Fast indeed help on this !! ( ty )

Check the picture below.

Answer:

1 / 3^2 = 1/9

Step-by-step explanation:

3^-5 = 1/3^5

(1/3^5) * (3^3) = 3^3 / 1/3^5 = 3^3 / 3^5 = 1/3^2

The value of the given expression is 1/9 .

Given,

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{3} )[/tex]

According to the power rule,

[tex](a^{m}) (a^{n} ) = a^{m + n}[/tex]

Now,

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{2}) = 3^{-5 + 3}\\ \\ (3^{-5}) (3^{2}) = 3^{-2}[/tex]

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{2}) = 1/3^{2}[/tex]

[tex](3^{-5}) (3^{2} ) = 1/9[/tex]

Thus with the power rule answer will be 1/9.

Learn more about power rule,

https://brainly.com/question/23418174

#SPJ6

[tex]Hiya![/tex]

Sokka is here to help!

I believe it is A..

Hopefully, this helps you!!!

[tex]Sokka[/tex]

Answer:

Option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question said "Opposite numbers and the sum of those numbers is 0". Let's see if Option B has these abilities.

=> Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.

Answer:

g = he - 10h

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

18 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

9 miles : 45 minutes

? miles : 90 minutes

45 x 2 = 90 minutes

9 x 2 = 18 miles

Here according to angle sum property all angles sum u up 180°

So,

[tex]8x + 2 + 60 + 70 = 180 \\ 8x + 132 = 180 \\ 8x = 180 - 132 \\ 8x = 48 \\ x = \frac{48}{8} \\ x = 6[/tex]

- BRAINLIEST answerer

Using a system of equations, the height of the tree would be 12.80 meters.

Equating the height and shadows of the tree and pole :

Height of pole / shadow of pole = height of tree / shadow of tree

Representing the equation thus :

Let the height of the tree = h

3/4 = h/17

Cross multiply

4h = 17 × 3

4h = 51

Divide both sides by 4

h = 51/4

h = 12.75.

Hence, the height of the tree to the nearest tenth of a meter is 12.80 meters.

Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/25562438

Step-by-step explanation:

To multiply fractions:

Multiply numerator to numerator and multiply denominator to denominator. Simplify the answer.

To multiply mixed numbers:

Change mixed numbers into improper fraction. Then multiply numerator and denominator just like how you multiply the fractions. Simplify.

Answer:

f(g(- 3) ) = - 5115

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluate g(- 3) then substitute the value obtained into f(x)

g(- 3) = (- 3)² + 6(- 3) - 7 = 9 - 18 - 7 = - 16 , then

f(- 16) = (- 16)³ - 4(- 16)² + 5

        = - 4096 - 4(256) + 5

        = - 4096 - 1024 + 5

        = - 5115

Answer:

so the answer is bar graph..

Answer:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 5}f(x)=-5\\\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x)=3\\\lim_{x \to 1^+} f(x)=3\\\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)=4\\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 5}f(x)[/tex]

This means "the limit of f(x) as x approaches 5"

In this case, f(x) is a basic linear function while x > 1, so a limit is not necessary but it can still be used as it is here. For this one, you can just calculate f(5), and that is:

[tex]f(x)=5-2x[/tex]

[tex]f(5)=5-2(5)=5-10=-5[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{x \to 5}f(x)=-5[/tex]

===================

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x)[/tex]

This one is a little different. It means "the limit of f(x) as x approaches 1 from the negative (left) direction"

The negative direction of course means x will be less than 1, so we'll use this function:

[tex]f(x)=4-x[/tex]

It's easier if you graph it, but you can also do it like this:

[tex]f(0)=4+0=4\\f(0.5)=4-0.5=3.5\\f(0.75)=4-0.75=3.25\\f(0.9)=4-0.9=3.1\\f(0.99)=4-0.99=3.01[/tex]

There's a clear pattern there. You can see that f(1) should be 3, but this function only applies while x is less than 1 so it can never reach 3. It will get infinitely close, and that can be shown with the limit:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x)=3[/tex]

===================

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^+} f(x)[/tex]

This one works the same way, but from the positive (right) direction.

[tex]f(2)=5-4=1\\f(1.5)=5-3=2\\f(1.25)=5-2.5=2.5\\f(1.1)=5-2.2=2.8\\f(1.01)=5-2.02=2.98\\f(1.001)=5-2.002=2.998[/tex]

It will also get infinitely close to 3 when x = 1, but won't ever reach it because this function only applies when x is greater than 1.

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1^+} f(x)=3[/tex]

===================

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)[/tex]

Here, the function for x=1 is just:

[tex]f(x)=4[/tex]

It's given already, so the limit is just:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)=4[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

1=56⁰

2=56⁰

3=68⁰

4=68⁰

5=56⁰

6=112⁰

7=180-124 Ans=56⁰

8=68+56 Ans=124⁰

9=68⁰

10=112⁰

11=124⁰

12=56⁰

Using error concepts for hypothesis tests, it is found that there is a Type I error.

A Type I error happens when a true null hypothesis is rejected.

A Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis is not-rejected.

In this problem, the null hypothesis is:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 24[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 24[/tex]

He concludes that the mean age is over 24 when it is not, that is, a true null hypothesis is rejected, hence there is a Type I error.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/25225353

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

45 minutes is 3/4 hr.

(3/4)(12 + b) = 9 + 3b/4 miles

==========================================

Explanation:

A) This is true because there are 4 cups of green and 2 cups of white. Each box represents 1 cup.

B) This is false. The ratio 4:2 reduces to 2:1 when describing the ratio of green to white. We have twice as many green compared to white. Choice B describes the other way around. The order is important.

C) This is true. We have 2 cups of white and 4 cups of green.

D) False. There are 6 cups total, but only 2 white (not 4).

E) True. This is a verbal way of describing the ratio 4:2, of green to white.

F) False. The ratio is the other way around. See choice E.

G) False. There are 4 cups of green, not 6. There are 6 cups total, not 4. The ratio of green to total is 4:6.

H) True. We have 2 cups of white and 2+4 = 6 cups total.

The numbers are 30, 22, and 66 if the sum of three numbers is 118. The second number is 8 less than the first. The third number is 3 times the second.

It is defined as the relation between two variables, if we plot the graph of the linear equation we will get a straight line.

If in the linear equation, one variable is present, then the equation is known as the linear equation in one variable.

Let's suppose the number are x, y and z

Then,

x + y + z = 118  ...(1)

y = x - 8   ...(2)

z = 3y  ....(3)

After solving the above three equation by plugging the value of z in the equation (1) then solve this equation with (2) we will get:

x = 30

y = 22

Then z from the equation (3):

z = 3(22) = 66

Thus, the numbers are 30, 22, and 66 if the sum of three numbers is 118. The second number is 8 less than the first. The third number is 3 times the second.

Learn more about the linear equation here:

brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ1

Answer:

Well I’m not sure what Answers do you want

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D  [tex]\sqrt{x+4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5.72

Step-by-step explanation:

(-16.75 + 16.75) = 0

0 + 5.72= 5.72

Therefore, the answer is 5.72

Answer:

To Decrease an amount in a given Ratio, we need to multiply by a fraction that is less than one. For example, in scaling down a recipe for four people into a recipe for 3 people, we would use the ratio of 3 : 4 which means we would multiply all our recipe amounts.

Answer:

37

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know if this is totally correct

ATQ,

★⤿ 8(x+9) ≥ 224

★⤿ x+9 ≥ 224/8

★⤿ x +9 ≥ 28

★⤿ x ≥ 28-9

★⤿ x ≥ 19

Hence , option A is correct ✓

Answer:

6 candies

Step-by-step explanation:

(find unit rate, cost / quantity)

35/10 = 3.5

20/3.5 = = 5.7142857142857

candies cannot be in decimal so you must round to the nearest whole

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

3.45x+2*1.65+5>=20

3.45x+8.3>=20

3.45x>=11.7

after rounding

x>=3

Answer:

14.87

Step-by-step explanation:

Para conocer cual es la fuerza que necesita el cuerpo para aumentar su velocidad de 5 m/s a 12 m/s en 8 m

Necesitamos conocer la aceleración y para conocer la aceleración debemos saber cuanto tiempo tarda en recorrer los 8m

Vf = Vo +a(t)

12 = 5 +a(t) -------> Vamos a despejar el tiempo.

t = 7/a

X= Vo(t) +1/2a(t²)

X= 5(7/a)+1/2a( 7/a )²

8 = 35/a+49/2a

a = 7.43 m/s²  

Ahora que conocemos la aceleración podemos calcular la fuerza como:

F = m*a

F = 7.43 * 2 kg.

F = 14.87

Answer:

90081???

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is B, The elevation is a nonlinear function because it does not have a constant rate of change.

Step-by-step explanation: