The US government policies were responsible for Chinese immigration to America in the mid-19th century because of the employment opportunities that were available.
The government needed cheap labor to build infrastructure like roads, canals, and railroads, so they turned to immigrants to provide it. Chinese immigrants were particularly attractive because they were willing to work for lower wages than other groups.
The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was passed by Congress to restrict Chinese immigration and prevent Chinese immigrants from becoming citizens or participating in American society. The act also led to the forced deportation of thousands of Chinese immigrants from the United States.
So, the US government policies encouraged Chinese immigration to America in the mid-19th century to fulfill their labor requirements.
To know more about US government policies, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17312190#
#SPJ11
Write a pitch for one of your favorite TV shows or movie franchises to be filmed in Atlanta, Georgia. Focus on why it would benefit the production company to make the film in Atlanta!
(minimum of three sentences please!!!!)
Remember, a pitch is a brief presentation or proposal used to sell an idea, product, or service.
What are the steps to write a pitch?The following are key steps you can take to write the ideal pitch for one of your favorite TV shows or movie franchises to be filmed in Atlanta, Georgia:
Research about your audience (the production company in this case): Develop your concept: Create a pitch deck (should include a logline, synopsis, character breakdowns, and budget estimates).Write a treatment summary of the story:Craft a compelling oral pitchPractice your pitchFollow up (after pitching, follow up with the production company).By following the steps above, you could create the ideal pitch you need to successfully get one of your favorite TV shows or movie franchises to be filmed in Atlanta, Georgia.
You can learn more about writing a pitch here https://brainly.com/question/27977622
#SPJ1
You've asked an unconcise question. I provided a draft of how you could go about writing your pitch.
in what ways did the colonizers of the late nineteenth century control the indigenous peoples and increase economic exploitation?
The colonizers of the late nineteenth century controlled the indigenous peoples and increase economic exploitation by forced labor, land grabbing, violence and repression.
The following are some of the ways:
Forced Labor: The colonizers used forced labor to exploit the indigenous peoples. The indigenous people were forced to work in the plantations, mines, and other workplaces owned by the colonizers.
Land Grabbing: The colonizers seized the land owned by the indigenous peoples and claimed it as their own. This forced the indigenous people to move to the marginal lands, which were less fertile and suitable for farming. The colonizers used the fertile lands to grow crops for exportation, which generated high revenues.
Violence and Repression: The colonizers used violence and repression to control the indigenous peoples. They imposed strict laws that restricted the movements and activities of the indigenous people. The violence and repression intimidated the indigenous people, making them obedient and easy to control.
Know more about indigenous peoples here:
https://brainly.com/question/30293439
#SPJ11
!70 points! in three to five sentences explain how relations in the Middle East Led to an oil embargo in the United states in the 1970s
Answer: During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations.
Explanation:
Answer:
Oil Embargo, 1973–1974. During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations.
Explanation: Hope this helps!!! Mark me brainliest!! Have a great spring break.
which of the following was not an argument opposing annexation of the philippines? * 1 point the natives could not be christianized. trade could continue without annexation. colonization was anti-american. cheap labor could be imported from the philippines. the filipinos could never become americans.
The argument that the Filipinos could never become Americans was not opposing annexation of the Philippines.
Colonization was seen by some as an anti-American move as it could be argued to be infringing on the independence of the Philippines.
Trade could continue without annexation as the Philippines could remain an independent country. The argument that the natives could not be christianized was also not opposing annexation, as some groups saw this as an opportunity to spread the faith.
The argument of cheap labor was actually an argument in favor of annexation, as some believed it would bring the economic benefits to the US.
To know more about Colonization click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919#
#SPJ11
which part of the nation would have sympathized with the view expressed in the cartoon? the western states like kentucky and tennessee the southern states like georgia, the carolinas, and virginia the northwest territories the new england states of massachusetts, connecticut and rhode island
The cartoon expresses the idea of an unfair political compromise, which would have been sympathized with in the Southern states like Georgia, the Carolinas, and Virginia.
These states had a strong feeling of nationalism, which meant that any compromise that was not to their benefit would be met with opposition.
They would have been opposed to the Compromise of 1850, which allowed California to be a free state, abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia, and created the Fugitive Slave Act.
The Fugitive Slave Act allowed Southern slave owners to reclaim escaped slaves in any Northern state.
