One of the most important factors in persuading some rural white legislators to vote for the new flag was the testimony of Denmark Groover, who had served as Governor Griffin's floor leader at the 1956 session. Groover had repeatedly denied that the 1956 change was racially motivated. Now nearly seventy-nine and dying of cancer, he admitted that anger over the federal government's support of integration had indeed been a factor and called on Georgia legislators to put the flag issue to rest.

—New Georgia Encyclopedia

How does this passage support or refute John Walker Davis’s argument?
It supports the argument by explaining that the flag really did celebrate segregation.

It supports the argument by explaining that the flag honored Georgia’s heritage.

It refutes the argument by explaining that the flag wasn’t changed due to integration.

It refutes the argument by explaining that the flag celebrated Confederate soldiers.

The pre-colonial period in Ni g e ria was characterized by the existence of various centers of civilization, each with its unique culture, beliefs, and social organization.

The people of these centers of civilization interacted with each other through trade, intermarriage, and cultural exchange. The exchange of goods and services was a significant part of their interaction, and it led to the development of trade routes and markets.

The exchange of ideas and beliefs also occurred, leading to the adoption of new practices and the adaptation of existing ones. This interaction fostered unity and diversity among the people of N i g e ria, contributing to the richness of their cultural heritage.

Read more about colonization here:

https://brainly.com/question/510352

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Great Wall was continuously built from the 3rd century BC to the 17th century AD on the northern border of the country as the great military defence project of successive Chinese Empires, with a total length of more than 20,000 kilometers. The Great Wall begins in the east at Shanhaiguan in Hebei province and ends at Jiayuguan in Gansu province to the west. Its main body consists of walls, horse tracks, watch towers, and shelters on the wall, and includes fortresses and passes along the Wall.

The Great Wall reflects collision and exchanges between agricultural civilizations and nomadic civilizations in ancient China. It provides significant physical evidence of the far-sighted political strategic thinking and mighty military and national defence forces of central empires in ancient China, and is an outstanding example of the superb military architecture, technology and art of ancient China. It embodies unparalleled significance as the national symbol for safeguarding the security of the country and its people.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

My environmental reaction to the discussion/lecture made by Al Gore in the documentary film An Inconvenient Truth is one of great concern.

Gore's presentation was very sobering and thought-provoking, as he highlighted the very real and serious environmental issues we are currently facing and the need to take action now. Gore pointed to the increase in global temperatures and the melting of the polar ice caps as some of the most pressing issues, and he outlined the consequences of these discussion. He highlighted how extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, and hurricanes are becoming more frequent, and how these events are likely to worsen as the climate continues to warm. He also stressed the need for us to reduce our carbon emissions in order to mitigate the effects of climate change.

To know more about discussion refer :

brainly.com/question/617725

#SPJ1

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The Declaration of Independence was a document adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, which announced that the thirteen American colonies then at war with Great Britain were now independent states, and thus no longer a part of the British Empire. It played a crucial role in the American Revolution and the formation of the United States of America. Although it is not a governing document, it has served as a source of inspiration for the country's founding principles and ideals.

Throughout history, leaders have utilized speeches to communicate their vision and inspire change. Two such speeches were delivered by Neville Chamberlain and Franklin D. Roosevelt during the tumultuous years leading up to World W a r II.

In the face of adversity, both leaders sought to rally their nations and promote peace. However, their speeches differed greatly in tone and message.

While Chamberlain's speech was marked by appeasement and a desire to avoid conflict, Roosevelt's was characterized by a call to arms and a commitment to defending democracy.

In this essay, I will explore the contrasting approaches of Chamberlain and Roosevelt, and argue that Roosevelt's speech was more effective in galvanizing support and achieving its desired outcome.

learn more about Roosevelt's speech: https://brainly.com/question/25914208

#SPJ1

Answer: Here it is!

