The rights and protections of workers around the globe will be discussed at the recent opening of the United Nations Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers' 36th session in Geneva, Switzerland. The committee will hear from a range of organizations and experts during the session, which will be centered on problems like labor exploitation and human trafficking. Meetings with civil society organizations will also be a part of the session, giving groups a chance to share their worries and suggestions with the committee. The meeting will likely finish with a report on the rights of migrant workers and suggestions for enhancing protections. The importance of addressing the problems migrant workers experience, who frequently lack appropriate legal protections and may be vulnerable to exploitation and abuse, is highlighted by this gathering. The committee's goal is to come up with practical solutions for defending the rights of all employees, regardless of where they are from by bringing together experts and activists.
About how many Americans were returned due to the treaty of Ghent
Answer:
The Treaty of Ghent, signed on December 24, 1814, ended the War of 1812 between the United States and Great Britain. The treaty did not require any Americans to be returned.
Explanation:
40. In Ms. Morales’s class, the ratio of boys to girls is 3:7. The class sizes at Ms. Morales’s school range from 22 to 34 students per class. What is the total number of students in Ms. Morales’s class? A. 21 students B. 24 students C. 28 students D. 30 students
Answer: answer D 30 students
Explanation:
i brainly'd it :)
all of the following were arguments made against the davis administration by its opponents except: a) the davis administration was corrupt b) the davis administration's policies led to excessive taxation c) the davis administration used the state police and state militia to ensure dictatorial rule over texas d) the davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves
Answer:
The argument that was NOT made against the Davis administration by its opponents is:
a) The Davis administration was corrupt.
The argument that was not made against the Davis Administration by its opponents is that d) "the Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves".
The Davis Administration was established in Texas at the conclusion of the Civil War. Union troops were occupying Texas, and the Davis administration was tasked with governing a state that was attempting to heal from the wounds of conflict.
There were various opposition groups and individuals who rose up against the Davis administration, making the following accusations and allegations about its administration:
a) The Davis Administration was corrupt: Accusations of corruption were widespread throughout the administration.
b) The Davis administration's policies led to excessive taxation: The policies implemented by the Davis Administration were accused of being the cause of excessive taxation.
c) The Davis Administration used the state police and state militia to ensure dictatorial rule over Texas: One of the Davis administration's primary faults was seen as its usage of the state police and state militia to maintain dictatorial rule over Texas.
d) The Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves: This is not an argument made against the Davis administration by its opponents. The correct answer is d) the Davis administration cared little for the civil rights of the freed slaves.
You can learn more about Davis administration at
https://brainly.com/question/5239695
#SPJ11
Exhibit Requirements
4
• One section (or slide if making a presentation) for Ghana with the most prominent features of its civilization, along with a
thorough explanation of what made one of the features historically significant.
• One section (or slide if making a presentation) for Mali with the most prominent features of its civilization, along with a
thorough explanation of what made one of the features historically significant.
• One section (or slide if making a presentation) for Songhai with the most prominent features of its civilization, along with a
thorough explanation of what made one of the features historically significant.
• One artifact/image for each kingdom
• In your explanations above, you should both explain what the feature was and why it was so significant. This could be a new
religion, a new source of economic wealth, or the fall of a dynasty in political power.
Here are the exhibit requirements for each of the three kingdoms along with explanations of their most prominent features and historically significant events:
Ghana:Ghana was a powerful kingdom in West Africa that flourished between the 6th and 13th centuries. Its most prominent feature was its wealth, which came from controlling the trans-Saharan trade routes that connected West Africa with North Africa and the Mediterranean world. The kingdom's position at the center of this trade network allowed it to accumulate vast amounts of gold, which it traded for salt, cloth, and other goods.
One historically significant event in Ghana's history was its conversion to Islam in the 11th century. Islam spread through the region as a result of trade contacts with Muslim merchants from North Africa and the Middle East.
By embracing Islam, Ghana's rulers gained access to new sources of knowledge and prestige, as well as new trade connections with Muslim communities around the world.
Artifact/Image: The Kumbi Saleh ruins, the former capital of the Ghana Empire, located in present-day Mauritania.