This caused great anger in the South, as it infringed upon their state's rights. They would have sympathized with the sentiment in the cartoon, as they were being unfairly treated.
To know more about Fugitive Slave Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/26160636#
#SPJ11
how did early people sustain themselves before the invention of the agriculture?
Answer: Before farming, people lived by hunting wild animals and gathering wild plants. When supplies ran out, these hunter-gatherers moved on to another location.
Explanation:
Taft gave the impression that he had "sold the Square Deal down the
river" by backing speaker Joe Cannon, by supporting Ballinger against
Pinchot, and by signing the…
Taft generated the idea that by supporting speaker Joe Cannon, he had "sold the Square Deal down the river" by signing the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act. Mainstream Republicans who attend state conventions embrace him.
What exactly does the Square Deal concept entail?Three key tenets formed the foundation of Theodore Roosevelt's domestic policy, known as The Square Deal: protecting consumers, controlling large corporations, and conserving the environment.
What big international event began when the Berlin Wall fell?On October 3, 1990, only 339 days after the fall of the Berlin Wall, East Germany was officially disbanded and the German state was formally reunited along democratic lines with the West German government. This was a major step towards German reunification.
To know more about Square Deal visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/2491286
#SPJ9
what evidence indicates that the harappan civilization of ancient india had a complete system of government and social organization?.
The evidence that indicates that the Harappan civilization of ancient India had a complete system of government and social organization includes: their extensive and sophisticated irrigation systems, their complex trade routes, their intricate city planning and design, their development of an efficient writing system, and the abundance of artifacts which display elaborate artwork.
1. Irrigation systems: The Harappan people were very advanced when it came to irrigation. They developed large networks of canals, dams, and water channels that helped to bring water to their cities and irrigate their land.
2. Trade routes: The Harappans had a complex network of trading routes that connected them with other civilizations, allowing for the exchange of goods, ideas, and knowledge.
3. City planning and design: The cities of the Harappans were designed with intricate planning. They had well-defined roads, street layouts, and city walls.
4. Writing system: The Harappans developed an efficient writing system that was used for record-keeping and trading purposes.
5. Artifacts: Many artifacts found in Harappan cities display intricate artwork, which indicates that the Harappans had a well-developed system of art and craftsmanship.
To know more about Harappan civilization refer to-
brainly.com/question/6100400#
#SPJ11
protestants who believed one had to be baptized again to join them were the a. puritans. b. anabaptists. c. methodists. d. presbyterians.
Protestants who believed one had to be baptized again to join them were the Anabaptists. Answer.b
What is Anabaptism?
Anabaptism is a Christian reform movement that began in the 16th century as a radical offshoot of the Protestant Reformation. It arose in part due to disagreements among Christians over the significance of baptism in the life of a believer.
Anabaptists emphasized adult baptism, unlike other Protestant groups at the time, and often practiced believer baptism, in which only individuals who confessed their faith in Jesus Christ as their Savior were baptized again.
However, a further schism occurred within the Anabaptist movement, with one group known as Mennonites and another group known as Hutterites. They continue to exist today, and both are recognized as historic peace churches. The correct option is option b. Anabaptists.
To know more about Anabaptists refer here:https://brainly.com/question/28586681#
#SPJ11
what was life like for enslaved children? what does the film reveal about family life, work, community, and religion during slavery? what role did music play? 3 points your answer
Enslaved children lived a difficult and often dangerous life.
The film reveals that family life during slavery was often separated due to the sale of family members. Work was assigned by the plantation owners, often including hard labor and long hours.
Enslaved communities provided support and protection to one another. Religion was often practiced in secret, as it was forbidden by the plantation owners. Music was a form of communication and was used to express emotions and to pass stories on to the next generations.
Slavery in the United States continued legally until the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted in 1865. Slavery had its beginnings with the British colonization of Virginia in 1607, although African slaves had been brought to Spanish Florida in the 1560s.
Learn more about Slavery : https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ11
Can someone do me the 27 amendements in my own words !
The 27th Amendment prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms for Representatives.
What is the provision of the 27th amendment?The 27th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1992, over 200 years after it was originally proposed by James Madison. The amendment prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms for Representatives.
