The pretrial process for a felony criminal case typically involves several steps, including the initial appearance, the preliminary hearing, and the arraignment.
What are the several steps in the pretrial process for a felony criminal case?The pretrial process for a felony criminal case is a critical stage in the criminal justice system. The process begins with the initial appearance, which is the defendant's first appearance in court. At the initial appearance, the defendant is informed of the charges against them and advised of their rights. The next step is the preliminary hearing, which is a hearing to determine if there is sufficient evidence to hold the defendant for trial. At the preliminary hearing, the prosecution presents evidence and witnesses, and the defense has the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses and challenge the evidence. If the judge determines that there is sufficient evidence, the case proceeds to arraignment. At the arraignment, the defendant enters a plea, and the judge sets a date for the trial. The pretrial process also includes discovery, which is the exchange of evidence between the prosecution and defense, and plea bargaining, which is a negotiation between the prosecution and defense to resolve the case without going to trial.Read more about felony case
brainly.com/question/880378
#SPJ1
what role did clothing play during the 1950s civil rights movement? be specific. demonstrate that you have studied the material in the unit.
Clothing played a significant role during the 1950s Civil Rights Movement, as activists used it as a form of nonviolent protest to challenge discriminatory laws and customs, demonstrate dignity, and challenge stereotypes.
Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955, in which African Americans refused to ride segregated buses and walked or carpooled instead. During this boycott, activists wore clothing with political messages, such as buttons and t-shirts that read "Don't Ride Where You Can't Sit" and "We Are Not Going to Take It Anymore."
Clothing also played a role in the Greensboro sit-ins of 1960, where African American college students wore their Sunday best clothes to demonstrate their dignity and respectability while protesting at a Woolworth's lunch counter.
To learn more about activists follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28115615
#SPJ4
why were american diplomats particularly dismayed that the soviets had installed a procommunist government in poland in 1945?
American diplomats were particularly dismayed that the Soviets had installed a pro-communist government in Poland in 1945 because they feared it would lead to the spread of communism throughout Eastern Europe. This was a direct threat to the United States' interests and its goal of containing communism during the Cold War.
Additionally, the United States had a long history of supporting democratic governments and human rights, and the installation of a pro-communist government in Poland went against these values.The United States was also concerned about the Soviet Union's aggressive actions in Eastern Europe and their desire to expand their sphere of influence.
The installation of a pro-communist government in Poland was seen as a clear indication of the Soviet Union's intentions to spread communism throughout the region. This was seen as a direct threat to the national security interests of the United States, and American diplomats were determined to stop the spread of communism at all costs.
The installation of a pro-communist government in Poland also had practical implications for the United States. Poland was a key strategic location for the Soviet Union, as it provided access to the rest of Europe.
The United States was concerned that the Soviet Union would use Poland as a base to launch further attacks against other countries in the region. American diplomats were determined to prevent this from happening and worked to contain Soviet influence in Eastern Europe.
To know more about cold war refer here: https://brainly.com/question/2765211#
#SPJ11
What helped the success of Democrats beginning with Andrew Jackson's election? A. Plans to gain territory in the West B. The appeal of an independent image OC. Plans to limit the power of the rich O D. All of the above
B. The appeal of an independent image.
Who was Andrew Jackson?Andrew Jackson was the 7th President of the United States, serving from 1829 to 1837. He was a prominent figure in American politics and military history, having gained fame as a general in the War of 1812, particularly for his victory at the Battle of New Orleans. As president, Jackson was known for his controversial policies and actions, including the forced relocation of Native American tribes, his opposition to the Bank of the United States, and his support for the "common man" against the "aristocracy."
To know more about Andrew Jackson, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27920494
#SPJ9
the modern state spread throughout the world primarily through a. philosophical treatises by european thinkers. b. colonial dominance imposed by european states. c. increased international commerce and trade. d. a centuries-long process of wars and indigenous development.
The modern state spread throughout the world primarily through colonial dominance imposed by European states.
The correct answer is option B.
