Answer:
Conflict theory is a sociological perspective that views society as a struggle for power between different groups. It asserts that social order is maintained through the domination of one group over another. In the context of Indigenous people, conflict theory can help to explain how social control mechanisms have been used to justify their oppression and forced assimilation.
Racism has been used as a social control mechanism to justify the oppression of Indigenous people. Racism involves the belief that some races are inherently superior to others, and this belief has been used to justify the treatment of Indigenous people as inferior and unworthy of respect. This has been used to justify discriminatory policies, such as the residential school system in Canada, which was designed to assimilate Indigenous children into Western culture and erase their Indigenous identity. Racism has also been used to justify land theft and forced removal of Indigenous people from their traditional territories, as well as the denial of their basic human rights.
Religion has also been used as a social control mechanism to justify the oppression of Indigenous people. Christian missionaries, for example, were often sent to Indigenous communities with the goal of converting them to Christianity and eradicating their traditional beliefs and practices. This was done under the guise of “saving” Indigenous people from their “savage” ways and bringing them into the “civilized” world. The forced assimilation and cultural genocide of Indigenous people was often justified in religious terms, such as the belief that Indigenous people were “heathens” who needed to be saved.
Education has been another social control mechanism used to oppress Indigenous people. The education system has been used to perpetuate colonialism and maintain the dominance of Western culture over Indigenous culture. The residential school system in Canada, for example, was designed to strip Indigenous children of their language, culture, and identity, and to indoctrinate them with Western values and beliefs. This has had long-lasting effects on Indigenous communities, as many people have lost their connection to their culture and language, leading to a loss of self-identity and self-esteem.
Finally, federal government authority has been used as a social control mechanism to oppress Indigenous people. The federal government has historically used its authority to pass laws and policies that discriminate against Indigenous people and deny them their basic human rights. Examples include the Indian Act, which was used to control every aspect of Indigenous life and deny them their basic freedoms, and the forced relocation of Indigenous people from their traditional territories. The government has also used its authority to deny Indigenous people access to basic services, such as health care, education, and clean drinking water.
In conclusion, conflict theory provides a lens through which to view the social control mechanisms that have been used to justify the oppression and forced assimilation of Indigenous people. Racism, religion, education, and federal government authority have all been used to perpetuate colonialism and maintain the dominance of Western culture over Indigenous culture. It is important to recognize the impact of these social control mechanisms in order to work towards reconciliation and healing for Indigenous communities.
According to the Declaration of Independence, when a government abuses its power, the people have the right to create a new government.
True
False
Answer:
This statement is true. The Declaration of Independence states that when a government becomes destructive to the people's rights, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and to institute a new government.
Explanation:
What was the strategy the allies used after the US joined WWII?
Answer:
the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers
Explanation: After the United States joined World War II, the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers. This strategy involved a combination of military, economic, and political tactics.
Militarily, the Allies used a combination of ground, naval, and air forces to launch attacks on Axis territories from multiple directions. This involved coordinated offensives in different theaters of the war, including Europe, Africa, and Asia. The Allies used their superior resources and firepower to gradually push back Axis forces, liberating occupied territories and advancing towards the heartlands of Germany, Italy, and Japan.
Economically, the Allies implemented a range of measures to weaken the Axis powers. The United States, as the leading economic power, provided significant economic aid to the Allies, including supplies, weapons, and money. This helped sustain the war effort and allowed the Allies to out-produce the Axis in terms of arms and resources. The Allies also implemented economic blockades and trade restrictions to disrupt Axis supply lines and limit their access to critical resources.
Politically, the Allies worked to build and maintain a coalition of nations united against the Axis powers. This involved diplomacy, propaganda, and intelligence efforts to gain the support of neutral nations and undermine Axis influence. The Allies also worked to coordinate their military efforts and minimize conflicts between their own forces, which was not always easy given their different strategic priorities and national interests.
