One impact of third parties in American politics is that they can serve as a "spoiler" or influence the outcome of an election.
In a winner-takes-all system like that used in most U.S. elections, a third-party candidate who receives even a small percentage of the vote can potentially swing the election in favor of one major party or the other. This can happen if the third-party candidate attracts voters who might otherwise have supported one of the major-party candidates.
Third parties can also help bring attention to issues and ideas that may be ignored by the major parties, and can serve as a check on the power of those parties. However, third-party candidates often face significant barriers to entry, such as difficulty in getting on the ballot and lack of media coverage, which can limit their ability to have a significant impact on the political process.
To know more about elections click here:
brainly.com/question/29760616
#SPJ4
which federal law extends the right to a jury trial and punitive damages to victims of intentional job discrimination?
Answer:
The federal law that extends the right to a jury trial and punitive damages to victims of intentional job discrimination is the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Explanation:
The average winning margin in House elections is percent .
A. 25
B. 10
C.40
D. 5
The average winning margin in House elections is 5 percent. The Option D is correct.
What was winning margin in House elections in 2020?The 2020 House of Representatives elections were highly competitive and closely watched, with both Democrats and Republicans hoping to gain or maintain control of the chamber.
In the end, the Democrats retained control of the House, though by a smaller margin than in the previous Congress. According to official results, the Democrats won 222 seats to the Republicans' 213, with several races still too close to call on election night.
This represented a net loss of 11 seats for the Democrats compared to the 2018 elections, but they were able to hold on to enough seats to keep their majority. The winning margin was relatively slim, with some key races decided by just a few thousand votes, highlighting the importance of turnout and voter engagement in determining election outcomes.
Read more about winning margin
brainly.com/question/23065639
#SPJ1
in modern democracies, courts and judges have taken over the power to settle conflicts by
In modern democracies, courts and judges have become the primary institutions for settling conflicts and resolving disputes.
This is because the legal system provides a neutral and objective forum for interpreting and applying the law to individual cases, rather than leaving decisions to the discretion of individual parties or using force to resolve disputes.
Courts and judges are responsible for interpreting and applying the law fairly and impartially, and for ensuring that individual rights and freedoms are protected. They have the power to enforce the law and to punish those who violate it, as well as to interpret the constitution and strike down laws that are deemed unconstitutional.
This system of judicial power is a key element of democratic governance, as it ensures that the rule of law is upheld and that citizens can seek redress for their grievances in a fair and equitable manner.
To know more about democratic click here:
brainly.com/question/30812351
#SPJ4
under article 15 of the ucmj, the commanding officer has how many punishments identified that he or she can impose at mast?
Under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the commanding officer has three types of non-judicial punishments (NJP) that they can impose at mast. These include:
Verbal reprimand: This is the least severe type of punishment and involves a simple verbal rebuke by the commanding officer.
Extra duties: This involves requiring the service member to perform additional duties, such as cleaning or other tasks, for a certain period of time.
Reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, and/or confinement: This is the most severe type of punishment that can be imposed at NJP. It can result in a reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, and/or confinement to a military prison for a limited period of time.
It's important to note that the punishments that can be imposed at NJP are less severe than those that can be imposed through a court-martial. Additionally, service members who are subjected to NJP have the right to refuse the NJP and demand a trial by court-martial. However, exercising this right can have consequences, including the possibility of facing more severe punishments if convicted at a court-martial.
Under article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the commanding officer has three punishments identified that he or she can impose at mast. The three punishments are: extra duty, restriction of specified privileges, and correctional custody. Extra duty is defined as additional duties or work assigned as a disciplinary measure.
Restriction of specified privileges is defined as denying the service member certain privileges, such as the ability to leave the base, for a period of time. Correctional custody is defined as the temporary confinement of a service member to his or her quarters, or other place of confinement, for a specified period of time.
These punishments are imposed to help enforce military discipline and encourage good behavior among members of the armed forces. The commanding officer has the authority to determine which punishment is appropriate for each offense and can impose any combination of the three punishments. The punishments are designed to correct the behavior of the service member and ensure that the same mistake is not repeated in the future.
Know more about Correctional custody here
https://brainly.com/question/28274501#
#SPJ11
As a U.S. citizen, how will you represent and share what it means to be an American during your program? How will you seek opportunities to become more culturally engaged and have meaningful interactions with people and cultures different from your own during your abroad program? Madrid, Spain program
As an American in the Madrid program, I will represent my country by sharing its diverse culture and values. I will seek out opportunities to engage with Spanish culture and diverse perspectives through language exchange, community service, and exploration.
As an American participating in the Madrid program, I intend to serve my country by sharing its rich and diverse culture, as well as its ideals of liberty, equality, and diversity. I think that by engaging in open and respectful discourse, I can help people comprehend and appreciate the United States and its people.
In addition, I plan to look for chances to interact with the local community and immerse myself in Spanish cultures, such as through language exchanges, volunteering with local groups, and experiencing the city's historical and cultural landmarks. By doing so, I expect to gain a better grasp of different points of view and form meaningful connections with individuals from various backgrounds.
Learn more about culture:
https://brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ4
1.Considering trait theory, is it more important to deter crime by create an environment or consequences?
