pls help me

4.05 Diary from Corps of Discovery
You will write 4 entries of a diary from the early 1800s. Each entry will be one paragraph each and is to be written in first person (using the word I, as if you are that person on the expedition). This will be a description from the perspective of 4 people who were part of the Lewis and Clark Expedition.

In a paragraph for each, describe the journey/experience of Lewis, Clark, Sacajawea, and York from each person’s perspective.
Include a date for each entry.
Read the lesson to learn about the historic events that took place during the Lewis and Clark Expedition to give examples and historic accuracy to your diary!
Topics to consider including background/personality traits of the individual, role the individual played in the journey, feelings about the journey, conditions (terrain, food and insects/animals) how the individual interacted with others, unique information from the lesson.

Entry #1 (Lewis)
Date:

Entry #2 (Clark)
Date:


Entry #3 (Sacajawea)
Date:
Entry #4 (York)
Date:

Explanation:

Answer:

the two countries believe in the value of education

and teach the same subjects in school and college

and the clothes fashion are kinda same

and food is similler .

A) it expanded the role of governmental action in American life and business.

Explanation:

right on plato

see attachment

Correct option is A.

The permanent changes to the federal government resulted resulted from the New Deal is to "expanded the role of governmental actions in American life and business."

By granting the government the authority to control previously unregulated areas of business, the New Deal extended the Government's role in our economy. Banking, agriculture, and housing are the most common example. It was accompanied by the establishment of new programs such as social security.

To know more about federal government, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/5394575

Answer:

Freedom, generally, is having the ability to act or change without constraint. Something is "free" if it can change easily and is not constrained in its present state.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. This founding document, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government.Explanation:

Answer:

Asteria earned a $27,000 salary as an employee in 2020. How much should her employer have withheld from her paycheck for FICA taxes

Answer: " that of the expanse of the United States being too big for Republican Government to work"

hope that helps

Answer: they form the base for many soups and sauces. This extracts the flavor, aroma, color, body, and nutrients of the ingredients. stock is made from simmering bones with vegetables, minimally adding herbs & salt to let the true flavor of the simmering, also stock can also be boiled to eliminate some of the liquid, which thickens the stock and intensifies the flavor.

Answer:

World War I was the "war to end all wars." It had major consequences on Americans both at home and abroad.

Explanation:

Answer:

Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.

Answer:

(B), (A)

Explanation:

I took the quiz

Answer:

B, A

Explanation:

I got it correct trust me

Explanation:

composition of population means the distribution of the number of the population according to characteristics such as age,sex,marital status,socio-economic status. ... It helps to find out the structure of population. It helps to study on various demographic indicators

Answer:

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). ... The British elite tended to support the Confederacy, but ordinary people tended to support the Union.

Explanation:

According to my knowledge

Answer:

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). ... The British elite tended to support the Confederacy, but ordinary people tended to support the Union.

Why did the British get involved in the Civil War?

The reason behind Great Britain's involvement within the American Civil War was primarily economic interest. In the mid-nineteenth century, a vast majority of the world's cotton was produced within the Southern States of America.

hope this helped!!

Answer:

So, no, the government can't limit it. False, I think? (I am kinda confused on your question, so, I gave the best answer I could)

Explanation:

The First Amendment guarantees our right to free expression and free association, which means that the government does not have the right to forbid us from saying what we like and writing what we like; we can form clubs and organizations, and take part in demonstrations and rallies.

Answer:

Anyone who holds that what matters most in politics is having the right people in power and not how power should be constrained will be unconvinced of the value of the rule of law. Neither will anyone who believes that institutions of public power are merely instruments of the ruling class that need to be dismantled rather than merely constrained. For the majority of modern democratic societies, however, the rule of law’s requirement that both rulers and the ruled be accountable to the law is of unquestionable value. To be sure, in the modern world, it is the liberal tradition that values the rule of law most highly. Liberals who are concerned with ways of protecting (and realizing) liberty in some form and averting threats to it view the rule of law as an overarching source of security. Nonetheless, there is substantial disagreement even among liberals over what exactly counts as a faithful application of the term and, even when that is pinned down, how it is to be accomplished.