Institutions of feudalism and dictatorship were replaced in Europe between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries by the ultramodern state, which ultimately spread to the rest of the world through subjection and colonisation. This contemporary state model's four identifying characteristics are bureaucracy, legality, home, and sovereignty( external and internal).
States use these four characteristics to give their citizens with services similar as a legal system, structure, and security( Drogus & Orvis, 2014). The accord that put an end to the war, known as the Peace of Westphalia, recognised the autonomous sovereign of a state as having power over all aspects of the state, including religion. As a result, the idea of a autonomous state as we know it moment was developed.
Learn more about colonization at
https://brainly.com/question/30690128
#SPJ4
who was the elected president of the russian republic who led the resistance to the coup attempt in 1991?gorbachevstalinyeltsinkhrushchev
Answer:
Mikhail Gorbachev
Explanation:
Just three days after it began, the coup against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev collapses. Despite his success in avoiding removal from office, Gorbachev’s days in power were numbered. The Soviet Union would soon cease to exist as a nation and as a Cold War threat to the United States.
.
The elected president of the Russian Republic who led the resistance to the coup attempt in 1991 was Boris Yeltsin. Who was Boris Yeltsin?
Boris Yeltsin was a Russian politician who served as the first president of the Russian Federation from 1991 to 1999. He was born in 1931 in Butka, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Soviet Union, and died in 2007 in Moscow, Russia. Yeltsin led Russia's response to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resulting political, economic, and social upheaval.
He became a prominent politician in the late 1980s and played a significant role in the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union. The elected president of the Russian Republic who led the resistance to the coup attempt in 1991 was Boris Yeltsin.
To know more about Boris Yeltsin refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/263972#
#SPJ11
montenegro was another balkan country that from the end of ww i until the early 1990s was a part of the socialist federal republic of
Montenegro is a Balkan country located in Southeast Europe. After the end of World War I, it became a part of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, which was later renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929.
Following World War II, the kingdom was dissolved and Montenegro became one of the six constituent republics within the newly formed Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). The SFRY, led by Josip Broz Tito, was a socialist state based on the principles of self-management and non-alignment. This meant that while it had a communist government, it did not fully align with either the Western or Eastern bloc during the Cold War. Instead, Yugoslavia pursued its path, focusing on internal development and cooperation with other non-aligned nations.
In 2006, Montenegro held an independence referendum, and the majority of its citizens voted in favor of becoming a separate nation. The country subsequently declared its independence, marking the end of its affiliation with the former Yugoslavia. Today, Montenegro is a sovereign state that is working towards further integration with the European Union and NATO.
Know more about Kingdom of Yugoslavia here:
https://brainly.com/question/31134561
#SPJ11
Read the quotation from Barack Obama’s 2016 address to the graduates of Howard University.
If you think that the only way forward is to be as uncompromising as possible, you will feel good about yourself, you will enjoy a certain moral purity, but you’re not going to get what you want.
–President Barack Obama, May 7, 2016
Which statement best summarizes President Obama’s main point?
Compromise is often necessary to bring about change.
People should not compromise if they want to bring about change.
People should not compromise if they want to remain morally pure.
Compromise makes people feel good about themselves and their actions.
please hurryy!!! timed quiz!!!!
Answer:
The statement that best summarizes President Obama's main point is: "Compromise is often necessary to bring about change."
although initially the us attempted neutrality, when the german u-boat sunk the british freighter, lusitania, carrying british war material the us drew closer to war, viewing the act as
Although initially, US attempted neutrality, when the german u-boat sunk the British freighter, Lusitania, carrying British war material the US drew closer to war, viewing the act as a violation.
The German U-boat sank the British freighter Lusitania in the year 1915, which was at that time transporting British war supplies and civilian passengers, causing the US to reconsider its original decision to stay neutral during the first world war. The US saw the incident as a violation, a breach of international law and an attack on defenceless civilians.
More than a hundred Americans were among the twelve hundred individuals who died in the assault. The complete destruction of the Lusitania played a major part in pushing the nation closer to officially joining the conflict, even though the country would not do so until the year 1917. Germans perceived the sinking of the Lusitania as an act of aggression, which increased American anger and resolve to support the Allied cause.
