what are the advantages and disadvantages of federal financing

Answer:

Public funding are funds or resources provided by the State/Government for political parties and/or candidates. Provisions often state that political parties and candidates should have an equitable access to public funds. Oftentimes, the rules regarding public funding are not clearly stated in law, and even if they are, there is often a (real or perceived) misuse of public resources by the incumbent party or candidate. The legal framework can be drafted in a way as to encourage the founding and sustainability of a multi-party system.  Ongoing oversight from a responsible government body combined with public (civil society) oversight through CSO watchdog capacity also can improve the monitoring and full disclosure of funding across party lines and in lines and consistent with the intent of full disclosure and fairness in campaign financing.[1]

Depending on the form in which public resources are made available, public funding is divided into direct public funding or indirect public funding.

Direct public funding is given to political parties and/or candidates in the form of money – usually as bank transfers but at times in cash or cheque.

Indirect public funding is when resources with a monetary value is provided by the Government to political parties and/or candidates.

Arguments against public funding

Those who oppose public funds to political parties or candidates often use one or several of the following arguments:

Public funding increases the distance between political elites (party leadership, candidates) and ordinary citizens (party members, supporters, voters)

When political parties and candidates do not depend on their supporters or members neither for monetary contributions (membership, donations) nor for voluntary labour, they might be less likely to involve them in party decisions or consult their opinions on policy issues.

Public funding preserves a status quo that keeps the established parties and candidates in power

Public funds are often allocated among political parties and candidates in the national legislature. This may make it more difficult for new political forces to gain representation. The legal framework can limit this negative influence by providing special funds for new political parties or candidates.

Through public funds, taxpayers are forced to support political parties and candidates whose views they do not share

Many believe that ordinary taxpayers should not be forced – through the public purse – to support political parties or candidates that they would never choose to vote for. Instead they should have the possibility to decide if and when they want to donate money to a political party or candidate.

Public funds to political parties and candidates takes money away from schools and hospitals to give to rich politicians

When introduced, public funding is often unpopular among the public. Public resources are scarce and needed for everything from schools and hospitals to roads and salaries for staff. To many people, using public funds to give to political parties and candidates would be far down their list of priorities.

Political parties and candidates both take the decision and collect the money

The decision to allocate public funds to parties and candidates is most often taken in the national legislature (or in some cases in the Government). This means that the political parties and candidates who will collect the money, also take the decision.

Political parties risk becoming organs of the State rather than parts of civil society

If all or a substantial amount of the party income comes directly from the State rather than from voluntary sources, political parties risk losing their independence and become organs of the State, thereby losing their ties to the civil society.

who was the first african american pictured on a us postage stamp

Do you think taxing the colonists was fair? Why or why not

the cartoon shows an officer from the federal government

How did World War II affect Europeans' feelings about allowing Jews to
immigrate to Palestine?
O A. Palestinians' refusal to aid the Allied powers during the war led
European leaders to punish them by giving their land to Jewish
settlers.
B. Jewish soldiers' substantial contributions to the Allied victory led
military leaders to suggest that Jews be rewarded with Palestinian
territory.
C. Nazi Germany's mass execution of Jews during the war convinced
many Europeans that more Jews should be allowed in Palestine.
D. Jewish leaders' unwillingness to join the Allied powers convinced
many Europeans that Jews should be relocated to a state outside
Europe.

What role did italy play in the crimean war

is Barbara Jordan a Texas hero?

Government during the American Regime what is the positive and negative effect​

Under the National Convention, what efforts were made to de-Christianize France

one thing i found interesting about the potterybof china is, it mad of _______ and hardened by ________​

who plays the part of mr. brown in the 1992 film reservoir dogs?

Naturalization is the legal process by which citizens of one country become citizens of another country.


Please select the best answer from the choices provided

T
F

What is the most frequently used measure of economic development?

A.total GDP
B.literacy rate
C.income tax rate
D. GDP per capita​

What was the Second Continental Congress ?

The Dark Age of Greece was marked
by each of the following EXCEPT
which one?
A. small, isolated communities
B. a boost in trade
C. the absence of written language
D. lack of organized government

how did the expansion of North America change British relationships with the colonists?

will give brainliest (long answers only)

which statement summarized the Enslaved Persons Clause?
A.) Enslaved persons who escape must be given constitutional rights.
B.) Enslaved persons who escape must be given equal protection
C.) Enslaved persons who escape will be seized and returned to their enslaver
D.) Enslaved persons who escape to a free state will be granted their freedom

I need help! What were the primary reasons for the fall of rome? dbq essay is due friday

I'll give someone a brainliest.
It needs to be a 5 paragraph essay with evidence from documents.

Here are the three primary reasons: political assassinations, military problems, and natural disasters/ diseases.

Sentences with the word Alejandro Magno?

Why did President Thomas Jefferson favor assimilation?

A. He believed that through assimilation the Indians would sell their land more readily.

B. He hated the Indians for their role in his defeat by the Creeks and Seminole tribes in earlier battles.

C. He thought the Indians would decide to fight rather than be assimilated, so they would cause their own demise.

D. He thought the southern states would treat the Indians fairly and the groups would learn to live together.

uh i was just wondering if anyone wanted to play Mine craft with me just uh let me know lol
have a great day!! :) <3

So sánh điểm tương đồng về hoàn cảnh của Nhật Bản vào giữa thế kỉ xix với các nước Châu á

Someone help me I will make you brain

How did President Nixon develop a better relationship with the People's
Republic of China

Describe President Andrew Jackson's attitude toward native people as he authorized theforced removal of Indians to Western lands. What did he think of them? Was he empathetic to their interests? What did they represent to him in terms of American expansion?

Thomas Cole's paintings inspired which of the following?

A. American Spirit

B. American Symbol

C. American National Identity

D. American Faith​

Which spiritual activity happens in all religions? a) singing b) prayer c) chanting d) clapping​

Study the image taken during World War I.

Soldiers stand in a field during World War One.



This image was originally published in an American encyclopedia after the war. Who is the intended audience of this kind of source?

general public
German readers
military personnel
experts and historians

how did the use of electricity affect Americans lifestyle

Why did African-Americans, both slave and free, develop their own segregated religious institutions and gatherings over the course of the early 1800s? What needs might such churches and gatherings have met that white churches did not?