At her birthday party marcies guests are 2/3 of her birthday cake and her family ate 1/4 of the cake how much cake was left after her party

The scenario could be modeled as a linear equation to produce the mathematical model written as : y = 10x + 7

Number of cards from previous card = 7

Number of cards per cardstock purchased = 10

Let :

Number of cardstocks purchased = x

Total Number cards made = y

The total number of cards made, y can be expressed thus :

(Number of cards per cardstock purchased × number of cardstocks purchased) + number of previous cards

This means :

y = 10x + 7

Therefore, the required equation is y = 10x + 7

Answer:

See below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello! My name is Galaxy and I will be helping you today!

We can check your answer in 1 step.

We need to find how much they earn if they worked 37 hours at a rate of 26 dollars per hour.

We can mutliply to figure this out:

[tex]37*26=962[/tex]

Therefore, yes, your answer is correct!

Cheers!

Answer:

$26=1hr

x   =37hr

$26 x 37=$ 962

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-24

Step-by-step explanation:

-3(p+2)

-3 ( 6+2 )

-3(8)

-24

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

4+4 =8

Answer:

y = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

To find this simply you have to put values instead of x and y,

For an example,

If the value of x is 1, you have to put 1 instead of x to the equation to find the value of y,

x = 1,

y = x + 4

y = 1 + 4

y =  5

In the same way, you can find the value of y when the value of x is 4.

x = 4,

y = x + 4

y = 4 + 4

y = 8

Hope this helps you.

Let me know if you have any other questions :-)

Answer:

242.975609756

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

242.975

Step-by-step explanation:

TIP: u can use a calculator if your teacher allows you, it would be faster :)

Answer:

27 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

please check the image it has all the steps to solve it . Thank you.

Answer:

18 and 29

Step-by-step explanation:

8+0=8

8+1=9

9+2=11

11+3=14

14+4=18

18+5=23

23+6=29

As you can see, the number that you add to the previous number in the sequence is increased by 1 as the sequence grows in length. The number added goes from 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 and so on. :-)

Using the binomial distribution, it is found that there is a 0.99999984 = 99.999984% probability that at least one household has a television set.

For each household, there are only two possible outcomes, either it has at least one television set, or it does not. The probability of a household having at least one television set is independent of any other household, which means that the binomial distribution is used to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

The parameters are:

In this problem:

The probability that at least one household has a television set is:

[tex]P(X \geq 1) = 1 - P(X = 0)[/tex]

In which:

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 0) = C_{4,0}.(0.98)^{0}.(0.02)^{4} = 0.00000016[/tex]

Then:

[tex]P(X \geq 1) = 1 - P(X = 0) = 1 - 0.00000016 = 0.99999984 [/tex]

0.99999984 = 99.999984% probability that at least one household has a television set.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24863377

A system of equations is simply a system that contains related equations of multiply variables

It took 5 seconds for the adults to go 20 yards and catch up to the kids

Let x represents the time of the race

The kids started 15 yards ahead, and they raced at 1 yard per second.

So, the kids' equation is represented as: [tex]\mathbf{k =15 + x}[/tex]

The adults' raced at 4 yards per second.

So, the adults' equation is represented as: [tex]\mathbf{a =4x }[/tex]

When they are side by side, we have the following equivalent equation

[tex]\mathbf{4x = 15 + x}[/tex]

Subtract x from both sides

[tex]\mathbf{3x = 15}[/tex]

Divide both sides by 3

[tex]\mathbf{x = 5}[/tex]

It means that, it took the adults 5 seconds to catch up with the kids

Substitute 5 for x in any of the equations to calculate the distance travelled.

[tex]\mathbf{a =4 \times 5}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{a =20}[/tex]

It means that, the adults catch up with the kids at 20 yards

Read more about systems of equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/12895249

Answer:

The adults went 123 yards and caught up to the kids in 41 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

ixl :)

Answer:

x = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other , then

6x + 11 = 5x + 14 ( subtract 5x from both sides )

x + 11 = 14 ( subtract 11 from both sides )

x = 3

Answer:

$2016

Step-by-step explanation:

Simple Interest equation: I = Prt

So,

P = $4800

r = [tex]\frac{7}{100}[/tex] = 0.07

t = 6

I = (4800) · (0.07) · (6)

Thus,

The simple interest is $2016.

Answer:

my sample ka

Step-by-step explanation:

bigyan mu ako para masagot ko ang tanong nayan.

Answer:

yes it is

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

SAS || Side - Angle - Side

Step-by-step explanation:

You have 2 sets of congruent sides, and one set of congruent angles between them. (SAS)

That angle is congruent because ∠QRP and ∠TRS are vertical angles, and vertical angles have the same measurement.

Answer:

15h+10n

Step-by-step explanation:

You forgot to list the equations.

10 * n = 10n = $ paid for amount of televisions sold

15 * h = 15h = $ paid for hours worked

15h + 10n = Total amount paid

The answer for n television sold and h hours working is 15h  +10n.

Expression:

An expression is an algebraic or mathematical statement in which some variable and constant are arranges with any algebraic operations

Given that

Cliff earned for one hour = $15

Therefore for h hours = 15h

Also he earned additional for each television sold = $10

Therefore for n television sold = 10n

Here 15h and 10n are two algebraic numbers because there is constants 15 and 10 and variables h and n are multiplied simultaneously.

Therefore the total earning is the addition of both

15h + 10n

The final answer is 15h + 10n

Learn more about expression here-

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ2

Answer:

9 times

Step-by-step explanation:

1 goes into 9, 9 times

1+1=2

2+1=3

3+1=4

4+1=5

5+1=6

6+1=7

7+1=8

8+1=9

Answer:

45

Step-by-step explanation:

15+15+15=45

that would increase her practice time by 45 minutes

we have f (x)= -3x + 10

so f(-5)= (-3)(-5) +10 = 15 + 10 = 25

we have g (x) = x^2 - 7x

so g(2)= 2^2 - 7.2 = 4 - 14 = -10

we have f (x)= -3x + 10

so f(4m)= -3(4m)+10 = -12m + 10

ok done. Thank to me :>

Answer:

Nvgjvfknh

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Zero

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is impossible to answer. 501+5 does not equal 551, 501+5 equals 506.

Hello,

- 10, - 8, 0, 2, 9

The ascending order is always : negative numbers, zero, positive numbers

Answer:

-10, -8, 0, 2, 9

Answer:

  State A loses a seat to State B when the total is increased

Step-by-step explanation:

The "work" is most easily done by a spreadsheet, as the calculations are easily defined and very repetitive.

The "fair share" of seats is the fraction the population is of the total, multiplied by the total number of seats. It will generally be a mixed number (integer plus fraction).

If the whole number is 1 or greater, the number of seats allocated at least that whole number.

If not all seats are allocated, the fractions are sorted in decreasing order, and 1 additional seat is added to the allocation for each state, working down the list, until all of the seats are allocated.

__

The attachment shows State A has the highest fraction when the number of seats is 24. Only one additional seat needs to be allocated in that case. State A gets that extra seat.

When the number of seats is 25, States B and C have the highest fractions. Each of them gets one additional seat, and State A gets no additional seats. This results in the appearance of State A giving up a seat to State B.

_____

Additional comment

Hamilton's apportionment method was used for a number of years in the US. The method now in use is substantially different. The current method would divide the 24 seats so that A=3, B=6, C=15. The 25th seat would be given to State A.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  b. $28.37

Step-by-step explanation:

In the cost function, x is the number of units. The derivative of the cost function with respect to x will tell the incremental cost of producing one more unit. That derivative is a constant, $28.37 per unit, so the cost of producing one more unit is $28.37 at any production level.

Answer:

x < -2

Step-by-step explanation:

2(x+4)<2-x

2x+8<2-x

+x        +x

3x+8<2

   -8  -8

3x<-6

x<-2    Divide both sides by 3

Hope this helps!

Answer:

2x+8<2-x

8-2<-x-2x

-3x>6

x>6/3

x<2

Step-by-step explanation:

I think it's smtg like this

Answer:

-5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Change 3/4 to 6/8 by cancelling the common factors.

