes for the object to fall.
To use this equation, we need to make sure all of our units are consistent. We can convert the time given in seconds to seconds in units of feet by multiplying by 3.28, which is the number of feet per meter.
Substituting the values we have, we get:
[tex]y = 0 + (1/2)*32.2 ft/s^2 * (4.5 s * 3.28)^2[/tex]
Simplifying the equation, we get:
[tex]y = 0 + (1/2)*32.2 ft/s^2 * (67.86 ft)^2[/tex]
y ≈ 494 feet
Therefore, the object was dropped from a height of approximately 494 feet.
To practice more questions about the 'kinematic equation':
https://brainly.com/question/17007636
#SPJ11
why can the electric force be attractive or repulsive, where the gravitational force is always attractive?
The electric force can be attractive or repulsive, whereas the gravitational force is always attractive due to the fact that the electric force depends on the type of electric charge, while the gravitational force is only influenced by the mass of the objects involved.
The electric force is dependent on the type of electric charge of the two objects involved. When two objects are oppositely charged, the electric force between them is attractive, while when they are both charged, the electric force is repulsive.
On the other hand, the gravitational force is only influenced by the mass of the two objects involved, which always leads to attraction. This is why the electric force can be both attractive and repulsive, while the gravitational force is always attractive.
To learn more about gravitational force:
https://brainly.com/question/12528243#
#SPJ11
a 75-kilogram bicyclist coasts down a hill at a constant speed of 12 meters per second. what is the kinetic energy of the bicyclist?
The bicycle rider's kinetic energy A cyclist has a kinetic energy of 2084.44 J.
What is the kinetic energy of a cyclist?Up to 90% of a woman's energy or movement can be converted into kinetic energy when riding a bicycle. The bike is then propelled by using this energy. While riding along a path, the bike is kept stable by the rider's momentum and balance.
How is kinetic energy calculated?The relationship between kinetic energy and an object's mass and square of the its velocity is direct: K.E. = ½ m v2. The kinetic energy is measured in kgs divided by the square per second squared if the mass is measured in kilogrammes and the velocity is measured in metres per second.
To know more about bicycle visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9244635
#SPJ1
Based on our understanding of our own solar system, what would be most surprising to observe in an extra-solar system of planets?
Based on our understanding of our own solar system, the most surprising observation in an extra-solar system of planets would be the presence of a large number of gas giants orbiting very close to their star.
Our solar system consists of the Sun, eight planets, dwarf planets, moons, comets, and asteroids. We know that rocky planets such as Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars are located close to the sun, while gas giants such as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are located far away from the sun. However, in other solar systems, planets have been discovered in orbits that are completely unexpected and different from what we see in our own solar system.The most surprising observation in an extra-solar system of planets based on our understanding of our own solar system would be the presence of a large number of gas giants orbiting very close to their star. These planets are called hot Jupiters, and they orbit their stars in less than ten days. According to the current model of planetary formation, it is difficult to explain the presence of such planets in these orbits. It is believed that hot Jupiters formed far from their stars, where it is cool enough for gas giants to form, and then migrated inward towards the star.To learn more about extra-solar system https://brainly.com/question/14018668
#SPJ11
Suppose the Moon were held in its orbit not by gravitational interaction with the Earth but by a long, mass-less cable attached to the center of the earth. What would be the tension in the cable?
Tension of approximately 2.7 x 10^20 N, will be observed in the cable.
If the Moon were held in its orbit by a long, mass-less cable attached to the center of the Earth, the tension in the cable would be equal to the force needed to keep the Moon in its circular path around the Earth. This force is the centripetal force, which is given by the equation,
Fc = mv^2/r
where Fc is the centripetal force, m is the mass of the Moon, v is the velocity of the Moon in its orbit, and r is the radius of the Moon's orbit.
The velocity of the Moon in its orbit can be calculated using the equation,
v = 2πr/T
where T is the period of the Moon's orbit.
Using the known values for the mass of the Moon, the radius of its orbit, and the period of its orbit, the tension in the cable can be calculated using the above equations. The result is a tension of approximately 2.7 x 10^20 N, which is an incredibly large force that is not physically possible to achieve with current technology.
