Answer:
In today’s political climate, we can say that people have mixed opinions about this topic. Right now, in the Senate 63% of Senate officials are over 65 years old, bringing the total number of Senate officials over 65 to 21 members (Quorum 2019). The question is raised now, are these members of our government representing us? According to Quorum Analytics, in 2019 the oldest member of the House is Representative Conyers (Democrat), he is 87 years old and represent Michigan. The average age of Michigan citizens in 2019 is 35, that is over half of the age of Rep. Conyers. This is quite an age difference and some of the other members of the house are just a couple of years off of Rep. Conyers. I believe and so many others around the US believe that the new Congress does not represent us as a country. They are too stuck in the past political agenda to see that our country is moving at an exponential rate, growing with the ever so growing economy, the changing way our country works and thinks, and just seems to have trouble keeping up with the modern era of voters that are in this country right. I believe that all members of the House should have up to 3 terms and are limited to those 3 terms which results in 2 years per term. Senate should have up to 2 terms in their tenure in the government, which results into 12 years total in those 2 terms (6 years per term). This will not only be beneficial for the government and the people of the United States also. This will help keep government officials more inclined with their voters and bringing legislation to the forefront of today’s issues instead of reverting back to legislation that would have only worked many years ago, also it will keep our government young and fresh.
Well, to be perfectly fair we have to look all the way back to the time where the constitution was constructed and approved in 1887, on a hot summer day the constitution was written by the members of the Senate. Of course, those members did not want to add a term limit and it was not spoken of because they thought they knew what was best for the country at the time. How could anyone blame them for the pathway they laid out for us anyways? We are doing a really great job with the modern constitution with the changes that had to me made in order for the country to function up to date. Almost like a computer update, sometimes if the old update is doing fine, we are going to keep it on that version until something monumentally goes wrong, and some of us like new updates and changes right away. Either way though, the citizens of the United States have been brought up and actually brought into law in 1639 with the Fundamental Orders of 1639. The colony’s governor was prohibited from serving consecutive terms of only one year, and stating that “no person be chosen governor above once in two years” After independence, Pennsylvania’s Constitution of 1776 limited members of the state’s General Assembly from serving more than “four years in seven”. At the federal level, the Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781, set term limits for delegates to the Continental Congress – the equivalent of the modern Congress – mandating that “no person shall be capable of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of six years”. Even in a short time period of 1990-1995 23 states had term limits but in the Supreme Court case of U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton. It ruled out the 23 states having any sort of constitutional power to enact term limits on their states.
The Founding Father considered and closed the idea of term limits for Congress. In Federalist Papers No. 53, James Madison, Father of the Constitution, explained why the Constitutional Convention of 1787 rejected term limits.
“A few of the members of Congress will possess superior talents; will by frequent re-elections, become members of long standing; will be thoroughly masters of the public business, and perhaps not unwilling to avail themselves of those advantages. The greater the proportion of new members of Congress, and the less the information of the bulk of the members, the more apt they be to fall into the snares that may be laid before them”, wrote Madison (Longley, 2019).
When did labor unions originate in the united states?
Labor unions originated in the United States in the early 19th century, during a period of rapid industrialization and urbanization.
The first recognized labor union in the United States was the National Trades' Union, which was formed in 1834 and lasted only a few years. The first successful and lasting national labor union was the Knights of Labor, which was founded in 1869 and grew to become a powerful force in American labor relations by the 1880s.
The rise of labor unions was fueled by a range of factors, including poor working conditions, low wages, and long hours. Union organizers sought to improve the lives of workers by negotiating with employers for better pay and working conditions, and by advocating for political and legal reforms that would benefit workers.
Over time, labor unions became an increasingly important force in American politics and society, and they played a key role in advancing social and economic justice for workers. Today, labor unions continue to be an important part of the American labor landscape, representing millions of workers in a wide range of industries and professions.
Learn more about the Labor unions:
brainly.com/question/28872741
#SPJ4
which revolutionary war battle is traditionally regarded as prompting france to enter the war on the side of the patriots?
the results of which event allowed white people to once again dominate political power in the south and lead to the establishment of jim crow laws?
Answer:
After Civil War, during the Reconstruction Era.
Explanation:
which of these things increased efficiencies, increased instantaneous communication across larger geographical spaces, and democratized access to information during the 1990s?
The internet increased efficiencies, increased instantaneous communication across larger geographical spaces, and democratized access to information during the 1990s.
How did the internet increase efficiencies, increase instantaneous communication across larger geographical spaces, and democratize access to information during the 1990s?
The internet increased efficiencies, increased instantaneous communication across larger geographical spaces, and democratized access to information during the 1990s through a range of technological advancements that enabled fast and real-time communication, data sharing, and processing, among other things.
With the development of the World Wide Web, e-mail, search engines, and other digital technologies, people had the ability to access and share information in real-time with ease.
Furthermore, businesses and industries could employ digital technologies to automate processes and reduce operational costs, improving overall efficiency.
The internet has undoubtedly transformed how people communicate, collaborate, and conduct business, making it an essential tool for individuals and organizations alike.
To learn more about world wide web, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/20341337
#SPJ11
1. How did the civil rights movement begin?
2. What events led Congress to pass the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts?
3. How did the civil rights movement change? Why could the results of the movement be called mixed?
4. Explain the difference between de facto segregation and de jure segregation. Provide an example of each that is not given in the text.
5. Consider what you know about segregation, then think about what conditions exist for minorities today. How have conditions changed? How have conditions stayed the same? Provide examples to justify your statements.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. The civil rights movement began in the 1950s in the United States, when African Americans and their supporters began protesting against racial discrimination and segregation. It was sparked by events such as the arrest of Rosa Parks for refusing to give up her seat on a Montgomery, Alabama bus, and the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
2. The Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts were passed by Congress in response to the civil rights movement and a series of events that highlighted the need for change. These events included the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech, and the violent clashes between police and protesters during the Selma to Montgomery marches in Alabama. The acts aimed to end discrimination based on race in areas such as voting, education, and employment.
3. The civil rights movement changed over time as it evolved from nonviolent protests to more confrontational tactics. The results of the movement can be called mixed because while it succeeded in ending legal segregation and discrimination, it did not eliminate all forms of racism and inequality. Many African Americans still face obstacles in areas such as education, housing, and employment, and incidents of police brutality and racial profiling continue to occur.
4. De jure segregation refers to segregation that is enforced by law or government policy. An example of this is the Jim Crow laws that existed in the southern United States before the civil rights movement. De facto segregation, on the other hand, refers to segregation that occurs due to social, economic, or cultural factors. An example of this is the phenomenon of "white flight," where white families move out of neighborhoods as minorities move in, leading to a de facto segregation of the area.
5. Conditions for minorities in the United States have changed in many ways since the civil rights movement. For example, legal segregation has been eliminated, and minorities have made significant gains in areas such as education and employment. However, discrimination and inequality still exist in many forms, such as unequal access to healthcare and the criminal justice system. In recent years, issues such as police brutality against minorities have come to the forefront of public attention, highlighting the ongoing need for progress in the fight for racial justice.
Explain one similarity and one difference between how Adolf Hitler rose to power in Germany and how Francisco Franco rose to power in Spain.
Respond in 4 to 6 complete sentences.
Answer:
Similarity:
- Both Adolf Hitler and Francisco Franco devoted their lives to transforming their vision of a better future for their beloved country into a reality
- Both fought in a way or shared military experience before coming to power
- Both had much charisma and powerfully convincing oral skills that moved all the people needed for their political movements
- Both were sociopaths
Difference:
- Francisco Franco didn't necessarily want to rule the world, meaning he was content with ruling only Spain. His vision ended at the borders of his country and he focused more on its development rather than its expanse
- Franco died of old age whereas Hitler met a violent end
Please mark brainliest! Hope this helped!!
When did Malaysia Airlines MH370 go missing?
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 went missing on March 8, 2014.
Here is a concise step-by-step explanation of the event:
1. Flight MH370, a Boeing 777, took off from Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia, with the destination being Beijing Capital International Airport in China.
