The main zero school policies are; Weapons, Threats to hurt someone, Drugs, Sexual behavior, Being Violent.( Big Fights )
Some schools are different from others but some school policies are Bullying and Being Disobedient and not following Conduct.
what is the punishment for drunk driving and killing someone
Life sentence. Killing someone while driving is called vehicular homicide, while driving drunk is a DUI. The two together can lead to a life sentence, however, it varies greatly depending on the State and Nation.
I hope I've helped! :)
The basis for Western culture typically includes beliefs and principles rooted in
O Scientology
O Judeo-Christian tradition
Taoism
O None of the above
judeo- christian tradition
The answer is B) Judeo-Christian tradition. Although the Government has separation of church and state, Western culture is heavily influenced by Judeo-Christian traditions. We see this in the food, technology, and holidays that are celebrated.
I hope this helps! :)
will give brainliest 3
Answer:
ok?
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
When the factories in Brian's city closed, people quickly found that they could no longer afford their homes. Many homes were abandoned, soon to be taken over by those who were engaging in criminal activity. Because there were fewer taxpayers, the city could no longer afford a large police force. This meant that if a crime was being committed, a person may have to wait a substantial amount of time before law enforcement arrived. People eventually stopped calling the police. Crime seemed to flourish. What happened in Brian's neighborhood is MOST closely aligned to which crime theory? OA. social pathology B. social disorganization theory OC. differential opportunity theory D. labeling theory
Answer:
Social Disorganization Theory
Explanation:
Answer:
social disorganization theory
Explanation:
a person's residential location is more significant than the person's characteristics when predicting criminal activity and the juveniles living in this areas acquire criminality by the cultures approval within the disadvantaged urban neighborhoods
when may you be subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative
Answer:
Under which circumstances may you be subject to criminal, disciplinary, and/or administrative action due to online misconduct? Any time you participate in or condone misconduct, whether offline or online.
Explanation:
Mark me brainly please
Any time when you are involved or participate in or condone misconduct, either online or offline mode subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative.
What is a criminal?A criminal is a person who breaks the law by an overact, omission, or neglect that may result in punishment.
when you are involved or participate in the misconduct either offline or online mode, it will be subject to criminal disciplinary and/or administrative.
Learn more about Criminal here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ2
if the appellate court thinks a decision was wrong, it will:
A(n) ____ is a charging document drawn up by a prosecutor in jurisdictions that do not use the grand jury system.
Answer:
The correct answer is information.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
On her way out of an expensive store, Callie notices that the car next to hers has a bag with the store's label on the backseat. Looking around to see if anyone is in the parking lot, Callie tries the car door. It is unlocked. Callie quickly grabs the bag and gets in her own car, driving away. Into what class of criminal would Callie MOST likely fall? A. professional thief B. persistent thief C. shoplifter D. occasional offender
Answer:
to my knowledge i think the best awnser choice is B
Explanation:
The definition of a persistant theif is a theif who continues in common law property crimes even though the level of sucsess is never more than ordinary
The persistent thief would Callie to MOST likely fall after her theft. Thus, option B is correct.
Who is a criminal?A criminal can be described as a person who has committed or has not been avoiding the law and order. That person is going against the set of rules and regulations.
This is formed as an illegal act which is usually done because of anger, jealousy, Revenge, or sometimes out of feelings. In this, the person who has created the crime is called a criminal and has to face the consequences regarding the same.
In this as Callie notices that there is a bag that is kept and has expensive items in the bag. To steal that bath and make sure that no one is seeing her they show that Callie is a persistent thief. Those who try and stop feeling but are not able to do so. They think that this will be the last time there but it is never the same.
Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ2
A person who believes a judge has behaved unethically while presiding over the case should file a complaint with which entity
Answer:
He shouldnt file a complaint
Explanation:
he shouldnt file a complaint because he wants the judge to go in hid favor and he needs to be nice to the judge
A judge's order that releases an accused from jail without paying bond, with the understanding that he or she will return for further court proceedings is called
Answer:
A court's decision to allow a person charged with a crime to remain at liberty pending the trial, without having to post bail is recognizance release?