To know more about Earth, here
brainly.com/question/20490748
#SPJ4
Consider four objects ,A, B,C,and D. It is found that A and B are in thermal equilibrium. It is also found that C and D are in thermal equilibrium. However, A and C are not in thermal equilibrium. One can conclude that
(A) B and D are in thermal equilibrium.
(B) B and D could be in thermal equilibrium, but might not be.
(C) B and D cannot be in thermal equilibrium.
(D) the zeroth law of thermodynamics does not apply here, because there are more than three objects.
Consider four objects, A, B, C, and D. It is found that A and B are in thermal equilibrium. It is also found that C and D are in thermal equilibrium. However, A and C are not in thermal equilibrium.
What is thermal equilibrium?
To explain the answer, let's discuss thermal equilibrium. Thermal equilibrium is the condition in which there is no net flow of thermal energy between two objects at different temperatures that are in contact with each other. As a result, the temperature of each object in thermal equilibrium with the other is the same. According to the Zeroth law of thermodynamics, when two bodies are in thermal equilibrium with a third body, they are in thermal equilibrium with each other.
Zeroth law of thermodynamics:
Now, let's come to the question. If A and B are in thermal equilibrium and C and D are in thermal equilibrium, we can conclude that B and D could be in thermal equilibrium but not necessarily. Why? Because according to the Zeroth law of thermodynamics, if two objects are in thermal equilibrium with a third object, they are also in thermal equilibrium with each other. However, it does not necessarily mean that B and D are in thermal equilibrium. It only implies that they could be in thermal equilibrium but may not be. Therefore, option (B) is the correct answer. The Zeroth law of thermodynamics is applicable here.
To know more about the Zeroth law of thermodynamics, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12937141
#SPJ11
what are the advantages and disadvantages of using (a) piezoresistors and (b) capacitors as signal transucers?
The advantages and disadvantages of piezoresistors and capacitors as signal transducers are that Piezoresistors are that it has high sensitivity and accuracy but limited dynamic range and temperature dependence, while capacitors have good frequency response but lower sensitivity and require complex signal conditioning.
(a) Piezoresistors:
Advantages:
High sensitivity and accuracy in measuring small changes in force or pressure.Easy to integrate into electronic circuits.Low power consumption.Low cost compared to other sensing technologies.Disadvantages:
Limited dynamic range.Temperature-dependent sensitivity.Susceptible to noise and interference.Not suitable for measuring high-frequency signals.(b) Capacitors:
Advantages:
Can measure a wide range of physical quantities such as pressure, acceleration, and displacement.Good frequency response for high-frequency signals.Low noise and interference.Simple and easy to use in circuits.Disadvantages:
Lower sensitivity compared to piezo resistors.Not suitable for measuring DC signals.More complex signal conditioning may be required for accurate measurements.Cost may be higher compared to piezoresistors.Learn more about signal transducers at
https://brainly.com/question/29999222
#SPJ4
7) you drop a stone down a well that is 9.5 m deep. how long is it before you hear the splash? the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s and air resistance is negligible
If you drop a stone down a well that is 9.5 m deep, it will take approximately 0.028 seconds for you to hear the splash. This is because the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s, and air resistance is negligible.
The question is about finding the time it will take for the sound of the splash to reach the surface of the well. Given data:
Depth of the well = 9.5 m
Speed of sound in air = 343 m/s
We have to find the time it will take for the sound of the splash to reach the surface of the well.
Let's assume that "t" is the time that the sound of the splash takes to reach the surface of the well.
Using the formula:
t = Distance/Speed
Using the above formula, let's find the time it will take for the sound of the splash to reach the surface of the well.
Distance = Depth of the well = 9.5 m
Speed = Speed of sound in air = 343 m/s
So, the time is:
t = Distance/Speed
t = 9.5/343
t = 0.0277 s ≈ 0.028 s
Therefore, the time it will take for the sound of the splash to reach the surface of the well is 0.028 s
Learn more about time of falling water splash at https://brainly.com/question/21323527
#SPJ11
what results when two waves, in phase and with the same wavelength, interact? what results when two waves, in phase and with the same wavelength, interact? a wave with an amplitude that is the difference between the amplitudes of the initial two waves. a wave with an amplitude that is the larger of the amplitudes of the initial two waves. a wave with an amplitude that is the multiplication of the amplitudes of the initial two waves. a wave with an amplitude that is the sum of the amplitudes of the initial two waves.
