This the last question I need help

The "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is an open letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. on April 16, 1963. King wrote the letter while he was incarcerated for leading peaceful protests against segregation and racial injustice in Birmingham, Alabama.

In the letter, King addresses a group of white clergymen who had criticized his nonviolent approach to civil rights activism. He explains the reasons behind his actions and argues that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." King also expresses his disappointment with the church's lack of support for the civil rights movement, arguing that it should be at the forefront of the struggle for equality.

The letter is considered a seminal piece of writing in the history of the civil rights movement, as it not only addresses the specific situation in Birmingham but also touches on larger issues of racial injustice and the role of nonviolence in social change. It is widely regarded as a masterpiece of persuasive writing, employing powerful rhetorical devices and stirring language to make its case.

The "Letter from Birmingham Jail" remains an important document today, as it continues to inspire activists fighting for social justice and civil rights around the world

Learn more about Letter from Birmingham Jail on

https://brainly.com/question/25843788

#SPJ1

The vocabulary word that best completes the following sentence: A/an amoral person does not make decisions based on what's right or wrong. The word amoral is an adjective that refers to a person, action, or situation that is neither moral nor immoral.

That means an amoral person does not follow the principles of morality and is unconcerned with right or wrong. For example, a person who lies, steals, or cheats may be considered amoral. An amoral person is indifferent to what is right or wrong.

They do not care whether their actions are ethical or not. They may act in ways that most people would consider immoral, but they do not feel guilty or ashamed for their actions. The sentence "A/an amoral person does not make decisions based on what's right or wrong" is true.

An amoral person has no moral compass to guide them. Therefore, they make decisions based on what benefits them or what they believe is necessary to achieve their goals.

To know more about vocabulary refer to-

brainly.com/question/28932775#
#SPJ11

Answer: I went to the Cinema with my friend because he owes me a ticket because he wanted to go to Universal Studios and we're watching thiller movies

Explanation:

Answer:

B. Complimentary

Explanation:

Hope this helps <3

:)

Answer:

Explanation:

4. introversion

Answer:

A. Inevitable and awful

A best friend shοuId be understanding. One must be abIe tο share anything with them withοut the fear οf being judged. They shοuId be suppοrtive and encοuraging οf οne anοther.

I caII her my best friend since she heIps me a Iοt in my difficuIt times. Whenever I needed suppοrt, she was aIways there fοr bοοsting me up. She is extremeIy hοnest tοwards οur friendship and a trustwοrthy persοn as weII. This is the reasοn why I cοnsider her as my best friend.

Friendship is a reIatiοnship οf mutuaI affectiοn between peοpIe. It is a strοnger fοrm οf interpersοnaI bοnd than an "acquaintance".

To know more about friend visit :-

brainly.com/question/8223105

#SPJ9

Answer: hope this helps pretty sure its this

emphasize the joy the woman finds in eating her plums

Explanation:

Repetition can create expectations, which can be fulfilled. It can create a sense of boredom and complacency, but it can also incite enchantment and inspire bliss.

The answer is A. It helps the reader imagine how the workers work hard together as they communicate while reconstructing the palace.

What is a palace?
A palace is a large and impressive building, usually a residence of a monarch, noble, or other high-ranking person or a governmental building. It often features ornate architecture and design, and historically, it was used as a center of political and social power.


The simile mentioned in the second paragraph creates a comparison between the workers in the palace and bees working together in a hive. This comparison helps the reader imagine how the workers are working hard together while communicating, just like how bees work hard together while communicating within their hive. The simile suggests that the workers are organized, coordinated, and working together towards a common goal, which is to reconstruct the palace. Therefore, the answer
is A.


To know more about monarch visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30280235
#SPJ1

The way Henri viewed hedgehogs after he saw them eating the ants can be best described as they were something to be feared, not something to be played with.

Thus, the correct answer is they were something to be feared, not something to be played with (B).

The above statement is an excerpt from the story "The Hedgehog" by Johann Peter Hebel. Henri viewed hedgehogs after he saw them eating the ants and he felt that they were something to be feared, not something to be played with in the 19th paragraph of "The Hedgehog" story.

