american express looks at historical transactions to predict consumer behaviors. by watching how current and past customers have used their credit, american express can predict churn and customer loyalty.

The source code for the Linux kernel is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL). The Linux source code remains freely available to anybody who wants it for non commercial use. The correct option is b).

Software programmes issued under the GNU GPL are allowed to be used, studied, shared, and modified for free.

Everybody who wants it can still access the Linux source code without paying anything. Those who use the Linux source code for non-commercial purposes can continue to do so for free.

A free software licence known as the GPL allows users to run, copy, distribute, study, change, and otherwise improve software that is covered by the GPL.

The GPL assures that any software updates or enhancements are also made available under the GPL for the benefit of others.

The Linux kernel source code is licensed under the GPL, which means that users have the freedom to use, study, share, and modify the software code. The GPL does not require users to pay a yearly fee to access or modify the Linux source code. Instead, it requires that any changes made to the code be released under the GPL.

Therefore, the Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications, but it can be modified and redistributed under the GPL.

To learn more about General Public License here:

https://brainly.com/question/30453074#

#SPJ11

complete question

Which of the following best describes the GNU General Public License (GPL) that is associated with the Linux kernel source code?

a) You can freely utilize, but not change, the Linux source code.

b) The Linux source code remains freely available to anybody who wants it for non commercial use.

c) You need to pay a yearly fee to access and change the Linux source code.

d) The Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications.

Courts have ruled that inmates are entitled to have legal materials and resources available to assist them in filing complaints. The legal materials and resources include access to the law library and legal help.

Courts are a central part of the United States government's justice system. Courts have the responsibility of hearing cases and deciding what should be done with them.

They make judgments based on the evidence presented in court and the law that applies to the case. Inmates are individuals who have been imprisoned. They are kept in correctional facilities for varying lengths of time depending on the severity of the crime committed.

Inmates are often viewed as being separated from the outside world and are subject to different rules and regulations than those on the outside. Legal materials and resources refer to the tools and materials that are available to help individuals navigate the legal system.

Courts have ruled that inmates are entitled to have legal materials and resources available to assist them in filing complaints, which includes access to the law library and legal help.

Learn more about court legal materials https://brainly.com/question/31051529

#SPJ11

The purchaser should have inspected the house and its various components to identify potential issues that could arise later. It is a case of "buyer beware" in which the purchaser takes the risk while buying the property.

As per the given case, the seller and the purchaser signed a contract for the sale of a 60-year-old house. The contract required a general warranty deed to be given at closing. The contract was silent regarding the condition of the house, and the purchaser did not ask. The purchaser received a general warranty deed with all covenants of title at the closing and promptly recorded the deed. The seller made no disclosures to the purchaser regarding the condition of the property.

Approximately one month after the closing, the furnace in the house stopped working, the basement flooded, and the roof leaked so badly that the second floor could not be occupied. The seller, when told of the house's condition, was genuinely surprised. According to the law, the purchaser cannot hold the seller liable for the defects in the house since the seller gave no disclosures regarding the condition of the house. Also, there are no applicable statutes that require any disclosures. As the seller did not make any disclosures, she cannot be liable for making an affirmative representation.

The purchaser received the general warranty deed at closing, and since there were no additional disclosures made by the seller, the purchaser took the house "as is." Therefore, it is clear that the seller cannot be held liable for the defects in the house since there are no applicable statutes and no disclosures were made by the seller. In this jurisdiction, it is the purchaser's responsibility to conduct a proper inspection of the property before buying it. Thus, the purchaser should have inspected the house and its various components to identify potential issues that could arise later. It is a case of "buyer beware" in which the purchaser takes the risk while buying the property.

For more such question on buyer beware

https://brainly.com/question/30539410

#SPJ11

The given statement " when it comes to homicide, statistically the perpetrator is more likely to be male and the victim is more likely to be female" is True because This statement is supported by crime data and research about 95% of homicide perpetrators worldwide are male.

Various studies have shown that men commit the majority of homicides. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), about 95% of homicide perpetrators worldwide are male. This can be attributed to various factors such as social, cultural, and biological influences that may predispose men to engage in more aggressive and violent behaviors.

On the other hand, it is also true that women are more likely to be victims of homicide, particularly in cases of intimate partner violence or domestic violence. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) about 38% of all female homicide victims globally are killed by their intimate partners, while the figure for male victims is much lower at around 6%. This illustrates that women are disproportionately affected by intimate partner violence and are more likely to be victims of homicide in these cases.

In conclusion, the statement is true that when it comes to homicide, statistically the perpetrator is more likely to be male, and the victim is more likely to be female. This pattern can be observed across different cultures and societies, suggesting a universal trend in gender differences in homicide perpetration and victimization. However, it is important to note that while these statistics provide a general overview, each case is unique and individual circumstances may vary.

To learn more about homicide here:

https://brainly.com/question/30638493#

#SPJ11

A merger  is when a new legal entity is formed by a combination or consolidation of two firms.

A merger is the consolidation of two or more companies into a single entity. Mergers, like acquisitions, are accomplished for the purpose of consolidating the resources and/or expanding the operations of the firms involved.

A merger is a transaction in which two or more businesses unite to form a new business or become a part of an existing business. The transaction is usually done by the companies that are roughly equal in size.

A merger typically involves the combination of two or more companies to form a new, larger legal entity. This new entity may take on a new name and may have a new management structure, but it essentially replaces the previous companies involved in the merger.

For more such questions on merger, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29752419

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.

Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.  

The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.

Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29371683

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

The Texas graffiti statute is directed largely toward property damage caused by the use of "paint, an indelible marker, or an etching or engraving device." This statute specifically prohibits individuals from intentionally or knowingly making markings, inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings on someone else's property without their consent.

The Texas criminal mischief statute, on the other hand, covers a broader range of conduct that could damage or destroy someone else's property, including actions such as vandalism, destruction, tampering, or defacement. While the elements of the criminal mischief statute and the graffiti statute may overlap somewhat, the graffiti statute specifically targets the act of making marks or inscriptions on someone else's property using certain specific tools, such as paint, markers, or etching devices.

The graffiti statute is largely directed toward property damage caused by aerosol spray paint, markers, etching tools, or similar implements.

Such implements are usually used to deface public and private property with writing, drawings, marks, etchings, or paintings. The graffiti statute provides additional penalties for graffiti offenses and allows for additional recovery of costs from the person who committed the offense.

Graffiti is a form of vandalism, and the Texas Graffiti Statute provides additional penalties for individuals convicted of this type of criminal mischief. The Statute also allows victims of graffiti to recover their costs for the removal of graffiti from property.

The Statute applies to property damage caused by aerosol spray paint, markers, etching tools, or similar implements and provides enhanced penalties for those who commit graffiti offenses.

The Statute also requires that the graffiti be visible from a public area in order for the enhanced penalties to apply.

To know more about private property click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29613081#

#SPJ11

Plea bargaining is a process in which a defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to a reduced sentence in exchange for a plea deal offered by the prosecution. This system is prevalent in the criminal justice systems of many countries, including the United States.

Proponents of plea bargaining argue that it can reduce the burden on courts and save taxpayers' money. It can also help to expedite the resolution of cases, reduce the risk of wrongful convictions, and provide closure to victims and their families.

Opponents of plea bargaining argue that it can incentivize prosecutors to seek convictions at any cost, even if it means coercing defendants into pleading guilty. It can also perpetuate systemic inequalities, as defendants who cannot afford to go to trial may feel compelled to accept a plea deal, even if they are innocent. Additionally, it can lead to disparities in sentencing, as plea deals may be offered more frequently to some defendants than others.

Learn more about bargain at:

https://brainly.com/question/13538163

#SPJ1

The correct statement about the Restatement of the Law of Contracts is that it clarified and simplified the case law that had developed around contract disputes by the early twentieth century. The Restatement is a law that was published in 1932 and has not been revised since. It does not supersede the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) or codify a series of statutes.The correct answer is option C

The Restatement of the Law of Contracts was drafted by the American Law Institute in 1932. It provides a comprehensive set of rules and principles that govern the formation and enforcement of contracts. The Restatement covers a broad range of topics to the different types of remedies available for breach of contract.

In addition, the Restatement also covers issues related to the enforceability of contracts, such as the statute of frauds, and the impact of unconscionability, fraud, and other defenses.

Know more about Uniform Commercial Code here:

https://brainly.com/question/30031234

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Indian Education Act of 1972 (also known as Title IV) was enacted to improve educational opportunities for Native American children. It provided financial assistance to local school districts to support the education of Native American students and established policies for the operation of schools on Indian reservations. The act recognized the unique cultural and linguistic needs of Native American students and required schools to work with local tribes to develop culturally appropriate curricula and programs. The goal of the act was to provide Native American students with an education that both respected their cultural heritage and prepared them for success in the modern world.:

Answer:

Explanation:

In California, the statute of limitations for bringing a court foreclosure action to enforce a mechanic's lien is typically 90 days from the date the mechanic's lien was recorded. This time period is established by California Civil Code section 8460.

However, it's worth noting that there are several factors that can affect the statute of limitations for enforcing a mechanic's lien in California, including the type of construction project, the date the work was completed, and the date the mechanic's lien was recorded. Therefore, it's important to consult with an attorney to determine the specific statute of limitations that applies in a particular case.

Regarding the statute of limitations for bringing an action for removal of encroachments in California, the time period varies depending on the specific circumstances of the case. The general statute of limitations for bringing an action for trespass or nuisance is three years from the date the cause of action accrues, as established by California Code of Civil Procedure section 338. However, there may be other factors that affect the statute of limitations in a particular case, such as the nature of the encroachment, the duration of the encroachment, and the type of relief sought. Therefore, it's important to consult with an attorney to determine the specific statute of limitations that applies in a particular case.

The statute of limitations in California for filing a foreclosure to enforce a mechanic's lien is 90 days from the time a mechanic's lien notice is filed. If the notice is not filed, the time limit for filing a foreclosure action is 60 days from the time the work was done.

On the other hand, in California, the statute of limitations for bringing an action for removal of encroachments is 5 years. This means that if a person is being dispossessed of their property through an encroachment, they have a 5-year time limit to bring a legal action to recover their property.

It is important to keep in mind that statute of limitations periods may vary depending on the case and the specific situation. It is advisable to consult with an attorney specializing in the relevant area to determine the time limits applicable in each particular case.

Lear More About The statute of limitations in California

https://brainly.com/question/29307980

#SPJ11

Negative spectator may impact the game by being rude and violent towards players.

The different types of spectator aggression include verbal abuse, gesturing, physical violence, property damage, littering, and "warming up" or rushing the field. Public intoxication, student gatherings, ticket touting, and other factors can all contribute to spectator violence. At sporting events, spectators can also have a negative impact because they can be rude and abusive to athletes, which demotivates them or causes them to lose focus, which affects their performance.

The four consequences of bad behavior spectator are disorientation with regard to values. Inefficiency. high homicide rate. Slow development and low investment.

Learn more about Negative spectator at:

brainly.com/question/30816169

#SPJ4

Some observers of less-developed countries use the term neocolonialism to describe unequal economic relationship between those countries and the former imperial power which used to control their territory.

Neocolonialism is a concept that refers to the continued economic dependence of former colonies on their former colonial masters or their allies, despite the fact that they may have achieved independence from their respective colonizers. It is also referred to as "economic imperialism."

Neocolonialism involves a relationship between a relatively small, wealthy, and powerful group of countries, known as the “first world,” and a larger, less powerful, and less prosperous group of countries, known as the “third world.” This relationship allows the first world to dominate and exploit the third world economically, maintaining the latter's dependence on the former.

Imperialism refers to a system in which a strong nation-state attempts to extend its influence or authority over weaker nations or territories. Imperialism is characterized by a variety of practices, including the use of military force, economic exploitation, and cultural assimilation. European nations, particularly those with naval power, were responsible for the most extensive imperialistic activities during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

You can learn more about the economic relationship at: brainly.com/question/18772455

#SPJ11

Criminal law is the branch of law that regulates the behavior of individuals or groups and punishes those who violate the law. It is designed to protect society from criminal acts and punish those who commit them. Criminal law consists of a body of rules and regulations that define criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of treatment applicable to convicted offenders.Criminal law serves several purposes. One of the most important is to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior.

Criminal law punishes those who break the law by imposing fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions. This helps to prevent crime and protect society. Criminal law also serves to protect individual rights by ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and justly when accused of a crime. This includes the right to a fair trial, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Criminal law is based on the principle of individual responsibility. This means that individuals are held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether they intended to commit a crime. Criminal law also distinguishes between different types of crimes.

Know more about criminal offenses here:

https://brainly.com/question/11112199

#SPJ11

According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in: medical records.

HIPAA stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which was passed by the United States Congress. It includes a range of provisions that provide guidelines for how patient data can be protected and transmitted.

An incident report is a document used to describe an event that has happened within a healthcare facility, such as a fall. This report is important because it can provide valuable information to healthcare providers about how to prevent future accidents from occurring. Betty's incident report was created to document the circumstances surrounding her fall in the community health center.

Incident reports are not considered part of the official medical record because they are created to document safety and quality issues rather than for clinical purposes. Therefore, incident reports are usually not protected by HIPAA regulations and can be released to patients or their legal representatives upon request.

If the incident report is maintained in medical records, then it is likely to be protected by HIPAA. However, if the incident report is maintained separately from the medical records, then it is less likely to be protected from discovery by the patient or their legal representative. Therefore, the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in medical records.

For more such questions on incident report, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29635795

#SPJ11

Answer:

answer 1. The American society can reduce the impact of victimization to the underclass by implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, providing education, job opportunities, and other resources to marginalized communities, increasing police accountability and community policing, providing accessible and affordable mental health and addiction services, and providing support and resources for victims of crime.

answer 2. Society frequently fails to understand the full scope of crime victimization due to lack of awareness or emphasis on certain types of crimes, political or social stigma associated with certain types of crime or victims, under-reporting of crimes due to fear of retaliation or distrust of law enforcement, and lack of attention or resources for victims after crime has occurred.

Advocacy refers to the act of publicly supporting a particular cause or issue, and protestors in advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protests due to safety concerns, legal repercussions, and negative public perception.

Any action that promotes, urges, justifies, defends, or pleads on behalf of another person is referred to as advocacy.

Getting support from another individual to help you communicate your opinions and wishes and help you stand up for your rights is referred to as advocacy.

Your advocate is a person who supports you in this way. There are a number of reasons why protestors participating in an advocacy campaign should refrain from using violence. The three are security, legitimacy, and legality. By supplying policymakers with the data they need to make decisions and, in turn, influence legislation, advocates can have significant positive effects on the puiblic's health. Effective advocacy does not necessarily require protracted or complicated legislative procedure.

Therefore, we can conclude that advocacy is when person pleads on behalf of another.

Learn more about Advocacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29639066

#SPJ5

Improper relationship between educator and student is unacceptable.

Improper relationship between educator and student is unacceptable. It is considered unethical and can have serious consequences for the educator. It can lead to disciplinary action by the school, suspension, and even termination of employment. It can also have legal implications and can lead to criminal charges being laid.

In addition, it can damage the reputation of the educator, the school, and the student. It is important for educators to maintain a professional relationship with their students and to be aware of the ethical implications of any relationship outside of the classroom.

To learn more about Improper relationship link is here:

brainly.com/question/8603419

#SPJ4

Answer:

injuction

Explanation:

The most likely outcome of Taylor's case is that she would be awarded damages for her injury due to the Giants' negligence.

In order for her to prevail in her case, she must be able to show that the Giants had a duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent her from being harmed, that they failed to do so, and that her injury was caused by that failure.

She must also show that her injury was the proximate result of their negligence, and that the damages that she incurred were a direct result of the negligence.

To prove negligence in this case, Taylor must show that the Giants had a duty of care to provide a safe environment for their fans and to prevent foreseeable harm. She must also prove that the Giants failed to act as a reasonably prudent person would have and that they breached their duty of care to her.

Finally, she must show that her injury was caused by the breach of their duty of care, that her damages are a direct result of their negligence, and that the damages she incurred were foreseeable by the Giants.

To know more about prudent click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/22082788#

#SPJ11

The First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism. It weakened the economic and political power of European nations and led to a shift in global power towards the United States and the Soviet Union. It also marked the end of the European colonial empires with the rise of nationalist movements in colonized countries. The war resulted in a significant loss of life and resources for European countries, which hindered their ability to maintain their colonies. Moreover, the war created political instability and economic depression, which led to anti-colonial movements in colonized countries. As a result, many European powers gradually lost their grip on their empires, paving the way for decolonization movements in the 20th century.

Answer:

The First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism, leading to a shift in power and a weakening of colonial empires. The war contributed to the eventual decolonization of several colonies, and it marked the beginning of a new era in international relations.

Explanation:

The First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism, both in terms of its scope and its character. Here are some ways in which it affected European imperialism:

Economic costs: The First World War was incredibly costly, both in terms of human lives and economic resources. European powers had to spend enormous amounts of money on weapons, ammunition, and other military supplies, which weakened their economies. This economic burden made it difficult for European powers to maintain their imperialist policies, and many of them had to scale back their overseas activities.

Political changes: The war brought about significant political changes in Europe, as several empires collapsed, and new nations emerged. The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war, forced Germany to give up its colonies and territories, which were then divided among the Allied powers. This led to a significant shift in the balance of power, and several European powers lost their colonial possessions.

Anti-colonial sentiment: The war also sparked anti-colonial sentiment among the colonized people, who saw the war as a struggle among imperial powers. The war created an opportunity for colonized people to organize and demand greater autonomy and independence. This sentiment grew stronger after the war and eventually led to several colonies gaining independence.

Rise of the United States: The First World War also marked the rise of the United States as a global power. The US emerged from the war as a major economic power and began to assert its influence on the world stage. This weakened the position of European powers, which had previously dominated world affairs.

Overall, the First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism, leading to a shift in power and a weakening of colonial empires. The war contributed to the eventual decolonization of several colonies, and it marked the beginning of a new era in international relations.

Knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is important because the classification determines when the contract is legally binding. In general, a bilateral contract becomes legally binding as soon as both parties agree to the terms. By contrast, a unilateral contract only becomes legally binding when the other party accepts the offer and agrees to perform the action outlined in the contract.

Bilateral and unilateral contracts are two different kinds of contracts, each with its own set of legal implications. A bilateral contract is an agreement between two parties, each of which promises to do something in return for the other. In other words, both parties agree to exchange something of value. A unilateral contract, on the other hand, is a one-sided agreement in which only one party makes a promise.


Knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is thus essential for understanding when it is legally binding and the potential legal implications of the contract.

Know more about  legal implications here:

https://brainly.com/question/30194646

#SPJ11

The method of finding cases in a legal digest are as follows: descriptive word approach.topic approach.table of cases approach.key number.

The four methods of finding cases in a legal digest are given above. A legal digest is a reference book containing summaries of case law that is used to locate cases based on their keywords or phrases. The digest is arranged by subject area or jurisdiction. All of the answer choices are appropriate methods of finding cases in a legal digest.

Locate a legal digest by browsing for the appropriate digest by topic or the jurisdiction you want to search for. Legal digests can be found in print format or electronic format. The search engines may vary depending on the format you select.

The descriptive word approach is a technique used to locate cases in a legal digest. This technique involves searching for words that match your case. For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would search for the words "medical malpractice" in the index or table of contents. It is possible to find cases that do not include the search terms.

Topic approach:The topic approach is a technique used to locate cases in a legal digest. This technique involves searching for cases by topic. For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would browse through the medical malpractice section of the legal digest.

For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would search for the name of the case in the table of cases.

The table of cases approach is helpful when you have the name of the case but not the citation.Key numberThe key number is a system used to classify cases by topic. Each topic has a key number assigned to it. This number is used to locate cases on that topic in a legal digest.

For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would use the key number assigned to medical malpractice cases to locate the relevant cases in the legal digest.

To know more about legal digest refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/13434743#

#SPJ11

The remedy that requires each party to a contract to return the consideration given to the other is rescission.

Rescission is the cancellation of a contract and the return of the parties to the same position they held prior to the contract.

This remedy is often used when one party has breached the contract, as it allows the non-breaching party to be put in the same position they were in before the contract was created.

It is important to note that in order for rescission to take place, both parties must give back the consideration they received from each other under the terms of the contract.

To know more about rescission click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30031740#

#SPJ11

Under civil law, Mark is liable to Don for Don's injury because he acted in a way that caused harm. In this scenario, Mark pushed Don, which caused Don to fall and break his arm.

This is considered a tort, or wrongful act, since Mark acted in a way that resulted in harm to Don. The tort of negligence applies, which means that Mark acted in a careless or negligent way.

Under civil law, Don can bring a lawsuit against Mark to recover damages. He must prove that Mark acted in a negligent way and that Don suffered damages as a result. To do this, Don must show that Mark had a duty to act in a certain way, such as not pushing Don, that Mark breached that duty by pushing Don, and that Don suffered damages as a result.

If Don is successful in his lawsuit, he can recover damages from Mark. This could include medical bills, pain and suffering, and other related costs. He could also be compensated for his lost wages, if any, if he had to miss work due to his injury. Mark is liable for Don's injury under civil law, and Don can seek compensation for his damages in a civil lawsuit.

To know more about civil law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14788507#

#SPJ11

The scenario that represents a violation of one of the civil liberties protected by the Bill of Rights is B. A state compels Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and it protects a range of civil liberties for U.S. citizens.

Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade is a violation of a civil liberty protected by the Bill of Rights. This is because, it may conflict with the Amish community's religious beliefs and practices, and therefore could be challenged under the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom.

Find out more on civil liberties at https://brainly.com/question/28852814

#SPJ1

Options for this question include :

The potential defenses that Rob could use to respond to Sue's claim based on the assumption that Sue has filed a claim against Rob under a theory of negligence. Rob's best argument for protecting himself from Sue's claim is the defense of comparative negligence.

Rob's Best Argument in Defense of Sue's Claim- Rob might use a defense of contributory negligence, but this is less probable because it is rarely utilized in any jurisdiction. Because the contributory negligence defense is more commonly seen in fewer jurisdictions, comparative negligence is a better defense for Rob to use to safeguard himself from Sue's claim.

In comparative negligence, the court determines the degree of negligence of each party involved and proportionally distributes the responsibility for the incident. This defense places some of the blame on Sue, lowering the amount she could receive in compensation if she is found to be partly liable for the incident.

To know more about theory of negligence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30652890#

#SPJ11