Overall, the Allies' strategy after the US joined WWII was to use their combined military, economic, and political resources to wear down the Axis powers and ultimately defeat them. While this strategy took time and required significant sacrifices, it ultimately succeeded in achieving the Allies' objectives and bringing an end to the war.
Who is someone who you think has made America a better place, like Martin Luther
King, Jr? How do you think we should honor this person?
Please someone :(
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is someone who I think has made America a better place, like Martin Luther King, Jr. In the 1970s, Ginsburg oversaw the influential American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project.
Throughout her career as a Supreme Court justice, Ginsburg worked to advance women's rights and gender equality. She was also renowned for her vociferous dissents, which influenced both legal and public discourse. Continue promoting gender equality and giving aid to groups that enhance women's rights as a way to honor her legacy. Ginsburg headed the significant American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project in the 1970s.
Learn more about Ruth Bader Ginsburg here:
https://brainly.com/question/29774518
#SPJ1
Which of the following was planned and discussed openly to help countries have confidence in its fairness?
Treaty of Versailles
League of Nations
United Nations
Yalta Conference
Answer:
United Nations
Explanation:
Brainliest please!
PLS HURRY TIMED !!!! Although Russell’s ideas about ethics are not discussed, which is the MOST likely description of his position on human behavior?
Power goes to those who take it.
People should fight when necessary.
Logic should rule all human behavior.
Justice and equality are core principles.
Based on the available information about Russell's ideas, the most likely description of his position on human behavior is that logic should rule all human behavior. Option 3 is the answer.
What is logic?
The process of reviewing an argument's structure to evaluate its validity, soundness, and strength is known as logic. It offers a framework for assessing assertions, spotting fallacies, and differentiating between sound and flawed reasoning.
The necessity of reason and rationality in all facets of life was stressed by philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell. For him, comprehending the world and coming to moral conclusions required the use of logic and critical thought. Therefore, it is most likely that he would support the idea that human behavior should be governed by logic rather than by ideals of fairness and equality, conflict, or power.
Learn more on human behavior here https://brainly.com/question/13227996
#SPJ1
“Living for the City” by Stevie Wonder is a clear example of his development and maturity as an artist. How does his vocal delivery continually re-engage the listener throughout the song? Discuss the importance of the audio story told as the bridge, or “B” section? What other style of rock is incorporating this technique?
Stevie Wonder's vocal delivery in "Living for the City" is engaging and powerful, drawing the listener into the story he is telling through his use of dynamics, phrasing, and emotion. Bridge or the 'B' section features a dramatic spoken-word narrative.
Throughout the song, Stevie Wonder uses his vocal range to convey the emotions of the characters in the story. His delivery is soulful and emotive, with a sense of urgency and passion that keeps the listener engaged. He varies his phrasing and dynamics, shifting between soft, tender passages and more powerful, energetic moments to create a sense of tension and release.
One of the most striking aspects of "Living for the City" is the audio story told as the bridge or "B" section. This section features a dramatic spoken-word narrative that describes the protagonist's journey from his rural hometown to the city, where he becomes caught up in the harsh realities of urban life.
The importance of this technique lies in its ability to convey a complex story with vivid detail and emotional resonance. By combining spoken-word storytelling with music, Stevie Wonder creates a powerful audio-visual experience that engages the listener on multiple levels.
To know more about Stevie Wonder, click here
https://brainly.com/question/30450404
#SPJ1
Thomas Paine wrote in common sense that the king was
How did the velvet revolution affect the Soviet Union fall
The Velvet Revolution was a non-violent political revolution that took place in Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) in 1989, which played a significant role in the fall of the Soviet Union.
The Velvet Revolution was a series of protests and demonstrations that were organized by Czechoslovak citizens demanding greater political and economic freedoms. The protests gained momentum throughout the country and eventually led to the resignation of the Communist government in Czechoslovakia.
The fall of the Communist government in Czechoslovakia was seen as a significant victory for the pro-democracy movement in Eastern Europe and served as an inspiration for other countries in the region. The events in Czechoslovakia paved the way for the peaceful transition to democracy in many other former Soviet bloc countries, such as Poland, Hungary, and East Germany.
The collapse of the Soviet Union was a complex process that was influenced by a variety of factors, including economic, political, and social changes. The Velvet Revolution played a role in this process by demonstrating that change was possible through peaceful means and by inspiring other countries to follow the example of Czechoslovakia.
White this answer may provide helpful information regarding your assignment, it is important to remember that using it verbatim could be seen as plagiarism. To avoid this, it is best to cite your sources and use your own words to ensure a better answer.
~~~Harsha~~~
What is your best guess as to how John Locke would have thought about how colonies should operate and how he should be run to benefit the homeland empire country? If a country was going to have a colony, how should the monarch treat that colony (in terms of rights, protections, respect, quality of life, etc)?
Which of the following questions could be answered by this quotation?
The question that can be answered by the quotation is: "How dld the Ottoman Empire mix religion with historical tradition? (Option C)
What exactly was the Ottoman Empire?The Ottoman Empire was one of history's most powerful and long-lasting dynasties. This Islamic-run empire governed important portions of the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and North Africa for about 600 years.
The Ottoman Empire, commonly known as the Turkish Empire, reigned over most of Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and Northern Africa during the 14th and early 20th centuries.
Learn more about the Ottoman Empire:
brainly.com/question/17850038
#SPJ1
President Nixon authorized the CIA to undermine ______ democratically elected leader Salvador Allende, setting the stage for brutal dictator Augusto Pinochet to take power.
a. Chile's
b. Brazil's
c. Argentina's
d. Columbia's
what was the result of the Russian-Japanese war
Answer:
Chaos
Explanation:
Japan and Russia in war had lots of nukes and guns, and both sides felt effects of war
Which statement is TRUE about Shays'
Rebellion?
A. The federal government decided to intervene.
B. The federal army was created to stop the rebellion.
C. The state was NOT able to gather together a militia
due to lack of funds.
D. The British army broke up the raid.
Answer:
C. The state was NOT able to gather together a militia due to lack of funds.
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
Slave cultures
a. were entirely American and retained no African cultural elements.
b. were based on the same fundamental ideas and culture as their masters’ culture.
c. were entirely African and did not embrace any American elements.
d. are lost to history, as no evidence of them has survived.
e. were semi-independent and centered on family and church.
5. What actions in the 1950s led to Texas becoming a two-party state? (1 point)
O Republicans became more liberal.
O The Democratic party became more liberal.
O Many conservative Democrats joined the Republican party.
O Most liberal Republicans joined the Democratic party.
Many conservative Democrats joined the Republican party such actions in the 1950s led to Texas becoming a two-party state. The correct option is C.
The Republican Party, which was viewed as being more conservative on topics like civil rights and states' rights, began to gain support from many conservative Democrats in Texas in the 1950s. This signaled the start of Texas' transformation into a competitive two-party state from a largely Democratic one-party state.
The Democratic-Republicans were made up of many factions that placed an emphasis on state and local rights, agrarian interests, local and humanitarian issues, and democratic processes.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about Democratic here:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ1
what is valuable to the Japanese as a result of their practice of Shinto?
The things that are valuable to the Japanese as a result of their practice of Shinto are purity as well as harmony.
What are the values of Japanese Shinto?The main beliefs of Shinto can be sen as one that focus on the importance of purity as well as harmony, respect for nature.
It should be noted that this serves as the subordination of the individual before the group however the Shinto gods is one that posses shrines so that people offer food, money and prayers. Shintoism can be regarded as the Japan's indigenous spirituality and can be seen as one that contains kami, or gods.
Learn more about Shinto at:
https://brainly.com/question/20034422
#SPJ1
Why do
you think some Abolitionists
started their own
newspapers?