Mali:Mali was a powerful kingdom in West Africa that succeeded Ghana in the 13th century. Its most prominent feature was its immense wealth, which was derived from controlling the gold mines of West Africa and the trans-Saharan trade routes. Mali's most famous ruler, Mansa Musa, was one of the richest people in history and is said to have distributed vast amounts of gold on his pilgrimage to Mecca in the 14th century.
One historically significant event in Mali's history was the establishment of Timbuktu as a center of Islamic scholarship and trade in the 14th century. Timbuktu became a hub for the trans-Saharan trade and a center for Islamic learning, attracting scholars from across West Africa and beyond. The kingdom's wealth and power were further enhanced by its control over the gold mines of Bambuk and Bure.
Artifact/Image: The Great Mosque of Djenné, a famous example of Sudano-Sahelian architecture and one of the largest mud brick structures in the world, located in present-day Mali.
Songhai:Songhai was a powerful kingdom in West Africa that succeeded Mali in the 15th century. Its most prominent feature was its military prowess, which enabled it to conquer neighboring kingdoms and expand its territory to become the largest empire in West Africa. Songhai's armies were well-organized and well-equipped, with thousands of soldiers and a fleet of war canoes on the Niger River.
One historically significant event in Songhai's history was the reign of Askia Muhammad, who came to power in the late 15th century. Muhammad was a devout Muslim who established Islam as the official religion of the empire and promoted scholarship and learning. Under his rule, Timbuktu became an even more important center of Islamic scholarship and attracted scholars from across the Muslim world.
Artifact/Image: The Tomb of Askia, a large pyramid-shaped structure located in Gao, Mali, which was the capital of the Songhai Empire. The tomb was built to honor Askia Muhammad and his achievements.
Read more about Mali kingdom here:
https://brainly.com/question/31182278
#SPJ1
which statement best represents colonial attitudes toward independence in the aftermath of the battle of bunker hill?
The statement that best represents colonial attitudes toward independence in the aftermath of the Battle of Bunker Hill is: "The colonies gained confidence in their ability to challenge British military power and started to believe that they could achieve independence."
This statement is true because while the colonists had shown great determination in the Battle of Bunker Hill, they were still not ready to declare independence from Great Britain. However, they were determined to defend their rights and were willing to fight for them. The battle had shown them that they were capable of standing up to the British army and that they had a chance of winning the war if they continued to fight.
Therefore the answer is The colonies gained confidence in their ability to challenge British military power and started to believe that they could achieve independence."
For more questions on: independence
https://brainly.com/question/1685775
#SPJ11
Please help quick I’ll mark brainly
The sudden halt to the Chinese treasure voyages to the Indian Ocean left a door open for the Portuguese to dominate trading there a century later. Once the Portuguese established their dominance in the Indian Ocean, they traveled farther east and established port cities along the Chinese coastline. Later, the Portuguese influence was replaced by the British and Dutch whose imperialism led to the claiming of previously independent Asian nations as colonies of England and the Netherlands. Do you think this timeline of events would have continued had the Chinese remained present and dominant in the Indian Ocean?
If the Chinese had maintained their dominance in Indian Ocean, it is possible that they could have established trade relationships and port cities along the East African coast and in the Arabian Peninsula.
What is trade?Trade refers to exchange of goods, the services, or resources between individuals, businesses, or the nations. The purpose of trade is to fulfill the needs and wants of the parties involved and achieve mutual benefit. Trade can take place locally, nationally, or internationally, and can involve physical or digital goods and services. Trade can be conducted through various means, including bartering, buying and selling, or exchanging resources. Trade has played a significant role in human history, driving economic growth, cultural exchange, and technological advancements. It has also been a source of conflict and competition, leading to trade wars and protectionist policies. Today, international trade is governed by various regulations and agreements, such as the World Trade Organization, to ensure fair and equitable trade practices and promote economic development.
To learn more about trade, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17175941
#SPJ1
how did fritz harkort influence the nature of economic development in nineteenth-century germany?
Answer:Industrialization in Germany was the phase of the breakthrough of industrialization in Germany, beginning at the time from around 1815 to 1835.
Fritz Harkort significantly influenced the nature of economic development in nineteenth-century Germany through his pioneering work in the industrial sector.
Here's a step-by-step explanation of his contributions:
1. Early career: Harkort was a successful businessman who began his career as a merchant, gaining experience in trade and manufacturing.
2. Embracing technology: Harkort was an early advocate for the use of technology in industry. He recognized the potential of steam power and machine manufacturing, which led him to invest in and promote these technologies in Germany.
3. Founding Harkort'sche Maschinenbau-Anstalt: In 1819, Harkort founded Harkort'sche Maschinenbau-Anstalt, a pioneering engineering firm that specialized in the production of steam engines and other machinery. This was one of the first companies of its kind in Germany and played a crucial role in the country's industrialization.
4. Railway industry: Harkort's company was also involved in the development of the railway industry in Germany, further supporting economic growth and the expansion of trade networks.
5. Political influence: In addition to his business endeavors, Harkort was an influential politician who advocated for economic policies that supported industrialization and economic development. He served as a member of the Prussian National Assembly and the Erfurt Parliament, promoting progressive economic policies.
6. Legacy: Fritz Harkort's contributions to the industrialization of Germany during the nineteenth century laid the groundwork for the country's economic growth and modernization. His emphasis on technological innovation and investment in industry was crucial to Germany's transformation into an economic powerhouse.
In summary, Fritz Harkort's influence on economic development in nineteenth-century Germany was through his support of technological innovation, investment in industry, and political advocacy for progressive economic policies. His work helped to establish Germany as a leading industrial nation during this time.\
For more about economic development:
https://brainly.com/question/16299816
#SPJ11
all the shared structures that both the Kutchicetus and the Saber-toothed cat have in common
Answer:, it is not possible to identify any shared structures between Kutchicetus and Saber-toothed cats as they belong to completely different groups with distinct anatomical features and adaptations.
Explanation:Kutchicetus is an extinct cetacean, believed to have lived during the Eocene epoch, around 48 million years ago. Saber-toothed cats, on the other hand, are a group of extinct predatory mammals belonging to the family Felidae, characterized by their long, curved canine teeth. While there are no shared structures between the two groups, there are a few anatomical features that are unique to each group.
Kutchicetus had several adaptations for an aquatic lifestyle, including a streamlined body, paddle-like forelimbs, and a powerful tail for propulsion. It also had nostrils positioned high up on the skull, indicating that it breathed air at the surface of the water. Saber-toothed cats, on the other hand, were terrestrial predators with elongated canine teeth used for killing prey.
Based on the evidence, do you think it's likely that Nixon was also involved in the planning or ordering the break-in? Explain
3 - The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach and try a president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon? Explain.
4 - In a 1977 interview with British journalist David Frost, Nixon made the argument that a president is allowed to commit illegal acts if they are done to promote the good of the country. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country? Explain
Answer:
Based on the evidence, do you think it's likely that Nixon was also involved in the planning or ordering the break-in? Explain There is strong evidence that suggests Nixon was involved in the cover-up of the break-in, but it is still unclear whether he was directly involved in the planning or ordering of it. Further investigation and evidence may be needed to make a definitive conclusion. 3 - The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach and try a president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon? Explain. The evidence against Nixon, including the Watergate scandal and obstruction of justice, was significant and could have warranted an impeachment and conviction. However, without further investigation and a fair trial, it is impossible to make a definitive conclusion.
4 - In a 1977 interview with British journalist David Frost, Nixon made the argument that a president is allowed to commit illegal acts if they are done to promote the good of the country. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country? Explain This argument raises important ethical and legal questions about the balance between national security and individual rights. It is crucial to carefully consider the potential consequences of allowing a president to break the law in certain circumstances before coming to a conclusion.
Explanation:
Based on the evidence, Nixon may or may not be involved in the planning or ordering the break -in.
Although there is compelling evidence that Nixon was engaged in the cover-up of the break-in, it is still unknown if he was personally responsible for its conception or execution.
To get a firm judgement, further research and proof may be required.
3. Do you think the evidence would have warranted an impeachment and conviction for Nixon?
The Watergate affair and other relevant charges against Nixon may have supported an impeachment and conviction. Yet it is hard to draw a firm judgement without more research and a fair trial.4. Do you agree that a president should be allowed to break the law for the good of the country?
The balance between individual rights and national security is a significant ethical and legal issue that is brought up by this debate.
When making a decision, it is essential to carefully weigh the possible repercussions of permitting a president to breach the law in specific situations.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
The United Nations needs permission to take action. How is this a good thing?
On the flip side, how is this a bad thing?
The question is answered in two parts. How is this a good thing, and how is it a bad thing?
The Good:
The United Nations in getting permission ensures that the UN will not act out of line, and that it is agreed that the action is warranted to keep global peace.
The Bad:
The United Nations needs roughly around 2/3 of votes to pass any resolutions, and they must pass through the security council, which contains China, France, Russia, UK, and US, in which, if any one of them vetoes the resolution, the resolution is not standing.
~
To wrap things up, it is good for the United Nations to need permission to ensure that they do not do anything rash, while it may be bad in that action which may have been warranted is disregarded because it fails the vote, either in the general assembly or through any one of the security council. It is important to note that in today's world, China and Russia do not align policy wise with France, UK, or US.
~
Learn more about the United Nations, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9763405
Who became the first Congress leader in the 1900's?
Which statement BEST explains how the Emancipation Proclamation did not account for all possible outcomes?
A
There was no caveat in the event that the Confederates won the Civil War.
B
There was no contingency plan for how abolishing slavery would affect the economy.
C
There was seemingly no plan to free the slaves if the rebellious Confederate states rejoined the Union.
D
There were no policies in place regulating how newly freed slaves would earn a salary or where they would live.
In the event that the Confederates prevailed in the Civil War, there was no exception.
What was the Emancipation Proclamation's primary flaw?Yet, because the Emancipation Proclamation was a military action, it came with a lot of limitations. Slavery didn't stop in the border states of allies; only those that had left the Union were impacted. However, it expressly left out Confederate states that were already ruled by the Union.
Why didn't slavery cease with the Emancipation Proclamation?Despite having such broad language, the Emancipation Proclamation had significant restrictions. Slavery in the ally border states was unaffected because it only applied to those that had left the Union. Additionally, it specifically excluded regions of the Confederacy that were already under Northern rule.
To know more about Civil War visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
View Full Description
The lesson states that in 1832 in the case of Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee had absolute rights over their tribal land and that no federal or state government had legal rights there, however; President Jackson refused to uphold Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling. Because the Supreme Court does not have any authority to enforce the rulings they pass it is possible for them to be disregarded, as was done by Andrew Jackson. Should the Supreme Court have any additional powers to allow them to enforce their rulings? If so, why, and what should the power be? If not, why not?
Your response should be 3-5 sentences long and show that you’ve thought about the topic/question at hand. Please be aware we are looking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION and there is not a single “correct answer.”
Answer:
Worcester v. Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. Although Pres. Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States regarding Native Americans.
Which parts of the chart represent an action taken by the U.S. House of Representatives?
A, C, E, G, H, J, K
B, D, F, I, J, L
G, J, M
I, K, L
Answer:
the answer is A (the first one)
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I just know
What laws came into effect because of such writings as The Cry of the Children ?
Answer:
These laws gradually shortened work hours, improved working conditions, and raised the age at which children could work. Eventually, the U.S. passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, which set the minimum working age to 16 during school hours, 14 for certain after-school jobs, and 18 for more dangerous jobs.
compare and contrast the approaches of w.e.b. dubois and booker t. washington as they fought for african american civil rights. which man would you have supported? why?
When it came to plans for black social and economic advancement, W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington had a strong disagreement. According to Du Bois, Black people should fight for equal rights.
Washington, meantime, had a conciliatory attitude towards African people. DuBois and George Washington were both African American leaders who fought for racial equality. DuBois espoused a paternalistic method of advancement, in contrast to Washington's hands-on exterior approach. Contrarily, Du Bois held that overt uprising was the only viable option. The fight for equality was led by W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. On the other hand, Washington believed DuBois caused more harm than good and simply served to enrage southern whites.
To know more about equal rights, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29761122
#SPJ4
A ship lost at sea for many days suddenly sighted a friendly vessel. From the mast of the unfortunate vessel was seen a signal, “Water, water; we die of thirst!” The answer from the friendly vessel at once came back, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” A second time the signal, “Water, water; send us water!” ran up from the distressed vessel, and was answered, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” And a third and fourth signal for water was answered, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” The captain of the distressed vessel, at last heeding the injunction, cast down his bucket, and it came up full of fresh, sparkling water from the mouth of the Amazon River. To those of my race who depend on bettering their condition in a foreign land or who underestimate the importance of cultivating friendly relations with the Southern white man, who is their next-door neighbor, I would say: “Cast down your bucket where you are”— cast it down in making friends in every manly way of the people of all races by whom we are surrounded."
Booker T. Washington, 1895
In this passage, Washington is urging African Americans to
Washington exhorts African Americans to collaborate more directly with whites throughout the South in this text. (option B)
What does he urge?In a well-known speech delivered in Atlanta in 1895, Washington advised African Americans to "lay down their buckets wherever you are. or to stay in the South with Jim Crow laws and put up with racial prejudice rather than making what he saw as impolite demands for equality.
Jesse Jackson became the initial major-party black contender to undertake nationwide primary campaign and win individual state primaries or caucuses in the presidential elections of 1984 and 1988. He ran for office as a Democrat.
To know more about African Americans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24318057
#SPJ1
Complete question: A ship that had been stranded at sea for days finally spotted a friendly ship. "Water, water; i die of thirst!" was signalled from the sad vessel's mast. The friendly vessel immediately responded, "Throw down your pail where you are." When the distressed ship cried out a second time, "Water, liquid; send us water," the response was "Throw down the bucket wherever you are. "Throw down the bucket where you are," was the response to a third and a fourth signal for water. When the captain of the struggling ship finally paid attention to the warning, he cast down his bucket and it was filled with clean, sparkling water from of the mouth of a Amazon River. Those who are my Cast down ones bucket where you are—cast it down in forming friendships in every manly way with the people of all races by which we are surrounded—to those of any race who rely on improving their condition in a foreign country or who undervalue the significance of cultivating cordial relations with Southern white man who is their next-door neighbour.
Booker T. Washington, 1895
In this passage, Washington is urging African Americans to
A) start a new life in South America.
B) work more with whites in the South.
C) start a revolution against United States.
D) form groups fight against the Ku Klux Klan.
B) work more with whites in the South.
briefly explain one major difference between williams's and gaddis's interpretations of the origins of the cold war.
One major difference between Williams's and Gaddis's interpretations of the origins of the Cold War is their view on the responsibility for the conflict.
Williams argues that the United States was primarily responsible for the onset of the Cold War due to its expansionist economic policies, such as the Marshall Plan and the Truman Doctrine, which threatened the Soviet Union's security and interests. He also emphasizes the role of ideology in shaping US foreign policy, particularly the belief in American exceptionalism and the need to spread capitalism and democracy globally.
Learn more about Gaddis's interpretations
https://brainly.com/question/23965186
#SPJ4
Which response best completes the graphic organizer to show reasons for
U.S. imperialism?
Reasons for U.S. Imperialism
?
One reason that show US imperialism is Establishing strategic military positions.
Other reasons - Seeking to expand global markets Promoting political and economic stabilityPursuing a civilizing missionUS expansionism -After the Civil War (1861-1865), America entered a period of reconstruction known as Reconstruction (1865-1877). After the Restoration, the United States entered the Gilded Age (1877-1900), during which the US economy experienced tremendous growth. As a result of this growth, the United States began looking to foreign markets to sell its products. In addition to exploring new markets, American imperialism was motivated by Social Darwinism, Manifest Destiny, and the Cold War.
To know more about US Imperialism -
https://brainly.com/question/715589
#SPJ1
colonization was extremely expensive. one of the major means the english used to offset the costs of this, most notably in the case of jamestown, was the use of:
The English used a variety of methods to offset the costs of colonization, most notably in the case of Jamestown.
One of these methods was the establishment of the Virginia Company of London, which was a joint-stock company that raised funds from investors to finance the settlement of Jamestown. The Virginia Company also provided incentives to settlers, such as land grants, to encourage immigration and settlement.
Additionally, the English government provided financial assistance and subsidies to the colony, and merchants and traders were able to make a profit by trading with the natives and selling goods to the colonists. Finally, the colonists were able to generate revenue through the cultivation of the land, the production of goods, and the sale of goods to England. Overall, the English used a combination of methods to offset the costs of colonization in Jamestown.
