Answer:
a terrible and bloody Civil War freed enslaved Americans. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution (1868) granted African Americans the rights of citizenship. However, this did not always translate into the ability to vote. Black voters were systematically turned away from state polling places. To combat this problem, Congress passed the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870. It says:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Yet states still found ways to circumvent the Constitution and prevent blacks from voting. Poll taxes, literacy tests, fraud and intimidation all turned African Americans away from the polls. Until the Supreme Court struck it down in 1915, many states used the "grandfather clause " to keep descendents of slaves out of elections. The clause said you could not vote unless your grandfather had voted -- an impossibility for most people whose ancestors were slaves.
This unfair treatment was debated on the street, in the Congress and in the press. A full fifty years after the Fifteenth Amendment passed, black Americans still found it difficult to vote, especially in the South." What a Colored Man Should Do to Vote", lists many of the barriers African American voters faced.
Explanation:
Which statements about how Federalists and Anti-Federalists felt about the Constitution are true?
Choose all answers that are correct.
A.The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
B.The Federalists at first argued that a bill of rights was not needed in the Constitution.
C.The Anti-Federalists created a second draft of the Constitution, this time adding a bill of rights, and ratified their version.
D.The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
Answer:
The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
To what extent did the American soldiers receive the clothing that they were promised
Explanation:
composition of population means the distribution of the number of the population according to characteristics such as age,sex,marital status,socio-economic status. ... It helps to find out the structure of population. It helps to study on various demographic indicators
Native Americans in the Pampas and the
Andes grew all types of food in their early
history.
True
False
Which Renaissance artist created a bronze statue of David?
Please help!!
Your answer is → sculptor Donatello
Answer: sculptor Donatello
Explanation:
David is the title of two statues of the biblical hero David by the Italian early Renaissance sculptor Donatello. They consist of an early work in marble of a clothed figure (1408–09), and a far more famous bronze figure
What is Freedom? What does it mean to be free?
Answer:
Freedom, generally, is having the ability to act or change without constraint. Something is "free" if it can change easily and is not constrained in its present state.
Explanation:
OPEN ENDED QUESTION
Do you think the French Revolution was successful? Why or why not?
Rewatch
Submit
Answer:
After the bloodshed, civil rights, and laws the anarchy did not represent the values that the citizens had fought for. So, the French Revolution was a major failure and a minor success.
How did nationalism lead to the breaking of these empires?
Austro-Hungarian
Russian
Ottoman
Answer:
Explanation:
Nationalist disputes led to the
division of the empire into two
states, Austria and Hungary.
After World War I, the empire
divided into separate nation-states
Nationalist feeling of non-Russian peoples, fueled by the
policy of Russification, weakened
the empire, which fell as a
result of war and revolution.
Conservative Turks, angered by
the Ottoman policy of granting
equal citizenship to nationalist
groups, caused tensions that
weakened and eventually broke
up the empire.
Drag and drop the tiles to match the topics to the Supreme Court cases.
limits freedom
of speechsupports antitrust
regulationprotects workers
rights
Answer:
In Lochner v. New York (1905) = protecting workers rights
In Schenck v. United States (1919) =limits freedom of speech
In Northern = supports antitrust
Explanation:
it was right
2
Which permanent changes to the federal government resulted from the New Deal?
OA. It expanded the role of governmental actions in American life and business.
OB.
It created policies that transferred some of the authority to the states.
O c.
It created policies that established work programs that continue today.
OD. It expanded the power of the federal reserve to fundamentally reform banks.
Reset
Next
A) it expanded the role of governmental action in American life and business.
Explanation:
right on plato
see attachment
Correct option is A.
The permanent changes to the federal government resulted resulted from the New Deal is to "expanded the role of governmental actions in American life and business."
By granting the government the authority to control previously unregulated areas of business, the New Deal extended the Government's role in our economy. Banking, agriculture, and housing are the most common example. It was accompanied by the establishment of new programs such as social security.
To know more about federal government, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/5394575
who is asteria and what does it mean
give info about that
help asap
Answer:
Asteria earned a $27,000 salary as an employee in 2020. How much should her employer have withheld from her paycheck for FICA taxes
What does it mean for something to be ironic
Answer: when what actually happens turns out to be completely different from what would be expected
Explanation:
How long did the war last?
Answer:
About 3 months
Explanation:
how dose stocks help sauce in flavor
Answer: they form the base for many soups and sauces. This extracts the flavor, aroma, color, body, and nutrients of the ingredients. stock is made from simmering bones with vegetables, minimally adding herbs & salt to let the true flavor of the simmering, also stock can also be boiled to eliminate some of the liquid, which thickens the stock and intensifies the flavor.
Taft's
Diplomacy upset many Progressives as it protected private
bank investments using military force.*
A. Moral
B. Big Stick
C. Dollar
D. Foreign
14. The one of the most prosperous province in India.
1)Satara
2)Pune
3)Bengal
4)Chennai
Answer:
satara
Explanation:
branless me please if i am wrong
What are the challenges we face today to uphold the rule of law? What about in the future?
Answer:
Anyone who holds that what matters most in politics is having the right people in power and not how power should be constrained will be unconvinced of the value of the rule of law. Neither will anyone who believes that institutions of public power are merely instruments of the ruling class that need to be dismantled rather than merely constrained. For the majority of modern democratic societies, however, the rule of law’s requirement that both rulers and the ruled be accountable to the law is of unquestionable value. To be sure, in the modern world, it is the liberal tradition that values the rule of law most highly. Liberals who are concerned with ways of protecting (and realizing) liberty in some form and averting threats to it view the rule of law as an overarching source of security. Nonetheless, there is substantial disagreement even among liberals over what exactly counts as a faithful application of the term and, even when that is pinned down, how it is to be accomplished.
In itself, the notion of the rule of law is not a faithful description of any state of affairs but a complex ideal that is even more complex to realize. Thus, there is reason to be skeptical about whether societies necessarily benefit from all that might be invoked under the term. The independence of the judiciary, for instance, is clearly a problem if the independence is misused to foster the sectoral privileges of judicial personnel or to allow unchallenged interpretations of the law. Heavy emphasis on the formal aspects of the rule of law—for example, on procedural justice—may distract from the content and consequences of those laws. Critics of a strictly formal conception of the rule of law argue that too much attention to legal process generates significant vices of its own in the form of exaggerated legalism and neglect of the political or real-world dimensions of legal conflicts. Excessive veneration of the law and legal procedures may be too costly if it inhibits independent social assessments of the merits of a given policy proposal or if the official mandate of “blindness” gives legitimacy to actions performed “according to the law” even when most people would oppose such acts. Some writers have charged, moreover, that the increasing domain of judges and lawyers—indeed, their encroachment into areas previously left to politicians and the electorate—entails the loss of much that is politically and democratically valuable.
In short, too much emphasis on procedures for preventing arbitrariness can lead to subverting the doing of justice according to what might otherwise find support in the rule of law, and the legal strictures then become themselves a form of arbitrariness that is no more legitimate. On the other hand, those who defend the negative value of the rule of law object to more substantive understandings of the ideal on the grounds that morally ambitious aspirations about the rule of law threaten to purge the concept of its specificity and usefulness. They argue that to open the concept to a whole host of extralegal considerations about substantive justice and wider societal goals is to conflate ideas about “the rule of law” with notions about “the rule of good law,” such that any distinction between the two is reduced to nothing. As a consequence, no discussion of the rule of law can be complete without some philosophical reflection on law, including on its purpose and meaning.
What is a personal staff member with office management duties
Answer:
administrative assistant.
Explanation:
Office Manager Job Description: Top Duties and Qualifications
An Office Manager,or Business Manager,is responsible for overseeing the daily operations of an office and its various departments. Their duties include communicating with department heads, relaying important information or policy changes from upper management and implementing incentives to enhance employee productivity.
Office Manager duties and responsibilities
Office Managers may be the first point of contact for internal and external parties for your office, which may impact some customer service and communication elements of their job duties. Duties and responsibilities will vary depending on an organization’s size, but might include:
Overseeing the work of all office employees to ensure they work productively and meet deadlines and company standards Counseling any employees struggling in their roles Answering telephone calls and emails from customers and clients and directing them to relevant staff Creating an office budget and ensuring all employees follow it Monitoring office supplies and ordering new stationery, furniture, appliances and electronics as required Interviewing and training new office employees and organizing their employment paperwork Organizing maintenance companies to keep the office clean and safe and ensure its appliances are in good working order Reporting office progress to senior management and working with them to improve office operations and proceduresWhat are 2 similarities between Hispanic culture and American culture ?
Explanation:
Both countries believe in the value of education, both teach the same subjects, many of the clothes we wear are the same as well as similar food and a value of religion plus much of American and Mexican culture blend together in certain places in the US which also makes the transition to American culture easier.Answer:
the two countries believe in the value of education
and teach the same subjects in school and college
and the clothes fashion are kinda same
and food is similler .
how was the british involved in the american civil war
Answer:
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). ... The British elite tended to support the Confederacy, but ordinary people tended to support the Union.
Explanation:
According to my knowledge
Answer:
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland remained officially neutral throughout the American Civil War (1861–1865). ... The British elite tended to support the Confederacy, but ordinary people tended to support the Union.
Why did the British get involved in the Civil War?
The reason behind Great Britain's involvement within the American Civil War was primarily economic interest. In the mid-nineteenth century, a vast majority of the world's cotton was produced within the Southern States of America.
hope this helped!!
Which statement about the Amazon rain forest is false?
0 It is considerably smaller today than it was a century ago because of cutting and burning.
O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
O More that 500 species of trees grow in a single two-and-a-half-acre plot.
O Scientists believe species there could hold the key to medical breakthroughs.
Answer: It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
Explanation: I hope this helps :) You've got this!
Answer:
O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
Explanation:
this is correct
Limiting expression of personal opinions or beliefs is a proper function on government
True False ?
Answer:
So, no, the government can't limit it. False, I think? (I am kinda confused on your question, so, I gave the best answer I could)
Explanation:
The First Amendment guarantees our right to free expression and free association, which means that the government does not have the right to forbid us from saying what we like and writing what we like; we can form clubs and organizations, and take part in demonstrations and rallies.
Need the answer ASAP
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The best answer is B that citizens should have the same rights as political leaders
HELP ME OUT PLEASE!!
Why did the framers feel it was necessary at times to amend the Constitution?
A) amending the Constitution can reflect changing times, beliefs, and social conditions.
B) amending the Constitution would allow for tyranny.
C) amending the Constitution shows other countries how strong the U.S. government is.
D) amending the Constitution allows for a smooth transition of power between political parties.
Answer:
C would be your answer
Explanation:
the men who wrote the Constitution, wanted the amendment process to be difficult. They believed that a long and complicated amendment process would help create stability in the United States. Because it is so difficult to amend the Constitution, amendments are usually permanent.
How was Mexico's struggle for independence similar to and different from the founding of the United States?
Answer:
Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.
What anti-federalist argument does madison counter in this essay?
Answer: " that of the expanse of the United States being too big for Republican Government to work"
hope that helps
Choose the best option to complete each sentence about the people of the Arabian Peninsula. Sedentary town dwellers mainly farmed crops or Most settlements were located
Answer:
(B), (A)
Explanation:
I took the quiz
Answer:
B, A
Explanation:
I got it correct trust me
1) What was the Yazoo Land Act?
2) Why did the Act become a Scandal?
3) Why were the legislators in the picture burning the law after it had already been repealed?
4) What did that message send to the public?
Answer:
You know sometimes reading the lesson really helps you progress in school and makes it alot easier on you so you dont have to be here
Explanation:
What do you know already about the United States Constitution?
Answer:
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. This founding document, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government.Explanation:
Why might so many Kalingans have died of hunger and disease?
They didn't have enough food and there was alot of sick people who may of had a disease , maybe other people caught on to that dieseae.
15 PTS How did the United States entry into World War I change the culture and international political policies of the country?
Answer:
World War I was the "war to end all wars." It had major consequences on Americans both at home and abroad.
Explanation: