The Chinese Exclusion Act represented a significant shift in America's immigration policy and demonstrated what it meant to be an American in the late 19th century.
The act was passed in 1882, and it was the first federal law to limit immigration based on ethnicity or nationality. It prohibited Chinese immigration for ten years, preventing the Chinese from becoming naturalized citizens.
The Chinese Exclusion Act represented a change in America's immigration policy by prohibiting Chinese immigration and barring Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized citizens. It marked the first time that the United States government had officially restricted immigration based on race or nationality.
It was also the first time that a large group of people had been excluded from the country based solely on their ethnicity or nationality.
The Chinese Exclusion Act represented a significant shift in what it meant to be an American in the late 19th century. It reinforced the idea that only people who shared a common culture and language were truly American. It also helped to create a social hierarchy in which white people were at the top and non-white people were at the bottom.
The act made it clear that the United States was a nation that was meant to be white and Christian, and it reinforced the belief that non-white people were not welcome in the country.
To learn more about immigrants, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ11
what is true about the relationship between the creoles and the peninsulares in latin america in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries
The relationship between the Creoles and the Peninsulares in Latin America in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries is that the Creoles desired independence while the Peninsulares wanted to maintain Spanish control.
Creole is a Spanish term used to describe the people of Spanish descent who were born in the Americas. The Creoles were descendants of the Spanish who settled in the colonies, and they were very wealthy and educated. They owned large tracts of land and occupied high-ranking positions in the colonial government.
The Peninsulares, on the other hand, were Spaniards born in Spain who occupied top positions in the colonial government, military, and church. The Relationship between the Creoles and the Peninsulares. The Creoles and the Peninsulares had different desires, which led to a strained relationship.
The Creoles desired independence and equality, while the Peninsulares desired to maintain Spanish control of the colonies. The Creoles wanted to have equal rights as the Peninsulares in the government, military, and church.
However, the Peninsulares were unwilling to share power with them, which made the Creoles angry.The Creoles were unhappy with the policies of the Spanish government that were designed to favor the Peninsulares. They wanted to have control of their country's resources and institutions, but the Spanish government did not allow them to do so.
To know more about Creoles and the Peninsulares here:
https://brainly.com/question/28898381#
#SPJ11
Describe the New left
Answer: Political movement around the 1960s in which activists campaigned for lots of different social issues
Explanation:
HELPP the test is due at the end of class
Answer:
c
Explanation:
fter the posting of several sikh soldiers in the british army to stations in malaya and hong kong in the late 1800s, many sikhs migrated to china and fiji because:
Sikhs began migrating to China and Fiji in the late 1800s after several Sikh soldiers were posted to stations in Malaya and Hong Kong by the British Army was to seek out economic opportunities.
Additionally, many of the Sikh migrants were escaping religious and political persecution in India, and they believed they would be able to practice their faith freely in their new homes.
The large population of Sikh migrants in both China and Fiji also created a sense of community and mutual support, which further incentivized migration.
Furthermore, the abundance of land in these countries offered Sikhs the opportunity to own land and businesses, which was a much more difficult prospect in India.
After the posting of several Sikh soldiers in the British Army to stations in Malaya and Hong Kong in the late 1800s, many Sikhs migrated to China and Fiji because they wanted better opportunities in terms of jobs, business, and agriculture.
What were the reasons for the migration of Sikhs?
The migration of Sikhs can be attributed to various reasons such as economic, political, social, and religious factors.
The Sikh soldiers who were posted in Malaya and Hong Kong during the late 1800s faced various challenges and difficulties, including racial discrimination, language barriers, and cultural differences.
Due to these difficulties, many Sikhs who had served in the British Army decided to migrate to other countries, including China and Fiji, to explore better opportunities and living conditions.
Sikhs migrated to China because there were better opportunities in terms of business and agriculture. Sikhs were known for their skills in farming and agriculture, and they utilized their skills to start their own businesses and farms in China.
Sikhs also set up their own trading businesses, which were known for their quality products and services. As a result, the Sikh community in China thrived and became an integral part of the local economy.
Sikhs also migrated to Fiji, which was a British colony at the time.
The British authorities encouraged migration to Fiji to provide labor for the sugar plantations. Many Sikhs took up jobs in the sugar plantations and established their own businesses, including shops and trading companies.
Despite facing racial discrimination and other challenges, the Sikh community in Fiji thrived and became an important part of the local economy.
In conclusion, the migration of Sikhs to China and Fiji was driven by economic and social factors, including the need for better opportunities and living conditions.
Despite facing challenges and difficulties, the Sikh community in these countries thrived and contributed to the local economy and society.
To know more about economic opportunities here
https://brainly.com/question/12401759
#SPJ11
multiple choice question the mausoleum of galla placidia contains what kind of symbolism? multiple choice question. early christian early greek renaissance roman
The Mausoleum of Galla Placidia contains symbols from both the early Christian and Roman periods. The correct option is a and d.
