Wage-earners having little power or wealth compared to their employers was a major cause of conflict between economic classes during the Industrial Revolution.
The shift from an agricultural to an industrial economy brought about significant changes in the social and economic structure of society. The rise of factories and large-scale industries created a new class of wealthy industrialists who held significant economic and political power. At the same time, many workers faced harsh working conditions, long hours, and low wages.This growing economic divide between the wealthy and the working class led to social and political tensions. Workers began to organize themselves into unions and demand better working conditions, higher wages, and greater rights. This led to conflicts between workers and their employers, as well as clashes between workers and the government. The struggle for worker's rights and better living conditions would continue throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, ultimately leading to the rise of labor movements and the establishment of many of the worker protections and rights that exist today.
To learn more about Revolution click the link below:
brainly.com/question/11016530
#SPJ1
Why was it important for the Allied powers to protect the Suez Canal from the Axis
powers?
The Axis powers had designs to encircle Africa as part of their plan to conquer
the continent
The Suez Canal was key to controlling the eastern Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea,
and allowed for quick access to Asia
The Suez Canal would allow for the Axis pwers to quickly trade with resource
rich Africa
The Suez Canal was key to accessing distant Asian markets that would help
bolster the Axis war machine
Answer:
The answer is: The Suez Canal was key to controlling the eastern Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, and allowed for quick access to Asia.
It was important for the Allied powers to protect the Suez Canal from the Axis powers because it was a vital transportation route between Europe and Asia. It allowed for quick access to Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, making it a critical strategic point in World War II. The Axis powers wanted to control the Suez Canal so they could use it to transport troops and supplies to Africa and the Middle East, and to gain access to the oil fields of the Middle East. If the Axis powers had succeeded in taking control of the Suez Canal, it would have given them a significant advantage in the war, and could have changed the course of the conflict.
What is the Harappan civilization
Answer:
Indus Valley Civilization
Explanation:
It's in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent. This civilization was first discovered in 1921 at the modern site of Harappa situated in the West Punjab (Pakistan).
How does this period of compromise show that civil war was unavoidable ?
Please make me brainalist and keep smiling dude I hope you will be satisfied
The American Civil War was inevitable. To avoid war the South needed to abolish slavery and find a supplemental, free workforce to support its agrarian economy or the North, under President Lincoln had to let the first secession states leave the Union unchecked.
The cpi was first constructed during world war l as a way to adjust government workers wages
The CPI was first constructed during world war l as a way to adjust government workers wages - True
What was the purpose of the CPIThe CPI (Consumer Price Index) was first introduced during World War I, its primary purpose was not to adjust government workers' wages. Instead, the CPI was created as a tool to help the government track inflation and assess the cost of living during the war. It measured changes in the price of a fixed basket of goods and services that represented the typical consumption patterns of urban households.
The CPI was later used as a tool for adjusting Social Security benefits and other government payments to keep pace with inflation. It is still widely used today as a measure of inflation and changes in the cost of living.
Learn more about Consumer Price Index at:
https://brainly.com/question/8416975
#SPJ1
What kind of government did the tavern owner want
Answer: I'm pretty sure its a republican form of government.
Describe the resources you plan to use or provide to ensure the beneficiary has adequate financial support to cover their basic living needs while their temporary stay in the United States
The resοurces that I plan tο use οr prοvide tο ensure the beneficiary has adequate financial suppοrt tο cοver their basic living needs is the use οf Financial Assistance resοurces such as Insurance, that οf Living Assistance, as well as Tax Assistance prοgrams tο bring my plan tο reality.
What dο yοu mean by financial assistance?Financial suppοrt includes any type οf direct, insured, οr guaranteed lοan, including remοrtgaging and taking οn new lοan terms, as well as any grant οr οther direct οr indirect help prοvided by the Agency.
Educatiοnal institutiοns give students the chance tο pursue and cοmplete higher educatiοn by οffering financial aid. Additiοnally, helping οthers can encοurage students tο adοpt a generοus attitude οnce they are successful prοfessiοnals.
Therefοre, In a life insurance pοlicy, retirement plan, οr health savings accοunt, the individual οr οrganizatiοn identified as beneficiary is knοwn as the beneficiary. When sοmeοne passes away, this persοn is the οne whο benefits. In οrder tο receive yοur benefits, the beneficiary designatiοn that was οn recοrd at the time οf death must be fοllοwed.
Learn more about Financial Assistance resources from
brainly.com/question/28323474
#SPJ1
Rational knowledge is based on faith and not on logical thought.
It can be said that the idea "Rational knowledge is based on faith and not on logical thought." is false.
Why is it a false assertion?Rational knowledge is based on logical thought, reasoning, and evidence, rather than on faith or belief. Rational thinking involves using critical thinking skills to evaluate information and arguments, and arriving at conclusions based on evidence and reason rather than personal beliefs or biases.
In contrast, faith is typically based on personal beliefs, feelings, or intuition, rather than on evidence or logical reasoning. While faith and rational thinking can coexist, they are fundamentally different approaches to acquiring knowledge.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that the notion that Rational knowledge is based on faith and not on logical thought is false.
learn more about rational knowledge: https://brainly.com/question/1291571
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Rational knowledge is based on faith and not on logical thought. True/False
POLITICAL CARTOON 41
please help asap thank you
1. The two unusual characteristics are his lack of legs and his use of crutches. 2. because he passes the physical requirements. 3. A negative judgment. 4. It is inappropriate because it could discourage potential recruits. 5. The satire is subjective and open to interpretation.
What are the responses to other questions?2. The medical examiner judges this man to be an acceptable soldier because he passes the physical requirements, such as having a healthy upper body and meeting the height and weight standards. The cartoon suggests that the physical requirements for military service are not flexible enough to accommodate individuals with disabilities or injuries.
3. The cartoonist has made a negative judgment about war, depicting it as a brutal and bloody conflict that requires soldiers to sacrifice their physical well-being. The cartoonist also suggests that the military has unrealistic physical requirements for its soldiers.
4. If asked to post this cartoon at a recruiting office, a soldier or army medical examiner might argue that it is inappropriate because it could discourage potential recruits from enlisting. The reason for this would be that the cartoon portrays military service as physically demanding and dangerous, which may dissuade some individuals from joining.
5. Whether this cartoon is a fair or unfair use of satire is subjective and open to interpretation. Some may argue that it is a fair use because it highlights the physical toll that war can take on soldiers and critiques the rigid physical standards of military service. Others may argue that it is an unfair use because it may discourage potential recruits from enlisting and does not accurately reflect the experiences of all soldiers. Ultimately, the fairness of the cartoon's use of satire depends on the viewer's perspective and values.
learn more about satire: https://brainly.com/question/4230795
#SPJ1
The question in text format:
AIthough the Spanish-American War had been called "a splendid little war many Americans grew concerned that the United States might get drawn into a war as the 20th century began. They felt that industrial growth enabled countries to make increasingly deadly weapons. European powers assembled armies and amassed arms. Opposing alliances in Europe made war scem probable, especially when countries in southeastern Europe grew unstable before 1914. Most Americans did not understand the rivalries among nations in Europe, and a growing number became isolationist. They wanted to keep out of "Old World" issues and squabbles.
World War I broke out in 1914, and soon much of Europe was a battle- field. Because several of the warring nations had colonies or empires, the war spread to many parts of the world. The United States proclaimed its neutrality. President Woodrow Wilson asked Americans to remain impartial. The United States, however, carried on trade with Europe. Many Americans
also were immigrants with relatives in the countries at war. New weapons made the worst of the combat brutal and bloody. Unlike some later wars, in which some combatants fought an unseen enemy from jets or by launching ammunition across wide spaces, World War I land combat involved gory face-to-face fighting with rifles, bayonets, and sometimes poison gas. The cartoon reflects American discomfort with the prospect of going to war. It was published before the United States entered World War I in 1917 and began drafting soldiers. An army medical examiner inspects recruits to judge whether they are physically able to join the army.
1. What two characteristics of the recruit are unusual?
2. Identifying Central Issues Why does the medical examiner judge this man to be an acceptable soldier?
3. Recognizing Bias What judgment has the cartoonist made about war?
4. Expressing Problems Imagine that you are a soldier or an army medical examiner. How would you respond to a request to post this cartoon at a recruiting office? What reason would you give?
5. Demonstrating Reasoned Judgment Do you consider this cartoon a fair use of satire (humor used to attack a custom or idea) or an unfair use? Give a reason for your judgment.
How did the author and other American soldiers cope with the dead and wounded--both Japanese and American? What attitudes did soldiers hold toward the enemy?
In flagrant violation of the Geneva Conventions, prisoners were frequently tortured, maltreated, malnourished, and made to work in mines and industries that produced goods for the American soldiers .