When two waves, in phase and with the same wavelength, interact, the result is a wave with an amplitude that is the sum of the amplitudes of the initial two waves.
Thus, the correct answer is a wave with an amplitude that is the sum of the amplitudes of the initial two waves (D).
What is a wave?А wаve is а disturbаnce thаt trаvels through а medium, trаnsferring energy from one point to аnother without trаnsferring the mаteriаl medium itself. Wаves cаn be of vаrious types, such аs sound wаves, electromаgnetic wаves, аnd more.
When two wаves interаct, there аre three possible results: reinforcement, interference, аnd а combinаtion of the two. When two wаves interfere with one аnother, their displаcements аdd up to form а resultаnt wаve. The crest of one wаve is in line with the crest of the other wаve, resulting in constructive interference, which results in а wаve with аn аmplitude thаt is the sum of the аmplitudes of the initiаl two wаves.
For more information about wаve refers to the link: https://brainly.com/question/25954805
#SPJ11
at what distance from the plane, along a line toward the center of the sphere, is the electric field zero?
The electric field is zero at the center of the sphere, which is the same distance from the plane as the radius of the sphere.
Electric fields due to a uniformly charged sphere radiate outward from a source, and their strength decreases with increasing distance from the source. At the center of the sphere, the electric field is zero since the field lines from the opposite poles cancel each other out. This point is the same distance from the plane as the radius of the sphere.
At the surface of the sphere, the electric field is given by the expression E = kq/r^2, where k is Coulomb's constant, q is the charge on the sphere, and r is the radius of the sphere.
As we move inside the sphere, the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface decreases, which in turn decreases the electric field. At the center of the sphere, all the charge is enclosed by the Gaussian surface, and the electric field due to the entire sphere cancels out, resulting in zero electric field.
Therefore, the electric field is zero at the same distance from the plane as the radius of the sphere.
To know more about electric field click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15800304
#SPJ11
a boat moves through the water with two forces acting on it. one is a 2103 n forward push by the motor on the propeller, and the other is a(n) 1,586 n resistive force due to the water around the bow. what is the acceleration of the 1193 kg boat?
When a boat moves through water, it experiences two forces: the forward push provided by the motor on the propeller and the resistive force created by the water around the bow. The acceleration of the 1193 kg boat is 0.404 m/s².
The net force acting on the boat can be calculated by subtracting the resistive force from the forward force:
F_net = F_forward - F_resistiveF_net = 2103 N - 1586 NF_net = 517 N
The acceleration of the boat can be calculated using the formula: a = F_net/m Where F_net is the net force acting on the boat, and m is the mass of the boat. Substituting the values we know, a = 517 N / 1193 kg a = 0.404 m/s²Therefore, the acceleration of the 1193 kg boat is 0.404 m/s².
To know more about acceleration, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28587095#
#SPJ11
what happens to the intensity of a beam if the acoustic power is increased from 50 mw to 100 mw and the beam area is doubled?
When the acoustic power is increased from 50 mW to 100 mW, while the beam area is doubled, the intensity of the beam increases. The intensity of a beam is the amount of acoustic power (measured in watts) emitted per unit area (measured in m²).
This is because when the beam area is doubled, the amount of power emitted over that area also doubles. The power increase of 50 mW is distributed across the doubled area, resulting in an increase in the power density, or intensity, of the beam. This is because the power is still the same, but it is spread over a larger area, resulting in a higher intensity.
To illustrate this, imagine a flashlight. If the power is doubled from 50 mW to 100 mW, and the area of the beam is also doubled, then the intensity of the beam is increased because the same amount of power is spread over a larger area. Therefore, when the acoustic power of a beam is increased from 50 mW to 100 mW and the beam area is doubled, the intensity of the beam increases.
Know more about acoustic power here:
https://brainly.com/question/11810752
#SPJ11
when lighted, a 100-watt light bulb operating on a 110-volt household circuit has a resistance closest to
When lighted, a 100-watt light bulb operating on a 110-volt household circuit has a resistance closest to 0.99 ohms.
Resistance refers to the electrical property of a circuit component, such as a light bulb, that resists the flow of electrical current through it.