The dome of the mausoleum contains a mosaic of Christ on the Cross with four apostles, a symbol of early Christianity. Additionally, the interior of the mausoleum is filled with depictions of mythical scenes from the Roman period, such as a mounted figure of Jupiter, the mythical god of thunder, and a scene of Diana, goddess of the hunt.
The dome of the mausoleum also features various images of Roman emperors, including Constantine and Honorius, as well as various classical scenes such as the battle of Alexander the Great against Darius.
All of these images represent the power of the Roman Empire and its influence over the Mediterranean region.
In addition to the mosaics, the mausoleum features a variety of decorative elements including wreaths, a frieze, and other symbols of early Christianity.
This combination of elements represents the religious and cultural beliefs of the time period and provides a unique insight into the beliefs of the people who constructed the mausoleum.
Overall, the Mausoleum of Galla Placidia contains a variety of symbols from both the early Christian and Roman periods.
The dome of the mausoleum contains a mosaic of Christ on the Cross with four apostles, representing the spread of Christianity throughout the Mediterranean.
To know more about early Christian and romans refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/29679036
#SPJ11
confucianism and buddhism both flourished during the tang and the song dynasties. what evidence from the text helps explain the growth of these belief systems?
The Tang (618–907 CE) and Song (960–1279 CE) dynasties were a time of great growth and prosperity in Chinese culture. Confucianism and Buddhism both flourished during this period, and there is evidence in the text to help explain the growth of these belief systems.
Confucianism: During the Tang and Song Dynasties, Confucianism became the official state religion, and the rulers of these dynasties employed Confucian scholars to help administer their governments. This meant that Confucianism was highly promoted and respected by the ruling class, and as a result, it spread quickly throughout the population.
Buddhism: Buddhism also grew during the Tang and Song Dynasties. The Tang rulers supported Buddhism and established many temples and monasteries, making Buddhism more accessible to the people. The Song Dynasty also supported Buddhism and had many powerful Buddhist monks in their court. This helped spread Buddhist teachings, and made it easier for people to learn about the religion and practice its teachings.
In conclusion, both Confucianism and Buddhism flourished during the Tang and Song Dynasties due to their support and promotion by the ruling classes. The evidence from the text includes the promotion of Confucianism by the rulers, and the establishment of temples and monasteries by the rulers to help spread Buddhism.
To know more about Tang and Song Dynasties refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/1961463
#SPJ11
A small settlement formed along the Tigris River following the Neolithic
Revolution. As the settlement grew, it developed complex social institutions
and people began to specialize at certain jobs. What other development does
the settlement need to be considered a civilization?
A. Advanced technology
B. Hunting and gathering methods
C. A theocracy
D. An empire
This kind of growth requires some kind of government, which controls the residents' life to some level, in order to be regarded as a Civilization.
What is Neolithic Revolution along the Tigris River?
The Neolithic Revolution was thought to have been a singular occurrence—a moment of brilliance—that took place in Mesopotamia, between the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers in what is now southern Iraq, notably the region of the Sumerian kingdom, which dates back to around 4000 B.C.E.
Archaeological evidence suggests that different kinds of plants and animals were domesticated in diverse places throughout the world beginning in the Holocene geological era 11,700 years ago. It was the first agricultural revolution in history that could be proven by history. The variety of foods that were readily available was significantly reduced during the Neolithic Revolution, which led to a decline in the standard of human nutrition compared to that previously attained by foraging.
Learn more about Neolithic Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/4092859
#SPJ1
which statements about the magistrate known as a tribune in ancient rome are true? choose two correct answers. responses they were elected by plebeians. they were elected by plebeians. they watched out for the interests of the poor. they watched out for the interests of the poor. they had no legal authority. they had no legal authority. they were in charge of the military. they were in charge of the military.
In Ancient Rome, magistrates called tribunes were elected by plebeians, and they watched out for the interests of the poor. Two correct statements about the magistrate known as a tribune in Ancient Rome are:
They were elected by plebeians.They watched out for the interests of the poor.Tribunes were the representatives of the plebeian class and were appointed to protect their interests. During the late Roman Republic, plebeians gained the right to elect their tribunes. They were also entitled to convene the concilium plebis, the plebeian assembly, where they could pass resolutions that were binding on all Romans.
Tribunes had the ability to veto (forbid) the actions of consuls or other magistrates, which was one of their most effective powers. However, it was a power that they were hesitant to use because it could lead to political turmoil in the city.
They also had the authority to stop any trial from proceeding, irrespective of the charges against the accused. The tribunes had no military authority. The power of the military rested with the consuls, who were elected by the patricians. The tribunes' function was to serve as a check on the consuls' power, ensuring that the interests of the plebeians were safeguarded.
Learn more about ancient Rome:
https://brainly.com/question/1892495
#SPJ11