To know more about colonization, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ4
3. Briefly describe the crisis of Social Security today.
The crisis of Social Security today refers to the financial challenges faced by the Social Security system in the United States. The Social Security program, which provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to millions of Americans, is facing a funding shortfall due to a combination of factors such as demographic changes, longer life expectancy, declining birth rates, and increasing healthcare costs. The number of retirees has been increasing, while the number of workers paying into the system has been decreasing. This has put a strain on the Social Security Trust Fund, which is projected to be depleted by 2033, unless action is taken to address the issue. If this happens, benefits may have to be reduced by as much as 25% or taxes increased to maintain the program's solvency. The crisis of Social Security today is a complex issue that requires a comprehensive solution to ensure the financial stability of the program for future generations.
You said to open it briefly, but it was such an explanation, sorry
What was the "final stage" of communism under Mao Zedong.
A. world domination
B. classless society
C. defeating the USSR
D. the death of Mao Zedong
Answer: D
Explanation:
NEED HELP ASAP - Nativism
1. Definition: Your definition of nativism in your own words.
2. Characteristics: Key ideas or features that makes up nativism.
3. Examples/Models: Examples of nativism from around the world.
4. Non-Examples: Examples from around the world of what nativism is not.
Answer:
1.Nativism is a political and social ideology that emphasizes the interests and rights of native-born inhabitants over those of immigrants.
2.
The key ideas that make up nativism include:
Cultural superiority: Nativists believe that their own culture is superior to that of other cultures and that immigrants pose a threat to their way of life.
Economic protectionism: Nativists often advocate for policies that protect native-born workers and businesses, such as tariffs and immigration restrictions.
Xenophobia: Nativists are often fearful or hostile towards immigrants, particularly those from cultures that are perceived as different or threatening.
Nationalism: Nativism is often associated with a strong sense of national identity and a desire to protect that identity from outside influences.
Anti-immigration sentiment: Nativists generally support restrictive immigration policies, including stricter border controls, deportation of undocumented immigrants, and limits on legal immigration.
3.
Nativism has been a part of American political and social discourse since the colonial era. Some historical examples of nativism in the United States include:
The Know-Nothing Party: This was a political party that emerged in the 1850s and was primarily focused on limiting the political power and influence of immigrants, particularly Catholics.
The Chinese Exclusion Act: This federal law, passed in 1882, prohibited Chinese immigrants from coming to the United States and was the first significant federal law restricting immigration.
The Immigration Act of 1924: This law established quotas on the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from various countries and favored immigrants from Western and Northern Europe over those from Southern and Eastern Europe.
The Red Scare: This was a period of intense anti-communist hysteria in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s that led to the persecution of many immigrants, particularly those from Eastern Europe and Asia.
The modern anti-immigrant movement: In recent years, nativist sentiment has been fueled by concerns about illegal immigration, particularly from Latin America and the Middle East, and has led to the rise of groups like the Minutemen and the Tea Party.
4. Some examples of things that are not considered nativism include:
A preference for one's own cultural traditions: While many nativists do believe in the superiority of their own culture, simply valuing one's own cultural traditions is not the same as nativism.
Support for border security or immigration enforcement: While nativists often advocate for stricter border controls and tougher immigration policies, not all supporters of these measures are motivated by nativist sentiment.
Concerns about national security: While fears of terrorism or other threats to national security can sometimes overlap with nativist sentiment, not all such concerns are rooted in a desire to protect native-born inhabitants at the expense of immigrants.
Advocacy for assimilation or integration: While some nativists may call for immigrants to assimilate or integrate into American society, this is not inherently a nativist idea and can be motivated by a desire for social cohesion or cultural harmony.
Criticism of specific immigration policies: While some critics of specific immigration policies may be labeled as nativists, it is important to evaluate their arguments on their own merits rather than assuming that all criticism of immigration is motivated by nativist sentiment.
One reason the ""land bridge"" theory is losing credibility is the fact that
Geneticist Jennifer Raff hypothesizes that early settlers to the Americas most likely traveled along what is known as the Kelp Highway rather than traversing the Bering Land Bridge on foot. The coastal route hypothesis is another name for this.
According to one scientific theory, the ancestors of today's Native Americans crossed this land bridge by foot before making their way south by following crevasses in the ice in pursuit of food. According to recent research, some people might have traveled by boat along prehistoric coasts.
The issue is that although the Bering land bridge theory continues to be by far the most widely accepted among archaeologists and paleogeneticists as to when and how Indigenous people first migrated to the Americas, the idea that the migration may have taken place "only" 14,500 years ago has been interpreted by the alt-right, the alt-lite, and many regular people as evidence that Indigenous peoples have no special claim to the hemisphere.
To learn more about Land Bridge Theory, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29470439
#SPJ4
how did world war 1 changed american history
3. What are some policies toward Jews that were instituted by the Nazis? What was the goal
of the Holocaust?
Antisemitism and the persecution of Jews were the main/central tenets of the Nazi ideology.
In 1920, the Nazi Party members publicly declared their intention to segregate Jews from “The Aryan” society and to abrogate their political, legal, and civil rights.
The goal of the holocaust was to get rid of the Jew minority, ROMAs and other minorities that were not German, per short the goal was to create a Nazi Germany with just ethnic Germans.
Policies:
German law restricted the number of Jewish students at German schools and universities.
Government agencies at all levels aimed to exclude Jews from the economic sphere of Germany by preventing them from earning a living.
In 1937 and 1938, German authorities again stepped up legislative persecution of German Jews, starting the "Holocaust"
Hope this was enough, Brainliest would be much appreciated.
Hello can anyone answer the questions 10-12. I would appreciate all the help I can get! Have a blessed day:)
The German submarines (U-boat) U-20 attacked and sunk the British cruise liner Lusitania on May 7, 1915.
Was the Lusitania's captain held accountable?Bluebell pulled Captain Turner out of the sea. Turner was purportedly to blame for the loss of the Lusitania, but the Mersey Inquiry subsequent Mayer proceedings from New York City to Liverpool, England, cleared Turner.
What was the Lusitania controversy?The sinking incident has also been a source of debate, with theories that the Lusitania may have been put in danger on purpose to draw the United States into the conflict and that her cargo may have contained unreported war armaments.
To know more about Lusitania visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29232786
#SPJ1
what emerged as the core concerns of the webster-hayne debate? multiple select question. nullification settlement of the west states' rights
The core concerns of the Webster-Hayne debate were states' rights and nullification. So the answer is states' rights and nullification.
The core concerns of the Webster-Hayne debate as follows :
States' Rights: This was a central issue in the debate, with Hayne arguing that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, while Webster argued that the federal government had ultimate authority and that the Constitution was a compact between the states and the federal government.
Nullification: Hayne argued that nullification was a legitimate means for states to resist federal authority, while Webster argued that nullification was unconstitutional and would lead to the dissolution of the Union.
Therefore, the correct answer is: States' Rights and Nullification. Settlement of the West was not a core concern of the Webster-Hayne debate.
For more questions on: nullification
https://brainly.com/question/887694
#SPJ11
in response to the sinking of the lusitania, woodrow wilson a. denounced british violations of neutrality rights. b. demanded the immediate end to submarine warfare. c. ordered a new battleship-building program. d. called on congress to declare war on germany.
Submarine warfare had to halt right away after the passenger ship Lusitania sank. Wilson sought an apology from Germany and maintained his impartial stance for as long as he could. Hence (b) is the colrrect option.
Yet the unrestrained submarine warfare of Germany was an unforgivable insult to American pride and dignity. Theodore Roosevelt sought immediate action, while President Woodrow Wilson preferred to move cautiously and maintain his neutrality. Germany supported its aggression by arguing that Lusitania had transported weapons and other supplies for the war and was thus fair game. Britain and the United States were horrified by the sinking of the Lusitania and denounced it as a flagrant infraction of the prohibition on attacks on passenger ships set forth by international law.
To know more about sank, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30236549
#SPJ4
In response to the sinking of the lusitania, woodrow wilson:
a. denounced british violations of neutrality rights.
b. demanded the immediate end to submarine warfare.
c. ordered a new battleship-building program.
d. called on congress to declare war on germany.
escribe una anecdota divertida que te alla pasado
Una vez, estaba en una reunión con mis amigos en una casa. Decidimos jugar un juego de mesa y, después de unas horas, nos dimos cuenta de que alguien había desaparecido. Buscamos por todas partes y finalmente encontramos a nuestro amigo dormido debajo de la mesa, con la cabeza sobre el tablero del juego. Resulta que estaba tan concentrado en el juego que se quedó dormido allí mismo. Todos nos reímos al verlo y ahora siempre lo recordamos como uno de los momentos más divertidos de nuestras reuniones.