"Wаtching hedgehogs eаt the occаsional beetle, holding them in а shoe box, or keeping them аt home wаsn’t the sаme аs wаtching them here. Henri never know the true power, the potentiаl, the аmаzing аppetite, or the criticаl importаnce thаt his cute compаnions held in the wide world of nаture. With аwe, he witnessed the hedgehog's work. For the first time, he truly sаw why they belonged where they being аnd why his fаther wаs right аbout them."

Your question is incomplete, but most probably your options were

A. They were no longer just a curiosity but were a powerful force of nature.

B. They were something to be feared, not something to be played with.

C. They were still interesting, but now he would play them outside.

Thus, the correct option is B.

For more information about The Hedgehog refers to the link: https://brainly.com/question/1550335

#SPJ11

A paragraph that contains a topic sentence, a summary sentence, and three supporting sentences are a basic format of writing. It is important to use transitional words while writing the paragraph. Transitional words are used to connect the sentences in the paragraph.

The following are the paragraph that contains a topic sentence, a summary sentence, and three supporting sentences. Air pollution is one of the main environmental concerns in the world. The air is contaminated by smoke from industrial and car emissions. The smoke is dangerous for human health, and it also destroys the ecosystem.

Moreover, it causes respiratory problems, like asthma and bronchitis. People need to understand the importance of air pollution and take necessary steps to reduce it. Therefore, they should use public transport and reduce the use of private cars to save the environment.

To know more about paragraph refer to-

brainly.com/question/24460908#
#SPJ11

The Answer is true

✍️(◔◡◔) Hope this helps

The passage above only contains one sentence, so the comparison between sentences is not applicable.

What is Passage?

A passage is a section or excerpt of written or spoken text that is usually longer than a sentence but shorter than a complete work, such as a book or an article. Passages are often used to convey information or to express ideas, and they can be found in a variety of written works, including literature, textbooks, and journalism. Passages can be a few sentences or several paragraphs long, and they often focus on a particular topic or theme.

Some sentences are short and to the point, while others are longer and more detailed.

For example, the first sentence is a simple sentence that states a fact: "Feral cats, or cats that live in the wild, originally appeared in the United States during the seventeenth century." In contrast, the second sentence is a complex sentence that provides more detail and explanation: "These cats hunt and kill native wildlife, disrupt ecosystems, and spread diseases, making them a significant threat to biodiversity and public health."

Learn more about Passage form the given link

https://brainly.com/question/27892321

#SPJ1

Answer: they have very similar structures

Explanation:

A good speech has a concise, pertinent message that is supported by evidence. To find a good speech is to recognize whether the speech aims to be both memorable and educational.

Despite the variety of public speeches, they can generally be divided into three groups based on their desired outcome: instructive, persuasive, and entertaining. The finest speeches have a clear, important message and a few excellent examples to support it. As a result, it's important to keep your speech straightforward and to have a distinct beginning, middle, and end.

Moreover, narrow your attention to just one theme while ignoring all others. An excellent speech contains a concise, pertinent message supplemented by anecdotes that make the subject being discussed more fascinating and remembered. The length of a speech is simply one aspect, though. A great speech must also capture the audience, be delivered confidently and effectively, and have a clear theme.

To learn more about speech, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28046765

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

FINDING GOOD SPEECH

hello everyone, is there anyone that could help me in my task, please I really need help asap, I hope that someone can serious to help me pls, I am struggle about this​, please help me asap! thank you!​

The "Coupe des Mousquetaires" is the trophy awarded to the French Open men's singles champion. This iconic trophy carries a historical legacy, honoring the Four Musketeers and symbolizing excellence and triumph in the world of tennis.

The French Open men's singles champion receives the "Coupe des Mousquetaires" trophy. The trophy's name translates to "The Musketeers' Cup" in English, and it holds a significant historical and cultural significance in the world of tennis.

The trophy's name pays homage to the famous French tennis players of the 1920s, known as the "Four Musketeers," who were highly successful in both Davis Cup and French Championships (now French Open) during that era. The Four Musketeers consisted of Jean Borotra, Jacques Brugnon, Henri Cochet, and René Lacoste. They were instrumental in elevating French tennis to a prominent position on the international stage and gaining widespread popularity for the sport in France.