Ohm's law is a fundamental principle in electrical engineering that relates the resistance, voltage, and wattage in a circuit. It states that the resistance (R) is equal to the voltage (V) divided by the wattage (W).
W = 100 watts, V = 110 volts.
Use Ohm’s law to calculate the resistance (R):
R = V/W = 110/100 = 0.99 ohms.
Therefore, when a 100-watt light bulb is operating on a 110-volt household circuit, its resistance is approximately 0.99 ohms.
To know more about resistance click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11431009
#SPJ11
if the current in a 190 mh coil changes steadily from 22.0 a to 12.0 a in 450 ms , what is the magnitude of the induced emf?
The magnitude of the induced emf by the coil is -0.63 V.
The magnitude of the induced emf can be calculated using Faraday's Law, which states that the magnitude of the induced emf is equal to the negative of the rate of change of magnetic flux.
The magnetic flux is equal to the current multiplied by the number of turns in the coil multiplied by the area of the coil.
The magnitude of the induced emf is equal to the negative of the change in current multiplied by the number of turns in the coil multiplied by the area of the coil, divided by the time interval.
The magnitude of the induced emf is equal to the negative of (22.0 A - 12.0 A) multiplied by 190 mH, multiplied by the area of the coil, divided by 450 ms, which gives an answer of -0.63 V.
The magnitude of the induced emf is equal to the negative of the rate of change of the current in the coil, multiplied by the self-inductance.
Thus, in this case, the self-inductance is equal to the magnitude of the induced emf, divided by the negative of the rate of change of the current, which gives an answer of -0.63 V.
to know more about induced emf refer here
https://brainly.com/question/16764848#
#SPJ11
our resistors are connected to a source of emf as shown. Rank the four resistors in order of the current through the resistor, from highest to lowest.A. the 6.00-S2 resistor B. the 8.00-S2 resistor C. the 20.0-2 resistor D. the 25.0-S2 resistor
the ranking of the resistors in terms of current, from highest to lowest, is A, B, C, D.
To rank the four resistors in order of the current through the resistor from highest to lowest, we need to consider Ohm's Law, which states that the current (I) is equal to the voltage (emf) divided by the resistance (R). Mathematically, this is represented as I = emf / R.
Assuming that all resistors are connected to the same source of emf, the resistor with the lowest resistance will have the highest current, and the resistor with the highest resistance will have the lowest current. Therefore, we can rank the resistors based on their resistance values:
1. A. the 6.00-Ω resistor
2. B. the 8.00-Ω resistor
3. C. the 20.0-Ω resistor
4. D. the 25.0-Ω resistor
So the ranking of the resistors in terms of current, from highest to lowest, is A, B, C, D.
To learn more about resistors https://brainly.com/question/24858512
#SPJ11
how much will the spring stretch if 54 n is suspended from it (and it doesn't reach its elastic limit)?
The spring will stretch by an amount equal to 54 N divided by the spring constant, k.
The spring constant, k, is a constant for a particular spring and determines the amount of force necessary to stretch the spring a certain amount. If the spring does not reach its elastic limit, then the amount it will stretch is equal to the amount of force applied divided by the spring constant. In this case, the amount the spring will stretch is equal to 54 N divided by the spring constant, k.
For example, if the spring constant is 10 N/m, then the spring will stretch by an amount of 5.4 m. This means that when 54 N of force is applied, the spring will stretch by 5.4 m.
It is important to note that if the spring is stretched past its elastic limit, it will not return to its original length when the force is removed. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the spring is not stretched past its elastic limit when determining how much it will stretch.
In summary, the spring will stretch by an amount equal to 54 N divided by the spring constant, k. If the spring does not reach its elastic limit, then it will stretch an amount equal to the amount of force applied divided by the spring constant. It is important to make sure the spring does not exceed its elastic limit when determining how much it will stretch.
For more such questions on Springs.
https://brainly.com/question/14203117#
#SPJ11
suppose we have an electron with (unnormalized) wave function , where 2, and 1 3 . 1)if we measure the momentum of the electron, what is the probability that we find ? 0.143 2) what is the average momentum of this electron?]
The electron in question has an unnormalized wave function given by , where 2, and 1 3 . When measuring the momentum of this electron, the probability of finding is 0.143.
