Gitlow v. New York was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in 1925 that established the principle of selective incorporation, which is the idea that certain provisions of the Bill of Rights are applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In Gitlow v. New York, the Court considered the case of Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist who had been arrested and convicted under New York's criminal anarchy law for distributing left-wing literature. Gitlow argued that his right to free speech, which was protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, had been violated.
The Supreme Court agreed with Gitlow and ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment "incorporated" the freedom of speech guarantee of the First Amendment, thereby making it applicable to the states. This decision had significant implications for the protection of individual rights and liberties in the United States, as it paved the way for the selective incorporation of other provisions of the Bill of Rights over time.
To know more about incorporation click here:
brainly.com/question/814339
#SPJ4
What is the maximum number of years that a person can serve as President of the US?
The amendment limits a president's tenure to 10 years. A person who succeeds in the presidency without an election and holds the position for less than two years is eligible to run for two full terms; otherwise, they are only permitted to hold the position for one elected term.
What is meant by amendment?Essentially a correction is what an amendment is. There are numerous types of it, including the process of changing something through either parliamentary or constitutional procedure. The phrase "modification to the U.S. Constitution" is frequently used in the country. A contract or other legal instrument can be amended to add new clauses or change existing ones. An amendment frequently consists of a tack-on or a fix that largely keeps the original intact tact.The first ten Constitutional Amendments are collectively known as the Bill of Rights. It explains how Americans should interact with their government. Freedom of speech, the press, and religion are just a few of the civil rights and liberties that are guaranteed to the individual.To learn more about the amendment, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/687600
which group achieved the right to vote in the twenty-sixth amendment?
What are subcommittees responsible for?
Subcommittees are smaller groups of members of a legislative body, such as a committee in the United States Congress. Subcommittees are responsible for reviewing and conducting hearings on specific issues related to the larger committee's jurisdiction.
They are also responsible for developing legislation and making recommendations to the larger committee for consideration. Subcommittees provide a more focused and specialized approach to legislative work, allowing for more in-depth analysis and discussion of particular issues. Subcommittees often include members with expertise or interest in the specific issue being considered, and their work helps to inform the larger legislative process by providing detailed information and recommendations to the full committee.
To know more about Subcommittees click here:
brainly.com/question/9528412
#SPJ4
a tree in connie’s yard fell during the last storm and damaged her neighbor’s car. connie did not have insurance that covered this type of accident and has not paid the neighbor for the damage. the neighbor has decided to sue connie in court. which type of lawsuit would this be?
This would be a civil lawsuit for property damage.
The neighbor is seeking compensation from Connie for the damage to their car that was caused by the fallen tree on Connie's property. The neighbor would need to prove that Connie was negligent in maintaining her property and that this negligence led to the damage to the car. The outcome of the lawsuit will depend on the evidence presented by both parties and the decision of the judge or jury.
Since Connie did not have insurance that covered this type of accident, she may be held personally responsible for the damages caused. The neighbor would need to provide evidence of the damage caused and the cost of repairs in order to successfully pursue this type of lawsuit.
To know more about lawsuit click here:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
Ethics in workplace between Employer and Employee
When making ethical decisions on behalf of your employer, should you consider the impact those decisions may have on others outside your employer? If so, who and why?
Then consider ‘what if’ decisions made by your employer conflicted with your own morals and ethics. What would you do? What should you do? Explain why and provide real life examples if you have ever experienced this type of conflict.
Absolutely, an ethical choice made by the employer should take into account how it will affect all parties involved, including the community, suppliers, and customers.
What choices do stakeholders make in an ethical manner?Stakeholder-based ethical decision-making offers a framework for assessing the available options or alternatives. Prior to making a decision, this strategy also calls for a knowledge of the potential effects on all of the stakeholders.
What effect does work ethics have on both employers and employees?A company that implements a workplace ethics programme aligns employee behaviour. This encourages transparency, collaboration, and trust as a result. Also, workers perform better at their professions when they are aware of the expectations of their superiors.
To know more about ethical visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ1
We are an organization that strongly supports the 2nd Amendment and we prepare responsible American gun owners to avoid danger, save lives, and keep their loved ones safe. Tell us how our mission resonates with you.
The mission of this organization, which fervently supports the Second Amendment by educating "responsible American gun owners to prevent danger, save lives, and keep their loved ones safe," is timely given that society has recently experienced issues due to the misuse of guns rather than their proper use for defense.
What guarantees does the second amendment provide?The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states that no one's right to keep and bear arms shall be infringed because a well-regulated militia is vital to the security of a free State.