Answer: The abolitionist movement began as a more organized, radical, and immediate effort to end slavery than earlier campaigns. It officially emerged around 1830. Historians believe ideas set forth during the religious movement known as the Second Great Awakening inspired abolitionists to rise up against slavery
Explanation:
Abolitionist newspapers played a vital role in the crusade to end slavery in the United States. The articles carried in these newspapers educated readers about the evils of the institution of slavery and helped to turn public opinion in northern states against it.
The one and only ivan
How do Stella and Ivan comfort each other?
A. They cuddle up at night.
B. Talk and share stories.
C. Draw pictures for each other.
OD. Make jokes about Mack.
To make each other comfortable Stella and Ivan used- A. to cuddle up at night.
According to the film "The one and only Ivan" which has characters named Ivan the Gorilla and Stella as the lead actress, Ivan and Stella's actions towards one another, such as snuggling, reveal their connection.
Hence, the correct answer is A. They cuddle up at night.
Cuddling?Any forms of contact, including cuddling, can be intimate. According to St. John, cuddling is a wonderful method to show physical connection and affection in a relationship.
It "may help foster a sense of intimacy and security and can be a highly personal experience."
To know more about Relationships visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2500832
#SPJ1
What did freeman meant be saying "allied by bonds that bind"
When Freeman said "Allied by bonds that bind" , he suggests that there is a strong connection or feeling of common purpose that binds a group of individuals.
Freeman proposed that people come together because of shared beliefs, experiences, or objectives that foster a sense of solidarity or support.
Why do people form Bonds?Psychology professor Vivian Zayas remarked, "We're social creatures because we require other people to exist. Human connection is a result of evolution, says Zayas. "If a behaviour is adaptive, one way to ensure that it occurs is that it's rewarding," Zayas said.
Why is it crucial?Many social connections may help lower stress levels and heart-related dangers, according to studies. Even a longer life span is associated with strong social bonds.
On the other side, loneliness and social isolation are associated with worse health, depression, and a higher chance of dying young.
To know more about Bonds visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30925235
#SPJ1
according to this map, which two groups of people were settled on lands to the WEST of the thirteen british coloniee
Answer:
French
Indians
Explanation:
Correct me if I'm wrong!!
The four largest Japanese islands are Honshu, skikoku, kyushu and
Answer:
Okinawa Island
Explanation:
If you examine a map you can tell that the largest islands in order are:
1. Honshu
2. Kyushu
3. Shikoku
4. Okinawa Island.
Hope it helps!
could someone help me paraphrase this
Today, I would like to talk about the Second Amendment and the different opinions that people hold about it. As we all know, the Second Amendment is one of the most controversial issues in our country. Some people believe that it is their constitutional right to bear arms, while others believe that it should be heavily regulated or even repealed altogether.
Regardless of our personal beliefs on this issue, I think we can all agree that we need to find a way to address the concerns of both sides. It is important that we find a solution that works for everyone, and that we do so in a way that respects the Constitution and the rights of all Americans.
One way that we can start to address this issue is by having an open and honest dialogue about it. We need to listen to each other's perspectives and concerns, and work together to find common ground. This may involve some compromise on both sides, but I believe that we can find a solution that works for everyone.
Another way that we can address this issue is by focusing on gun safety and education. We need to ensure that people who own guns know how to use them safely and responsibly. We also need to make sure that guns are not falling into the wrong hands, such as criminals or those with mental health issues.
Finally, we need to look at our laws and regulations around firearms. We need to make sure that they are effective at keeping our communities safe, while also respecting the rights of gun owners. This may involve strengthening our background check system, closing loopholes in our laws, and ensuring that law enforcement has the resources they need to enforce these laws.
Answer:
The Second Amendment is a controversial issue in our country, with some believing it is their constitutional right to bear arms, while others believe it should be heavily regulated or repealed. To address this issue, we need to have an open and honest dialogue, focus on gun safety and education, and strengthen our laws and regulations around firearms. This may involve strengthening our background check system, closing loopholes in our laws, and ensuring law enforcement has the resources to enforce these laws.
Explanation:
Why were the Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful?
They harmed local businesses' revenue.
They appealed to the business owners' morality.
They won the support of the President.
They appealed to religious feelings.
Answer:
The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of nonviolent protests that took place in 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina, where a group of African American college students sat at a segregated lunch counter at a local Woolworth's store and refused to leave until they were served. The sit-ins were successful for several reasons:
Nonviolent protest: The students were committed to nonviolent protest, and their peaceful actions made it difficult for the authorities to use force against them without risking public condemnation.
Persistence: The students continued their sit-ins day after day, despite facing harassment, threats, and physical violence. This persistence kept the issue of segregation in the forefront of public attention and created pressure for change.
Media coverage: The sit-ins attracted significant media attention, both locally and nationally, which helped to raise awareness of the issue of segregation and put pressure on local businesses and authorities to take action.
Community support: The sit-ins were widely supported by the African American community in Greensboro, as well as by sympathetic white allies. This support helped to sustain the protests and put pressure on local authorities and businesses to change their policies.
Economic impact: The sit-ins had a significant economic impact on the targeted businesses, as the protesters encouraged a boycott of the stores. This economic pressure helped to convince the stores to change their policies and desegregate their lunch counters.
Overall, the Greensboro Sit-Ins were successful because of the students' commitment to nonviolence, their persistence in the face of opposition, the media coverage they received, the support of the community, and the economic pressure they exerted.
Explanation:
They appealed to the business owners' morality were the reason why Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful. Correct option is 2.
The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of nonviolent protests that began on February 1, 1960, when four African American college students sat at a segregated Woolworth's lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina. They refused to leave until they were served, sparking a larger movement of sit-ins across the country.
The success of the Greensboro Sit-Ins can be attributed to several factors:
Nonviolent and Peaceful Approach: The protesters adhered to nonviolent tactics, inspired by the principles of civil disobedience advocated by leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. Their peaceful and disciplined behavior garnered sympathy and support from many Americans who were disturbed by the blatant injustice of racial segregation.
Moral Appeal: The sit-in participants demonstrated tremendous courage and dignity, sitting quietly at the lunch counter despite facing hostility and threats. Their actions highlighted the moral injustice of segregation and appealed to the conscience of business owners and the public.
Media Attention: The sit-ins attracted significant media coverage, both local and national. Television and newspapers showcased images and stories of peaceful demonstrators being denied service simply because of their race. This media exposure brought the issue of racial segregation to the forefront of public consciousness and put pressure on businesses and local authorities to address the situation.
Solidarity and Widespread Participation: The Greensboro Sit-Ins inspired similar protests in other cities and towns across the United States. The movement gained momentum as more people joined in, creating a sense of solidarity and a powerful collective voice demanding change.
Support from the Black Community: The sit-ins received strong support from the local African American community, civil rights organizations, and religious leaders. Their unity and determination added strength to the movement.
In conclusion, the Greensboro Sit-Ins were successful because they appealed to the morality of business owners and the public at large. By peacefully confronting the injustice of segregation and showcasing the courage and determination of the protesters, the sit-ins brought attention to the issue and played a significant role in the broader civil rights movement, leading to the eventual desegregation of public facilities in the United States.
To know more about Greensboro Sit-Ins :
https://brainly.com/question/363060
#SPJ2
Question 2 of 10 The Soviet Union and the United States nearly went to war with each other in 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet missiles on the island of Cuba. This event, called the Cuban Missile Crisis, was resolved peacefully after several days of negotiations between U.S. and Soviet leaders. Which approach would a military historian take to study the Cuban Missile Crisis? A. Explain why the negotiations that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis were successful о B. Describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba ← PREVIOUS
Answer: The answer should probably be answer A: Explain why the negotiations that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis were successful
Hope this helps! :)
President Nixon's Revised Philadelphia Plan was an early milestone for ______.
a. early childhood education
b. affirmative action
c. the pro-choice movement
d. LGBTQ rights
"America has a problem...it is that of the
Answer:Humans ruining the earth"
Explanation:
Which of the following is true of general elections?
Question 8 options:
a)
Ads rarely focus on political party.
b)
They do not depend on visibility as much as primary elections do.
c)
They have a higher turnout than primary elections do.
d)
They have very similar strategies to primary elections.
The true statement about general elections is that they have a higher turnout than primary elections do. The Option C.
Do general elections have higher turnout than primary elections?Yes, the general elections have a higher turnout because they are the final stage in the electoral process where voters choose their representatives for public office but primary elections are preliminary contests within political party to select a candidate for the general election.
Therefore, its tend to attract a wider range of voters such as those who may not be registered with a political party or who may not have participated in the primary election. In addition, its also receive more media coverage from political campaigns which can also help to drive up voter turnout.
Read more about general elections
brainly.com/question/25815264
#SPJ1
please help me with this history question i’ll give you brainlist
Answer: B
Explanation: African natives were never huge fans of Europeans barging in, and they often rebelled.
Which of the following is considered non-excludable?
Question 37 options:
a)
particularized benefits
b)
a collective good
c)
political institution
d)
a private good
Answer: Non-excludable goods are public goods that cannot be used by a specific person or group of people.
Explanation:
A collective good is considered non-excludable. So the correct answer is b) a collective good
A collective good, also known as a public good, is considered non-excludable. Non-excludability means that individuals cannot be effectively excluded from using the good or benefiting from it, regardless of whether they have contributed to its provision or not. In other words, once the collective good is provided, everyone in the community can access and enjoy its benefits. Examples of collective goods include clean air, national defense, public parks, and street lighting.
To know more about collective good:
https://brainly.com/question/31214959
#SPJ2
A combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force was used to erode Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas. What are some examples of these different tactics?
Answer & Explanation:
Various tactics were employed by the United States to undermine Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas during the 19th century. These tactics included a combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force. Some examples of these tactics are:
Manifest Destiny: The belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States was destined to expand across the North American continent, played a significant role in justifying the erosion of Mexican rights and social structures. This attitude led to widespread support for American expansion into Mexican territories, often at the expense of the Mexican people.
Economic pressure: American settlers and entrepreneurs moved into Mexican territories, such as California and Texas, and established businesses and farms. This influx of American economic activity undermined the local Mexican economy and displaced Mexican landowners. Additionally, the increasing economic dependence on the United States made it more difficult for Mexico to maintain control over these regions.
Land policies and dispossession: American land policies in newly acquired territories, like the implementation of the Homestead Act, often favored American settlers over Mexican landholders. These policies led to the dispossession of Mexican landowners and further eroded their rights and social structures.
Brute force and military action: The United States engaged in military actions, such as the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), to forcefully annex Mexican territories, including California and Texas. The war and subsequent Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo resulted in the loss of a substantial portion of Mexico's territory and further weakened its influence in the region.
Racism and discrimination: American settlers often held racist attitudes towards Mexicans and other non-white groups. This led to discrimination and violence against Mexican communities, further eroding their rights and social structures. For example, the lynching of Mexicans in Texas by Anglo-American vigilantes was not uncommon during this period.
Assimilation and Americanization: American authorities and settlers promoted the assimilation of Mexican populations into American society, often at the expense of their cultural identity and social structures. This process, sometimes referred to as "Americanization," involved the imposition of American customs, language, and values on Mexican communities.
These tactics, which combined attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force, significantly impacted Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas, leading to the long-lasting marginalization of Mexican-American communities in these regions.