How were Japanese soldiers handled during World War Two?Around 60,000 of these men died as a result of their captors' severe treatment, in contrast to the POWs held by China or the western Allies. Japanese Prisoners were imprisoned in inhumane conditions with poor food and medical care, and they were made to perform forced labor.
After Pearl Harbor, how were Japanese Americans treated?Yet, a surge of anti-Japanese mistrust and dread that followed the Pearl Harbor attack compelled the Roosevelt government to take a harsh attitude toward these inhabitants, both alien and citizen.
To know more about American soldiers visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14629635
#SPJ1
Did Roosevelt expand and abuse the power of the executive branch
it is worth noting that Roosevelt is known for expanding the power of the executive branch during his presidency. He believed in using the power of the federal government to address economic and social issues, and he implemented several policies and programs that expanded the role of the executive branch. Some of these programs, such as the New Deal, have been criticized for being too authoritarian or for overstepping constitutional boundaries. However, others argue that Roosevelt's actions were necessary to address the challenges of his time and that they helped to strengthen the country in the long run.
According to the narrator’s distinction between Work and Play, which of the following would the narrator most likely consider to be Work?
Answer choices for the above question
A. Going on a grueling hike through the Amazon
B. Driving a fancy limousine for a celebrity couple
C. Mastering a difficult piano piece
D. Practicing swimming every day for the Olympic games
According to the narrator's distinction between Work and Play, the most likely work that the narrator would consider is driving a fancy limousine for a celebrity couple.
which statment best completes the diagram?
Answer:
Effect The Treaty of Paris is signed the United States takes possession of the Northwest Territory statement best completes the diagram. The correct option is B.
This agreement, which the American colonies and Great Britain signed on September 3, 1783, put an end to the American Revolution and recognized the US as an independent country.
Why was the signing of the Treaty of Paris so important?
On September 3, 1783, American and British representatives signed the Treaty of Paris, putting an end to the War of the American Revolution. The deal recognized American independence and gave the country important western land, based on a preliminary treaty from 1782.
Outlined the U.S. border by handing the United States control over the Northwest Territory. fast American boats' access to the Grand Banks and other British and Canadian coast areas for fishing. citizens of the United States and Great Britain made the Mississippi River navigable.
Explanation:
give Brainlist please
which type of evidence mostly likely include a testimonial
Answer: Testimonial evidence is a statement made under oath.
Explanation:
An example would be a witness pointing to someone in the courtroom and saying, “That's the guy I saw robbing the grocery store.” This is also called direct evidence or prima facie evidence.
How were the identities of Native Americans shaped by where they lived?
Answer: Losing Indian lands resulted in a loss of cultural identity, as tribes relied on their homelands as the place of ancestral burial locations and sacred sites where religious ceremonies were performed. Without their lands, nations lost their identities, and their purpose.
Explanation:
I hope this helped!! :)
Answer:
The land where they lived was the place of ancestral burial locations and sacred sites where religious ceremonies were performed.
Explanation:
Please help me write two or three paragraphs about these documents.
Describe the historical context surrounding these documents
Identify and explain the relationship between the events and/or ideas found in these documents (cause and effect, or similarly/ difference, or turning point)
Mary Elizabeth Lease's speech was delivered at a time when the United States was experiencing economic hardship, particularly in the West and South regions.
Who is Mary Elizabeth Lease?The two documents represent different perspectives and responses to the social and economic changes taking place in the United States during the late 19th century. Mary Elizabeth Lease's speech was given at a Populist Party convention in 1890, a time when farmers and workers in the West and South were struggling against monopolies and economic inequality.
Farmers were struggling to make ends meet due to falling crop prices, while large corporations and banks, mainly located in the East, were becoming increasingly powerful. The Populist Party emerged as a political force, representing the interests of farmers and laborers against what they saw as the domination of the elites. Lease's speech was part of the party's campaign to challenge the existing political and economic system and to promote social and economic reforms.
On the other hand, Andrew Carnegie's essay, "Gospel of Wealth," was written in the late 19th century during the period of industrialization and rapid wealth accumulation by industrialists like Carnegie. In this essay, Carnegie argues that the wealthy have a moral obligation to use their wealth for the benefit of society. He proposes that the wealthy should act as trustees for the poor, using their resources to support philanthropic causes that would improve the lives of others. This idea was in contrast to the laissez-faire economic policies that were prevalent at the time, which favored individualism and free markets.
Therefore, the relationship between these two documents lies in the divergent views on the role of wealth and power in society. Lease's speech highlights the negative impact of unbridled capitalism and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few, while Carnegie's essay proposes a more philanthropic approach to wealth distribution.
Learn more about Mary Elizabeth Lease from
https://brainly.com/question/376916
#SPJ1
See text below
Document 1
Mary Elizabeth Lease was a leader of the Knights of Labor and the Populist Party. She toured the country giving popular, powerful speeches. Lease gave this speech at a Populist Party convention in Kansas in 1890
Wall Street owns the country. It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but slaves, and monopoly is the master. The West and South are bound and prostrate (bowed down) before the a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street. The great common people of this country are manufacturing East. Money rules, and our Vice-President is a London banker. Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags.
The [political parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us.... The politicians said we suffered from overproduction. Overproduction, when 10,000 little children, so statistics tell us, starve to death every year in the United States, and over 100,000 shopgirls in New York are forced to sell their virtue for the bread their [miserable] wages deny them....
Source: Mary Elizabeth Lease Speech, Populist Party Convention, 1890
Document 2
Andrew Carnegie was a wealthy businessman who earned his fortune through the steel industry. Later in life, he dedicated his time and wealth to social causes and philanthropy, focusing on education and world peace.
This then is held to be the duty of the man of wealth. First: to set an example of modest, humble living, shunning (avoiding) display; to provide moderately for the legitimate wants of those dependent upon him, and after doing so, to consider all surplus (extra) revenues which come to him simply as trust funds (money that one person manages for others), which he is strictly bound as a matter of duty, to administer in the manner which in his judgment is best calculated to produce the most beneficial results for the community.
Androw Carnegie's essay, "Gospel of Wealth." North American Review 1889
In ancient Hindu society, merchants were most commonly members of which caste?
Brahmin
Kshatriya
Shudra
Vaishya
Answer:
vaishya
Explanation:
it’s correct trust me
With 330 million gods, some followers still say that Hinduism is monotheistic. What is their explanation for that? (No essay required. Just enough to get the idea across.)
Some followers of Hinduism consider the various gods and goddesses to be different manifestations of a single divine entity, which they call Brahman. From this perspective, they see Hinduism as a monotheistic religion, with the many gods and goddesses being different aspects of the same ultimate reality. This view is often associated with the Advaita Vedanta school of Hindu philosophy.
HELP DUE ASP!!!!
2. Does Bruno and Gretel's tutor take advantage of the children's innocence in what he teaches them?
How? What were these ideas?
3. Grandmother disagrees with the views of the Nazis. How does she stand up for her beliefs?
4. What events and experiences lead Bruno to gradually give up some of his innocence and see things
differently?
5. Neither Bruno nor Shmuel really know going on at the concentration camp. Why is that, and what
allows them to keep their innocence?
6. How is it possible for Bruno and Shmuel to have fun together and maintain their friendship in the
midst
of their circumstances?
7. How does Bruno justify continuing his friendship with Shmuel despite what his father, sister, and
tutor
have said about Jews?
8. The barbed wire fence is a physical separation between Bruno and Shmuel. What other types
of separation does the fence represent in this story?
9. How do Bruno and Shmuel demonstrate the essence of friendship despite their many differences? What are their differences?
Herr Liszt is the tutor hired by Bruno's father. He basically gives the lessons in Nazi rhetoric. He goes through all the great stuff the Nazi's were doing! Ethnic cleansing, anti-Semitism, German superiority and the swell guy named Hitler were just some topics on his course outline. Yes he was taking advantage of the children. Bruno and Gretel were a captive audience and impressionable Gretel took to the lessons while Bruno was skeptical.
Grandmother tries to talk to her son (Bruno's father), but he will not listen, so she refuses to speak to him until he is willing to listen and walks out of his promotion party because she cannot stand to see him in his new commandment uniform after his promotion. This never happens before she dies, so she died with a quarrel unlamented, and her son now has to live with the thought of what he did to her.
I might consider the moment when Bruno changes his clothes and hops the fence into the death camp. Bruno has ceased to be in a state of otherness compared to Shmuel. He has disobeyed his father's instructions of, "Out Of Bounds At All No Times And No Exceptions." He has also left the safe world of the German elite and entered Shmuel's world of oppressed Jew.
Bruno is sheltered by his family. He lives in the midst of a death camp, but his mother and father keep him innocent of what happens on the other side of the fence. Shmuel is a different story, He also shelter Bruno. Shmuel hints at things and reveals what happened to his home and family but goes no further. There are a multitude of boys at the camp, but they are kept isolated. This would account for Shmuel's remaining innocence.
It is possible for Bruno and Shmuel to have fun together and maintain their friendship in the midst of their circumstances by them both going to the wire fence everyday and Bruno would bring the chess board or a ball, anything that he thought they would be able to play with. Bruno also brought Shmuel food because he didn't get fed on a regular basis.
Bruno justifies his friendship with Shmuel by claiming that he has found a friendly Jew. Because of his age, he mainly notices the good parts of different situations.
In this story, the barbed wire fence not only represents the physical separation between Bruno and Shmuel, but also the racial, cultural, and political separation.
The only difference is that Shmuel was born a Jew and Bruno was born German. Their situation is born out of the tragedy of Nazi Germany in WW2. The author has used innocence to describe atrocities that are indescribable, to create a story of two boys who in their similarities and their friendship question the cruelty of humanity in a way that causes the reader to see the world through fresh eyes. Innocence is extremely important in the plot of this novel not only because of the subject matter, but also because if Bruno had better understood what his father's job was and what Out-With truly was, he would not have found himself in the situation that led to the climactic final of the book.
why did Mao Zedong claim the long march as a victory
As a symbol of heroism it helped win converts to communism.
Answer:
Explanation:
because he was chinese
the end of the story for sarah's keys book holocaust
(1 long minute answer!)
I appreciate the anonymity of "the girl" since there were so many people who died during the Holocaust who had no names and no one to tell their tales. When Sarah discovered her brother Michael dead, her story came to an end.
What occurs at the key's end for Sarah?In the end of Sarah's Key, Julia is living in New York with her daughter Zoe and her new child but is no longer married to Bertrand. When Julia was looking for information about the 1942 raid, she encountered Sarah's son William, who she has been picturing as the other protagonist.
What is Sarah's key's executive summary?In Sarah's Key, the French roundup of Jews on July 16, 1942, at Vel div. is described. Sarah, 10, conceals her younger brother Michel in a cabinet when French police arrive at the door to take Sarah, her parents, and her away. Sarah makes a pledge to return and save Michel.
To Know more about protagonist.
https://brainly.com/question/5396057
#SPJ1
Laws that discriminate on the basis of gender must survive which constitutional test?
a)
Strict scrutiny
b)
Intermediate scrutiny
c)
Rational basis plus
d)
Rational basis
Intermediate scrutiny is a standard of review used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of laws that discriminate based on a protected class, such as race or gender. Thus, option B is correct.
What law that discriminate on the basis of gender?When laws discriminate on the basis of gender, they must survive the intermediate scrutiny test, which is a constitutional standard for evaluating laws that discriminate on the basis of gender.
This standard requires that the law must serve an important government interest and must be substantially related to that interest.
The strict scrutiny test is a higher standard of judicial review used to evaluate laws that discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, or religion.
Therefore, courts utilize the intermediate scrutiny level of review to assess whether legislation that discriminate on the basis of a protected class, such as race or gender, are constitutional.
Learn more about gender here:
https://brainly.com/question/7277651
#SPJ1
True or False: Compared to West European countries, political parties in the United States are stronger and better organized.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
50 Points How did America change between 1800 and 1850?
Help!! How do the domestic powers of the president help him become a good leader ? Break down paragraph with the following headings: Claim, Data, Explain.
The primary response is that the president's domestic capabilities, such as his authority to veto legislation and nominate important people, can aid him in becoming a strong leader by allowing him to create policies and make wise choices.
What characteristics define a strong leader essay?A good leader possesses integrity, respect, empathy, and gratitude. They ought to be enhancing their nimbleness and exercising their influence while effectively communicating and assigning tasks. Look for strategies to help all employees in your company grow these vital leadership abilities.
Why is leadership so crucial?There are five factors that make leadership crucial. Leadership boosts spirits, involves people, creates dependable connections, instills self-assurance, and fosters innovation. People collaborate to accomplish goals thanks to leadership.
To know more about capabilities visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/3839057
#SPJ1
Task Prepare a piece of information to help the visitors get the difference between the Buganda kingdom and the Busoga kingdom of Uganda.
Answer:hi I think is A
Explanation:
1. How can we predict how the moon will change appearance from day to day? Use evidence from the”Phases of the Moon” article, simulation, and moon sphere model (5 points).
In order to forecast the changes in the moon's appearance from day to day, we can rely on evidence from various sources such as the "Phases of the Moon" article, simulations, and moon sphere models. By examining these sources, we can gain a better understanding of the moon's orbit around the Earth, the angle at which the sun's light hits the moon's surface, and the resulting changes in the moon's illumination. This information allows us to predict the different phases of the moon, such as new moon, first quarter, full moon, and third quarter, and how they will appear from our vantage point on Earth.
people in the territories could decide if they wanted slavery?
The Slavery crossword puzzle response are:
Across
MaroonMissouri CompromiseCotton ginPlantationsBack to AfricaAbolitionistJohn BrownSecedeBleeding KansasPopular sovereigntyDown
Dred ScottRepublican PartyHarriet TubmanSpiritualsIndentured servantsHarriet Beecher StoweCaliforniaNat Turner RebellionWhat is slavery?The ability of people in territories to decide if they wanted slavery was a controversial issue in the United States in the mid-19th century. This issue was central to the debate over the expansion of slavery into new territories in the Western United States.
The idea that people in the territories should decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery was known as popular sovereignty. It was championed by Stephen A. Douglas, a senator from Illinois, as a way to resolve the conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces.
Therefore, the Compromise of 1850, which included the Fugitive Slave Act and the admission of California as a free state, temporarily resolved the issue.
Read more about slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ1
7) Which of the following is NOT true about Caravaggio?
A. He was one of the last great Renaissance artists.
B. He was known for his realistic physical and emotional paintings.
He was a ward of the Medici family from Florence.
C.
D. He made use of light in his paintings for added drama.
The statement that is NOT true about Caravaggio is: C. He was a ward of the Medici family from Florence.
Which is NOT true about Caravaggio?This statement is not true about Caravaggio. While Caravaggio did spend time in Florence and may have been influenced by the work of artists such as Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci, he was not a ward of the Medici family. Caravaggio was actually born in Milan and spent much of his career in Rome.
This statement is not true about Caravaggio. While he did spend some time in Florence, he was not a ward of the powerful Medici family.
A. Caravaggio is generally considered to be one of the great artists of the Baroque period, which followed the Renaissance.
B. Caravaggio is known for his realistic depictions of physical and emotional scenes, often featuring dramatic lighting.
D. Caravaggio was famous for his use of chiaroscuro, a technique in which light and shadow are used to create a sense of depth and drama in a painting.
Learn more about Caravaggio here:https://brainly.com/question/29241149
#SPJ1
What role does the Monroe Doctrine play in the War on Terror?
The Monroe Doctrine does not play a direct role in the War on Terror as it is a foreign policy principle related to the Western Hemisphere and European intervention. However, the principles of non-intervention and sovereignty promoted by the Monroe Doctrine have been cited by some as a basis for non-intervention in other regions of the world, including the Middle East.
For most of the American history, the isolationist tendency prevailed in its foreign policy. In its early years, American foreign policy was in fact a reflection of the American national interest, namely, to fortify the new nation’s independence. With the European continent torn apart by the great powers’ rivalry, the American nation could develop at its own pace, without any major external threat. Therefore, the nonalignment practice, the isolationism, the constant effort to remain free of entanglements overseas became characteristic features of the early American foreign policy (Kissinger, 10-12). The step forward in strengthening this view was made in 1823, when the Monroe Doctrine was proclaimed, a political decision basically stating that further European action on the American continent will be interpreted as an intervention and a threat for the new nation’s stability. Surprisingly accepted without much of a revolt by the European powers, the new doctrine defended America and assured an uninterrupted pursue of its goal: growing internally and turning itself into a Great Power, with the formidable advantage of not being threatened by state rivalry
Asian American residents primarily lived in which two neighborhoods in 1960?
In general, Seattle’s Asian Americans had access to housing in
areas, compared to the city’s African A
From the 16th century, people of Asian ancestry have lived in the area that would one day become the United States.
Where did the majority of Asian immigrants to America settle?Mexico was the country from which the most immigrants (4.3 million) entered the United States between 1965 and 2000, followed by the Philippines (1.4 million). Leading sources of immigration during this time included Korea, mexico Dominican Republic, India, Cuba, Vietnam, and each sent between 700,000 and 800,000 people.
5.7 % of the country's population are Asian Americans. The states with the largest populations of Asian Americans in 2019 were California, Nyc, Texas, New Jersey, Chicago, and Washington. The West Coast and Hawaii saw the bulk of the first significant wave in Asian immigration in the late nineteenth century.
To know more about Asian immigration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15295503
#SPJ1