Explanation:

Dr. King’s letter from Birmingham jail was a letter that defended the strategy of nonviolent actions, which argued people naturally had the urge to break unjust laws. While king was in jail, an ally smuggled in a newspaper that contained an article called “A Call for Unity” which provoked king to write a response to the clergymen criticizing his methods. However, even though the article was written by clergymen in which Dr. King understood their importance and status in the church, Dr. King still managed to write the letter to them in a scholarly way. From another point of view, Malcom X, human rights activist, delivered his public speech at Cory Methodist Church in Ohio. Malcom X separated from the Nation of Islam, which had disagreements …show more content…

King opens this letter with addressing the clergymen who criticized his actions during protests in Birmingham. Dr. King refers to their claims of him being an “outsider” and defends himself in a straightforward tone, and explains that he was there because of his organizational ties with the SCLC who asked for his nonviolent action program to fight the injustice in Birmingham. Dr. King believed that all cities and towns should work together and all carry the same amount of freedom and justice wherever it is practiced. All states should work together as they all have commons and are interrelated. Dr. King states, “If injustice is practiced somewhere, then it threatens justice everywhere.” Dr. King’s process in taking nonviolent action is in four steps: collecting facts to determine where the injustice is present; negotiation; self-purification; then direct action. The steps already have been taken and he implies racial injustice covers the community. The Negro community has waited for their justice, for a while actually. The word “Wait!” became “Never!”, as they have waited almost 340 years for their justice. There are two types of laws, just and unjust laws. Everyone has a moral responsibility to follow just laws, but the opposite with unjust laws. Dr. King states, “An unjust law is no law at all”. He criticizes the white moderates and believed that they were the largest obstacle in obtaining their justice. Dr. King hopes the community will eventually see the justice of

The Dixiecrats were one of the major dishonesties within the system. The Dixiecrats were basically southern democrats, but they were given a name as they were a group that basically controlled the smaller committees that ran the government. The Dixiecrats had seniority because they originated from a state where the Negro can’t vote. Malcom X asks, “Why can’t they simply pass something that will help you and me?” The issue here is the house, especially the Dixiecrats, hold the bills like a giant con game that they call a filibuster. A filibuster is the right to unlimited debate.

I hope this is what you wanted, and I hope this helped you. A brainilist would be extremely appreciated! <3

Answer:

Character: Amelia Earhart

Description: Amelia Earhart was an American aviation pioneer and author who was the first female aviator to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean. She was known for her courage, determination, and adventurous spirit, as well as her advocacy for women's rights and gender equality.

Evidence: Earhart's many accomplishments and achievements serve as evidence of her strong character. In addition to her solo flight across the Atlantic, she set numerous aviation records and paved the way for women in the field of aviation. She was also a vocal advocate for women's rights, serving as a member of the National Woman's Party and promoting gender equality through her writing and public speaking. Her bravery and determination in the face of adversity, including surviving a plane crash and continuing to fly despite criticism and opposition, further demonstrate her strong character. Finally, her legacy as an inspiration to future generations of women and aviators is a testament to the enduring impact of her character and achievements.

Character: George Palmer Putnam

Description: George Palmer Putnam was an American publisher and author who was known for his support of aviation and his marriage to Amelia Earhart.

Evidence: Putnam's support for aviation, particularly his partnership with Earhart, serves as evidence of his character. He was instrumental in promoting and publicizing Earhart's flights, helping to secure funding and sponsorships, as well as arranging speaking engagements and book deals. He was also an author in his own right, writing numerous books on aviation and adventure, and was a proponent of progressive social and political causes, including women's rights and civil rights. Finally, his dedication to Earhart and their marriage, despite the challenges of their respective careers and the pressures of public scrutiny, demonstrates his loyalty and commitment as a character trait.

Explanation:

#1 African Americans were the last to be hired, the first to be fired, and were restricted to certain jobs in the workforce.

Restriction is the limiting or controlling of something, usually through the use of rules, regulations, guidelines, or laws. Restrictions can be applied to any aspect of life such as activities, behavior, rights, or resources. Restrictions often come in the form of laws, regulations, or policies that are put in place in order to protect people and resources.

#2 Women were not considered for certain jobs and were not given the same salary or benefits as men.
#3 African Americans were not allowed to serve in certain branches of the military, attend certain universities, or live in certain neighborhoods.
#4 Women were denied certain opportunities, such as the ability to get a loan or credit, and were not allowed to serve on juries.
These actions demonstrate that African Americans and women were treated differently than before World War II, as these restrictions were no longer in place for those groups.

To learn more about restriction
https://brainly.com/question/28531246
#SPJ1

One of the goals listed in the Preamble is to promote the general welfare. Creating rules for a new government to follow could help meet this goal.

Creating rules for a new government to help achieve this goal by ensuring that the government is structured in a way that allows for the efficient and equitable distribution of resources and services that promote the well-being of all citizens. For example, the government could enact policies ensuring that all citizens, regardless of socioeconomic status, have access to healthcare, education, and basic necessities. By enacting rules and regulations that priorities the general welfare, the government can help to reduce poverty, improve public health, and create a more equitable society. Furthermore, these rules may ensure that the government operates in a transparent and ethical manner, which can aid in the development of public trust and civic engagement, thereby promoting the general welfare of the population. One of the goals listed in the Preamble is to promote the general welfare. Creating rules for a new government to follow could help meet this goal.

Learn more about Preamble:

https://brainly.com/question/28959887

#SPJ1

Trade goods from the Han Dynasty were transported along the Silk Roads as far west as Imperial Rome. These complex trade routes facilitated extensive cultural and commercial exchanges, although they did not directly reach Phoenicia.

Dating back to the Han Dynasty, Chinese merchants transported goods along a network of trade routes collectively known as the Silk Road. These routes extended into several regions, including Central Asia, India, and Persia, further stretching westward. While the Silk Road did connect to various important ancient cities, the farthest western point to which trade goods were typically transported during the Han Dynasty was Imperial Rome. Despite the distance and complexity of these trade routes, they were instrumental in fostering cultural and commercial interactions between vastly different civilizations.

It's worth noting that Phoenicia, another region known for its merchant culture, was not directly reached by the Silk Road. Instead, Phoenician trade networks were primarily conducted through maritime routes across the Mediterranean.

https://brainly.com/question/10415068

#SPJ2

1. Middle Passage 2. enslaved Africans

Answer: 1. Middle Passage 2. Enslaved Africans

Explanation: Plato

Answer:

Explanation:

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that was first proposed by philosophers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill in the 18th and 19th centuries. The basic principle of Utilitarianism is that an action is considered morally right if it results in the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure for the greatest number of people affected by the action. Here are the key principles of Utilitarian theory:

The principle of utility: This is the central principle of Utilitarianism. It states that an action is morally right if it maximizes happiness or pleasure and minimizes suffering or pain for the greatest number of people affected by the action.

The greatest happiness principle: This principle states that the goal of human action should be to promote the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure for the greatest number of people.

The consequentialist principle: Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, which means that it evaluates the moral worth of an action based on its consequences. The consequences of an action are more important than the intentions behind the action.

The impartiality principle: Utilitarianism holds that all people's happiness and suffering are equally valuable, and therefore, moral decisions should be made impartially, without favouring any particular individual or group.

The aggregation principle: Utilitarianism assumes that happiness and suffering can be quantified and compared, and therefore, the moral value of an action can be determined by adding up the total amount of happiness or pleasure produced and subtracting the total amount of suffering or pain produced.

The utilitarian calculus: In order to determine the moral value of an action, Utilitarianism requires a calculation of the expected consequences of that action for all parties involved. The utilitarian calculus involves considering the intensity, duration, certainty, and extent of the happiness or suffering that will result from an action.

Overall, Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory that prioritizes the greatest happiness and pleasure for the greatest number of people, while minimizing suffering and pain.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer: in my case Palestinians deserve the land because because Israelis has been very rasist towards muslims which im a muslim. Israelis is also misusing all the power they have. This is something like the revolutionary war. So these are my reasons why Palestinians.

Explanation: i would apreciate if i get brainliest

Answer:

Explanation:

The tax policies of the Han dynasty were primarily based on the principles of social status and the ability to provide for others. The government collected taxes in the form of labor, goods, and money, which were used to fund the imperial bureaucracy, military, and public works projects. Here are some specific tax policies implemented during the Han dynasty:

Taxation based on social status: The Han dynasty divided its citizens into four social classes, with each class paying a different tax rate. The highest class, which included scholars and officials, were exempt from taxes, while the other classes paid taxes in the form of labor or goods.