In itself, the notion of the rule of law is not a faithful description of any state of affairs but a complex ideal that is even more complex to realize. Thus, there is reason to be skeptical about whether societies necessarily benefit from all that might be invoked under the term. The independence of the judiciary, for instance, is clearly a problem if the independence is misused to foster the sectoral privileges of judicial personnel or to allow unchallenged interpretations of the law. Heavy emphasis on the formal aspects of the rule of law—for example, on procedural justice—may distract from the content and consequences of those laws. Critics of a strictly formal conception of the rule of law argue that too much attention to legal process generates significant vices of its own in the form of exaggerated legalism and neglect of the political or real-world dimensions of legal conflicts. Excessive veneration of the law and legal procedures may be too costly if it inhibits independent social assessments of the merits of a given policy proposal or if the official mandate of “blindness” gives legitimacy to actions performed “according to the law” even when most people would oppose such acts. Some writers have charged, moreover, that the increasing domain of judges and lawyers—indeed, their encroachment into areas previously left to politicians and the electorate—entails the loss of much that is politically and democratically valuable.

In short, too much emphasis on procedures for preventing arbitrariness can lead to subverting the doing of justice according to what might otherwise find support in the rule of law, and the legal strictures then become themselves a form of arbitrariness that is no more legitimate. On the other hand, those who defend the negative value of the rule of law object to more substantive understandings of the ideal on the grounds that morally ambitious aspirations about the rule of law threaten to purge the concept of its specificity and usefulness. They argue that to open the concept to a whole host of extralegal considerations about substantive justice and wider societal goals is to conflate ideas about “the rule of law” with notions about “the rule of good law,” such that any distinction between the two is reduced to nothing. As a consequence, no discussion of the rule of law can be complete without some philosophical reflection on law, including on its purpose and meaning.

Answer: He wishes for a wife as beautiful as the forest. He is given a wife (companion) and he is happy; however, she is unhappy.

Explanation:

Hope that helps but hope that helps

Answer:

satara

Explanation:

branless me please if i am wrong

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The best answer is B that citizens should have the same rights as political leaders

Answer: It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.

Explanation: I hope this helps :) You've got this!

Answer:

O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.

Explanation:

this is correct

Answer: when what actually happens turns out to be completely different from what would be expected

Explanation:

Answer:

About 3 months

Explanation:

Answer:

administrative assistant.

Explanation:

Office Manager Job Description: Top Duties and Qualifications

An Office Manager,or Business Manager,is responsible for overseeing the daily operations of an office and its various departments. Their duties include communicating with department heads, relaying important information or policy changes from upper management and implementing incentives to enhance employee productivity.

Office Manager duties and responsibilities

Office Managers may be the first point of contact for internal and external parties for your office, which may impact some customer service and communication elements of their job duties. Duties and responsibilities will vary depending on an organization’s size, but might include:

Answer:

The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.

The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.

Your answer is → sculptor Donatello

Answer: sculptor Donatello

Explanation:

David is the title of two statues of the biblical hero David by the Italian early Renaissance sculptor Donatello. They consist of an early work in marble of a clothed figure (1408–09), and a far more famous bronze figure

Answer:

You know sometimes reading the lesson really helps you progress in school and makes it alot easier on you so you dont have to be here

Explanation:

Answer:

In Lochner v. New York (1905) = protecting workers rights

In Schenck v. United States (1919) =limits freedom of speech

In Northern = supports antitrust

Explanation:

it was right

Answer:

After the bloodshed, civil rights, and laws the anarchy did not represent the values that the citizens had fought for. So, the French Revolution was a major failure and a minor success.

They didn't have enough food and there was alot of sick people who may of had a disease , maybe other people caught on to that dieseae.

Answer:

Explanation:

Nationalist disputes led to the

division of the empire into two

states, Austria and Hungary.

After World War I, the empire

divided into separate nation-states

Nationalist feeling of non-Russian peoples, fueled by the

policy of Russification, weakened

the empire, which fell as a

result of war and revolution.

Conservative Turks, angered by

the Ottoman policy of granting

equal citizenship to nationalist

groups, caused tensions that

weakened and eventually broke

up the empire.