The provision was intended to prevent Congress from giving themselves immediate pay raises or cutting their own salaries as a political tactic. It was originally proposed along with other amendments as part of the Bill of Rights in 1789, but was not ratified by enough states at the time. The amendment was revived in the 1980s by a college student who discovered the forgotten provision while researching a term paper.
Read more about 27th amendment
brainly.com/question/12059939
#SPJ1
How did Galarza describe life for Mexicans in the U. S. ? Give two examples from the text
Mexicans in the United States have a difficult time adjusting because of prejudice and discrimination, according to Ernesto Galarza.
Here are two instances from the text that demonstrate this:
1) "Because most states' labor laws did not apply to Mexican laborers, they may be paid less than the minimum wage and had no legal protection from their employer. They received no compensation when they were hurt at work."
The difficulties in the economy that Mexican employees in the United States experience are illustrated by this case. Because to the lack of labor regulations protecting them, they were open to exploitation by employers who may pay them less than the minimum wage. Their vulnerability was further increased by the fact that they had no legal options available to them if they were hurt at work.
2) "Mexican Americans frequently experienced harassment and discrimination, and many public places, such as parks, swimming pools, and theatres, were off-limits to them. They were also denied access to many jobs and faced prejudice in housing."
This illustration demonstrates the social and cultural challenges that Mexican Americans in the US confront. They were frequently marginalized and denied access to homes, employment, and public venues. They felt marginalized and excluded from mainstream American society as a result of this discrimination, which made it challenging for them to fully engage and achieve success.
To know more about Ernesto Galarza
brainly.com/question/14149850
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
How did Galarza describe life for Mexicans in the U. S. ? Give two examples from the text(See Picture).
How did White fur traders and Indigenous people in the Pacific Northwest benefit one another?
White fur traders and Indigenous people in the Pacific Northwest had a mutually beneficial relationship.
The fur traders were interested in the fur trade, which was a significant source of wealth in the region. The Indigenous people were skilled hunters and had access to furs, which the traders could use to exchange for European goods such as blankets, metal tools, and weapons. In exchange for furs, the traders brought goods and technologies that were otherwise unavailable to the Indigenous people, such as firearms, which made hunting more efficient. The traders also established a system of credit, whereby the Indigenous people could borrow goods against future furs. This system allowed the Indigenous people to acquire goods they needed for survival, such as food and clothing, and encouraged them to produce more furs, which they could trade for more goods. The fur trade thus helped to create a network of trade relationships that connected the Indigenous people to the global economy, while also providing them with access to goods and technologies that improved their daily lives.
Learn more about Indigenous people :
https://brainly.com/question/30878844
#SPJ1
SK #4: Is the United States a modern day empire?
Take a position and state your opinion!
Write an answer to the question 3-4 sentences
Create a bullet list of your evidence (supporting points) that back your answer
Use specific examples
Although the USA does not consider itself an empire, it has still come to represent one.
Do you believe the United States is an empire?Ferguson made the case that the US is an empire and ought to be categorized as such, citing its dominance in the military, economics, and culture as proof.
Some analysts, like Max Boot, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., and Niall Ferguson, have referred to the United States as an empire even though it has never openly referred to itself and its territories in that way.
The fact that America is the only superpower in the world, with greater military might, economic power, influence throughout the world, technological and scientific capabilities, and foreign alliances, implies another assumption, which is that America is already an empire.
Learn more about foreign alliances: https://brainly.com/question/8124913
#SPJ1
Was a protest over federal tax, washington used domestic force to stop the uprising?
Whiskey Rebellion of 1791-1794, occurred in response to an excise tax on whiskey imposed by the newly formed federal government under President George Washington.
In 1794, after several years of protests and violence by farmers and distillers in western Pennsylvania, Washington ordered the mobilization of a federal army of 13,000 troops to quell the rebellion. The use of force was successful, and the rebels dispersed without significant bloodshed.
This event demonstrated the federal government's willingness to use domestic force to enforce its laws and maintain order, as well as its ability to do so effectively. However, it also sparked debates about the appropriate balance between federal power and state sovereignty, and the role of taxation in American society.
To learn more about federal government follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
you have a diary thought to be written by a confederate soldier during the civil war. a hand writing expert believes the writing matches other samples that have already been traced to this man. a carbon-dating expert can verify the age of the document. the diary gives an account of a battle, but you have other documents that contradict some of the events as written. based on this information, what should you question about the diary?
The diary thought to be written by a Confederate soldier during the Civil War, you should question the accuracy and reliability of the events described in the diary.
While the handwriting expert's analysis indicates that the writing matches other samples traced to the soldier, and the carbon-dating expert can verify the age of the document, the diary's account of a specific battle contradicts other documents you have on that event.
To assess the diary's reliability, you can follow these steps:
1. Compare the diary with other primary sources about the battle, such as official military records, letters, and newspaper articles, to determine any discrepancies or similarities.
2. Investigate the background and credibility of the handwriting and carbon-dating experts to ensure their findings are trustworthy.
3. Examine the context in which the diary was written and consider the soldier's perspective and possible biases that may have influenced his account of the battle.
4. Cross-reference the diary with secondary sources, such as history books and scholarly articles, to gain a broader understanding of the battle and its context.
5. Consult with other historians or experts in the field of Civil War history to gather their opinions and insights on the diary's content and its potential impact on the understanding of the battle.
By questioning the accuracy and reliability of the diary, you can assess its potential value as a historical source and determine its place in the broader context of Civil War history.
To know more about Confederate soldier refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9682613#
#SPJ11
in 1936 president roosevelt wanted to create 6 new supreme court justices and 50 new federal judges. this was criticized by many as:
In 1936, President Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, also known as the "court-packing" plan, which aimed to add six new justices to the Supreme Court, as well as 50 new federal judges. which faced significant criticism from the political parties.
The proposal was seen as a response to the Supreme Court's opposition to several of Roosevelt's New Deal policies, which the Court had struck down as unconstitutional. Critics argued that Roosevelt's plan to add new judges was an attempt to stack the courts in his favor, allowing him to push through his agenda without opposition from the judiciary.
The proposal was also seen as a violation of the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government. Ultimately, Roosevelt's plan was not successful, as it was met with significant opposition from both political parties, as well as the public.
In 1936 president Roosevelt wanted to create 6 new supreme court justices and 50 new federal judges. By whom this was criticized?
Learn more about President Roosevelt:
https://brainly.com/question/27751393
#SPJ11
HELPP! Why was this case important?
After the War of 1812, the U.S. government needed to borrow money to pay off war debts. At this time in history, each state had its own bank. This meant that the U.S. government had to work with multiple state banks to borrow money. To solve this problem, in 1816 Congress decided to set up the Second Bank of the United States with branches in multiple states. Many of the states opposed the national bank because it meant that their state banks had to compete with the national bank for business.
Many states were unhappy with the Second Bank of the United States. One of those states was Maryland. To show its unhappiness, Maryland passed a law that required the national bank to pay a heavy tax to the state of Maryland. This was a move to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States. James McCulloch, cashier of the Baltimore branch, had to pay a $15,000 annual tax. When McCulloch refused to pay the tax, a Maryland court convicted him and fined him $2,500. He appealed the decision to the Maryland Court of Appeals and lost again. The dispute then ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States, with Chief Justice John Marshall presiding.
Did Congress have the power to establish a national bank?
McCulloch Argument:
Congress debated the creation of the national bank a few years ago. Members of Congress believed they had the right to create the Second Bank of the United States, citing the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). The members believed that the bank was a "necessary and proper" way for Congress to conduct the financial operations of the nation. Congress referred to these as "implied powers," stating that the Constitution only provides a framework and cannot specifically outline every detail of national operations.
Maryland Argument:
The Constitution does not directly grant the power to charter a national bank. It is also not an implied power. Therefore, Congress did not have the right to establish a national bank. The states should determine the right to establish a bank.
Was the Maryland law that taxed nationally chartered banks unconstitutional, interfering with federal powers?
McCulloch Argument:
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) states that federal law takes priority over state law. The bank is a federal function which no state may interfere. If Maryland can tax the national bank, it could interfere enough to cause the bank to close.
Maryland:
Maryland is a sovereign state; it has the right to tax individuals and businesses in its state borders.
The Judgement
The Supreme Court unanimously (7–0) ruled in favor of McCulloch and the federal government. The case was important because it established a precedent for the relationships between the federal government and the state governments. It stated that the federal government had powers the Constitution did not list, known as implied powers. These implied powers granted Congress the constitutional right to establish a national bank. They said that states had the power to tax within their borders. However, the state of Maryland did not have the power to tax a federal establishment. Maryland's decision to tax the national bank was an attempt to destroy the bank. The state challenged the supremacy of federal power.
what impact did the events of the 1968 democratic national convention have on the american people watching at home?