The design of the "Coupe des Mousquetaires" trophy is as elegant and timeless as the sport of tennis itself. It is a silver cup with intricate engravings and handles shaped like twisted tennis racket strings. The trophy embodies the spirit of sportsmanship, excellence, and determination required to succeed in the competitive world of tennis.

Each year, the French Open men's singles champion is presented with this prestigious trophy in a grand ceremony, symbolizing their achievement and dominance on the clay courts of Roland Garros. Winning this trophy is a dream for many professional tennis players, as it represents not only their skill and talent but also their place in the rich history of tennis champions.

For more such information on: trophy

https://brainly.com/question/27802733

#SPJ1

Answer: He said she looked beautiful and he couldn't take his eyes off her.

Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra are arguing about Agamemnon's decision to sacrifice their daughter Iphigenia to the gods so that they could be victorious in the Trojan War.

The topic of the disagreement between Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra in Greek mythology and literature can vary depending on the specific version of the story being referenced. In some versions, they argue about Agamemnon's sacrifice of their daughter Iphigenia before departing for the Trojan War.

In other versions, their argument revolves around Agamemnon's affair with the prophetess Cassandra during the war, or his decision to bring Cassandra back with him as his captive. In all cases, their disagreement is a key plot point in the story, leading to further conflict and tragedy.

Learn more about Greek mythology and literature here:https://brainly.com/question/1953133

#SPJ11

Juror 5 and Juror 2 are similar in their initial passivity, their sympathy towards the defendant, and their willingness to consider alternative perspectives during the deliberation process.

Give brief introduction of Juror 5 and Juror 2?

Juror 5 is a young man from a poor background who is initially quiet and passive during the deliberation process. He is the youngest of the jurors and comes from a similar background to the defendant, which makes him more sympathetic to the defendant's situation. As the deliberation progresses, Juror 5 becomes more assertive and willing to challenge his own assumptions and prejudices.

Firstly, they are both initially hesitant to voice their opinions and are somewhat passive in the beginning of the deliberation process. Juror 5 is a young man from a poor background who is intimidated by the older, more experienced jurors, while Juror 2 is a timid, insecure bank clerk who is easily swayed by the opinions of others.

Secondly, both jurors are portrayed as being sympathetic towards the defendant, who is a young man accused of murdering his father. Juror 5 can relate to the defendant's background and upbringing, while Juror 2 expresses his sympathy for the defendant by highlighting the emotional impact of the trial on the defendant's life.

Learn more about Juror 5 and Juror 2 from given link

https://brainly.com/question/30586104

#SPJ1

Poetry allows for more creative freedom than historical writing, which requires accuracy and objectivity.

The poem and the historical notes were likely written using different types of writing. The poem is a creative work of literature and would therefore allow for more freedom in its treatment of the subject matter. The historical notes, on the other hand, are likely a work of non-fiction and would be expected to adhere to certain standards of accuracy and objectivity.

Poetry as a form of creative writing allows for a great deal of freedom in its treatment of the subject matter. Poets are not bound by the same rules of structure and style as writers of non-fiction, and they are free to use language in innovative and unconventional ways. This creative freedom allows poets to explore complex themes and ideas in a way that is not always possible in other forms of writing.

The historical notes, on the other hand, are expected to adhere to certain standards of accuracy and objectivity. The purpose of historical writing is to present factual information about events and people in the past. This requires a more disciplined approach to writing, with an emphasis on research, documentation, and analysis. While historical writing can be creative in its interpretation of the facts, it must still be grounded in solid research and analysis.

In summary, while both forms of writing have their own unique challenges and expectations, poetry as a form of creative writing allows for more freedom in its treatment of subject matter than historical writing, which is expected to adhere to certain standards of accuracy and objectivity.

To learn more about Poetry, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19987784

#SPJ1

Answer:

B

Explanation:

I think tell me if I am correct

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Getting sick is apart of your health care and spending time in the hospitial is also apart of your health care aswell.