Read more about violation on:
https://brainly.com/question/30039274
#SPJ4
Please help
The Cold War at Home to write two letters (4-5 Sentences each) from two different viewpoints. One is from the perspective of an American describing what has been going on in their life and one is from the perspective of someone from the Communist East (like East Berlin or the Soviet Union).
The Letter from the perspective of an American is given below:
Dear friend,
I wanted to share with you the recent events in my life. The country is currently facing a tense period due to the Cold War. The threat of nuclear war looms over us, and people are constantly living in fear.
The government is conducting extensive surveillance on citizens, and there have been reports of McCarthyism, where people are being accused of being communists without any evidence. I personally know some people who have lost their jobs due to these accusations. The situation is dire, and I hope things get better soon.
Best regards,
[Your name]
Letter from the perspective of someone from Communist East:
Dear comrade,
I hope this letter finds you well. Life in East Berlin has been challenging due to the Cold War. We are constantly being portrayed as the enemy by the West, and there is a sense of isolation. The government controls all aspects of life, and people who criticize the regime are punished severely.
However, the Soviet Union is providing us with support, and we feel that we are not alone. We know that the West is constantly spying on us, but we have to remain vigilant and united. We hope that one day, there will be peace and cooperation between our two countries.
Yours in solidarity,
[Your name]
Read more about the Cold War here:
https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ1
What did Adam Smith believe about self-interest and government regulation of the economy? A. He believed people should be allowed to pursue their own self-interest because it was necessary to support mercantilist economies. B. He believed governments should regulate people's economic activities to limit the harm caused by the industrialization of the economy. C. He believed governments should regulate people's economic activities to ensure that all people benefited from economic growth. D. He believed people should be allowed to pursue their own self-interest because doing so would create a collective benefit for the economy.
Answer: the ansewr is c
Explanation:
it says c
the monacan tribe was known for . (choose all that apply) group of answer choices making beautiful pottery intricate woven baskets mining copper for jewelry clovis points
The Monacan tribe was known for making beautiful pottery, intricate woven baskets, and mining copper for jewelry. There is no evidence that they were specifically known for Clovis points.
Monacan tribe was known for making beautiful pottery and intricate woven baskets, but not for mining copper for jewelry or creating Clovis points.
They were skilled in making beautiful pottery, which was highly valued for its intricate designs and functionality. They created a variety of pottery types, including bowls, jars, and other vessels, which were often decorated with geometric patterns or shapes that reflected their cultural beliefs and traditions.
In addition to pottery, the Monacan tribe was also recognized for their intricate woven baskets. They utilized various materials like bark, grasses, and reeds to create strong and durable baskets in a range of shapes and sizes. These baskets were not only practical for daily use but also reflected the artistic talents and craftsmanship of the Monacan people.
The Monacan tribe did not mine copper for jewelry; rather, they were known to trade for copper and other metals to create jewelry, tools, and ornaments. Copper would be fashioned into various items such as necklaces, bracelets, and earrings, demonstrating their metalworking skills.
Lastly, Clovis points were not associated with the Monacan tribe. Clovis points are a type of stone projectile point that was used by the Clovis people, who lived in North America long before the Monacan tribe.
For more about Monacan tribe:
https://brainly.com/question/24404285
#SPJ11
dos ejemplo de las relaciones entre la civilizacion, sociedad, salvajismo, y clan
Civilization and society are closely related. Civilization is the process of developing a society from a primitive state to a more advanced one.
This process involves the development of rules, laws, and social structures to ensure the security and stability of the group. Society is the group of people living together in a defined territory and sharing a common culture.
Savagery is a term used to describe the behavior of people who live in an uncivilized state. It is characterized by lack of laws and social structures, and often includes violence, cruelty, and chaos. In contrast, clan is a group of people who are related by blood and share a common ancestral lineage. Clans often have distinct customs and beliefs, and in some cases, they may have their own language and culture. Clans typically have strong social bonds that provide a sense of belonging and security.
To know more about civilization, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12207844
#SPJ4
The Question is-
Write two examples of the relationships between civilization, society, savagery, and clan.
Fill in the table below with two major causes and two major effects of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
BIUX² X₂ 14pt
AVENE
Causes of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 Effects of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965
Space used (includes formatting): 650/15000
BB
因
田田園 田用
Submit
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, was major piece of legislation that dramatically changed U.S. immigration policy.
What is immigration?Immigration refers to the movement of people from one country to another with the intention of settling in the new country. It is driven by a variety of factors such as economic opportunities, family reunification, political instability, or seeking asylum from persecution. Immigration has been a source of controversy and debate in many countries, with some arguing that it brings economic benefits, cultural diversity, and innovation, while others argue that it can strain social services, lower wages for native workers, and threaten national security. Immigration policies vary widely among countries, with some placing strict limits on the number of immigrants allowed, while others have more open policies. Effective management of immigration requires balancing the needs of both immigrants and the host country.
To learn more about immigration, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28772696
#SPJ1
The midterms are often referred to as a “referendum on the president.” What does this mean?
Answer:In the middle of the term of the executive or of another group of members, the people can elect their representatives in a midterm election
Explanation:
Did the New Deal effectively provide relief to Americans during the Great Depression? Historians and economists still disagree over the answer to this question. Read the four articles provided here to learn more about both sides of the argument. Determine your viewpoint on this topic and develop a claim.
Write an essay to present an argument that either accepts or rejects the claim that the New Deal effectively provided relief during the Great Depression. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and accurate data and other relevant evidence. It should also include, and rebut, a counterclaim.
the source to reed is the one in the link bellow
Here is your essay.
The New Deal, a series of economic programs and reforms implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, remains a controversial topic among historians and economists. Some argue that it effectively provided relief to Americans, while others maintain that it failed to bring about significant change. After careful consideration of both sides of the argument, I firmly believe that the New Deal was successful in providing relief during the Great Depression.
Those who argue that the New Deal was effective in providing relief point to several programs that significantly impacted Americans. For instance, the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) provided employment for thousands of unemployed men who worked on projects such as reforestation and soil conservation. The Works Progress Administration (WPA) provided employment for millions of Americans who worked on various public works projects, including roads, bridges, and schools. Additionally, the Social Security Act provided a safety net for the elderly and disabled, which greatly improved the quality of life for those who previously had little or no support.
Furthermore, the New Deal stimulated economic growth, which led to a decrease in unemployment rates. The National Recovery Administration (NRA) established codes for fair competition, which stabilized prices and wages and led to increased production. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) provided electricity to rural areas, which spurred economic development in those regions. These programs, among others, helped to boost the economy and provide relief to those who were struggling.
However, those who argue against the effectiveness of the New Deal point out that the unemployment rate remained high throughout the 1930s. They also argue that some programs, such as the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), had negative consequences. The AAA paid farmers to decrease production, which led to higher food prices and caused hardship for many Americans.
Despite these criticisms, I believe that the New Deal was successful in providing relief during the Great Depression. While the unemployment rate remained high, the New Deal helped to stabilize the economy and provide employment opportunities for millions of Americans. Additionally, the New Deal brought about lasting reforms, such as Social Security, that continue to benefit Americans today. While some programs had negative consequences, overall, the New Deal was a positive step towards recovery.
In conclusion, while historians and economists continue to debate the effectiveness of the New Deal, I firmly believe that it was successful in providing relief during the Great Depression. The New Deal programs provided employment opportunities, stimulated economic growth, and brought about lasting reforms that continue to benefit Americans today. While there were some negative consequences, overall, the New Deal was a necessary and effective response to a devastating economic crisis.
Which sentences from Frederick Douglass' speech, What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?, show the separation between him and his audience and prove that he does not share his listeners' attitudes toward the Fourth of July?