Taxation of merchants: The Han government taxed merchants and traders at higher rates than other citizens. This was because merchants were seen as less productive members of society who profited from the labor of others.

Taxation based on ability to pay: Citizens living in poverty paid the most taxes because they were required to provide a certain amount of labor or goods to the government regardless of their income level. This policy was designed to ensure that everyone contributed to the needs of society.

Land tax: The government also collected taxes in the form of land, which was measured based on the quality and productivity of the land. Landowners were required to provide a certain amount of labor or goods based on the size and productivity of their land.

Overall, the Han dynasty created a complex system of taxation based on social status, ability to pay, and productivity. While the tax policies were designed to fund the government and provide for the needs of society, they also perpetuated inequality and favored the wealthy and powerful.

The easiest way to sum up the Texas oil business in the 20th century is to say that Texas rose to become the most populated state in the union as a result of how much oil was found there.

Opportunities were provided to Texas by the oil business. Texas evolved became the nation's hub for oil exploration and production. Cities grew up in a lot of rural areas. There were new job categories made.

When Spanish explorer Luis de Moscoso of the DeSoto expedition first discovered oil in Texas in July 1543, it was in the Galveston Bay, between High Island and the Sabine Pass, close to Port Arthur.

To know more about Texas visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/13104506

#SPJ1

Answer: Inequality is a drag on economic growth and fosters political dysfunction, experts say. Concentrated income and wealth reduces the level of demand in the economy because rich households tend to spend less of their income than poorer ones. Reduced opportunities for low-income households can also hurt the economy.

Explanation: there You go

Disparities in opportunity have an effect on life expectancy as well as access to necessities like healthcare, education, clean water, and sanitization. They can limit someone's human rights by treating them unjustly, abusing them, or interfering with the legal process.

According to analysts, inequality hinders economic progress and encourages political dysfunction. Concentrated wealth and income lower economic demand because wealthy families typically spend a smaller percentage of their income than do impoverished households. The economy may suffer from fewer chances for low-income households.

The unequal distribution of money and opportunity among distinct socioeconomic groups is known as economic inequality. It is a worry for almost every country in the globe, and many individuals are locked in poverty with little prospects to rise in society.

Learn more about economic inequality: https://brainly.com/question/30239024

#SPJ1

Answer:

Its World War I

Explanation:

If you look at the bottom of the posters you can see it says 1915 in the text and world war I was from 1914 to 1919.

Answer: A. Jim Crowe Laws

Explanation:

Answer:

See Explanation Please

Explanation:

W.E.B. Du Bois, a prominent African American intellectual and civil rights leader, initially supported a policy of assimilation, which aimed to promote integration and equality for African Americans by encouraging them to adopt the cultural norms and values of white Americans. However, over time, Du Bois became disillusioned with assimilation and shifted his focus to an antiracist stance, which sought to dismantle systemic racism and promote racial equality.

There were several factors that contributed to Du Bois' shift in perspective. One of the key factors was his growing awareness of the persistence of racism and discrimination despite African Americans' efforts to assimilate. Du Bois recognized that assimilation alone was not enough to overcome the deeply ingrained racial prejudices and structures of power that maintained white supremacy.

Another factor was Du Bois' increasing interest in the experiences and perspectives of African Americans themselves, rather than solely focusing on their relationship to white America. Through his research and writing, Du Bois explored the unique cultural and social contributions of African Americans and emphasized the importance of valuing and celebrating their distinct identities and histories.

Finally, Du Bois was influenced by the growing civil rights movement and the activism of African Americans, who were demanding greater political and social equality. He recognized the need for more radical and transformative change in order to achieve true racial justice and advocated for a more militant approach to challenging racism and discrimination.

Overall, Du Bois' shift from assimilation to antiracism was a product of his deepening understanding of the persistence of racism and the need for more radical and transformative change in order to achieve true racial equality.