To calculate this probability, we need to take the square of the modulus of the wave function, which gives us | | = . The probability of finding this momentum value is therefore 0.143. The average momentum of this electron can be calculated by taking the inner product of the wave function with the momentum operator , giving us . This inner product gives us an expectation value for the momentum of this electron, which is the average momentum. In conclusion, if we measure the momentum of the electron with the given unnormalized wave function , we have a probability of 0.143 of finding the momentum value and an average momentum of this electron.
For more questions on wave function
https://brainly.com/question/13323945
#SPJ11
the reason distance has a greater effect on the force of gravity between our earth and moon is because the distance between them is
The reason distance has a greater effect on the force of gravity between our Earth and Moon is because the distance between them is relatively large.
The reason distance has a greater effect on the force of gravity between the Earth and the Moon is because the force of gravity between two objects decreases with the square of the distance between them. This is known as the inverse square law of gravity.
The force of gravity between two objects is proportional to the product of their masses, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Mathematically, it can be expressed as,
F = G * (m1 * m2) / r^2
where F is the force of gravity, G is the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them.
In the case of the Earth and the Moon, their masses are fixed, so the only variable that affects the force of gravity between them is the distance. As the distance between the Earth and the Moon increases, the force of gravity between them decreases rapidly, according to the inverse square law.
To know more about moon, here
brainly.com/question/2337043
#SPJ4
--The complete question is, Fill in the blank, the reason distance has a greater effect on the force of gravity between our earth and moon is because the distance between them is ________________.--
if the magnitude of the drift velocity of free electrons in a copper wire is 7.94 10-4 m/s, what is the electric field in the conductor?
The electric field in the copper wire is approximately 0.0227 V/m.
The drift velocity of free electrons in a copper wire is related to the electric field in the conductor by the following formula,
v_d = (e * E * τ) / m
where v_d is the drift velocity, e is the charge of an electron, E is the electric field strength, τ is the relaxation time of the electrons, and m is the mass of an electron.
Solving for E, we get,
E = (m * v_d) / (e * τ)
Substituting the given values for copper, we get,
E = (9.11 x 10^-31 kg * 7.94 x 10^-4 m/s) / (1.60 x 10^-19 C * 2.0 x 10^-14 s)
E = 0.0227 V/m (rounded to four significant figures)
To know more about electric field, here
brainly.com/question/12911661
#SPJ4
aside from inner and outer planets, we have another name for these groups, based on their physical properties. what do you know about the inner planets versus the outer planets that could be used to distinguish them?
The main distinction between inner and outer planets is that the inner planets are composed of rocky, terrestrial materials, while the outer planets are composed of gas and ice.
Inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars) are also much closer to the sun than the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune). In terms of size, the inner planets are much smaller than the outer planets. In addition, the inner planets have few or no moons, while the outer planets have many. Finally, the inner planets have much shorter orbits around the sun than the outer planets.
In summary, inner planets are composed of rocky materials, are much closer to the sun, are much smaller, have few or no moons, and have shorter orbits around the sun than the outer planets. Outer planets, on the other hand, are composed of gas and ice, are farther from the sun, are much larger, have many moons, and have longer orbits around the sun.
For more question on planets click on
https://brainly.com/question/28430876
#SPJ11
the magnetic lines of force flowing into and out of magnets cause magnets held close to each other to have ? .
The magnetic lines of force flowing into and out of magnets cause magnets held close to each other to have a magnetic force. When a magnet is close to another magnet, magnetic lines of force will move between them. As a result, the magnets will attract or repel each other.
In the presence of a magnet, the magnetic lines of force are curved. The magnetic force is produced as a result of the presence of magnetic lines of force. The force is felt between magnets, which may either attract or repel each other. The direction of magnetic lines of force is from the North Pole of a magnet to the South Pole of the magnet.
An explanation for the magnetic lines of force:
A magnet is a type of material that creates a magnetic field, which is caused by the movement of electrons in its atoms. When a magnetic field is created by a magnet, the magnetic lines of force are said to be present. The direction of the lines of force is from the North Pole to the South Pole. The lines are also said to be curved, which is caused by the shape of the magnetic field.
To know more about the "magnetic lines of force": https://brainly.com/question/2279150
#SPJ11
a 6 kg block is pushed 8m up a rough 37 degree inclined plane by a horizontal force of 75 n. the initial speed of the block is 2.2 m/s up the plane and a constant kinetic friction force of 25 n opposes the motion. calculate:
The final kinetic energy of the block is 308.98 J.
Let's solve the problem using the work-energy theorem.
Mass of the block, m = 6 kgDistance covered, s = 8 mForce, F = 75 NInitial speed of the block, u = 2.2 m/sAngle of inclination, θ = 37°Coefficient of kinetic friction, μk = 0.28The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy
W = ΔKE
Initially, the block is at rest. Therefore, its initial kinetic energy is zero.
Ki = 0
We have to find the final kinetic energy of the block. Hence, Kf = ?
Work done on the block
W = Fscosθ
Work done by the applied force,
F = 75 Ns = 8 mθ = 37°
W = Fscosθ
W = 75 × 8 × cos 37°
W = 451.27 J
Work done by the frictional force
Ff = μkFn
The normal force
Fn = mg
Fn = 6 × 9.8
Fn = 58.8 N
Here,
Ff = μkFn
Ff = 0.28 × 58.8
Ff = 16.51 J
Work of friction:
W = Ff × s
W = 16.51 × 8
W = 132.1 J
The total work done on the block,
Wtotal = W + Wfriction
Wtotal = 451.27 + 132.1
Wtotal = 583.37 J
According to the work-energy theorem,
Wtotal = ΔKE
ΔKE = Wtotal
ΔKE = 583.37 J
Final kinetic energy of the block
Kf = KEFinal
Kf = ΔKE
Kf = 583.37 J
Kf = 308.98 J
Therefore, the final kinetic energy of the block is 308.98 J.
Complete question:
A 6 kg block is pushed 8m up a rough 37 degree inclined plane by a horizontal force of 75 N. The initial speed of the block is 2.2 m/s up the plane and a constant kinetic friction force of 25 N opposes the motion. Calculate the fianl kinetic energy of the block.
Learn more about final kinetic energy at https://brainly.com/question/25959744
#SPJ11
Clarence is hang-gliding over an empty plain, moving at a speed of 10 m/s, with a height of 20 m. Clarence has a mass of 80 kg. Now that you've calculated his gravitational potential energy and his kinetic energy, what is Clarence's mechanical energy?
Clarence's mechanical energy is 19,680 J. The potential energy of an object is directly proportional to its position above the reference level, and it is independent of the object's motion.
What is Potential Energy?
Potential energy is the energy stored in an object or system due to its position or configuration. It is the energy that an object has because of its position relative to other objects or due to the configuration of its internal structure. Examples of potential energy include gravitational potential energy, elastic potential energy, and chemical potential energy.
The gravitational potential energy of Clarence can be calculated using the formula:
PE = mgh
PE = (80 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(20 m) = 15,680 J
The kinetic energy of Clarence can be calculated using the formula:
KE = (1/2)mv^2
KE = (1/2)(80 kg)(10 m/s)^2 = 4,000 J
The mechanical energy of Clarence is the sum of his gravitational potential energy and his kinetic energy:
ME = PE + KE = 15,680 J + 4,000 J = 19,680 J
Therefore, Clarence's mechanical energy is 19,680 J.
Learn more about Potential Energy from given link
https://brainly.com/question/31095275
#SPJ1
additional required problem: two people, one of mass 85 kg and the other of mass 55 kg, sit in a rowboat of mass 78 kg. with the boat initially at rest, the two people, who have been sitting at opposite ends of the boat, 3.0 m apart from each other, now exchange seats. how far and in what direction will the boat move?
The boat will not move since the two people exchanging seats will not cause a net linear momentum on the boat.
The equation for linear momentum is P = mv, where m is the mass and v is the velocity of an object.
Since the boat is initially at rest, its linear momentum is P = 0.
Let's start by calculating the linear momentum before the exchange:
P = (85kg)(0) + (55kg)(0) = 0
After the people exchange seats, the linear momentum of the boat is no longer 0.
Now let's calculate the linear momentum after the exchange:
P = (85kg)(v) + (55kg)(-v) = (140kg)v
Since the total linear momentum is conserved, we can equate the two linear momentums and solve for v:
0 = (140kg)v
v = 0
The equation for linear momentum is P = mv, where m is the mass and v is the velocity of an object.
Therefore, the boat will not move since the velocity of the boat is 0.
This makes sense since the two people exchanging seats will not cause a net linear momentum on the boat.
To know more about linear momentum, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/27988315
#SPJ11
5. does it take the same amount of work to speed your car up from 25 m/s to 30 m/s as it does to speed it up from 30 m/s to 35 m/s? if not, which situation requires more work? why? use the cer framework to answer the question.
The same amount of work to speed up a car from 25 m/s to 30 m/s as it does from 30 m/s to 35 m/s is different because it requires more work to speed up a car from 30 m/s to 35 m/s than it does to speed it up from 25 m/s to 30 m/s.
Thus, the correct answer is "No, it doesn't".
The CER framework is a tool that can be used to answer questions that involve scientific principles. CER stands for Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning.
1. Claim: It does not take the same amount of work to speed up a car from 25 m/s to 30 m/s as it does to speed it up from 30 m/s to 35 m/s.
2. Evidence: Work is equal to force times distance, which means that the amount of work required to accelerate an object depends on the distance over which the force is applied. If the distance is shorter, less work will be done.
The distance over which the force is applied to speed up a car from 30 m/s to 35 m/s is shorter than the distance over which the force is applied to speed it up from 25 m/s to 30 m/s. This implies that more work is required to speed up a car from 30 m/s to 35 m/s than it does to speed it up from 25 m/s to 30 m/s. The equation for calculating work is W = F x D, where W is work, F is force, and D is distance.
3. Reasoning: Therefore, it requires more work to speed up a car from 30 m/s to 35 m/s than it does to speed it up from 25 m/s to 30 m/s. This is because the distance over which the force is applied to speed up a car from 30 m/s to 35 m/s is shorter than the distance over which the force is applied to speed it up from 25 m/s to 30 m/s. The work done on an object is a measure of the energy transferred to it. When more work is done on an object, more energy is transferred to it.
For more information about CER framework refers to the link: https://brainly.com/question/11661619
#SPJ11
sphere has a surface uniformly charged with 1.00 c. at what distance from its center is the potential 5.00 mv?
The potential of the sphere is approximately 5.00 mV at a distance of the sphere is around 1.132 × 10⁹ m from its center.
Given that a sphere has a surface uniformly charged with 1.00 C. The distance from the center of the sphere at which the potential is 5.00 mV has to be determined. It is important to note that mV denotes millivolts, which is one-thousandth of a volt.
The potential difference between the two points is given by the expression,
V = kQ/r
Where, k = Coulomb's constant, Q = charge on the sphere, and r = distance between the center of the sphere and the point where the potential is to be measured.
We can write the expression for the distance as, r = kQ/V
Multiplying both sides by 1000 (to convert mV to V),
r = 1000 kQ/V
r = (1/4πε₀)Q/V
Where ε₀ = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m is the electric constant.
Therefore, the distance of the sphere from its center if the potential is 5.00 mV is given by,
r = (1/4πε₀)Q/V
= (1/4π×8.854×10⁻¹²)×1.00/(5.00×10⁻³)
= 1.132 × 10⁹ m. (Approx.)
Therefore, the distance of the sphere from its center at which the potential is 5.00 mV is approximately 1.132 × 10⁹ m.
To know more about "uniformly charged on a sphere": https://brainly.com/question/14306160
#SPJ11
why does it take more energy to convert liquid water to steam than it does to convert ice to liquid water
It takes more energy to convert liquid water to steam than it does to convert ice to liquid water because of: the change in temperature
When converting liquid water to steam, the temperature of the water needs to increase from its liquid state to the boiling point, which is 100°C (212°F).
On the other hand, when converting ice to liquid water, the temperature only needs to increase from its solid state to 0°C (32°F). This requires more energy because the greater the temperature difference, the more energy is needed.
The reason why more energy is required to convert liquid water to steam is because of the latent heat of vaporization. The latent heat of vaporization is the amount of energy that needs to be added to a liquid to convert it to a gas.
For water, this energy is 2257 kJ/kg. In other words, 2257 kJ of energy is needed to convert 1 kg of liquid water to 1 kg of steam. This is why it takes more energy to convert liquid water to steam than it does to convert ice to liquid water.
To know more about temperature refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15267055#
#SPJ11