Its objective is to protect an individual's right to own a handgun for non-military uses and to use such a weapon for legal purposes such as self-defense within the home.
How does the organization's mission relate to ours?Despite the fact that the United States Constitution enables individuals to acquire and possess firearms, we do not agree that there are organisations that focus on training citizens to use weapons since we consider that this is a measure that may generate danger in society. Additionally, we think that the state should have the legal ability to use guns to protect its citizens. It should also give them with security.
Learn more about second amendment: https://brainly.com/question/29894002
#SPJ1
what is proctor’s main purpose in bringing mary warren to court in act iii of the crucible?
In Act III of The Crucible, Proctor's main purpose in bringing Mary Warren to court is to prove that the accusations of witchcraft are false and to save his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, from being convicted.
Mary Warren, who is one of the girls accusing people of witchcraft, had previously admitted that their accusations were false, but she is now too afraid to speak out against the other girls. Proctor believes that if Mary Warren testifies in court and tells the truth, the accusations will be exposed as fraudulent and his wife will be cleared of any wrongdoing.However, Mary is afraid of Abigail and the other girls and eventually breaks down, claiming that Proctor is the devil's man. Proctor's attempt to expose the truth is thwarted, and he is ultimately arrested for witchcraft himself.
To know more about witchcraft click here:
brainly.com/question/8159939
#SPJ4
which was a direct political change that resulted from the industrial revolution?
The Reform Bill of 1832 was a significant political turning point brought on by the Industrial Revolution. A movement to increase the representation of the populace in Parliament was launched in November 1830 by the Whig party's leader, an aristocrat named Charles, Lord Grey (1764–1845).
What is meant by industrial revolution?The Industrial Revolution, which took place between roughly 1760 and about 1820–1840, was the adoption of new manufacturing techniques in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States. The world as we knew it underwent a profound transformation with each of these three technological advances: the steam engine, the era of science and mass production, and the rise of digital technology.An agrarian economy gave way to an industrial economy during the Industrial Revolution, where machines as well as humans were used to produce goods. As a result, there was an uptick in output and efficiency, as well as a decrease in prices, an increase in available commodities, higher earnings, and a migration of people from rural to urban regions.To learn more about industrial revolution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14240244
which statements accurately describe the implications of a good samaritan law for a registered nurse? select all that apply. a nurse who provided out of scope care is not protected by the good samaritan law such laws are universally worded so as to minimize differences between jurisdiction. a nurse can be held responsible for a person's injuries if he or she does not intervene. a nurse has a legal responsibility to provide emergency services to be protected, nurses must provide care that is within their legal scope of practice.
The Good Samaritan Law provides legal protection for nurses who provide emergency care.
The following statements accurately describe the implications of a Good Samaritan Law for a registered nurse: a nurse who provided out of scope care is not protected by the Good Samaritan Law, a nurse can be held responsible for a person's injuries if he or she does not intervene, and to be protected, nurses must provide care that is within their legal scope of practice.
The Good Samaritan law is legislation that protects individuals who voluntarily provide emergency aid from being sued for medical malpractice. It provides protection from liability for injuries caused by acts of commission or omission during a declared emergency, provided the healthcare provider acts in good faith.The implications of the Good Samaritan Law for a registered nurse are as follows:a nurse who provided out of scope care is not protected by the Good Samaritan Law.
Learn more about The Good Samaritan Law: brainly.com/question/13160856
#SPJ11
what was a unique qualification about ronald reagan’s presidential candidacy compared to others who preceded him?
Unique limitation of Ronald Reagan's presidential run was that he was an actor.
Political figure and the 40th President of the United States, Ronald Reagan. He was among the most influential conservatives of the modern era. Ronald stood out from the other presidential nominees because he had previously worked as an actor. This made him unique among those vying for the same position.
According to President Reagan, 60% of Americans who at the time believed that their defense spending was insufficient vowed to rebuild the nation's military power. Reagan also pledged to put an end to "trustworthy government" and to implement supply-side economic policies in order to revive the economy.
More jobs and tax revenue result from policies that promote growth in the production of goods and services. Reagan supported a balanced budget, supply-side economic policies, and higher defense spending. Democratic discontent with Carter, the Iranian hostage situation, and a faltering domestic economy characterized by stagflation all helped his campaign.
Learn more about Ronald Reagan at:
brainly.com/question/2352947
#SPJ4
a form of government in which power is held by the people, who vote to elect their representatives.
Democratic is a form of government in which power is held by the people, who vote to elect their representatives.