The events of the 1968 Democratic National Convention had a significant impact on the American people watching at home.
It was a pivotal moment in American history, and it was marked by intense protests and demonstrations. It left a lasting impact on the American political landscape and American society as a whole.
The events that took place at the 1968 Democratic National Convention had a significant impact on the American people watching at home. It was a time of great political upheaval and social unrest, and the convention was seen as a battleground for the various factions that were vying for power and influence.
In the end, the events of the 1968 Democratic National Convention had a profound impact on American society. They gave rise to a new generation of activists and protestors, and they helped to redefine the relationship between the government and the people.
Today, the events of 1968 are remembered as a turning point in American history.
TO KNOW ABOUT American political:
https://brainly.com/question/25278887
#SPJ11
in an effort to avoid a future war, the treaty of versailles called for german disarmament. which measures were part of that effort? select three answers.
The Treaty of Versailles called for German disarmament as part of an effort to avoid a future war. Three measures included in this effort were the abolition of Germany’s navy and air force, the limitation of their army size to 100,000 soldiers, and the prohibition of all tanks and heavy artillery.
The German Navy was abolished as part of the Treaty of Versailles, resulting in the destruction of Germany’s warships and submarines. This was designed to prevent Germany from engaging in a naval war in the future.
The Treaty of Versailles also limited the size of Germany’s army to just 100,000 men. This was done to ensure that Germany was unable to build a large enough force to pose a threat to other nations.
Additionally, the Treaty of Versailles prohibited Germany from owning or constructing tanks and heavy artillery. This was done in order to ensure that Germany did not have the capability to wage a war with superior military power.
In conclusion, the Treaty of Versailles included several measures designed to ensure that Germany was unable to engage in war in the future. These measures included the abolition of their navy, the limitation of their army size, and the prohibition of tanks and heavy artillery.
To know more about Treaty of Versailles refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/518077
#SPJ11
in what ways and to what extent did the united states government encourage westward migration from 1860 to 1890? apush essay
The US government encouraged westward migration from 1860 to 1890 by offering incentives such as land grants and homesteads, creating new routes of transportation, and improving land access with new canals and railroads.
From 1860 to 1890, the US government enacted various policies and laws to encourage citizens to move westward. The Homestead Act of 1862 granted 160 acres of public land to individuals and families who agreed to live on and cultivate the land for at least five years.
The 1862 Pacific Railroad Act subsidized construction of the first transcontinental railroad, connecting the east and west coasts.
By 1890, the government had granted almost 10 million acres of public land to individuals and businesses. These policies allowed for more citizens to move westward and pursue opportunities in the new frontier.
To know more about Homestead Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487#
#SPJ11
Based on this excerpt, how were these nonviolent actions effective? PLEASE ANSWER IM IN A HURRY
The theme of the march is “the people shall govern.” We intend to
march to Parliament in arm-linked rows of eight. . . . If the police order
us to disperse, we will sit down to kneel in the road. Kneel in the road?
Nothing on earth will persuade me to kneel on the road in front of a
serious, mean-looking police force. My stomach contracts with fear and
doubt. . . .
The marchers brace themselves. Somewhere a critical button is pushed
and a sharp jet of water bursts forth, changing in mid-stream to lurid
purple.
Some are hit head on, full in the face. Some are knocked off their
knees. . . . Then it stops. A lone protester has climbed on top of the truck
and is diverting the nozzle away from the people. . . . The crowd stares
for a moment in disbelief— then goes wild, cheering, shouting, and
leaping in the air with delight for this brave young man. . . .
By Monday morning an efficient graffiti artist has said it all for all of us.
“The purple shall govern.” I can believe it.
"Nonviolent action was so effective because African Americans used peaceful demonstrations to highlight the injustices they faced as a result of white people's decisions and actions."
What were the impact of nonviolent action?Non-violence is a strong, active approach to work-ing for human liberation that strongly op-poses as well as refuses to co-operate to evil and injustice, while attempt-ing to show good-will toward all as well as taking suffer-ing on itself rather than inflicting suffering or vio-lence on others.
The unique lever-age that non-violent resistance had in the face of power & force was that it demons-trated to the people of the United States that they were demand-ing what was fair and right in an orderly manner. It also demonstrated the police's and white people's brutality and aggression. American citizens throughout the United States began to sympathize with African Americans.
To know more about nonviolent actions click below:
brainly.com/question/30406168
#SPJ1
how did racial unrest in the north affect the journey of african americans during the great migration of the early 1900s a prigraph
During the Great Migration of the early 1900s, African Americans faced racial unrest in the North, which affected their journey. Specifically, the unrest made it difficult for African Americans to find employment and housing. In some areas, they were not welcomed by white residents and faced discrimination, segregation, and even violence.
As a result, African Americans were often forced to live in cramped, segregated areas and could only find employment in low-paying jobs.
1. During the Great Migration of the early 1900s, African Americans faced racial unrest in the North.
2. This unrest made it difficult for African Americans to find employment and housing.
3. In some areas, African Americans faced discrimination, segregation, and even violence.
4. As a result, African Americans were often forced to live in cramped, segregated areas and could only find employment in low-paying jobs.
To know more about Great Migration refer to-
brainly.com/question/29555473#
#SPJ11
when conflicts peak between japan and the us, why do you think japan chose to attack hawaii instead of mainland united states
When conflicts peak between Japan and the US, Japan chose to attack Hawaii instead of the mainland United States because of the following reasons:
Distance from Japan: It was easier for Japan to launch an attack on Hawaii since it was relatively close to Japan, as compared to the mainland United States.
Lack of Defenses: Hawaii was also considered a vulnerable target since it was not well-defended by the US army at the time. This made it an easier target for Japan. Attack on mainland US was considered difficult because the US had better military protection compared to Hawaii.
Strategic Value: Pearl Harbor in Hawaii had a strategic value since it was home to the US Navy's Pacific fleet. The Japanese leadership believed that by launching an attack on Pearl Harbor, they would neutralize the US Navy's capability to operate in the Pacific, thereby preventing them from intervening in Japan's expansionist ambitions.The attack on Pearl Harbor in Hawaii was, therefore, a strategic move by Japan to deal a devastating blow to the US Navy and weaken its ability to interfere with Japan's goals of expansion and acquisition of territories in the Pacific region.
To know more about conflicts click on below link :
https://brainly.com/question/17085630#
#SPJ11
compare and contrast the positions of washington and du bois on the issue of civil rights for african americans. how were they similar, how were they different?
Washington and Du Bois held different positions and beliefs on civil rights for African Americans.
While Washington believed that African Americans could earn civil rights by improving their economic status, Du Bois advocated for immediate political and social equality for African Americans. They had some similarities as well.
Washington's position on African Americans and their civil rights was that they should focus on economic advancement rather than immediate political or social equality. He believed that by becoming financially successful, African Americans would gain respect from the white community and eventually earn civil rights.
Washington also believed that African Americans should not openly challenge segregation and discrimination but should rather work within the existing system to improve their lives.
Du Bois, on the other hand, believed that immediate political and social equality for African Americans was necessary to end racism and discrimination. He advocated for African Americans to have the right to vote, receive equal education, and have equal opportunities for employment.
Du Bois also believed that African Americans should openly challenge segregation and racism rather than working within the system.
Washington and Du Bois shared some similarities in their positions.
Both believed that education was crucial for the advancement of African Americans. Washington founded the Tuskegee Institute, which provided vocational training to African Americans. Similarly, Du Bois believed in the importance of education and was a strong advocate for African Americans to receive equal education opportunities.
In conclusion, Washington and Du Bois held different positions on civil rights for African Americans, but they both shared a belief in the importance of education for African American advancement. Washington focused on economic advancement, while Du Bois advocated for immediate political and social equality.
To know more about African Americans, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/24318057#
#SPJ11
The theory of gravity which helps explain the movement of the planets was developed by the scientist
Answer:
the theiry of gravity is studied by Gellilio Gallile
Explanation:
all things fall downward at the same rate time in vaccum
The Phillips curve ability to explain the relationship between unemployment and inflation was reduced after the events of Select the correct answer below. O the Great Recession O the Great Depression the housing bubble and crash of 2008 o the Stagfiation of the 1970s
The Phillips curve ability to explain the relationship between unemployment and inflation was reduced after the events of the housing bubble and crash of 2008. The correct option is C.
