If you vertically compress the absolute value parent function, f(x) = x1, by a


factor of 4, what is the equation of the new function?


O A. G(x) = (x-41


B. G(x) = 1


O C. G(x) = 14x1


O (


D. G(x) = 411

The limit of the given function as t approaches 0 is undefined.

To find the limit of the given function,[tex]lim (e^(5t) - 1) / (t × sin(t))[/tex] as t approaches 0, follow these steps:

Observe the given function

[tex]lim (e^(5t) - 1) / (t × sin(t)) as t → 0[/tex]

Apply L'Hopital's Rule, since the limit is of the form 0/0 as t approaches 0.

Differentiate the numerator and denominator with respect to t.

Numerator: [tex]d(e^(5t) - 1)/dt = 5e^(5t)[/tex]

Denominator: [tex]d(t × sin(t))/dt = sin(t) + t × cos(t)[/tex]

Rewrite the function with the new numerator and denominator.

lim [tex](5e^(5t)) / (sin(t) + t × cos(t)) as t → 0[/tex]

Evaluate the limit as t approaches 0.

[tex](5e^(5 × 0)) / (sin(0) + 0 × cos(0)) = 5 / 0[/tex]

Since the denominator is still 0, the limit does not exist.

for such more question on limit

https://brainly.com/question/12017456

#SPJ11

The radius of the circle is 10 inches.

A sector is a part of a given circle which is made from two radii and an arc. It's area can be determined by;

area of a sector = θ/360*πr^2

where θ is the measure of its central angle, and r is its radius.

Then from the given question, we have;

area of a sector = θ/360*πr^2

162 = 180/360 *3.14*r^2

      = 1.57r^2

r^2 = 162/1.57

     = 103.1847

So that;

r = (103.1847)^1/2

 = 10.16

The radius of the circle is approximately 10 inches.

Learn more about area of a sector at https://brainly.com/question/22761976

#SPJ1

Therefore, it will take 3 years for Rs. 6350 to amount to Rs. 8255 at 10% per annum. Therefore, the rate of interest is 32.6% per annum if the loan is returned in 1 1/2 years.

Interest is the amount of money that a lender charges a borrower for the use of money or assets. It is typically expressed as a percentage of the amount borrowed or invested, and is paid by the borrower to the lender as compensation for the use of the money. There are two main types of interest: simple interest and compound interest. Simple interest is calculated based on the initial amount borrowed or invested, and is paid out at regular intervals over a fixed period of time. Compound interest, on the other hand, is calculated based on the initial amount plus any accumulated interest, and is paid out at the end of the investment period.

Here,

Using the formula for simple interest:

Simple Interest = (Principal x Rate x Time) / 100

where Principal is the initial amount, Rate is the interest rate per annum, and Time is the duration of the loan in years. To find the time it takes for Rs. 6350 to amount to Rs. 8255 at 10% per annum, we can set up the equation:

8255 - 6350 = (6350 x 10 x Time) / 100

Simplifying the equation, we get:

1905 = 635 x Time

Time = 1905 / 635

Time = 3 years

To find the interest rate if the loan is returned in 1 1/2 years, we can rearrange the formula for simple interest as:

Rate = (100 x Simple Interest) / (Principal x Time)

Plugging in the values, we get:

Rate = (100 x (8255 - 6350)) / (6350 x 1.5)

Rate = 3105 / 9525

Rate = 0.326 or 32.6%

To know more about interest,

https://brainly.com/question/28792777

#SPJ1

About the equation used to estimate the height E of the tramway t seconds after it left the station, we first need to calculate the rate of elevation gain per second.

Elevation difference: 5632 feet (Range Peak) - 4692 feet (tramway station) = 940 feet
Time: 4 minutes * 60 seconds/minute = 240 seconds

Rate of elevation gain: 940 feet / 240 seconds = 3.9167 feet/second (approximately 3.9 feet/second)

Now, we can write the equation to estimate the height E of the tramway t seconds after it left the station:

E = initial elevation + (rate of elevation gain * t)
E = 4692 + 3.9t

So, the correct equation is: E = 4692 + 3.9t

Learn more about Wyler Aerial Tramway at https://brainly.com/question/18666885

#SPJ11

The distance from the place Tyler meets his neighbor to his home is 450 meters.

Tyler's speed is 1.2 meters per second.

Part A:

To find the distance from the place Tyler meets his neighbor to his home, we need to find the distance when x=0, since it's the time they meet. Plug x=0 into the equation y=450-72x:

y = 450 - 72(0)

y = 450

The distance from the place Tyler meets his neighbor to his home is 450 meters.

Part B:

To find the speed of Tyler, we need to find the rate at which the distance is decreasing. This can be found by taking the derivative of the distance function with respect to time:

dy/dx = -72

Since the derivative is constant, Tyler's speed is constant, and it is 72 meters per minute. To convert it to meters per second, we need to multiply by the conversion factor (1 minute = 60 seconds):

Speed = 72 m/min * (1 min / 60 s)

Thus, the speed = 1.2 m/s

Tyler's speed is 1.2 meters per second.

Read more about speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/13943409

#SPJ1

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

An equation representing the statement that 282828 is 121212 less than kkk is kkk = 282828 + 121212.

An equation is a mathematical statement showing that two or more mathematical or algebraic expressions share equality or equivalence.

Equations are represented using the equal symbol (=).

Unlike equations, mathematical expressions do not use the equal symbol.

282828 = kkk - 121212

kkk = 282828 + 121212

Thus, one way of representing the statement that that 282828 is 121212 less than kkk is by forming an equation like kkk = 282828 + 121212.

Learn more about equations at https://brainly.com/question/2972832.

#SPJ1

Answer is: manager can be 95% confident that the true proportion of time spent mowing is between 0.452 and 0.548

We can use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution to estimate the confidence interval for the true proportion of time spent mowing.

The sample proportion of time spent mowing is:

p = 200/400 = 0.5

The standard error of the sample proportion is:

SE = sqrt(p(1-p)/n) = sqrt(0.5 * 0.5 / 400) = 0.025

To find the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of time spent mowing, we can use the formula:

p ± z*SE

where z* is the critical value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to a 95% confidence level, which is approximately 1.96.

So the 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of time spent mowing is:

0.5 ± 1.96*0.025 = (0.452, 0.548)

Therefore, the manager can be 95% confident that the true proportion of time spent mowing is between 0.452 and 0.548.

To know more about ratio-proportions:

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ11

Answer:15)5760.1 6)78. 17)582.4 18)112

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference (pre-debate minus post-debate) in the sample proportions of likely voters who said they would vote for this candidate was approximately 0.025.

We are given a confidence interval of (-0.014, 0.064) for the true difference in proportions of likely voters who would vote for the political candidate before and after the debate. This means that we can be 95% confident that the true difference in proportions falls within this interval.

To find the difference in sample proportions, we need to subtract the pre-debate proportion from the post-debate proportion. Let's call the pre-debate proportion "p1" and the post-debate proportion "p2".

We are not given the sample proportions directly, but we can use the midpoint of the confidence interval as an estimate for the true difference in proportions. The midpoint is (-0.014 + 0.064)/2 = 0.025.

So, we can estimate the difference in sample proportions as:

p2 - p1 = 0.025

This means that the post-debate proportion was 0.025 higher than the pre-debate proportion, on average. Note that we don't know the actual values of p1 and p2, just their difference.

Learn more about confidence interval: https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer to your problem is, 39

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the area of the triangle use the formula down below:

A = [tex]\frac{h_{b} b}{2}[/tex]

Base = 13

Height = 6

Replace them equals:

= [tex]\frac{6*13}{2}[/tex] = 39

Thus the answer to your problem is, 39

The top two officers hand out approximately 56.86% of the good driving citations.

The given good traffic citations are = 14, 8, 10, 4, and 15.

Among the above citations, the top two officers get top 2 values for their good driving. The top two values are 14 and 15.

Lets add those top two good traffic citations and divide it by the total number of citations to find out the percentage the top two officers hand out.

Total number of citations = 14 + 8 + 10 + 4 + 15 = 51

Citations get by top two officers = 14 + 15 = 29

percentage handout by top two officers = 29 / 51 = 0.5686.

To convert the obtained value in to peercentage multiply it by 100.

so, 0.5686 x 100 = 56.86%

From the above analysis, we can conclude that the 56.86% of the citations could be hand out by the top two officers.

To know more about percentage,

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

The calculated value of x is 8 and the perimeter is 80 units

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The figure

If the lines that appear to be tangent are tangent, then we have the following equation

x = 26 - 18

Evaluate the like terms

x = 8

The perimeter is the sum of the side lengths

So, we have

Perimeter = 26 + 18 + 14 + 14 + x

This gives

Perimeter = 26 + 18 + 14 + 14 + 8

Evaluate

Perimeter = 80

Hence, the perimeter is 80 units

Read more about perimeter at

https://brainly.com/question/19819849

#SPJ1

in the given triangle, using SOH CAH TOA, the value of x is 16.48

From the question, we are to determine the value of x in the given diagram

In the given diagram,

We are given a right triangle.

70° is the included angle

6 is the adjacent

and x is the opposite

Using SOH CAH TOA,

sin (angle) = Opposite / Hypotenuse

cos (angle) = Adjacent / Hypotenuse

tan (angle) = Opposite / Adjacent

Then, we can write that

tan (angle) = Opposite / Adjacent

Then,

tan (70°) = x/6

x = 6 × tan(70°)

x = 16.48

Hence, the value of x is 16.48

Learn more on Trigonometry here: https://brainly.com/question/20734777

#SPJ1

The statements that  gives the best reasons that ben’s rent payment is an essential (fixed) expense is he agreed to pay the same amount every month. The correct answer is D.

In personal finance, an essential expense is a regular expenditure that is necessary for maintaining a basic standard of living. These expenses are typically fixed, meaning that they do not fluctuate from month to month, and are difficult or impossible to eliminate without sacrificing basic needs like food, housing, or healthcare.

Since, this is his rent, the amount of money that he is legally bound to pay every month in order to keep on living in that location.

He has an agreement with his landlord to pay $215 each month and thus he has to do it.

Essential expenses are often considered a top priority in budgeting because they are critical to maintaining health, safety, and overall well-being. In the given scenario, Ben's rent payment is an essential expense because it is a fixed expense that is necessary for maintaining his housing, which is a basic need. The correct answer is D.

Learn more about essential expense at https://brainly.com/question/30804860

#SPJ11

The scientific notation 5.3*10‐⁵ in standard notation gives 0.000053

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Write 5.3*10‐⁵ in standard notation.

The above number is written in scientific notation

The standard notation of a number a * 10ⁿ is represented as

a000 where the 0's are in n places

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

5.3 * 10‐⁵ = 0.000053

Hence, 5.3*10‐⁵ in standard notation is 0.000053

Read more about scientific notation at

https://brainly.com/question/1767229

#SPJ1

The union set of A and B is A∪B={1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}.

Given that, A={x|x is an odd number greater than 0 and less than 10} and B={2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.

Here, set A={1, 3, 5, 7, 9}

Now, A∪B = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}∪{2, 3, 4, 5, 6}

= {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}

Therefore, the union set of A and B is A∪B={1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9}.

Learn more about the set here:

https://brainly.com/question/18877138.

#SPJ1

The derivative of the function at s=0 is approximately 258.

The derivative of the function[tex]r=[5(e4s-e-45)]/e45[/tex]is:

[tex]r' = 5[(4e4s + 45e-45)e45 - e45(4e4s - e-45)(e45)]/e902[/tex]

Plugging in s=0, we get:

[tex]r' = 5[(4 + 45)e45 - (4 - 1)(e45)]/e902[/tex]

[tex]r' = 5[49e45 - 3e45]/e902[/tex]

[tex]r' = 5(46e45)/e902[/tex]

r' ≈ 258

Therefore, the derivative of the function at s=0 is approximately 258.

To know more about derivative, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

a) The Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.76.

b) Null hypothesis: There is no significant correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics (H0: r = 0)

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics (Ha: r ≠ 0)

c) The regression line is: y = 0.64x + 34.18

d) Interpretation and conclusion:  The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.76 indicates a strong positive correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics.

Correlation analysis:

Using the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables.

Hypothesis testing:

Setting up null and alternative hypotheses, and using the t-test to determine whether the correlation coefficient is statistically significant.

Linear regression:

Finding the equation of the regression line that best describes the relationship between the two variables.

Interpretation and conclusion:

Using the results of the analysis to draw meaningful conclusions about the relationship between the two variables and the sample population as a whole.

Here we have

A study was conducted to determine the relationship existing between the grade in English and the grade in mathematics. a random sample of 10 students in uc was taken and the following are the results of the sampling

Student           1     2      3     4     5     6     7     8      9    10

English          75   83   80   77   89   78   92   86   93   84

Mathematics 78   87   78   76   92   81    89   89   91   84​  

a) To compute the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), first calculate the mean, standard deviation, and covariance of the two variables:

Mean of English grades (x)

= (75+83+80+77+89+78+92+86+93+84)/10 = 83.7

Mean of Math grades (y)

= (78+87+78+76+92+81+89+89+91+84)/10 = 84.5

The standard deviation of English grades (Sx)

= √((75-83.4)²+(83-83.4)²+...+(84-83.4)²)/9) = 6.52

The standard deviation of Math grades (Sy)

= √((78-84.4)²+(87-84.4)²+...+(84-84.4)²)/9) = 5.47

Covariance of the two variables

= ((75-83.4)(78-84.4)+(83-83.4)(87-84.4)+...+(84-83.4)(84-84.4))/9 = 26.6

Using the formula, r = cov(X,Y)/(SxSy),

we can calculate the correlation coefficient as follows

r = 26.6/(6.52*5.47) = 0.76

Therefore,

The Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.76.

b) Null hypothesis: There is no significant correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics (H0: r = 0)

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics (Ha: r ≠ 0)

c) To find the equation of the regression line, we need to calculate the slope (b) and the intercept (a) of the line. The formula for the slope is:

b = r(Sy/Sx) = 0.76(5.47/6.52) = 0.64

The formula for the intercept is:

=> a = y - bx = 84.4 - 0.64(83.4) = 34.18

Therefore,

The equation of the regression line is:

y = 0.64x + 34.18

Interpretation and conclusion:

The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.76 indicates a strong positive correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics.

The p-value associated with this correlation coefficient can be used to test the null hypothesis.

The equation of the regression line shows that for every one-point increase in the English grade, the predicted increase in the Mathematics grade is 0.64 points.

Therefore,

a) The Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.76.

b) Null hypothesis: There is no significant correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics (H0: r = 0)

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics (Ha: r ≠ 0)

c) The regression line is: y = 0.64x + 34.18

d) Interpretation and conclusion:  The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.76 indicates a strong positive correlation between the grades in English and Mathematics.

Learn more about Correlation analysis at

https://brainly.com/question/29785220

#SPJ4

To find the area of a parallelogram, multiply the base length by the height. Therefore, the area of the parallelogram is 8 cm * 24 cm = 192 cm².

To find the area of a parallelogram, you can use the formula A = base × height. In this case, the given measurements are 8 cm for the base, 9 cm for the height, and 24 cm for one of the sides of the parallelogram.

First, identify the base and height of the parallelogram. In this case, the base is 8 cm and the height is 9 cm.

Next, substitute the values into the formula for the area of a parallelogram: A = base × height.

A = 8 cm × 9 cm

Multiply the base and height:

A = 72 cm²

Therefore, the area of the parallelogram is 72 square centimeters. It's important to note that the area is not drawn to scale, so the measurements given are solely used for calculation purposes.

Learn more about formula

brainly.com/question/28647690

#SPJ11

Saturn is approximately 9.52 times further from the sun than Earth.

To find out how many times further from the sun Saturn is compared to Earth, we need to divide Saturn's distance from the sun by Earth's distance from the sun.

First, let's correct the distances given:
- Earth's distance from the sun: 1.496 x 10^8 km
- Saturn's distance from the sun: 1.4246 x 10^9 km (I assume you missed the exponent)

Now, let's calculate the ratio:

Ratio = (Saturn's distance) / (Earth's distance)
Ratio = (1.4246 x 10^9 km) / (1.496 x 10^8 km)

To make the calculation easier, let's factor out the common exponent (10^8):

Ratio = (1.4246 x 10) / (1.496)
Ratio ≈ 9.52

So, Saturn is approximately 9.52 times further from the sun than Earth.

To learn more about Saturn, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/12181523

#SPJ11

The interquartile range (IQR) of the given data set {3, 8, 11, 11, 12, 13, 15} is 5.

To find the interquartile range (IQR) of a data set, follow these steps:

Order the data set in ascending order: 3, 8, 11, 11, 12, 13, 15.

Find the first quartile (Q1): This is the median of the lower half of the data set. In this case, the lower half is {3, 8, 11}. Since there is an odd number of data points, the median is the middle value, which is 8.

Find the third quartile (Q3): This is the median of the upper half of the data set. In this case, the upper half is {12, 13, 15}. The median of this set is 13.

Calculate the interquartile range (IQR): The IQR is the difference between the third quartile (Q3) and the first quartile (Q1). In this case, IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 13 - 8 = 5.

Therefore, the interquartile range (IQR) of the given data set {3, 8, 11, 11, 12, 13, 15} is 5.

Learn more about the interquartile range (IQR) for a given data set.

brainly.com/question/31190938

#SPJ11

The length of OP to the nearest tenth of a foot is approximately 41.5 feet

To find the length of OP, we can use the Pythagorean theorem since we have a right triangle.

OP^2 = PN^2 - ON^2

First, we need to find ON using the trigonometric ratio of tangent.

tan(39) = ON/PN

ON = PN * tan(39)
ON = 72 * tan(39)
ON ≈ 53.4 feet

Now we can plug in our values:

OP^2 = 72^2 - 53.4^2
OP^2 ≈ 1720.84
OP ≈ 41.5 feet (rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot)

Therefore, the length of OP to the nearest tenth of a foot is approximately 41.5 feet.

To know more about length refer here

https://brainly.com/question/9842733#

#SPJ11

A. Main Answer:

The hypothesis that the variability in both populations is the same against the alternative that it is larger in the second population, we can perform a permutation test using two different test statistics:

(i) the difference of sample ranges and

(ii) the ratio of sample variances. By comparing the results of both test statistics, we can draw conclusions about the variability in the populations.

(i) Difference of Sample Ranges:

1. Calculate the sample range for each sample. The sample range is the difference between the maximum and minimum values in the sample.

  Sample 1 Range = Maximum value - Minimum value for Sample 1

  Sample 2 Range = Maximum value - Minimum value for Sample 2

2. Calculate the observed difference of sample ranges, which is the difference between the sample range of Sample 2 and Sample 1.

3. Pool the data from both samples and shuffle them randomly, keeping the same sample sizes.

4. Calculate the difference of sample ranges for the shuffled data.

5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 many times (e.g., 1000 permutations) to obtain a distribution of the difference of sample ranges under the null hypothesis (where variability is the same in both populations).

6. Compare the observed difference of sample ranges from step 2 with the distribution obtained from the permutations.

(ii) Ratio of Sample Variances:

1. Calculate the sample variance for each sample.

2. Calculate the observed ratio of sample variances, which is the ratio of the sample variance of Sample 2 to the sample variance of Sample 1.

3. Pool the data from both samples and shuffle them randomly, keeping the same sample sizes.

4. Calculate the ratio of sample variances for the shuffled data.

5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 many times (e.g., 1000 permutations) to obtain a distribution of the ratio of sample variances under the null hypothesis.

6. Compare the observed ratio of sample variances from step 2 with the distribution obtained from the permutations.

By comparing the results of both test statistics, we can assess whether the variability in the second population is significantly larger than the first population. If both test statistics consistently indicate larger variability in the second population, it provides evidence against the null hypothesis and suggests that the variability in the second population is indeed larger.

To know more permutation test , refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/21083287#

#SPJ11

At both the 5% and 1% significance levels, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the proportion of US adults who have great confidence in banks is 15% or higher. Therefore, we can conclude that the economist's claim that less than 15% of US adults have great confidence in banks is supported by the data.

Null Hypothesis: The proportion of US adults who have great confidence in banks is 15% or higher.

Alternative Hypothesis: The proportion of US adults who have great confidence in banks is less than 15%.

We can use a one-tailed z-test to test the economist's claim.

The test statistic is

z = (P - p) / √(p * (1-p) / n)

where P is the sample proportion, p is the hypothesized proportion, and n is the sample size.

Using the sample data, we have

P = 149/1325 = 0.1121

p = 0.15

n = 1325

The test statistic is

z = (0.1121 - 0.15) / √(0.15 × (1-0.15) / 1325) = -3.196

Using a significance level of α = 0.05, the critical value for a one-tailed test is -1.645. Since our test statistic is less than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

The p-value for this test is P(Z < -3.196) = 0.0007. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

At the 5% significance level, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the proportion of US adults who have great confidence in banks is 15% or higher. Therefore, we can conclude that the economist's claim that less than 15% of US adults have great confidence in banks is supported by the data.

Using a significance level of α = 0.01, the critical value for a one-tailed test is -2.33. Since our test statistic is less than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

The p-value for this test is P(Z < -3.196) = 0.0007. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis.

At the 1% significance level, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the proportion of US adults who have great confidence in banks is 15% or higher. Therefore, we can conclude that the economist's claim that less than 15% of US adults have great confidence in banks is supported by the data.

Learn more about p-value here

brainly.com/question/30461126

#SPJ4

[tex](\text{x}+2)^{1/2}-5 = -2\\\\\sqrt{\text{x}+2}-5 = -2\\\\\sqrt{\text{x}+2} = -2+5\\\\\sqrt{\text{x}+2} = 3\\\\(\sqrt{\text{x}+2})^2 = 3^2\\\\\text{x}+2= 9\\\\\text{x}= 9-2\\\\\text{x}= 7\\\\[/tex]

-----------------------

Check:

[tex](\text{x}+2)^{1/2}-5 = -2\\\\\sqrt{\text{x}+2}-5 = -2\\\\\sqrt{7+2}-5 = -2\\\\\sqrt{9}-5 = -2\\\\3-5 = -2\\\\-2 = -2 \ \ \ \checkmark\\\\[/tex]

The answer is confirmed.

-----------------------

Answer:

1.2

Step-by-step explanation:

based on your description the top sides are corresponding pairs, the bottom sides are corresponding sides, the left sides are corresponding sides, and the right sides are corresponding sides between the 2 polygons.

the dilation (scaling) is happening for all points on the polygon with the same scaling factor.

so, we only need to find the scaling factor f between one of these corresponding pairs.

8×f = 9.6

f = 9.6/8 = 1.2

Answer: The answer is 1.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Just trust me.

Answer:

$450

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use the variables C, I, and F to represent the number of chocolate fudge bars, ice cream sandwiches, and frozen fruit bars, respectively, that you will sell.

The cost of each chocolate fudge bar is $0.75, the cost of each ice cream sandwich is $0.85, and the cost of each frozen fruit bar is $0.50. Therefore, the total cost of the frozen treats that you buy will be:

Total cost = 0.75C + 0.85I + 0.50F

We want to make sure that this total cost is no more than $450. Therefore, we can write the following inequality:

0.75C + 0.85I + 0.50F ≤ 450

This inequality represents the number of chocolate fudge bars, C, the number of ice-cream sandwiches, I, and the number of frozen fruit bars, F, that will cost you no more than $450.

The geometric term that can be used to describe the crossing sign shown is intersecting lines.

In geometry, intersecting lines are two lines that cross one another at a location known as the point of intersection. It is possible to use the point of intersection to solve issues concerning angles, segments, and geometric shapes because it is the sole point that both lines share.

Two pairs of opposite angles that are equal to one another are formed when two lines connect, giving rise to four angles.

Learn more about geometry:https://brainly.com/question/31408211

#SPJ1

To use the GCF and distributive property to find the sum of 22 + 33, we first need to identify the GCF of both numbers, which is 11.

We can then write each number as a product using the GCF as a factor: 22 = 11 x 2 and 33 = 11 x 3. Next, we can apply the distributive property by multiplying the GCF by the sum of the other factors in each number: 11 x (2 + 3).

Finally, we can simplify the expression by adding the sum of the other factors, which is 5: 11 x 5 = 55. Therefore, the sum of 22 + 33 using the GCF and distributive property is 55.

In summary, to find the sum of 22 + 33 using the GCF and distributive property, we first identify the GCF as 11 and write each number as a product using the GCF as a factor.

We then apply the distributive property by multiplying the GCF by the sum of the other factors in each number. Finally, we simplify the expression by adding the sum of the other factors and arrive at the answer of 55. This method can be helpful when working with larger numbers or more complex expressions.

To know more about distributive property click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/6276874#

#SPJ11