2. Divide how you normally would

Answer:

- [tex]\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

-3[tex]\frac{1}{8}[/tex] ÷ 3[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-25}{8}[/tex] ÷ [tex]\frac{15}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-25}{8}[/tex] × [tex]\frac{4}{15}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-100}{120}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-50}{60}[/tex]

- [tex]\frac{5}{6}[/tex]

* Keep in mind that - [tex]\frac{5}{6}[/tex], [tex]\frac{-5}{6}[/tex], and [tex]\frac{5}{-6}[/tex] mean the same thing!

First, I converted -3 1/8 and 3 3/4 to improper fractions. I then switched the sign of division to multiplication and changed 15/4 to 4/15. I then multiplied -25 with 4 and 8 with 15, resulting in -100/120. I simplified this to -5/6.

Hope this helps, and if you have any questions, let me know!

Answer:  [tex]\boldsymbol{37.5} < \mu < \boldsymbol{44.5}[/tex]

===========================================================

Explanation:

At a 90% confidence level, the z critical value is roughly z = 1.645. Use a reference table or a calculator to determine this. Despite not knowing what sigma is, we can use a z interval here because n > 30. If the sample size n was smaller than 30, then we'd have to use a T distribution instead.

We'll plug that z value, along with the other given values, into the formula for the lower boundary L of the confidence interval.

[tex]L = \text{lower boundary}\\\\L = \overline{x} - z*\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\\\\L = 41 - 1.645*\frac{12}{\sqrt{31}}\\\\L = 41 - 3.545\\\\L = 37.455\\\\L = 37.5\\\\[/tex]

This value is approximate.

Do the same for the upper boundary as well

[tex]U = \text{upper boundary}\\\\U = \overline{x} + z*\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\\\\U = 41 + 1.645*\frac{12}{\sqrt{31}}\\\\U = 41 + 3.545\\\\U = 44.545\\\\U = 44.5\\\\[/tex]

This value is also approximate.

We have 90% confidence that the population mean [tex]\mu[/tex] (greek letter mu) is somewhere between L = 37.5 and U = 44.5

Therefore, we would write the 90% confidence interval as [tex]\boldsymbol{37.5} < \mu < \boldsymbol{44.5}[/tex]

This is the same as writing the confidence interval in the form [tex](\boldsymbol{37.5} , \boldsymbol{44.5})[/tex]. Both forms are two different ways to say the same thing. The first form being [tex]L < \mu < U[/tex] while the second form is [tex](L,U)[/tex].

Side note: The value 3.545 calculated earlier is the approximate margin of error.

Answer:

1st part:

0.65= 13/2

0.425=4251000

9.35=9 7/20

2nd part:

19/25= 0.76

311/500=0.622

5/8=0.625

14 3/5=14.6.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helped good luck!<3

Answer:

a.

a - q = a + sx

a - a - q = a - a + sx

-q = sx

[tex]\frac{-q}{s} = \frac{sx}{s}[/tex]

x = [tex]\frac{-q}{s}[/tex]

b.

kx - bf = [tex]\frac{fy}{m}[/tex]

m(kx - bf) = m([tex]\frac{fy}{m}[/tex])

mkx - mbf = fy

[tex]\frac{mkx - mbf}{f}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{fy}{f}[/tex]

y = [tex]\frac{mkx - mbf}{f}[/tex]

y = [tex]\frac{mkx}{f}[/tex] - [tex]\frac{mbf}{f}[/tex]

y = [tex]\frac{mkx}{f}[/tex] - mb

c.

a - q = a + sx

a - a - q = a - a + sx

-q = sx

-q × (-1) = sx × (-1)

q = -sx

d.

kx - bf = [tex]\frac{fy}{m}[/tex]

m(kx - bf) = m([tex]\frac{fy}{m}[/tex])

m(kx - bf) = fy

[tex]\frac{m(kx - bf)}{kx - bf}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{fy}{kx - bf}[/tex]

m = [tex]\frac{fy}{kx - bf}[/tex]