Brainliest! Please help
Answer:
Offender
Explanation:
D is not in our businesses .
C includes victim which denotes to the payer of crime.
B denotes to witness which means knower of crime.
Offender in A means to do crime Option A is correctunder what circumstance might a party elect to pursue litigation in lieu of alternative dispute resolution?
Answer:
Disputes between businesses, employers and workers, and enterprises and customers are frequently resolved through alternative dispute resolution.
A party elect to pursue litigation in lieu of alternative dispute resolution where the cases are related to more of personnel loss in the form of life and property.
Litigation cases can be seen in the case of criminal law and Alternative Dispute Resolution is more prominent in Civil Matters and Family disputes.
Litigation is a legal term for the settlement of the disputes between two parties in legal court.
The dispute can be related to either personnel or professional issues ranging from family matters, businesses and are classified into Criminal and Civil cases.
Example of Criminal cases- Murder, Theft, Robbery, Forgery, Fraud
Example of Civil Cases- Property Dispute, Trespassing, Real estate and Agricultural dispute.
In some cases few crimes can be the part of both civil and criminal cases for example Trespassing
Punishment for these casesIn case of Criminal law- Punishment related to Imprisonment, penalty and maximum Capital punishment
In case of Civil law- Punishment related to pecuniary and in some cases imprisonment as well
Alternate Dispute Resolution
It is a process of resolving disputes between two parties using the third party as a mediator. They are used for disagreeing parties who could not come to an agreement short of litigation.
Advantages of Alternate Dispute Resolution over litigation
-Cost friendly and time saving
-Parties in controlling position
-Risk Management
-Flexibility of Process
-Suitable for multi party system.
Examples of Alternative Dispute Resolution in different countries:
USA- Structured negotiation is a type of collaborative and solution-driven alternative dispute resolution that differs from traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution options as it does not rely on a third-party mediator and not initiated by a legal complaint. The process is implemented for seeking injunctive relief.
UK- In the United Kingdom, ADR is encouraged as a mean of resolving taxpayers' disputes with Revenue and Customs
Alternative Dispute Resolution is now widely used in the UK across many sectors such as Finance, Energy and Legal Sector.
To learn more about litigation here
https://brainly.com/question/9096166
#SPJ3
In a medical malpractice case, an individual alleges that he or she has been injured by another’s negligence or malfeasance. Medical malpractice cases such as this one involve which kind of law
Answer:
Tort
Explanation:
A type of pretrial release in which a defendant promises to meet certain stated conditions is known as:
Answer:
The answer is Condition Release
Lester is stopped on a public highway and he has a shell in the guns magazine but not in the chamber has he violated the fish and game code true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Cuz he had gun
Hope it helps
no fear act requires federal agencies to provide notice to federal employees, former federal employees, and applicants for federal employment about their rights and protections related to federal antidiscrimination, whistleblower protection and retaliation laws.
It is true that the the No fear Act requires the federal agencies to provide notice to the federal employees, former federal employees and applicants for federal employment about their rights and protections.
No fear Act means the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act 2000.
The No fear Act was enacted to improve the Federal agency accountability for violations of the anti-discrimination and whistleblower protection laws related to employment.Hence, it is It is true that the the No fear Act requires the federal agencies to provide notice to the federal employees, former federal employees and applicants for federal employment about their rights and protections.
Read more about No fear Act:
brainly.com/question/25648014
A representative that views her job more as a delegate is more likely to display with of the following behaviors?
Select one:
a.
Vote based on the majority opinion within their district, regardless of her political standing.
b.
Vote with her party at all times.
c.
Vote to bring back as much pork as possible to the district.
d.
Vote against her political party.
We know that a delegate is a politician who speaks on behalf of the majority. This means that the answer is going to be A- Vote based on the majority opinion within their district, regardless of her political standing.
Option C and D are not anywhere close to accurate. And option B is not going to be accurate all the time, as the vote will be based on what the people of the district want.
I hope I've helped! :)
Morrey and Veronica get into an accident. Both sides have worked to settle their claims but are unable to do so. The case is __________ because the judge would be able to make a decision which would affect the parties.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Mateo is a policeman speaking at a retirement community lunch. He is discussing crime prevention and giving residents tips on how to keep themselves safe. Mateo notes that many crimes in the area are not assaults but tend to be larcenies. Thinking of the statistics, what tip will Mateo MOST likely stress to the retired residents? OA. Don't leave valuables in their cars. B. Purchase security systems for their homes. OC. Do not conduct business with strangers over the phone. D. Be careful when lending money to family members.
Answer:
A. Don't leave valuables in their cars.
Explanation:
There are more larcenies than assaults in the area.
Mateo observes that many crimes in the area are not assaults but tend to be larcenies. The tip that don't leave valuables in their cars. The appropriate response is option A.
What is Larceny?Larceny is a crime that involves the wrongful taking and theft of another person's or company's personal property. It was unlawful under English common law and was made unlawful in jurisdictions where English common law was adopted into local legislation, where it is still frequently used today.
In accordance with common law, larceny is defined as the trespassory seizing and carrying away of another person's tangible personal property with the intention of permanently depriving the owner of it. In all U.S. jurisdictions, larceny is now established as a statutory offense.
Mateo observes that most crimes in the neighborhood seem to be larcenies rather than assaults. Don't leave valuables in your car, is the advice. Option A is the appropriate response.
To learn more about Larceny
https://brainly.com/question/28206067
#SPJ5
What rationale upheld by SCOTUS supports subjecting individuals charged with a crime but not yet found guilty to strip searches while awaiting trial in jail
Answer:
Explanation:
Not or guilty
Bryce was charged with first degree murder. Through his attorney, he offers to plead guilty to manslaughter in exchange for a lesser sentence. What preconviction process is he engaging in
This would be an example of an "Alford Plea". An Alford Plea is not the same as a guilty plea, as it is used by those who claim innocence but plead guilty for a lesser sentence. This is one of the many issues with American Law, as we are forcing those who may not be guilty into accepting a guilty deal to lessen their time.
I hope this helps! :)
by european law, feta cheese can only be called feta if it is produced in what country?
Answer:
particular areas of Greece
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
Carson is called to the scene of a murder. He brings his kit with him and begins to dust the area for fingerprints. Then he carefully puts a clear, special tape over possible prints to lift them off the surface. Carson puts the prints in his evidence bag to scan into the computer at the lab. What title would MOST likely describe Carson's profession? A. criminologist B. criminalist OC. criminal justice professional D. jurist
Answer:
Criminalist
Explanation:
A.K.A forensics
Answer:
criminalist
Explanation:
forensics
The ______ is supposed to make sure that the rules of the court process are enforced fairly.
A law prohibiting a newspaper from publishing a story exposing military secrets is an example of what kind of law
Answer:
Prior Restraint
Explanation:
Because...
Answer:
A law prohibiting a newspaper from publishing a story exposing military secrets is an example of a prior restraint.
I don't have to explain because the definition of a prior restraint is in the question.I hope this helped at all.
keeping criminals away from society, describes which purpose of punishment?
Answer:
The awnser is containment.
Explanation:
Amerimed is negotiating a deal with Mountain Medical (MM) for the sale of Amerimed's latest health supplement. Amerimed would like to package its supplements in bottles produced by Rick, but Rick says he will not enter into a contract with Amerimed until the MM contract is finalized. MM has sent Amerimed a letter of intent, but Rick thinks it is too vague and refuses to enter into an agreement with Amerimed. What should Amerimed do?
In this scenario, Amerimed should send Mountain Medical (MM) its own letter of intent, stating that they do have a binding agreement.
What is a contract?