Explanation:

The article titled "Should We Stop Admiring Works of Art That Were Created by Bad People?" discusses the ethical implications of appreciating art created by individuals who have committed morally reprehensible acts. The article delves into the ongoing debate surrounding whether we should separate an artist's personal life from their work. The author argues that while we should not condone the actions of artists who have done wrong, we should still appreciate their works as they have "cultural and historical significance." The article concludes by stating that "We have to learn to live with moral ambiguity."

I agree with the statement by the author that we should not judge the whole of an artist only by the immoral part of their lives. While it is essential to acknowledge the reprehensible actions of these individuals, it is equally important to appreciate their artistic contributions. The work of art should be evaluated independently of the artist's personal life. An artist's work has a cultural and historical significance beyond their personal lives. It is not fair to dismiss their entire oeuvre because of their immoral behavior. As the article rightly states, we must learn to live with moral ambiguity and recognize that people are not entirely good or bad. Therefore, we should not let the actions of the artist overshadow their artistic contributions.

Answer:

Explanation:

Carry Nation is the figure most associated with the temperance movement. She was a prominent leader and activist in the movement, which aimed to eliminate the consumption of alcohol in the United States. Carry Nation became famous for her aggressive tactics, which included destroying saloons and smashing bottles of alcohol with a hatchet. Her actions were controversial but drew attention to the issue of alcoholism and its impact on society. She was also a strong advocate for women's rights and suffrage and believed that the consumption of alcohol was a threat to women's safety and well-being. Carry Nation's efforts, along with those of other temperance activists, eventually led to the passage of the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibited the production, sale, and transportation of alcohol in the United States.

Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, Spain, and Italy are the main nations responsible for the modern colonization of Africa. The official language in almost all African nations nowadays is

Eventually, two critical crises in European imperialism in Africa at the turn of the 20th century are seen by historians as being important to the broader tale of the Scramble for Africa. There were two of them: the First and Second Moroccan Crises.

The primary economic, political, and religious justifications for colonising Africa. Powerful nations like Germany, France, and Great Britain were experiencing financial losses during this period of colonisation while Europe was experiencing an economic downturn.

To know more about colonization of Africa visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28186423

#SPJ1

B. Increased poverty rates for Black people living in cities.

The loss of manufacturing jobs and rollback of government protections have had a significant impact on urban areas, particularly on the Black community. As manufacturing jobs moved overseas or were automated, many urban residents lost their jobs, making it harder to find good-paying jobs. The rollback of government protections also left many low-income people, including Black people, without the support they needed to make ends meet. This has contributed to increased poverty rates for Black people living in cities. The decline in manufacturing jobs also led to a decline in the availability of good-paying jobs in urban areas, making it harder for Black people to achieve upward mobility and contributing to the persistence of racial and economic inequality.

The decline in manufacturing jobs and the rollback of government protections have likely led to increased poverty rates among Black urban dwellers due to the loss of stable income sources and diminishing job security.

The loss of manufacturing jobs and the rollback of government protections most likely contributed to increased poverty rates for Black people living in cities. When manufacturing jobs decrease, it has a domino effect on local economies. Such jobs often provide a steady income and benefits and are vital to lower and middle-class families. Additionally, government protections, such as labor laws and regulations aimed at providing job security and promoting equality, are incredibly important. If these protections are rolled back, it could lead to higher rates of unemployment and lower wages, disproportionately affecting already vulnerable populations, such as Black residents of cities.

https://brainly.com/question/32412332

#SPJ2

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

The annual economic impact of the military community on South Carolina is $34.3 billion.

Answer:

D- Ulysses Grant

Explanation:

In March 1864, President Lincoln appointed Ulysses S. Grant as General-in-Chief of the Union Army, giving him overall command of all Union armies fighting in the Civil War. Lincoln chose Grant because of his aggressive tactics and his ability to lead and coordinate large armies. Grant had already achieved significant victories in the western theater of the war and was known for his determination and perseverance. Lincoln believed that Grant could bring the war to a close and end the Confederacy's rebellion. Grant went on to implement a strategy of total war, which helped bring about the eventual Union victory in 1865.