Place the passage here with the hot texts highlighted in yellow Only the correct answer(s) should be highlighted in green. The papers and placards say, that l am to delıver a 4th [of] July oration. This certainly sounds large, and out of the common way, for it is true that I have often had the privilege to speak in this beautiful Hall, and to address many who now honor me with their presence. But neither their familiar faces, nor the perfect gage I think I have of Corinthian Hall, seems to free me from embarrassment. The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, the distance between this platform and the slave plantation, from which lescaped, is considerable and the difficulties to be overcome in getting from the latter to the former, are by no means slight. That I am here to-day is, to me, a matter of astonishment as well as of gratitude. You will not, therefore, be surprised, if in what I have to say l evince no elaborate preparation, nor grace my speech with any high sounding exordium With little experience and with less learning, I have been able to throw my thoughts hastily and imperfectly together; and trusting to your patient and generous indulgence, I will proceed to lay them before you. This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom. This, to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God. It carries your minds back to the day, and to the act of your great deliverance; and to the signs, and to the wonders, associated with that act, and that day. This celebration also marks the beginning of another year of your national life; and reminds you that the Republic of America is now 76 years old. I am glad, fellow-citizens, that your nation is so young. Seventy-six years, though a good old age for a man, is but a mere speck in the life of a nation. Three score years and ten is the allotted time for individual men; but nations number their years by thousands. Accordıng to this fact, you are, even now, only in -Frederick Douglass from "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?"
Answer ASAP please!
Answer:
The sentences that show the separation between Frederick Douglass and his audience and prove that he does not share his listeners' attitudes toward the Fourth of July are:
- "This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom. This, to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God."
- "I am glad, fellow-citizens, that your nation is so young. Seventy-six years, though a good old age for a man, is but a mere speck in the life of a nation."
the mortality depicted in the image most directly contributed to which of the following changes in europe in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries? responses the end of feudalism the end of feudalism the decline of serfdom the decline of serfdom the collapse of the byzantine empire the collapse of the byzantine empire the protestant reformation
The mortality depicted in the image most directly contributed to the decline of serfdom in Europe in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.
What is mortality?Mortality is a term used to describe the occurrence of death in a population. Mortality rate is used to describe the number of deaths per unit of population over a specific period of time, usually expressed as a percentage. In the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, Europe was hit by a series of outbreaks of the bubonic plague, also known as the Black Death. This disease caused a significant decrease in population in many areas, with mortality rates as high as 60%.
Due to the significant decrease in population, there was a decrease in labor supply, which led to a decline in serfdom. Serfs, who were bound to their land and lords, lost their value, as lords began to compete with each other to retain laborers, and serfs had more bargaining power. This led to the decline of serfdom in Europe, and the rise of more free labor.
See more about mortality in:
https://brainly.com/question/30774820
#SPJ11
which emperor was responsible for the production of some of the most significant byzantine monuments?
Emperor Justinian I, who governed the Byzantine Empire from 527 to 565 AD, was responsible for the creation of many important Byzantine monuments.
Justinian embarked on a massive construction program to boost the prestige of the Byzantine Empire and cement his position in history.
The Hagia Sophia, a massive basilica that was considered one of the wonders of the medieval world; the Basilica Cistern, an underground water storage system; and the Church of the Holy Apostles, a grand mausoleum for Justinian and his wife, Theodora, were all built during his reign.
Justinian's construction program was important not only for its size and grandeur, but also for its innovative use of architecture, engineering, and art. His architects and builders incorporated new techniques and materials into their designs, such as brick and mortar, allowing for greater height and stability in their buildings.
Overall, Justinian's construction program had a lasting impact on the Byzantine Empire and continues to affect architecture and engineering to this day.
Learn more about Byzantine monuments:
https://brainly.com/question/31241136
The production of some of the most significant byzantine monuments is Emperor Justinian I.
This was during the 6th century AD when he ruled over the Byzantine Empire. Emperor Justinian I was a Byzantine Emperor who was responsible for the production of some of the most significant Byzantine monuments. He was the emperor who built the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, which is now known as Istanbul in Turkey. Justinian also built a massive wall that was used to surround Constantinople.
The wall was over 20 feet high, and it helped to protect the city from invaders. The emperor was responsible for the construction of a massive number of architectural works throughout the Byzantine Empire. He also built many churches and other public buildings that were used by the people of the Byzantine Empire. Justinian was known for his love of architecture and his passion for creating beautiful buildings that would last for centuries.