What is the Phillips curve?The Phillips curve portrays the relationship between unemployment and inflation. According to the Phillips curve, there is a negative relationship between unemployment and inflation. This implies that as unemployment rates rise, inflation rates decrease, and vice versa.
What caused the Phillips curve to lose its ability to explain the relationship between unemployment and inflation?The Phillips curve lost its ability to explain the relationship between unemployment and inflation after the housing bubble and crash of 2008. It happened due to a variety of factors. According to some economists, the 2008 financial crisis was caused by the financial sector's actions. Additionally, the financial crisis was attributed to the real estate market's collapse. The United States' GDP has been below potential since the housing bubble and crash of 2008.
Since the Great Recession, the Phillips curve has become less accurate due to factors like structural changes in the labor market, global economic trends, and technological advancements that have contributed to the erosion of workers' bargaining power, keeping wages low. As a result, unemployment and inflation have become less closely related over time. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Phillips curve's ability to explain the relationship between unemployment and inflation has reduced after the events of the housing bubble and crash of 2008.
Therefore, the correct option is C.
To know more about Phillips curve refer: https://brainly.com/question/28163276
#SPJ11
the immigration and nationality acts amendments, beginning in 1965, had what kind of impact on california's immigration?
The Immigration and Nationality Acts Amendments of 1965 had a significant impact on California's immigration.
These amendments removed the previous discriminatory policies in place that favored immigrants from certain countries, and instead replaced them with a system that was based on a person's skills and family reunification.
This allowed for a greater influx of diverse immigrants from all parts of the world, thus increasing the diversity of the population of California.
The Immigration and Nationality Acts Amendments of 1965 significantly changed the landscape of immigration to the state of California.
These amendments ended the discriminatory quota system that favored immigrants from certain countries, and instead replaced it with a system based on the skills of the applicant and family reunification.
This allowed a greater number of immigrants to enter the state, including those from countries that had previously been under-represented in the population.
This increase in diversity allowed California to become a melting pot of cultures and ideas, and opened the door for economic growth and opportunity. The Immigration and Nationality Acts Amendments of 1965 therefore had a huge impact on California's immigration.
To know more about discriminatory policies click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30650257#
#SPJ11
Which Civil War battle is described in the above box?
Question 6 options:
Battle of Fort Sumter
Siege of Vicksburg
Battle of Gettysburg
Battle of Antietam
Battle of Gettysburg
Explanation:The Battle of Gettysburg is considered to be one of the most important battles of the American Civil War.
Battle of Gettysburg Characteristics
We can tell that the Civil War battle being described is the Battle of Gettysburg by identifying the main characteristics of the battle. Firstly, The Battle of Gettysburg was 3 days long and lasted from July 1st to July 3rd in 1863. It was one of the biggest battles of the Civil War with over 160,000 troops present. This made the battle the largest land battle in North America. Additionally, the Battle of Gettysburg was one of the bloodiest battles in the Civil War. Over 45,000 Americans died in the battle. Nevertheless, the Battle of Gettysburg was a Union Victory and helped the Union win the War.
Significance of the Battle of Gettysburg
The Battle of Gettysburg is widely considered to be one of the most important battles of the Civil War. This is because the battle was a turning point in the war. The Battle of Gettysburg marks the last time the Confederacy ever attacked Union-controlled territory. This means that the Battle of Gettysburg was the last time the South attempted to invade the North. After this battle, the Confederacy went on defense, and slowly their army began to weaken. The Battle of Gettysburg was the beginning of the end for the Confederacy and led to the Union victory.
Many wars have been fought in the past over ownership and control of land however world war 1 was not fought for this reason. Why did countries around the world send their soldiers into battle at the beginning of the 20th century?
Land ownership and control were not the primary motivations for World War I, which was instead driven by complicated factors including nationalism, militarism, and alliances.
For children, what is World War One?World War I, sometimes known as the Great War, lasted from 1914 to 1918. It was mostly fought in Europe, but it also stretched to the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. It is sometimes referred to as the Great War or the First World War.
What factors led to World War I, according to the essay?In certain European countries in the years preceding World War 1, militarism was the most effective form of force to employ. Militarization had an impact on culture, the media, and public opinion in addition to legislation.
To know more about World War I visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ9