Answer:
five
Explanation:
Why is it important to have media coverage of government elections?
O It may be the only accessible source of information on the issues and candidates for a particular group of people.
O It helps people have a comprehensive understanding of all of the issues.
It introduces the public to only the candidates who have the best chance of winning.
• It encourages people to vote for the right candidate based on the media's informed opinions.
Answer: There are several reasons why media coverage of government elections is important:
Media coverage helps inform the public about the candidates and the issues at stake in the election. This allows voters to make informed decisions about who to vote for and what policies to support.
Media coverage helps ensure transparency and accountability in the electoral process. By reporting on the elections, the media can help expose any wrongdoing or malfeasance that may occur.
Media coverage of elections can help promote public engagement and participation. By providing information about the elections and encouraging discussion of the issues, the media can help increase turnout and ensure that the election reflects the will of the people.
Media coverage can also help ensure that the results of the election are widely accepted as legitimate. By providing objective and unbiased reporting, the media can help build confidence in the electoral process and reduce the likelihood of disputes or challenges to the results.
It important to have media coverage of government elections because It helps people have a comprehensive understanding of all of the issues. Thus, option B is correct.
Why media coverage is important?The public is more informed about the candidates and the election's key concerns thanks to media coverage. This makes it possible for people to decide who to vote for and what policies to support after doing their research. The electoral process is made more transparent and accountable thanks to media coverage.
The media can aid in exposing any potential impropriety or misbehavior by covering the elections. Election coverage in the media might encourage voter participation. The media can help boost turnout and guarantee that the election reflects the will of the people by disseminating information about the elections and promoting discussion of the topics. The acceptance of the election results as legitimate can also be increased through media coverage. By delivering unbiased and objective reporting.
Therefore, we can conclude that option B is correct.
Learn more about media coverage here:
https://brainly.com/question/1212542
#SPJ5
Order the CRIMINAL jurisdiction of the following courts from the LOWEST to the HIGHEST (smallest court to the biggest court) 1. Supreme Court of the U.S. 12. Court of Appeals * 3. Justice of the Peace Court 14. District Court 15. County Court at Law 6. Court of Criminal Appeals
Answer:
huh what do you what us to do
Explanation:
22. Which branch of government contains the Supreme Court?
a. Legislative
b. Executive
c. Judicial
d. Confederate
23. What best describes the method of distributing power where power is divided among the national and regional
governments?
a. Federalism
b. Popular Sovereignty
c. Rule of Law
d. Limited Government
24. Which type of power is not specifically listed in the Constitution?
a. Enumerated
b. Implied
c. Concurrent
d. Reserved
25. The “Necessary and Proper Clause” of the Constitution is sometimes called the
a. “All-Powerful Clause.”
b. “Elastic Clause.”
c. “Federalist Clause.”
d. “Nationalist Clause.”
26. Which type of power is specifically listed in the Constitution?
a. Enumerated
b. Implied
c. Concurrent
d. Reserved
SSCG 1-16
Unit 4 - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
27. Which Amendment reserves powers for the states?
a. 9th
b. 10th
c. 12th
d. 16th
28. What is the first step in trying to amend the Constitution? (choose two answers)
a. Proposed by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress
b. Ratified by three-fourths of the 50 state legislatures
c. Proposed by a constitutional convention called by Congress on petition of two-thirds of the 50 states
d. Ratified by threes-fourths of special constitutional conventions called by the 50 states
29. What is the second step to amend the constitution? (choose two answers)
a. Proposed by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress
b. Ratified by three-fourths of the 50 state legislatures
c. Proposed by a constitutional convention called by Congress on petition of two-thirds of the 50 states
d. Ratified by threes-fourths of special constitutional conventions called by the 50 states
30. What Article of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power of Supremacy?
a. Article III
b. Article VI
c. Article V
d. Article VII
31. Why are there debates over the Affordable Care Act and the power of Executive Orders?
a. States feel the national government is overreaching their power
b. The national government feels the states are overreaching their power
c. They are currently being debated in Congress
d. They are new powers being given to the national government.
32. Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which of the following was NOT protected from discrimination?
a. Race
b. Religion
c. Sexual Orientation
d. Physical Disability
33. In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) the U.S. Supreme court held that ______________.
a. Ethnic minorities have no rights to equal treatment by the government
b. Public school segregation of races violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
c. The national government does not have the power to force any type of action on local school boards
d. Separation of races for a reason such as education is not a violation of the Constitution
34. In Roe v Wade the majority of the Supreme Court justices determined that
a. a constitutional right to privacy necessitated making contraceptives legal
b. abortions could be performed only during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy
c. the United States Constitution implies a right to privacy and thus made abortion legal
d. a husband is allowed to veto his wife's decision to have an abortion
35. ________________ states that the government must act fairly and in accordance with established rules and laws in
all that it does and the government must treat ALL citizens fairly and apply equal protection under the law.
a. double jeopardy
b. self-incrimination
c. due process
d. incorporation
SSCG 1-16
Unit 5 - The Legislative Branch
36. Which amendment enabled the Supreme Court to rule that much of the Bill of Rights applies to state and local
governments?
a. 11th
b. 12th
c. 13th
d. 14th
37. The Fifth Amendment protects people who are accused of crimes by …
a. allowing citizens to remain silent and not tell on themselves.
b. preventing another trial for the same crime if one has already been found innocent (not guilty).
c. ensuring that due process must take place.
d. All of the above
38. How is it decided if a high profile criminal case has enough evidence to make it to trial?
a. Probable cause
b. Double jeopardy
c. Grand Jury
d. Due process
Who makes Local laws?
Who makes State laws?
Who makes federal laws?
Answer:
Local Laws: City Council, and is approved by the Mayor.
State Laws: The State legislature create the laws, and are approved by the Governor.
Federal Laws: The United States House of Representative and Senate, makes laws, and are approved by the President.
What is the main benefit of the use of technology in private security?
surveillance
gaining background knowledge
detaining suspects
writing reports
Answer:
Gaining background knowledge
The _______________ was a result of the National Research Act, which created the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
A. Declaration of Helsinki
B. Belmont Report
C. IRB
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Belmont Report was a result of the National Research Act, which created the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Personal Reflection: Reflect on the final product process. What advice would you share with a
student completing this project next year? What worked well? What could be improved? What
did you enjoy? What did you learn about research?
Answer:
A good research must revolve around a novel question and must be based on a feasible study plan. It must make a significant contribution to scientific development by addressing an unanswered question or by solving a problem or difficulty that existed in the real world.
Explanation:
I would say something like this.
Negotiation is the process by which people involved in a dispute discuss their problem and try to reach a solution acceptable to all.
True
False
which of the follwing steps folows the establishment of a cover story?
Answer:
Infiltration
Explanation:
 A president usually honors the principle of senatorial courtesy in appointing judges to district courts. Why is this?
Answer:
The United State constitution says that ALL Judiciary appointments by the President are to be taken up by the United States Senate. A president can do that to fill the courts with Conservative or Liberal Views, or because he wants to fill as much as possible.
(Policy and Elections 03.03 MC)
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the
opportunity for the (3 points)
President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be
accomplished
Senate to address the President about concerns regarding policies proposed by
the House
House to address the President about concerns regarding policies proposed by
the Senate
Congress to address the President and the nation about the legislative goals to
be accomplished
Answer:
A. President to Address Congress and the Nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished.
Explanation:
During a President's one term, he or she can face up to 4 State of the Union address, all members of Congress would be there, including the Vice President and the Speaker of the house who would be sitting behind the President. He will speak on his success, his goals, and the State of the Union.
Answer:
The Answer Is "A" - President to Address Congress and the Nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished.
Explanation:
How can two similar Supreme Court cases have different outcomes. What is the significance of that
difference?
Answer: The factors that can cause two similar Supreme Court cases to have different outcomes are: different attorneys, different Supreme Court Justices, when/date/era, cases of precedent, other pending court cases, and even though the cases are similar there would be differences and those differences that appear to be small, may actually be significant.
Explanation: Different attorneys present cases and specific points of the case differently. How cases are presented, what evidence is presented, and what elements of the case they are requested the decision be based on can all determine the outcome. Different Supreme Court Justices have different views, experiences, and interpretations of the law. Some are liberal and some are conservative, so based on that they will lean one way or the other. When the case has come before the Supreme Court is extremely important. What is happening in the country at the time, the view of the American people, what the individual states are doing, and what kind of movements or pushes that are going on in society all play in to how cases will be viewed. For example, if gender or race discrimination are getting a lot of focus in society and other related court cases are going on, the Supreme Court will likely take that into consideration in their interpretation of the law and react more liberally if the law is conservative in nature but society as a majority is pushing the issue to the liberal side. In looking at similar cases, there are always differences, and those differences may be the deciding factor in the outcome of a case. For example, you may have a case of a 17 year old involved in one court case and an 18 year old involved in another, so even though they are only one year apart in age, in the eyes of the law, one is a minor and one is an adult.
Different lawyers, different Supreme Court justices, when/date/era, precedent cases, and other pending court cases, and even though the cases are similar, there may be differences that, despite their apparent smallness, may be very important. These factors can result in two similar Supreme Court cases having different outcomes.
How can two similar Supreme Court cases have different outcomes?Cases and certain parts of the case are presented differently by various attorneys. The manner in which cases are presented, the evidence that is offered, and the aspects of the case that are sought to form the basis for the judgment are all factors that might affect the result.
Justices of the Supreme Court differ in their perspectives, backgrounds, and legal interpretations. They will lean one way or the other depending on whether they are liberal or conservative. It is crucial to know when the Supreme Court heard the case.
Learn more about the Supreme court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ2
Even before the 19th Amendment was passed by the federal government, why do you think some states passed state laws allowing women to vote?
Answer:
Some state possible did this because of the pressure women was putting on them, infact several of thousands of women took to the street demanding they have their right. In fact Several Activist paved the way: Lucy Stone, Susan B. Anthony, Matilda Joslyn Gage, Abby Kelley Foster, and Sojourner Truth
What is one reason the principle of stare decisis is important?
It defines what areas of law each court controls.
It prevents Congress from writing unethical laws.
It provides stability in the rule of law for all citizens.
It ensures the courts are able to financially support themselves.
One reason the principle of Stare Decisis is important is C. It provides stability in the rule of law for all citizens.
What is Stare Decisis?Stare Decisis is a judicial doctrine in which a court looks at previous judicial decisions when the same points come up again.
It literally means "let the decision stand" and directs lawyers to carefully overturn decisions made by previous courts.
The vital point of stare decisis is that it allows judges to decrease the uncertainty concerned with making decisions.
They can check their results against the earlier results reached by judges that have handled such cases and reached a decision as well as allows all citizens to fully experience the rule of law.
Learn more about Stare Decisis at brainly.com/question/21085371.
#SPJ1
What are national laws called
Describe what the chain of command is and its purpose in the investigation.
Answer:
The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.
Does this help?
Please help:(
Ryan is studying for a test. There is one concept in his lesson that he does not completely understand. He types some key words into a search
engine. To his surprise, the answers to his upcoming test are listed as one of the choices. Even though Ryan did not put the answers online and they
are there for all to see, he chooses not to copy them. What kind of decision has Ryan made?
folkway
more
crime
law
Answer:
Folkway or more
Answer:
A- more
Explanation:
I took the quiz
What is presumption of innocence ?
What is the difference between the standard of proof and the burden of proof?
What does beyond reasonable doubt mean to you?
Answer:The presumption of innocence until proven guilty means that the burden of proof is always on the government to satisfy you that [defendant] is guilty of the crime with which [he/she] is charged beyond a reasonable doubt. ... This burden never shifts to [defendant].
⦁ How does the Fourteenth Amendment define a U.S. citizen?
Answer:
The Fourteenth Amendment states that All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.
Explanation:
Have a good day :)
Which of the following was established by the Supreme Court case Graham v. Connor?
A. Standard of Reasonableness
B. Legal authorities for the use of force
C. Key terminology related to the use of force
D. Hitting the officer with a baseball bat
E. Forces available to peace officers
Answer: B. Legal authorities for the use of force
Answer:
B. Legal authorities for the use of force
Explanation:
The legal authorities for the use of force was established by the Supreme Court case Graham v. Connor.
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)
(LC)Approximately what percent of wrongful convictions can be attributed to informant testimony?
5 percent
10 percent
15 percent
20 percent
When did the Secret Service formally begin to provide protection to the president and his family?
The Secret Service provided protection for the president and his family from the beginning of the agency.
The Secret Service began providing protection to the president and family after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.
O The Secret Service began providing protection to the president and family after the assassination of William McKinley.
O The Secret Service does not provide protection to the president and his family.
Answer:
Secret service
Explanation:
Since 1901, every President from Theodore Roosevelt on has been protected by the Secret Service. In 1917, threats against the President became a felony (a serious crime in the eyes of the law), and Secret Service protection was broadened to include all members of the First Family
Answer:
O The Secret Service began providing protection to the president and family after the assassination of William McKinley.
Explanation:
I think :) I just took the quiz
which ring would be better for everyday wear
im so indecisive but im leaning towards the second one
Answer:
I think personally the black one looks better
Explanation:
Do you think it's okay for police brutality to happen despite what the officer or convict does ? Do you also think it's okay to use violence as a way to "protest"? Do you think your political party belief has anything to do with what's going on in today's world?
Answer:
I dont think police brutality is ok, it does not matter what going on the police need to follow the correct protocol.
I dont think it's ok to use violence to protest but some use violence in a way to be heard because they might have been. dismissed the first time.
I do think political party belief has an affect on the world today
Put the continuum of force in order from least to greatest force:
A. Verbal Officer + Presence + Lethal + Empty Hand + Less Lethal
B. Less Lethal + Empty Hand + Lethal + Verbal + Officer Presence
C. Officer Presence + Verbal + Empty Hand + Less Lethal + Lethal
Answer:
C. Officer Presence + Verbal + Empty Hand + Less Lethal + Lethal
Explanation:
Less lethal should come before lethal and lethal should come last. Used process of elimination.
SkillsUSA is an organization made up of high-level college entry personnel who use their skills to enable students to enter prestigious colleges.
A. True
B.False
Skills USA is an organization made up of high-level college entry personnel who use their skills to enable students to enter prestigious colleges.
The statement is True
What do such organization do?
The middle-school, high-school, college, and postsecondary students served by SkillsUSA, a nonprofit national association for education, are those pursuing careers in skilled trade, technical, and service occupations.The main organization that assists students in their preparation for technical, skilled, and service vocations is called SkillsUSA. One of the most deliberate actions you can make in your professional career is to serve as an advisor to a SkillsUSA branch.Benefits of Membership: Gain and build academically-based personal, professional, and technical skills. Obtain entry to privileged scholarship possibilities. Gain recognition by competing in local, state, and national career competition programs offered by SkillsUSA.To know more about college here
https://brainly.com/question/25567167
#SPJ1
At which of the following BAC levels are motor coordination skills, judgment, and self-control impaired?
.08
.15
.30
.60
At the BAC levels of 0.15, individuals have their are motor coordination skills, judgment, and self-control impaired. The Option B is correct.
What are some effects at Specific BAC?Individual differences among users have a significant impact on the effects of alcohol intoxication. Some users may become intoxicated at much lower levels of Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) than shown.
No loss of coordination, slight euphoria, and loss of shyness at 0.02-0.03 BAC. There is no evidence of depressive effects. Mildly relaxed and possibly a little dizzy.BAC 0.04-0.06: A sense of well-being, relaxation, lower inhibitions, and a sensation of warmth. Euphoria. Some minor impairment in reasoning and memory, as well as a reduction in caution. 0.07-0.09 BAC: Impaired balance, speech, vision, reaction time, and hearing. Euphoria. Judgment and self-control are impaired, as are caution, reason, and memory. 08 is legally impairing and illegal.0.10-0.125 BAC: We have significant impairment of motor coordination and loss of good judgment.0.13-0.15 BAC: Gross motor impairment and lack of physical control. Blurred vision and major loss of balance.Read more about BAC levels
brainly.com/question/13614186
#SPJ1
difference between senators for life and senators by right
Answer:
Explanation:
Rules are meant to be broken when needed.
When you can't do anything about a situation and the last option is to break the rules. Depending on the time and situation given. You do the crime you do the time. For example. If you had to come up with the money to save your family and time is not on your side the last thing you can do is to steal for the ones you love then if it saves their life wouldn't anyone risk their life for their family? When I say risk their life I mean freedom. We all know the consequences that follow and we will sacrifice our own self to save those we love especially our children/our loved ones people who mean everything to us. If we had no choice given and we tried our best to get help from everyone to anyone but no one was there to help what else can you/we do?
Now this isn't always the best thing to do in some scenarios but as long as breaking the rules don't involve hurting anyone or taking someone's life away I'm sure that if it saves a life or many lives then yes rules are meant to be broken. I would break it if needed just to save many or even just 1 life because 1 matters.
Anyways RULES should stay the way it is it has worked for so long but there are just some that need to be looked into that may need a little bit of tweaking. The rule-makers knows whats best for the people I'm sure they did not just get to where they are at without the knowledge and experience and I'm sure they also had to live the way others did in order to experience what others are experiencing they can even be beside us and we don't even know it. To know what rules are to be broken you must first experience the reasoning as to why they had to be broken. The reasonings vs the excuses. Which one outweighs is there's a will there's a can. You will do your hardest to succeed in life by obeying rules along the way. Rules are there not to keep us in line but to help us along the way. We have our own will our own rights and the knowledge to know what is wrong or right we also are given the feeling that we have felt in our journey and we know when something seems to be off or wrong like Spiderman we get these senses. A666nd it is up to us to follow it. Our intuition plays a big part you will sense things that makes eye doesn't see this is when your body mind and soul aligns and when it does you just know and feel that you must do what you believe is right even thou you know that it may break some rules but you just know that you need to it because you can see it by the experience you have encountered and the knowledge you have learned from it. And when you feel that something just isn't right or you just feel that it's needed you go with your feeling and what you believe. And because you believe you need to see for yourself that what you feel is right so you go blindness into the unknown and you hope that you are right and if you arnt well atleast you went with what you believe in and now you know. Atleast it was your own choice. So let me ask now thesame questions are rules meant to be broken? Yes they are but that's the test of life the questions we should ask is. What are you willing to sacrifice? Your freedom? Or the freedom of others? If you can make a difference and if you had to endure all the pain and suffering to change something wouldn't you sacrifice yourself if it helps all of us? If it can make a difference?
4. If you get on an airplane and take a flight that
doesn't leave the country it is called a
flight.
domestic
foreign
Answer:
If you get on an airplane and take a flight that doesn't leave the country it is called a domestic flight.
Explanation:
A domestic flight is within the country while a foreign flight leaves the country.
the flight Is Called a domestic flight
In at least 150 words, evaluate the effectiveness of the Supreme Court In extending libertles outlined in the Constitution
to all U.S. citizens. Give an example.
Answer:
5
Us.Citizen is are good people.