What are some of the ways the print press revolution transformed Europe?

Answer:

America

Explanation:

America made this cartoon, the hand is also pointing from the west, and this cartoon was printed in the Chicago Tribune.

Answer:

A.)

Explanation:

Answer:

The Spanish-American War began on April 25th, 1898 and ended on August 12th, 1898, lasting three months, two weeks and four days. It was fought between Spain and the United States, after Spain declared war on the U.S. because the U.S. supported Cuba's desire to be independent of Spanish rule.

Explanation:

1.  3,000 Americans died during the Spanish-American war, but only approximately 385 died from battle itself. The rest died of disease. Typhoid and yellow fever was an enemy to both the Spanish and the Americans.

2. During the Spanish-American War there were 29 battles. 11 battles were won by the United States, 11 battles were won by the Spanish, and the remaining battles were considered inconclusive as to who actually won.

3. On July 17th, 1898, the Spanish surrendered to the United States at Santiago.

4. Although Cuba gained its independence as a result of the Spanish-American war, the country was under U.S. military control for three years after the war ended, until May 20th, 1902.

5. Spain was once considered to be the most powerful colonial nation in the world, but lost much of its control as one country after another declared independence just as Cuba did in 1898.

6. The Cubans were being treated horribly by the Spanish, which led to Cuba's desire for independence.

7. Cubans were forced into slavery and thousands of them died from both starvation and disease.

8. On June 22nd, 1898 U.S. troops landed in Cuba.

9. On July 1st, 1898, the United States defeated the Spanish at the Battle of San Juan Heights, and on July 3rd, 1898, off Santiago Bay, the United States destroyed the Spanish fleet.

10. On April 25th, 1898, the U.S. declared war on Spain, and the first battle occurred on May 1st, 1898 at Manila Bay in the Philippines. The U.S. won.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Since the Tsar relied heavily on the counsel of Rasputin, Russia suffered heavy casualities during WW1 and also suffered from fuel and food shortages in 1917, which ended up in the Tsar abdicating the throne, and therefore the rule of the Tsars in Russia collapsing.

Thank you! Please Mark Brainliest! :)

Answer:

are you asking for someone to give you a poem? if so you need to say that. add more information so people can give you a better answer

Explanation:

The war of 1812 impacted the United States by resulting in a surge of national pride.

This is because the war of 1812 was fought between the United States and Great Britain.

At the time, Great Britain was considered the best military in naval war, and the United States, which was then a new nation, was able to fight them to draw.

This created a sense of pride among the Americans and increased the spirit of nationalism among the citizens.

Also, the United States gained a lot of international respect.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "It resulted in a surge of national pride."

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20902667

Explanation:

Without freedom of the media our newspapers would lose much of their value.

Answer:

i cant see it

Explanation:

The poems "Old Ironsides" and "Village Blacksmith" were similar as they were both in three stanzas. Also, the emotions of the authors were conveyed in the poems.

The Village Blacksmith described a local blacksmith and his daily life. In the poem, the blacksmith was a role model so balanced both his job with the role that he played in his family and community.

The purpose of the author in Old Ironsides was to protest the destruction of a ship that fought in World War. The poem centered on the ship that served in many battles. It should be noted that the poems had three stanzas and the emotions of the authors were conveyed in the poems.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/25305843

Answer:

you need to list the following

Explanation:

Answer:

no it will not

Explanation:

It’s Election Day in the United States, and as the day unfolds, all eyes will be on the men and women streaming into the polls to cast their ballots. News broadcasts will be devoted to counting up all the votes cast, and trying to divine who came out to vote and why.But American elections aren’t actually about the people who vote. They’re about the people who don’t. Politicians are almost always chosen by less than a majority of the population. Laws and practices that exclude large numbers of potential voters determine who wins and who loses.That’s by design. Voter exclusion is hard-wired into what is, on close inspection, a very undemocratic system of governance. The U.S. Constitution placed the selection of presidents in the hands of “electors,” not the people, and it offered no clear protections for a citizen’s right to vote. In the original Constitution, states retained enormous latitude to determine who went to the polls and who did not.And although amendments eventually extended voter protection to black Americans, women and people 18 and over, even these guarantees were only partially enforced. Communities nationwide used poll taxes, literacy tests, inconvenient voting locations and onerous registration requirements to discourage voting by particular groups, especially African Americans and other minorities.The real fraud in American voting is not illegally cast votes but legally blocked ones. Our history has taught us all too well how to keep people away from the polls, despite their constitutional rights. Even a half-century after the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, tens of thousands of citizens are denied the franchise because of insufficient proof of identity, felony convictions or other state stipulations — all of which are designed today, as they were in the past, to keep certain people from casting their ballots.“Certain people” means, most obviously, people of color, who are told they are not welcome as voters at every stage in the process, from demeaning rhetoric about their “fake” votes to convoluted registration processes to intimidation at the polls. For many Mexican Americans, it feels safer just to stay home. That’s why states such as Texas have electorates that remain dominated by white votes even as their populations become rapidly more diverse.But “certain people” also means those without access to wealth. The mobilization of money for elected office makes dominant groups even more powerful. The sheer scale of wealth in the hands of several billionaires has allowed them, and their political action committees (PACs), to smother competitors. As the rich have become so much richer, they have made their votes count more, and the votes of others count less. Donald Trump began his presidential campaign as a critic of big political donors, but he and his supporters in the Republican Party benefited from their money in the election.By the time poor citizens vote, the candidates have already been vetted by the wealthy donors who are necessary for any person running to have a chance. That means Election Day is really about choosing among candidates handpicked by the super wealthy (say, Trump or Hillary Clinton), rather than candidates who reflect the needs and experiences of citizens.And this dominance by wealth becomes more true with each successive electoral cycle. As candidates require more and more money for advertising and social media, the influence of money grows. Parties have always chosen elites, but now fundraising crowds out other qualities of leadership. You cannot run if you cannot bring in big bucks, immediately.Gerrymandering likewise nullifies votes, erecting exclusionary boundaries between voters and their representatives. During the decennial district-drawing process for national, state and local representatives, the politicians in power choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Incumbent legislators make certain that their districts are dominated by like-minded citizens, and they limit the power of opposition groups by splitting their presence among as many districts as possible.Although gerrymandering goes back to the earliest days of the republic, it has never distorted electoral outcomes as much as it does today. Wisconsin and Texas are two of many states where elected representatives are far more Republican than the voters. That is because Republican majorities in both legislatures set it up that way, exaggerating and entrenching their power with the lines they drew across the landscape. New computer technologies have turned this process into a precise science, limiting voter choice wherever possible.These structural roadblocks make clear how little say citizens have in who represents them. The system is indeed “rigged,” but the rigging benefits the powerful, the wealthy and the extremes — not the vast majority of Americans.Trump’s presidency is a result of this system.  