Formal language is typically more appropriate in professional or formal settings, such as business meetings, academic presentations, or legal proceedings.

For example, if presenting a proposal to a group of executives, it would be more appropriate to use formal language to convey the proposal's significance and to demonstrate respect for the executives. Similarly, if presenting research findings to an academic conference, the use of formal language would be more appropriate to convey the seriousness of the research and to maintain a level of professionalism.

On the other hand, in casual or personal settings, such as among friends or in a social media post, informal language may be more appropriate to convey a sense of familiarity, friendliness, and authenticity. In these settings, the use of formal language may come across as stiff or cold.

Therefore, the appropriate use of formal language depends on the context and the audience. It is important to consider the setting and the audience when deciding whether to use formal or informal language.

Learn more about  formal language

https://brainly.com/question/24222916

#SPJ4

Answer: is this the kind of warrant you mean :)

The warrant is the assumption on which the claim and the evidence depend. Another way of saying this would be that the warrant explains why the data support the claim.

Explanation:

Noun The police had a warrant for his arrest. There was no warrant for such behavior. Verb The writing was poor, but it hardly warrants that kind of insulting criticism. The punishment he received was not warranted.

The usual order of the development of spoken language in an infant is cooing, babbling, reflexes, and spoken words.

The correct answer is option c.

Cooing is the first stage of development of spoken language in an infant. It is a type of vocalization that infants do in the first months of life. It is a sound made by infants that usually indicates happiness and contentment.

Babbling is the second stage of the development of spoken language in an infant. It is characterized by the production of consonant-vowel syllables. The syllables are repeated over and over again.

Reflexes are automatic or involuntary reactions to a stimulus. They are the first movements that an infant makes. These are involuntary movements that are usually part of the nervous system of the infant.

Spoken words are the last stage of the development of spoken language in an infant. These are actual words that are articulated by the infant. They are used to communicate with others. They usually happen around the 12th month of life.

For more such questions on  spoken language, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/20243134

#SPJ11

Answer:

C.replaced

Explanation:

You do not have to include every piece of information that would be in a written bibliography when citing sources in a speech. You include relies on the assertion you're making, the subject, the type of evidence you're employing, and your audience.

When citing sources in your speech, you should include enough information to allow your audience to identify the source and find it if they wish. Generally, this means including the author's name, the title of the work, and where it was published.

Depending on the claim you are making and the kind of supporting material you are using, you may also need to include additional information such as the date of publication, page numbers, and the URL of an online source.

To learn more about citing sources link is here

brainly.com/question/10307267

#SPJ4

When Henry Fleming thinks that they will never see battle and only parade around from place to place for show in their blue uniforms, he becomes disillusioned and feels a sense of disappointment.

In Stephen Crane's novel, The Red Badge of Courage, Henry Fleming thinks they will never see battle and only parade around from place to place for show in their blue uniforms. He is disappointed, as he desires to fight and prove his courage in battle. Henry had initially romanticized war and believed that he would become a hero, but the reality of army life had not yet matched his expectations.

When he realizes that there may be no actual fighting and that his experiences may not motives live up to his idealized vision of war, he begins to question his for joining the army in the first place.This realization is a turning point for Henry's character development, as he begins to confront the harsh realities of war and grapples with his own courage and morality.

Learn more about literature and the analysis here:https://brainly.com/question/9965425

#SPJ11

His allusion affects the meaning of the poem as A. The speaker wonders whether the creator who made the lamb would make the tiger.

The allusion to God or a creator in the lines "Did He smile His work to see? / Did He who made the lamb make thee?" suggests that the poem is contemplating the idea of divine creation and questioning why a benevolent creator would also create something as fierce and dangerous as the tiger. This allusion emphasizes the speaker's sense of wonder and awe at the power and mystery of creation.

Therefore, the correct interpretation is that the allusion suggests that the speaker values the lamb more than he values the tiger. It emphasizes the contrast between the gentle and innocent nature of the lamb and the ferocity and power of the tiger, and prompts the speaker to reflect on the paradoxical nature of creation.

Learn more about allusion on;

https://brainly.com/question/11507587

#SPJ1