Since "democracy" is derived from the Greek words "demos," which means "people," and "kratos," which means "power," democracy can be defined as a form of government that is based on the will of the people. The ability of the people to choose their leaders is the primary characteristic of a democracy. So, in a sense, a democracy is a form of popular rule. The fundamental tenet is that by taking part in the creation of these rules, people rule themselves. democracy in our governments.
Since the people elect their representatives as Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs), they hold the primary power in a democracy. The members of the ruling party then form the government, with some of them being named ministers.
Learn more about democracy at:
brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
In general, Congress is most willing to defer to the President in
The field of foreign policy is generally where Congress is most likely to defer to the President.
What are the President's duties?The President picks the leaders of federal agencies, including the Cabinet, with the goal of putting into effect and upholding the laws passed by Congress. Also a member of the Executive Branch, the Vice President is prepared to take over as President if necessary.The CEO is the top-ranking official, followed by a president as the next-highest official.In each survey, Abraham Lincoln has received the highest score, followed by George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Theodore Roosevelt, who have always placed in the top five. James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, and Franklin Pierce have had the lowest scores throughout all four surveys.To learn more about the President's duties, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29638611
Please help me with this form.
Premium Court pays District of Columbia (DC) unemployment tax and makes the required deposits of both federal and state unemployment taxes on a timely basis.
DC applies a rate of 0.7 percent to the first $9,000 of wages per employee and thus Premium Court paid state unemployment taxes of $496.30 to DC in 2022. DC is not subject to a credit reduction and there was no overpayment of FUTA in 2021. Use this information to complete Parts 1-4 (as necessary) of Form 940.
1b. If you had to pay state unemployment tax in more than one state, you are a multi-state employer
1b. Check here
Complete Schedule A
How to present the informationBased on the information provided, Premium Court only paid state unemployment tax in one state, which is the District of Columbia (DC).
Therefore, they are not considered a multi-state employer.
The response to the given questions should be:
1a. If you had to pay state unemployment tax in one state only, enter the state abbreviation.
1a. DC
1b. If you had to pay state unemployment tax in more than one state, you are a multi-state employer
1b. Check here
Complete Schedule A
Leave this section blank, as Premium Court is not a multi-state employer.
Read more about tax here:
https://brainly.com/question/1775528
#SPJ1
what is the official retirement age, according to the us government? a) 67. b) 68. c) 69. d) 70.
The official retirement age, according to the US government, is a) 67.
What is the official retiement age ?This refers to the age at which individuals are eligible to receive full Social Security retirement benefits.
While individuals may choose to begin receiving benefits as early as age 62, their monthly benefit amount will be reduced if they choose to do so before reaching full retirement age. Conversely, if individuals choose to delay their retirement beyond full retirement age, their monthly benefit amount may be increased.
Find out more on retirement age at https://brainly.com/question/30331927
#SPJ1
law regulates the structure and administration of government agencies and their relationships with citizens, employees, and other governments. a. criminal b. public c. private d. civil
Law regulates the structure and administration of government agencies and their relationships with citizens, employees, and other governments is Public Law. (B)
Public law regulates the structure and administration of government agencies and their relationships with citizens, employees, and other governments. It covers areas such as constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, and international law.
Public law establishes the power of the government and ensures the protection of individual rights. It sets out the roles and responsibilities of government bodies, defines the limits of their authority, and establishes procedures to ensure the fair and equitable enforcement of laws.
It also governs the relationships between governments and citizens, as well as between governments and other governments.(B)
To know more about Public Law click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31145481#
#SPJ11
(T/F) products liability laws that cover individuals who are injured by a product may take the form of state common law or state statutes.
The stated statement is untrue since product liability laws, often known as laws that protect people damaged by-products, can be either state common law or state legislation.
What is meant by legislation?The act or outcome of a legislature, parliament, or other comparable governing body creating, ratifying, or promulgating laws is known as legislation. A piece of legislation may first be referred to as a bill before it is passed into law. While it is still being considered, it may also be referred to generally as "legislation" to set it apart from other activity. Many different things can be accomplished with legislation, including regulating, authorizing, outlawing, providing (funds), sanctioning, granting, declaring, and restricting. An administrative or executive entity acting in accordance with a legislative act may compare it to a non-legislative act. The term "legislation" is a generic one that refers to both laws made by individuals or organizations with the permission of the Parliament as well as laws passed by parliaments.To learn more about legislation, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
in roe v. wade (1973) the u.s. supreme court ruled a. that the right to privacy extends to an abortion b. women have a right to an abortion at any time during a pregnancy c. to legalize abortion with regulations to consider the interests of the mother, the state and the unborn child d. only a and b e. only a and c
Answer:
e. only a and c.