Answer:

McKinely - C

Explanation:

McKinley is the answer:)

Answer:

1/5

Explanation:

a terminating decimal is one that ends. since 1/5 is 0.2, while the other numbers keep on going, 1/5 is the terminating decimal.

Answer:

The Sugar and Stamp Acts. The Sugar and Stamp Acts of 1764 and 1765, intended to raise revenue in Great Britain, led to increased resistance from the colonies.

Explanation:

CAN YOU GIVE ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

the rosenbergs?

Explanation:

Answer:

It is like this to help ensure that no one branch is more powerful than another. Therefore making them all equal and not one is more powerful. I hope this helps you.

Answer:

shared cultural heritage

Answer:

D

Explanation:

In 1794, farmers from Western Pennsylvania rose up in protest of what they saw as unfair taxation and provided the new nation, and George Washington, with a looming crisis.

please mark as brainliest it helps

Whiskey was being taxed is the people protest is the Whiskey Rebellion. Hence, option D is correct.

The Whiskey Rebellion served as the federal government of the United States' first significant test. This rebellion enforced the notion that the new government had the authority to impose a certain tax that would apply to citizens of all states.

The Whiskey Rebellion provided the fledgling American government with its first opportunity to exercise federal power militarily within state boundaries as authorities moved into western Pennsylvania to put down a rebellion of settlers opposing the whiskey tax.

Farmers in Western Pennsylvania revolted in 1794 over what they perceived as excessive taxes, creating a crisis that threatened the fledgling country and George Washington.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more details about Whiskey Rebellion, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/478473

#SPJ2

Explanation:

Objectively speaking, this type of development economics did once make positive guiding effects on China's economic development which include establishing catching-up and overpassing strategies for boosting GDP, supporting economic growth at high accumulation and high investment rates and transferring surplus agricultural.

The controversial issue about the territorial disputes between the people's republic of china and the republic of the Philippines was caused by the " illegal occupation of some of China's islands and reefs in the South China Sea."

The Republic of China claimed that some coastal islands like the Philippines are illegally occupying their territories.

To solve these territorial disputes, the Philippines seek arbitration while China seeks bilateral negotiation.

With none of the countries yielding a method to solve the issue, territorial disputes continue to exist.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the cause of the controversial issues on the territorial disputes between China and the Philippines can be resolved if both are willing to come to terms.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20263720

Answer:

B - All people should be treated equally.

Answer:

B) All people should be treated equally.

Second answer is also B) They were often not invited to participate in white churches.

☆
EDGE2022; Good Luck :D!!!

Explanation:

C) Mass manufacturing techniques were adopted to maximize production.

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's B

Explanation:

it was used to record a variety of information such as temple activities, business and trade. *Sorry if it's incorrect.*

Answer:

Many empires rose and fell between 2300 B.C. & 334 B.C. This includes the Babylonian and Hittite Empires which were located near the Middle East. The Babylonian Empire was found particularly in between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris, but also stretched to include Present-day Palestine, Present-day & Ancient Israel, North-east of Egypt, and terminating at the ancient city of Ur. The Hittite Empire, on the other hand, included most of present-day Turkey down to present-day northern border of Israel. In comparing both of the empires, we can see that they were able to conquer areas of their surrounding.

However, there are extreme differences between the two empires. One can be savage, in that they continued to war and pillage other civilizations. The Hittite empire fell apart during the rise of the Assryian Kingdom, which effectively removed the "staff of power" from the Hittite's, as well as suppress Babylon.

The Babylonian Empire, on the other hand, rose after the fall of the Assryian Empire, and was able to conquer most of what the Hittite's had. They ruled Northern Egypt, present-day Israel and Palestine, up to what would later be known as Constantinople, and going down to the Persian Gulf. The Babylonians were conquerors, who defeated and assimilated the people groups into the empire, though displacing them to discourage rebellion. They were overthrown later on by the Persians at the end of their empire.

Babylon and the Hittite were similar only in that they became empires, but the differences are great. They both took different approaches in trying to conquer the lands. One tried suppression, while the other did assimilation (though they did have to suppress in numerous occasions). In the end, they both were empires, and they both fell.

Explanation:

Man I hope you mark it as brainliest

Answer: C

Explanation: Once the governor receives a bill, he can sign it, veto it, or do nothing. If he signs it, the bill becomes law. *If he does nothing, the bill becomes law without his signature.* If he vetoes the bill, and the Senate and House of Representatives do nothing, the bill “dies.