Describe the electoral process in primary and general elections?

Answer:

Primary:The primaries are elections between candidates of the same party with the purpose of electing one candidate in the November general election. Candidates should register by a pre-determined deadline in order to appear in their state’s primaries ballot.

General:within their parties, candidates square off against other parties. The highest elected office in the general election is the Presidency,

Explanation:

Hope it helps:)

5. And if these laws have been made they have to be enforced by a body called executive, and when these laws are broken or disobeyed, there are courts of law to interpret and apply the laws to individual cases, is called the mental organizations (NGO) that operates in the

answer:

​

the federalist system created under the constitution was designed to limit governmental power by creating a second layer of sovereignty in

explain term sadness
bye :-(​

How are taking photographs and making casts similar? How are they different?

What does a single solid white line mean?

1. Under the Obama Administration, what did the Justice Department allow states to do in regards to marijuana?


2. What issue is still present when it comes to a citizen in a legalized state and the federal government?


3. What is stopping the Attorney General from prosecuting people in legalized states?

What is the level of punishment for criminal attempt?

in a diversity case, federal trial courts are required to apply a _______ when considering a motion for a new trial based on the excessiveness of the verdict.

The United States is one of only eight countries in the world that does what?

O Gives women the right to vote

O Allows changes to their Constitution

O Does not have mandated maternity leave

O Allovws new mothers to stay home with their babies for at least 12 weeks

20 points, 1 question , some reading
Jordan has been following an important case since the beginning. He wrote about the crime, arrest, and guilty verdict. He is preparing to cover sentencing and hopes to meet with the victim for background information.

Jordan tries calling the victim several times. In response, he gets an angry call from the victim advocate demanding he respect the victim’s privacy. Flustered, Jordan stammers out an apology. Then he suggests that running his story might mean the victim gets more support and fewer questions from people in the long run.

The next day, the advocate says the victim will speak with Jordan if he provides a list of questions in advance. She explains that some members of the victim’s family have complicated immigration statuses and feel uneasy about any focus on the family. A few family members are also concerned about reprisals from the offender's friends.

Jordan sends the questions to the advocate. The next day he gets an email from the victim's sister with detailed answers to the questions. Jordan thanks her and starts writing so he can submit his story before the sentencing hearing. Shortly after he finishes his story, the advocate calls him. She says the family is angry the sister sent so much information, and they do not want it revealed.

Would publishing the piece violate the victim’s legal rights?

please dot give a wrong answer for the points :(

The principle of
was established in the court case Marbury v Madison
O Judicial Activism
O Judicial Restraint
O Judicial Review
O Judicial jurisdiction