Explanation:
In the landmark case Roe v. Wade (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy extends to an abortion, and that the Constitution protects a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. However, the Court also ruled that the right to an abortion is not absolute, and that the state has a legitimate interest in regulating abortion to protect the health of the mother and the potential life of the fetus. The Court established a trimester framework for evaluating state abortion regulations, with greater state restrictions on abortion permitted as the pregnancy progresses.
What do lawsuits related to performance management usually involve?
Charges of discrimination or unfair termination are frequently included in lawsuits brought against performance management.
What is meant by lawsuits?In a civil court of law, a lawsuit is a legal action brought by one or more persons (the plaintiff or claimant) against one or more other parties (the defendant). The ancient term "suit in law" is present in just a tiny number of laws still in effect today.A $206 billion tobacco settlement was reached in 1998. The largest legal settlement ever reached was the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement, which was signed in November 1998. You can seek justice for any losses or harm physical or emotional you may have suffered as a result of the other party's acts by bringing a lawsuit. The party that you are suing will be referred to as the defendant and you as the one who is making the claim will be referred to as the plaintiff.To learn more about lawsuits, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27880380
which u.s. supreme court case involved a family suing a school system saying the segregation of schools was unfair and was hurting children?
The U.S. Supreme Court case that involved a family suing a school system saying the segregation of schools was unfair and was hurting children was Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
The Brown v. Board of Education case was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that American state laws that established segregation in public schools are unconstitutional. It was a pivotal moment in the civil rights movement that challenged racial segregation in the United States.In 1951, Oliver Brown, a black father in Topeka, Kansas, tried to enroll his daughter, Linda Brown, in the white-only Sumner Elementary School.
The school system denied Linda's enrollment due to her race, which required her to attend the black-only Monroe Elementary School. The Browns, along with twelve other Topeka families, filed a lawsuit against the Board of Education of Topeka Public Schools.
You can learn more about Brown v. Board of Education (1954) at
https://brainly.com/question/11960172
#SPJ11
what is an exception to the statute of frauds? collateral promises contracts dealing with land promissory estoppel contracts under the ucc
Collateral promises made in connection with a primary agreement, contracts for the sale of goods over $500 under the UCC, and contracts where one party has reasonably relied on the other's promise.
Collateral promises refer to promises made by a third party to guarantee the performance of a primary obligation between two parties. These promises can be oral or written and are often made to provide additional security to a creditor. Collateral promises are an exception to the Statute of Frauds, which requires certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. In such cases, the collateral promise can be enforced even if the primary agreement is not in writing. However, for the collateral promise to be enforceable, it must be made in connection with the primary obligation and must be for the benefit of the promisor. Collateral promises are common in loan agreements, where a third party agrees to be responsible for the debt of the borrower if they default.
Learn more about Collateral promises here:
https://brainly.com/question/26985573
#SPJ1
India is blessed with a vibrant wildlife and ecosystem, which is often subject to
indiscriminate exploitation by unscrupulous elements of society including business organizations. Briefly explain any 5 (five) legislations that are related to environment protection or conservation
equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
This clause guarantees equal protection under the law for all citizens, regardless of race, gender, religion, or other factors. It also prohibits states from denying certain fundamental rights and privileges to certain classes of people. This is an important component of the American civil rights system.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is a crucial part of the US Constitution that protects people's rights to equal protection under the law regardless of their background. This clause was added to the Constitution in 1868 and has been used in several landmark Supreme Court cases to strike down discriminatory laws and policies.
Section 1- All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
To know more about Equal Protection Clause, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30190596#
#SPJ11
___________makes it easier for employees to win discrimination lawsuits
There are several factors that can make it easier for employees to win discrimination lawsuits, but one of the most important is evidence.
Evidence can take many forms, including documentation of discriminatory actions, witness testimony, and statistical data that shows patterns of discrimination. When employees have strong evidence to support their claims of discrimination, they are more likely to be successful in court. Additionally, having a clear and comprehensive anti-discrimination policy in place can also strengthen an employee's case. This policy can serve as evidence that the employer was aware of the discriminatory behavior and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it. Overall, having solid evidence and a strong anti-discrimination policy can significantly increase the likelihood of success in a discrimination lawsuit.
To know more about lawsuits click here:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
Who was involved in the Loving vs Virginia?
Two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man was involved in the Loving vs Virginia.