For more about byzantine monuments:
https://brainly.com/question/6968853
#SPJ11
Kung ikaw ay nabuhay noon, ano kaya ang maaari mong ginawa sa pagdating
ng mga mananakop? sa kasalukuyang panahon, kung sakali na may mananakop
na dumating sa bansa, ano ang iyong gagawin? at kung sa hinaharap ay may
darating na mananakop, paano mo ito haharapin?
sagot:
noon:____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
kasalukuyan:____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
hinaharap:______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Answer:
i speak english
Explanation:
:)
Explain the impact of the rise of universities upon society during the Middle Ages.
Answer: The rise of universities in the Middle Ages profoundly impacted society. They provided a forum for exchanging ideas and developing new knowledge, and they helped create a more educated and literate populace. Universities also played a role in developing new technologies and industries, and they helped spread new ideas about government and society.
One of the most critical impacts of universities was their role in developing new knowledge. In the Middle Ages, knowledge was primarily based on the authority of the Bible and the Church fathers. However, universities began challenging this authority by studying the works of ancient Greek and Roman philosophers and scientists. This led to new ideas about the nature of reality, the universe, and the human condition.
Universities also played a role in developing new technologies and industries. For example, the University of Bologna was home to the first law school in Europe, and the University of Paris was home to the first medical school. These schools helped train lawyers and doctors, who helped develop new laws and medical practices.
Finally, universities played a role in developing new ideas about government and society. In the Middle Ages, society was primarily based on the feudal system, in which land was owned by a few nobles and worked by many peasants. However, universities began challenging this system by studying the works of ancient Greek and Roman philosophers who argued for the equality of all people. This led to the development of new ideas about democracy and republicanism.
In conclusion, the rise of universities in the Middle Ages profoundly impacted society. They provided a forum for exchanging ideas and developing new knowledge, and they helped create a more educated and literate populace. Universities also played a role in developing new technologies and industries, and they helped spread new ideas about government and society.
Explanation:
what impact did the end of the war in vietnam in 1975 have on the southeast asian population of california? group of answer choices many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong came to the united states, with california alone receiving 40 percent of these immigrants. many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong were already living in california; after the war, many more came to already established communities, creating conflicts between longtime and new residents. many vietnamese who were already here returned home to help rebuild the country. many cambodians and hmong who were already here returned to their countries because the end of the war in vietnam led to the start of wars in neighboring countries.
In California, there were already many Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Hmong residents; nevertheless, following the war, a large influx of new immigrants led to tensions between longtime residents and those who had recently moved in. Hence (a) is the correct option.
In 1975, Communist forces took over South Vietnam, bringing an end to the conflict. The next year, South Vietnam was united as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. It concludes that some of the claims that the Vietnam War strengthened the noncommunist states in Southeast Asia, boosted the region's economic development, and sparked the formation of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), all of which made the region more secure and stable, have some basis.
To know more about immigrants, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ4
what impact did the end of the war in vietnam in 1975 have on the southeast asian population of california? group of answer choices
a. many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong came to the united states, with california alone receiving 40 percent of these immigrants.
b. many vietnamese, cambodians, and hmong were already living in california; after the war, many more came to already established communities, creating conflicts between longtime and new residents.
c. many vietnamese who were already here returned home to help rebuild the country.
d. many cambodians and hmong who were already here returned to their countries because the end of the war in vietnam led to the start of wars in neighboring countries.
why did iron become central to the success of the british economy in the nineteenth century?
Answer: New technologies of iron making substituted cheap coal for expensive charcoal and mechanised production to increase output per worker.
Iron was central to the success of the British economy in the nineteenth century because it was the main raw material used in the manufacturing of steam engines, railroads, and machinery.
This gave Britain a major advantage over other countries in terms of industrialization and transportation infrastructure. Iron was also used in the construction of bridges, buildings, and ships, which further contributed to the growth of the British economy. During the Industrial Revolution, Britain became a global leader in iron production.
This was due to several factors, including access to raw materials, such as coal and iron ore, as well as technological advancements in iron production. The use of coke in iron production, which replaced charcoal, was a major breakthrough, as it allowed for a more efficient and cost-effective process of iron smelting.The production of iron in Britain increased dramatically during the nineteenth century, which fueled the growth of the economy.
Iron production in Britain went from around 30,000 tons in the early 1800s to over 3 million tons by the end of the century. This allowed Britain to become the world's leading industrial power and paved the way for modern industrial economies.
For more about British economy:
https://brainly.com/question/12302796
#SPJ11
Which general was characterized by his aggressive tactics and his strong sense of the war as a
whole?
A. George McClellan
B. Ulysses S. Grant
C. Robert E. Lee
D. Thomas J. Jackson
Federalism and popular sovereignty both help to
Federalism and popular sovereignty, both help to channelize the access to political power at various levels. Starting from people's representatives to the central authority, the decisions and powers are properly utilized.
When political power is properly channelized, federalism and popular sovereignty ensures that the proportionality between enactment and decision in the following manner; maintaining dual polity in government action, maintaining rigidity of constitution, independence to judiciary, and citizenship rights.
Therefore, based on the aforesaid points, it can be clearly said that, both federalism and popular sovereignty help to maintain political rights of the common citizens in framing their government and policies.
To know more about federalism and popular sovereignty;
brainly.com/question/590796
brainly.com/question/11227385
Only maintaining diplomatic relations with countries that share similar ideologies is called:
A. Dollar diplomacy
B. International diplomacy
C. Moral diplomacy
D. Big stick diplomacy
Only maintaining diplomatic ties with nations that hold like ideology is referred to as:virtuous diplomacy
What does the phrase "big stick diplomacy" mean?The phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far" was the motto of President Theodore Roosevelt, and it is sometimes referred to as "big stick ideology," "big stick diplomacy," or "big stick policy."
What does "dollar diplomacy" mean?Dollar Diplomacy is an international strategy developed by U.S. President William Howard Taft (1909–1913) and his secretary of state, Philander C. Knox, to maintain a region's financial stability while defending and advancing American business and financial interests there.
To know more about Moral diplomacy visit:-
brainly.com/question/27940423
#SPJ1
Answer:
moral diplomacy
Explanation:
What is the author suggesting about Artemisia in this passage when Xerxes calls her for a consultation?
The next question Xerxes poses is whether he's going to stay or go home.
When asked a second time, what counsel did Artemisia offer Xerxes?In order for the Great King to easily put the responsibility at someone else's shoes if things go wrong, Artemisia encourages him to send Mardonius to handle the war and go home.
Xerxes was amazed by her fortitude and bravery, commenting that "My men are becoming women, but my women, men." Nobody on the Calypso ship survived. Xerxes halted his assault on Greece after the battle of Salamis, and Artemisia is attributed with convincing him to do so.
To know more about Xerxes visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14679361
#SPJ9
What did the Cherokee peoples receive under the Treaty of Echota
Answer: It resulted in the forced removal of thousands of Cherokee from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) in what became known as the Trail of Tears.
Explanation:
The Treaty of Echota was signed on December 29, 1835, between the United States government and a minority faction of the Cherokee Nation. The treaty was controversial because it was signed without the consent of the majority of the Cherokee people, and it resulted in the forced removal of thousands of Cherokee from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) in what became known as the Trail of Tears.
Under the terms of the Treaty of Echota, the Cherokee people ceded all their lands east of the Mississippi River to the United States government in exchange for compensation of $5 million and land in Indian Territory. The treaty also provided for the establishment of a Cherokee Nation government in Indian Territory and guaranteed the Cherokee people the right to self-government and protection of their property rights.
However, many Cherokee leaders, including Principal Chief John Ross, opposed the treaty and argued that it was not valid because it was signed without the consent of the majority of the Cherokee people. The U.S. government disregarded these objections and used the treaty to justify the forced removal of the Cherokee people from their homes in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory.
Which of these statements does the quote above overrule?
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Options:
1.
"The only two clauses in the Constitution that point to [the black] race treat them as persons whom it was morally lawfully to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves."
2.
"The statute of Louisiana, acts of 1890, c. 111, requiring railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in that State, to provide equal, but separate, accommodations for the white and colored races."
3. "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States. . . ."
4.
"[A]ll citizens of the United States who are or shall be otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election. . . shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections, without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. . .
This quote is superseded by the one from the Constitution of 1868 that states that "All people born or naturalised in the United States" are included. Answer 1 is the right one.
What does the Constitution say about everyone who is born or acquired citizenship?All people who are born or naturalised in the United States and fall under its jurisdiction are citizens of both the nation and the state in which they currently reside, according to Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The 14th Amendment made it clear that "All persons born or naturalised in the United States" were entitled to citizenship, allowing previously enslaved individuals this right. After being ratified in 1868, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution promised "equal protection of the laws" to all citizens, including freed slaves, and extended citizenship to anybody born or naturalised in the country. The only people who can run for president or vice president are those who were born in the United States, unlike other types of citizens. The main distinction between natural-born and naturalised citizens' rights is that the former have access to more freedoms.Therefore,
This quote is superseded by the one from the Constitution of 1868 that states that "All people born or naturalised in the United States" are included. Answer A is the right one. The only two clauses in the Constitution that specifically mention the [black] race describe them as individuals with whom it was ethically permissible to handle as objects of property and keep as slaves.
To learn more about equal citizenship, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17046541
many white americans of the eighteenth century viewed native americans as . multiple choice question. cultivated undignified
Answer: undignified
Explanation:
b/c cultivated means like civilized and refined. undignified means uncivilized and dirty, which is what the americans thought
Many white Americans of the eighteenth century viewed Native Americans as "undignified."
In the eighteenth century, white Americans viewed Native Americans as inferior and savage. They were viewed as uncivilized people, and they were forced to abandon their beliefs and culture. The Europeans saw themselves as the superior race and believed they could civilize the Native Americans.
Native Americans were seen as undignified by the whites in the eighteenth century. The whites saw them as people who could not properly live in society, and they believed that they needed to change their way of life to suit the white way of living. They viewed them as people who needed to be educated and taught new skills to be able to survive in the new world.Native Americans were often displaced from their ancestral lands and forced to relocate to new areas. They were subjected to discrimination, prejudice, and racism. Native Americans suffered greatly in the eighteenth century due to the actions of the whites who were determined to impose their way of life on them.The treatment of Native Americans during the eighteenth century was unfair and unjust.
They were not given the same rights as the whites, and they were not respected as people. It was not until much later that Native Americans were recognized for their contributions to society, and their culture was respected and valued by Americans.
Know more about Native americans here:
https://brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ11
why did the seminole argue that their treaty, the treaty of fort gibson, was illegitimate and unenforceable?
Answer:
The treaty gave the tribe the choice to go or stay on their lands.
The Seminole tribe argued that the Treaty of Fort Gibson was illegitimate and unenforceable for several reasons. they claimed that the treaty was signed by a small group of Seminole representatives without the consent or knowledge of the majority of the tribe.
This group did not have the authority to make such a decision on behalf of the entire tribe, rendering the treaty invalid. The Seminoles believed that the terms of the treaty were unfair and unjust. The treaty called for the removal of the Seminoles from their ancestral lands in Florida to new lands west of the Mississippi River. This forced relocation, also known as the Trail of Tears, caused significant hardship, suffering, and death among the displaced tribes.
Additionally, the Seminoles argued that the U.S. government did not uphold its promises outlined in the treaty. For instance, the government failed to provide adequate resources and support to the tribe during the relocation process, further contributing to their suffering.
Lastly, the Seminoles maintained that the Treaty of Fort Gibson violated their sovereignty as a nation. They believed that the U.S. government had no right to dictate the terms of their existence or force them to leave their lands. This infringement on their rights and autonomy further fueled their argument against the legitimacy and enforceability of the treaty.
In summary, the Seminoles considered the Treaty of Fort Gibson illegitimate and unenforceable due to the lack of proper representation in signing the treaty, the unfair terms, the U.S. government's failure to uphold its promises, and the violation of their sovereignty.
To learn more about Fort Gibson here:
https://brainly.com/question/12805292#
#SPJ11