2. The plane had 239 passengers and crew members on board.
3. At 01:19 local time, the aircraft's final voice communication with air traffic control was made, stating "Good night Malaysian three seven zero."
4. Shortly after, the aircraft's transponder stopped transmitting data, and the plane disappeared from civilian radar.
5. Military radar continued to track the flight for about an hour, showing the plane veering off course and heading west, before eventually losing contact.
6. An international search and rescue operation was launched, focusing on the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the southern corridor of the Indian Ocean.
7. The search continued for months, but no significant debris was found until July 2015, when a flaperon from the aircraft washed up on Réunion Island in the Indian Ocean.
8. Over the next few years, more debris believed to be from the aircraft was discovered on various shores in the Indian Ocean.
9. The search was officially suspended in January 2017, with the final report being released in July 2018.
10. Despite extensive efforts, the main wreckage of Flight MH370 has never been located, and the cause of its disappearance remains unknown.
In summary, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 went missing on March 8, 2014, and its disappearance remains one of the greatest mysteries in aviation history.
For more question on "Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370" :
https://brainly.com/question/31218309
#SPJ11
What a dense metal named for its use by romans as pipes for plumbing?
Answer:
Explanation:
The dense metal named for its use by Romans as pipes for plumbing is lead.
Answer:
Lead
Explanation:
Lead was first discovered by the ancient Romans in 3000 BC. They used lead for a vary of things including making water pipes and lining baths etc.
What ruler of Tenochtitlan from 1502 1520 was killed?
The ruler of Tenochtitlan from 1502 to 1520 was Moctezuma II. He was the ninth ruler of the Aztec Empire and was the son of Axayacatl.
Moctezuma II had the longest reign of any ruler of Tenochtitlan and was widely respected among his subjects. However, his rule would ultimately be cut short by the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire. Moctezuma II was killed by his own people in 1520 during the Spanish siege of Tenochtitlan.
He was either killed by a stone thrown by the Spanish soldiers, or by his own people who were enraged at his perceived collaboration with the Spanish. After Moctezuma II’s death, the Aztec Empire quickly fell to the Spanish, and the city of Tenochtitlan was completely destroyed.
To know more about Tenochtitlan , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29621449
#SPJ4
in your own words describe or explain how the events of WW2 changed the worlds view on one of the following subjects:
human rights
war tactics
nuclear weapons
Answer:
Explanation:
The war had also taken a staggering toll in both military and civilian lives Shortages of food fuel and all kinds of consumer products persisted and in many cases worsened after peace was declared.
Why was the American economy stronger then the economies of its European Allie’s at the end of world war 1
The flood of money into the manufacturing sector from both home and abroad led to a welcome rise in employment for American workers. The U.S. unemployment rate dropped from 16.4% in 1914 to 6.3% in 1916. This fall in unemployment reflected not only an increase in available jobs but a shrinking labor pool.
What became the major factor emphasized by factories in the industrial age?
education
skilled workforce
productivity
reducing costs
The major factor emphasized by factories in the industrial age was productivity.
As it helped in reducing costs and increasing efficiency. This often led to a focus on creating a skilled workforce through education and training. Factories in the industrial age emphasized productivity. Productivity refers to the amount of output produced by a worker, machine, or factory in a given amount of time.
Factories in the industrial age emphasized productivity because it allowed them to produce more goods more quickly, which increased profits. Additionally, increasing productivity often required investing in new machinery and technology, which allowed factories to stay competitive and keep up with advancements in manufacturing.
It is also worth noting that as factories became more efficient, they also began to require a more skilled workforce. This led to a greater emphasis on education and training for workers, which further increased productivity. The correct answer is Productivity .
Know more about productivity here:
https://brainly.com/question/21044460
#SPJ11
What led the U.S. to the Persian Gulf War?
The U.S. led the Persian Gulf War in response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, which was seen as a threat to the stability and security of the region, and in order to enforce UN resolutions and protect the interests of Kuwait and the international community.
The Persian Gulf War, also known as the Gulf War, was a conflict between a coalition of countries led by the United States and Iraq in 1990-1991. The war was primarily triggered by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990.
Iraq, under the leadership of Saddam Hussein, had long claimed that Kuwait was a part of Iraq and that Kuwait was "stealing" Iraqi oil by drilling slantwise into Iraqi oil fields. On August 2, 1990, Iraq launched a massive invasion of Kuwait. The United States, along with other countries, immediately responded by imposing economic sanctions on Iraq and building up a military presence in the region
On January 17, 1991, a U.S.-led coalition launched a massive air campaign against Iraq, known as Operation Desert Storm. The campaign was followed by a ground offensive that quickly drove Iraqi forces out of Kuwait
Learn more about Persian Gulf War here
brainly.com/question/30562450
#SPJ4
What was the main way that Georgia attempted to increase the population in the western part of the state in the early 1800s?
Georgia attempted to increase the population in the western part of the state in the early 1800s by offering land to settlers through the land lottery.
A land lottery was a type of raffle in which the state government gave away land to those who were interested in settling in a particular region. Georgia created its first land lottery in 1805.
The process of the land lottery: The Georgia General Assembly passed legislation authorizing the creation of the lottery. The eligible area was determined by the legislature. The legislature then divided the eligible area into land lots, which were numbered and listed in alphabetical order according to the name of the county where they were located.
Those who wanted to participate in the lottery had to meet certain requirements, such as being 21 years old, being a resident of Georgia for a certain period of time, and paying a fee.The drawing of the lots began.The lottery had winners and losers, and winners were given land titles.
Some of the lottery lands were located in western Georgia, in what was then known as the Cherokee Nation. The lottery was one of the main ways that the Georgia government attempted to increase the population in the western part of the state in the early 1800s.
For such more question on population:
https://brainly.com/question/21148283
#SPJ11
9. true or false: a. axum was important to the trade routes between africa, the mediterranean, and india. b. dhows were boats introduced to africans by europeans. c. zimbabwe rose to be an important trading kingdom
The economically vital northern Silk Road and the southern Spice (Eastern) trade routes. Due to the maritime routes that ringed the Horn of Africa and the Indian subcontinent, Aksum was a key trade port for roughly a century.
Has Zimbabwe grown to be an important trading power?During the 11th through the 15th centuries, Great Zimbabwe served as the capital of a prosperous trade empire. Its economy was based on the production of grain, the raising of cattle, and the sale of gold along the Indian Ocean shore. Zimbabwe, the country's name, is a Shona (Bantu) word that meaning "stone homes."
Who gave Africans dhows?According to historians, the dhow was either invented by Arabs or Indians, and it was initially used as a fishing or trading vessel along the coasts of Arab countries as well as Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and East Africa to convey goods like slaves, fruit, fresh water, and other goods.
Was Axum significant for the commerce routes connecting India, Africa, and the Mediterranean?Ivory, gold, emeralds, silk, spices, agricultural products, salt, exotic animals, manufactured items, and more were all traded between India and the Mediterranean under Aksum's leadership. Aksum prospered in the first century CE. To guard their trade routes and police the Red Sea, they could afford to erect a strong fleet.
True, The commercial routes connecting Africa, the Mediterranean, and India passed via Axum.False, dhows were boats that are not brought to Africans by Europeans.True, Zimbabwe developed become a significant trade power.Learn more about Aksum's leadership: https://brainly.com/question/1992318
#SPJ1
List three reasons why there would be resistance to centralization of courts in city and county systems.
Answer:
Three reasons why there would be resistance to centralization of courts in city and county systems are:
• Public convenience: Many jurisdictions provide court services within about twenty minutes' driving time as a convenience for the public, which would be lost if courts were centralized[1].
• Fear of overreaching federal power: The framers of the Constitution limited the power of federal courts to avoid overreaching federal power[2].
• Court culture: The handling of cases, responsiveness of courts to community concerns, division of labor and allocation of authority between judges and court staff members, and court leadership are all aspects of court culture that could be disrupted by centralization[3].
"An arrogant and stubborn faith in America’s power to shape the course of foreign events compounded thedangers sown by ideological rigidity. Policymakers . . . shared a common . . . conviction that the UnitedStates not only should, but could, control political conditions in South Vietnam, as elsewhere throughoutmuch of the world. This conviction had led Washington to intervene progressively deeper in SouthVietnamese affairs over the years. . . . This conviction prompted policymakers to escalate the war. . . .Domestic political pressures exerted an equally powerful . . . influence over the course of U.S. involvementin Vietnam. . . . Another ‘loss’ to communism in East Asia risked renewed and devastating attacks fromthe right."Brian VanDeMark, historian, Into the Quagmire, 1995"The escalation of U.S. military intervention [in Vietnam] grew out of a complicated chain of events and acomplex web of decisions that slowly transformed the conflict . . . into an American war. . . . [PresidentLyndon Johnson] made the critical decisions that took the United States into war almost without realizingit. . . . Although impersonal forces . . . influenced the president’s Vietnam decisions, those decisionsdepended primarily on his character, his motivations, and his relationships with his principal advisers. . . .The war in Vietnam was not lost in the field, nor was it lost on the front pages of The New York Times oron the college campuses. It was lost in Washington, D.C., even before Americans assumed soleresponsibility for the fighting."H. R. McMaster, historian, Dereliction of Duty, 1997a) Briefly explain ONE major difference between VanDeMark’s and McMaster’s historical interpretationsof the United States involvement in the Vietnam War.b) Briefly explain how ONE historical event or development in the period 1945 to 1975 that is notexplicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support VanDeMark’s interpretation.c) Briefly explain how ONE historical event or development in the period 1945 to 1975 that is notexplicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support McMaster’s interpretation
This excerpt is about Van De Mark's and Mc Master's interpretations of America's policy on South Vietnam.
a. Both Van De Mark's and McMaster's arguments that President Johnson's policies led to the United States' participation in Vietnam and that the strategy of containment was implemented as justification are clearly understood.
b. Van De Mark's backing for the operation allowed for the Chi Minh to be bombed, which stopped the flow of supplies from North to South Vietnam.
This is one event or development in the period 1945 to 1975 that could be used to support Van De Mark’s interpretation.
c. McMaster thought Johnson made all of his choices based on his Great Society Program, which consisted of ideas to transform the country.
This event could be used to support McMaster’s interpretation.
To know more about Politics visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14452198
#SPJ1
Why did Europeans not travel to the interior of Africa prior to 1880?Because Africans wouldn't let Europeans into the interior.Because they thought there was nothing in the interior.Because it was too expensive to travel to interior.Because they mostly engaged in trading on the coast.
Europeans do not travel to the interior of Africa prior to 1880 because they mostly engaged in trading on the coast.
Prior to 1880, European explorers and traders had limited contact with the interior regions of Africa. This was due to several factors, including the lack of navigable rivers and reliable maps, the prevalence of disease, and the formidable physical barriers posed by the dense rainforests, high plateaus, and desert regions that characterized much of the interior of Africa. Additionally, European traders and explorers focused their efforts primarily on coastal areas, where they could establish trade relationships with existing African kingdoms and empires. It was not until the late 19th century, with the development of new technologies such as steamships and rifles, that Europeans began to explore and colonize the interior regions of Africa in greater numbers.
To learn more about trading visit;
https://brainly.com/question/27622280
#SPJ4
how did the medici family influence and rule in renaissance florence?
One of the most mighty and significant families in the annals of European history is the Medici family. They established the foundation for Florence to become a cultural hub while inventing new finance methods.
They influenced the development of the High Renaissance by their political manoeuvring and support of influential artists like Michelangelo. Most people know the Medici for their support of the arts. A wealthy individual or family will patronise artists. For significant pieces of art, they would give artists commissions. The patronage of the Medici had a significant impact on the Renaissance since it freed up artists to concentrate on their work without having to worry about finances.
To know more about Medici family, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27075084
#SPJ4
How did segregation affect life in the postwar period? 200 words
Segregation in the postwar period led to significant disparities in education, housing, employment, and political representation, which limited opportunities and perpetuated racial inequality.
How did the segregation affect our life in the postwar period?Segregation in the postwar period had a profound impact on American society, particularly in the South. Despite the gains made by the civil rights movement, segregation remained entrenched in many aspects of life, including education, housing, employment, and political representation.
In education, African Americans were often forced to attend underfunded and overcrowded schools, which limited their opportunities for academic achievement and advancement. In housing, African Americans were often subjected to discriminatory practices such as redlining, which prevented them from obtaining mortgages and purchasing homes in desirable neighborhoods. This led to a cycle of poverty and inequality that persisted for generations.
Read more about segregation
brainly.com/question/1574751
#SPJ1
Compare the two maps and examine the data for Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia. Which of the following statements is supported by the comparison of the two maps? (5.10)
There is a strong correlation between countries with a large percentage of women in the paid workforce and women working in agriculture.
Agriculture is considered a prestigious field in these regions, and they have the highest percentage of women working in agriculture.
There is less food produced in these regions and therefore fewer women working in agriculture.
Typically women in these regions work for agribusiness in the formal
paid workforce.
Many women in these regions work on farms and grow food for their families, but not all are paid to do this work.
what was one of the major provisions of the voting rights act of 1965?
Answer:
Banned literacy tests
Explanation
Spurred by protesters and the President, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The act banned literacy tests and empowered the federal government to oversee voting registration and elections in states that had discriminated against minorities.
Which roles could medieval noblewomen play in society? (3 total)
A. Household manager
B. Knight's squire
C. Manor physician
D. Property owner
E. Spinner and weaver
F. Village or town cleric
The roles that medieval noblewomen could play in society are:
A. Household manager: Noblewomen were responsible for managing their household, which included supervising the servants, managing finances, and overseeing the education of their children.D. Property owner: Women could inherit property and wealth from their families, and they could also acquire property through marriage or business. As property owners, they had some degree of financial independence and could use their wealth to support causes they believed in.E. Spinner and weaver: Women were often responsible for spinning and weaving wool and other materials to make clothing and other household items. This was an important skill and was often passed down from mother to daughter.Overall, medieval noblewomen had limited opportunities to participate in public life and were largely confined to the domestic sphere. However, their roles as household managers, property owners, and skilled workers gave them some degree of influence and independence within their families and communities.
a monument featuring scenes from the last judgment, a vision of the apocalypse, the rising of the dead is typical for?
It is a representation of Christ's Second Coming and God's ultimate, eternal judgement of the entire human race. The dead get up and walk down to their graves.
The entire altar wall of the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City is covered in a fresco by Italian Renaissance artist Michelangelo titled The Final Judgment. It is a representation of Christ's Second Coming and God's ultimate, eternal judgement of the entire human race. In the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo painted The Last Judgement on the wall behind the altar. Despite the artist's apparent inspiration from the Bible, his own creative vision is what shines through in this picture, which shows Christ's second coming.
To know more about eternal, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24040048
#SPJ4
Imagine you were an Air Force pilot in WWII. You got home from bombing Germany in 1945. In 1948, the Air Force asks you to go back to Europe and save the people in Germany's capital from starving to death.
Make a list of positives and negatives that you would consider. You should have a totalof 10 items,
Answer:
Based on the hypothetical scenario you provided, I can provide a list of potential positives and negatives that an Air Force pilot in WWII might consider if asked to go back to Europe in 1948 to save people in Germany's capital from starving to death:
Positives:
Ability to help people in need
Sense of duty and honor to serve one's country
Opportunity to use piloting skills to make a positive impact
Potential to gain additional experience and skills
Opportunity to work with other military personnel toward a common goal
Negatives:
Risk of physical harm or death in a dangerous situation
Emotional trauma from seeing people suffer
Personal sacrifices, such as time away from family and loved ones
Moral conflict between bombing Germany in the past and now helping its people
The possibility of not being able to achieve the mission and save lives, leading to disappointment or guilt.
Which of the following was NOT a right addressed by Roosevelt in his idea of a Second Bill of Rights?
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living, was not a right addressed by Roosevelt in his idea of a Second Bill of Rights.
What is clarified by the Bill of Rights?It outlines the rights of Americans with regard to their government. It ensures that each person has the freedoms of expression, the press, and religion. It establishes guidelines for the administration of justice according to the law and reserves to the people or the States any power not granted to the federal government.
Why is the Bill of Rights significant?The Value of the Bill of Rights There are numerous reasons why the Bill of Rights is significant, but our American freedom is one of them. It safeguards our rights to free expression, religion, assembly, and the administration of justice.
To know more about Bill of Rights visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30092735
#SPJ1
The Cleveland administration said a Cuban victory might lead to "the establishment of a white and a black republic," since Cuba had a mixture of the two races. And the black republic might be dominant.
This idea was expressed in 1896 in an article in The Saturday Review by a young and eloquent imperialist, whose mother was American and whose father was English -Winston Churchill. He wrote that while Spanish rule was bad and the rebels had the support of the people, it would be better for Spain to keep control:
"A grave danger represents itself. Two-fifths of the insurgents in the field are negroes. These men . . would, in the event of success, demand a predominant share in the government of the country . . . the result being, after years of fighting, another black republic."
The Spanish minister to the United States wrote to the U.S. Secretary of State: "In this revolution, the negro element has the most important part. Not only the principal leaders are colored men, but at least eight-tenths of their supporters.... and the result of the war, if the Island can be declared independent, will be a secession of the black element and a black Republic."
6. What arguments did Winston Churchill used to urge the United States to capture Cuba from Spain?
In 1896, Winston Churchill argued in an article in The Saturday Review that it would be better for Spain to keep control of Cuba rather than to let the rebels succeed, as he believed that a victory by the rebels could lead to the establishment of a black republic in which the black population would have a predominant share in the government. Churchill argued that this would be a grave danger, given that two-fifths of the insurgents in the field were negroes. He suggested that the United States should intervene in Cuba to prevent this outcome and to ensure that Spain remained in control of the island. It is worth noting, however, that Churchill's views on imperialism evolved over time, and he later became a vocal opponent of British imperialism in India and elsewhere.
Study the map in Image A. What does it show about the spread of printed materials across Europe? Which areas of Europe produced the most printed books? Why do you think these areas produced the most books?
The map shows that in relation to the spread of printed materials across Europe, printed materials started from Germany, and then spread outward to the rest of Europe.
The areas of Europe that produced the most printed books in the 1400 were Western and Central Europe and this was most likely because they were more developed.
How did printed materials spread across Europe ?The printing press was invented by Johannes Gutenberg in the mid-15th century in Mainz, Germany, and it quickly spread throughout Europe, with printing presses established in many major cities such as Paris, Venice, and London.
Western and Central Europe had a significant number of printing presses and produced a large amount of printed materials for several factors including their rate of development.
Find out more on printed materials at https://brainly.com/question/13169371
#SPJ1
Which detail BEST reflects England's MAIN goal for the Jamestown Colony?
Answer: As in other attempts at settlement, two of the primary goals were to find gold and to find a water route to Asia. The original Jamestown was also intended to be strategically located far enough from the James River that it would not be in the firing range of ships belonging to hostile powers such as Spain.
Explanation:
What caused the Kent State protest?
The Kent State protest was caused by ; the Vietnam war that was occuring against the Asians
What caused the Kent State protest?The Kent State protest was a demonstration against the Vietnam War that occurred on May 4, 1970, on the campus of Kent State University in Ohio, USA. The protest began as a peaceful rally but turned violent when the National Guard was called in to disperse the crowd. The Guardsmen fired into the crowd, killing four students and injuring nine others.
The protest was sparked by the expansion of the Vietnam War into Cambodia, which President Nixon announced on April 30, 1970. The announcement angered many students, who felt that the war was already unjust and that the expansion would only lead to more bloodshed. The protest was also fueled by the draft, which required young men to serve in the military whether or not they supported the war.
The shooting at Kent State shocked the nation and led to protests at universities across the country. The incident became a symbol of the government's failure to understand and address the concerns of young people and helped to galvanize the anti-war movement.
Read more on Kent State protest here: https://brainly.com/question/796055
#SPJ1