Mildred Jeter, a black woman from Virginia, wed Richard Loving, a white man, in the District of Columbia in 1958. Soon after, the Lovings went back to Virginia. Following that, the couple was accused of breaking the state's anti-miscegenation law, which outlawed inter-racial unions.
In a unanimous 9-0 decision in the Lovings' favor on June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court overturned their criminal convictions and invalidated Virginia's anti-miscegenation law. Chief justice Earl Warren penned the opinion for the court, and all of the justices concurred.
A unanimous Supreme Court overturned state laws that forbade interracial unions, ruling that these anti-miscegenation laws were in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Learn more about Loving vs Virginia at:
brainly.com/question/28957766
#SPJ4
One of the hosts of the video claims that the trickiest weather condition you'll encounter is ___________ .
The trickiest weather condition that an individual may encounter is an adverse weather conditions in which this type of weather produces effects that makes an individual to find it difficult to go out or see, examples of this is when there are conditions such as snow, ice, rain or fog.
The question is asking about the trickiest weather conditions according to a host in a video. This generally refers to unpredictable and severe weather like tornadoes, hurricanes or blizzards.
Explanation:The subject of the question is related to weather conditions, which typically falls under Geography. The tricky part of this question is that it does not provide more specific details about the host's claim but in general, hosts often refer to severe and unpredictable weather conditions like tornadoes, hurricanes or blizzards as the trickiest weather conditions. These conditions can be tricky because of the high level of unpredictability and the rapid changes that can occur.
Learn more about trickiest weather conditions here:https://brainly.com/question/32509576
#SPJ2
what is one impact of third parties in american politics?
One impact of third parties in American politics is that they can serve as a "spoiler" or influence the outcome of an election.
In a winner-takes-all system like that used in most U.S. elections, a third-party candidate who receives even a small percentage of the vote can potentially swing the election in favor of one major party or the other. This can happen if the third-party candidate attracts voters who might otherwise have supported one of the major-party candidates.
Third parties can also help bring attention to issues and ideas that may be ignored by the major parties, and can serve as a check on the power of those parties. However, third-party candidates often face significant barriers to entry, such as difficulty in getting on the ballot and lack of media coverage, which can limit their ability to have a significant impact on the political process.
To know more about elections click here:
brainly.com/question/29760616
#SPJ4
First, for an action against Rough & Tough, she would have to show that the company had no right to transfer her pawned property without her written consent. Illinois Pawnbrokers Act, 205 Ill. Comp. Stat. 510/10 (2017). If pledged property was transferred without written consent of the property owner, the pawnbroker can be held responsible for loss or theft of pawned property because the property was in his safekeeping and was transferred illegally. Jacobs v. Grossman, 141 N.E. 714, 716 (Ill. App. Ct. 1923).
is it a issue, rule, Application or conclusion?
Further justification for the applicability of the legal principle is provided by the citation to Jacobs v. Grossman. As a result, the passage includes both a legal principle and how it is applied.
How can you tell if a rule of law is being applied?The first section outlines the law, which states that in order to file a lawsuit against Rough & Tough, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the business lacked the legal authority to transfer her pawned item without her express written agreement. The next phrases provide an application of that legal principle, stating that the pawnbroker can be held accountable for any later loss or theft of the property if it was truly transferred without the owner's express consent.
To learn more about legal issues visit:
brainly.com/question/13603534
#SPJ1
according to article 7 of the nar code of ethics, which of these statements is most accurate when accepting compensation from parties to a transaction?
Article 7 of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Code of Ethics states that real estate agents must disclose to their clients any financial benefits they receive from the transaction.
This includes compensation from both the buyer and the seller, as well as any referral fees or compensation from other parties. The disclosure must be made in a timely and complete manner, and the agent must obtain the client's informed consent before accepting any compensation. This helps to ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, as clients are able to make fully informed decisions about their transactions with all relevant information disclosed to them by their agent.
To know more about National Association of Realtors click here:
brainly.com/question/31226349
#SPJ4
What types of cases require questioned document examiners?
Answer:
Questioned document examiners can be called upon to investigate a variety of cases related to documents, including:
1. Forgery: when a document is suspected to have been forged or manipulated
2. Fraud: when a document is suspected to be fraudulent or to contain fraudulent information
3. Document alteration: when a document has been altered from its original form
4. Disputed wills: when the legitimacy of a will is in question
5. Anonymous letters or threats: when a document is suspected to be authored by an unknown person
6. Counterfeit currency: when a document is suspected to be counterfeit or fake, such as banknotes or checks
These are just some examples of the types of cases that may require the expertise of a questioned document examiner.
What are the three basic common characteristics of state constitution ?