A contract can be defined as a legally binding and enforceable agreement between two (2) or more parties (business associates), which gives rise to a mutual and legal obligation for the parties involved to do business together.
What is a letter of intent?
A letter of intent can be defined as a formal document that outlines the understanding between two (2) or more parties (business associates) while explicitly stating (declaring) the intentions of the writer with respect to formalizing a legally binding agreement (contract).
In this scenario, a business deal is being negotiated between three (3) parties:
AmerimedMountain Medical (MM)RickSince Mountain Medical (MM) has sent Amerimed a letter of intent, it is necessary that Amerimed acknowledges the letter and respond with its own letter of intent, wherein, it would be stated that there is a legally binding agreement between, regardless of what Rick thinks or his subsequent actions.
In conclusion, Amerimed should send Mountain Medical (MM) its own letter of intent, stating that they do have a binding agreement.
Read more on contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/17185606
It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within _____ feet of a bridge, viaduct, or tunnel. 100 150 200 300
Answer:
It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within 100 feet of a bridge, viaduct, or tunnel.
I hope this helped at all.
5 paragraph Essay about law enforcement in the United States
Answer:
There are close to 18,000 different police agencies operating in the United States today. These different police agencies all fulfill a role in the criminal justice system. To manage the sheer scale of operating these agencies they are broken down into different levels, branches of government, and jurisdiction. The scale of these agencies can be seen as a progressive stair case starting with the lowest level, the local agencies, and working its way up to the federal agencies. Their collective primary goal is enforce the law, maintain order, and ensure public safety. They do not determine guilt in long trials, nor do they create law. Instead these collective agencies are more focused on working within the general population instead of working on behalf of the general population.
The first level of a police agencies are those that are at the local level. Even the local level can be broken down further to agencies operating at the municipal level, county level, and tribal agencies. Municipal police or city police are those agencies responsible for law enforcement with in their city boundary. These agencies car vary in size from 1 officer to 30,000 officers. Municipal police are generally tasked with traffic enforcement, patrol, and depending on the resources available they are also tasked with criminal investigations. Next is the county sheriff and deputy sheriffs. Most of the sheriff positions are elected officials serving 2 to 4 year terms. The county agencies are responsible for law enforcement within the boundaries of their respective counties. They are tasked with similar duties as those of municipal police, and can also provide help to smaller municipal agencies. The Next level up from local agencies are the state agencies. Some states use a state police agency, like Texas or Massachusetts, these agencies are responsible for law enforcement at the state level. Most are tasked with highway patrol and statewide investigations. The state police execute search warrants in some states and help responded to situations where the local police do not have the resources available. Some states only have a highway patrol like here in Colorado. The highway patrol is responsible for enforcing traffic laws on state highways and interstates. The investigative side of law enforcement is normally handled by a state bureau of investigations. 23 states employ a state police force, while the rest employ a highway patrol with the exception of Hawaii which has no state agency. The final level of police agencies In America are those that operate at the federal level. There are currently 65 federal agencies operating today in the country. These different agencies have various responsibilities ranging from law enforcement, border patrol, customs, taxes, and corrections. The most commonly known agencies are the FBI, ICE, Boarder Patrol, ATF, and the Marshals. Agencies like the FBI are tasked with investigating crimes at the federal level these can include crimes that violate federal law, interstate crime rings, and terrorism. Each agency has a specific role to play in investigations. The ATF for example investigate crimes related to illegal use or manufacturing of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and arson. While agencies like the DEA are tasked with drug trafficking prevention and investigation. Different agencies fall under different departments of government, for example the FBI and DEA fall under the Department of Justice under the executive branch of government. While agencies like the IRS fall under the Department of the Treasury. Each of the agencies has a role to fill and their domain to maintain, but they must also work in conjunction with the different components of the criminal justice system. The police agencies are not the only source working and governing in the criminal.
Explanation:
international tribunal finds u.s. guilty of crimes against humanity
The systematic killing and maiming of unarmed African Americans by police amount to crimes against humanity that should be investigated and