2. What are the two approaches to addiction? Which do you agree with?
3. Name an example for: mala in se, mala prohibita and why is this complicated?
4. Why is the use of DNA complicated?
5. In what ways do judges, police officers, and/or prosecutors have discretion that changes the application of the law?
the executor is the individual who is responsible for carrying out the provisions of your will. group of answer choices true false
Answer:
True. The executor, also known as the personal representative, is appointed by the testator (person making the will) and is responsible for carrying out the wishes and provisions of the will.
Explanation:
which best paraphrases this excerpt? being self-executing, this law would be easy to enforce because it would not require lawmakers to change any current laws. the amendment would automatically repeal any state or federal laws in conflict with it after a year; no legislative action would be needed. the amendment would become effective one year after the date of its ratification; no further legal action would be necessary. ratifying the amendment would give state and federal legislatures an opportunity to change prejudicial laws within one year.
Answer:
The best paraphrase of this excerpt is "The law is self-executing, meaning that it can be enforced easily and without the need for lawmakers to change any existing laws. Within a year of its ratification, the amendment would automatically repeal any state or federal laws that conflict with it, without requiring legislative action."
Explanation:
The original excerpt explains the process by which a self-executing law would be enforced, and how it would automatically repeal any conflicting laws without requiring further legislative action. The paraphrase accurately conveys this information in a slightly different way, using simpler language and clearer syntax. The paraphrase emphasizes the self-executing nature of the law, and highlights the fact that no legislative action would be required to enforce it. Additionally, the paraphrase clearly states that the amendment would automatically repeal any conflicting laws within a year of its ratification.
What is equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment ?
Answer:
The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection.
Explanation:
A person 20 years old was at a party and has been drinking alcohol. They were driving home from the party and stopped by law enforcement. What penalties and results could occur?
Driving under the influence of alcohol is a serious offense, and the penalties for this offense vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case.
What Penalty can a Person Get for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol?In the given instance, assuming the person's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was above the legal limit, here are some potential penalties and consequences they could face:
Legal Penalties: The person could face criminal charges, fines, and potential jail time. In most states, a first-time DUI offense can result in a fine of several thousand dollars, a license suspension, and up to a year in jail. Repeat offenses carry stiffer penalties, including longer jail time and higher fines.License Suspension: The person's driver's license could be suspended for a period of time, usually several months to a year or more. In some states, they may be eligible for a restricted license that allows them to drive to work, school, or medical appointments, but this usually requires the installation of an ignition interlock device.Insurance Implications: The person's car insurance premiums will likely increase significantly, and they may have difficulty finding affordable coverage in the future.Criminal Record: A DUI conviction will appear on the person's criminal record, which could have long-term implications for their employment, housing, and other aspects of their life.Social Consequences: The person may face social stigma, especially if they caused an accident or injured someone while driving under the influence.It's important to note that the specific penalties and consequences will depend on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. It's always best to avoid drinking and driving altogether to avoid these potential consequences and to keep yourself and others safe on the road.
Learn more about Driving under the Influence of Alcohol here: https://brainly.com/question/24351524
#SPJ1
a. first amendment b. third amendment c. the simpsons d. fourth and fifth amendments e. second amendment
Answer: What's the question?
Explanation:
The Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929 would provide long-term residents meaningful access to the legal immigration system by updating section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act known as Registry. True or False?
The assertion made is accurate. By revising section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, also known as the Registry, the Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929 would give long-term residents meaningful access to the legal immigration system.
What is meant by Immigration Act?The Immigration Act of 1924 set a national origins quota that restricted the number of immigrants who may enter the country. As per the 1890 census, there were 2% of each nationality's total population in the United States qualified for immigration visas.The Act's specific provisions raised the yearly immigration ceiling from 270,000 to 675,000, then to 700,000 for the first three years following its implementation, and raised the per-country immigrant visa cap to 25,600. (from 20,000).Among federal laws governing immigration is the Immigration and Naturalization Act. The Hart-Celler Act, also known as the National Origins Quota Elimination Act, did away with the system that limited the number of people from a particular country that could come to the US.To learn more about Immigration Act, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1916562
The sentiments expressed in the excerpt are most in direct conflict with which of the following New Deal policies?
a) a reduction in tariff rates
b) labor rights
c) economic recovery
d) deficit spending
In order to combat the economic crisis of the Great Depression in the 1930s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt developed a number of initiatives and policies known as the New Deal.
The resurgence or improvement of an economy after a period of recession or decline is referred to as economic recovery. It typically entails carrying out measures or plans designed to boost economic expansion, generate employment, and boost consumer confidence. Economic recovery can occur in a number of ways, including through monetary or fiscal policies, public spending, and investments in infrastructure and construction projects. Strategies for economic recovery that are successful can raise living standards, lower poverty rates, and encourage long-term economic growth. The effectiveness of these strategies, however, is dependent on a number of variables, including the status of the economy, the nature of the crisis, and the efficiency of the implemented policies and programmes.
Learn more about economic recovery here:
https://brainly.com/question/3615698
#SPJ4
a nurse is facing a malpractice suit after a patient was injured in a fall. when establishing whether the nurse committed a breach of duty, the court will consult with:
When establishing whether the nurse committed a breach of duty, the court will consult with: other medical professionals who have knowledge, skill, experience, or training in the relevant field.
What is medical malpractice?
Medical malpractice is a form of negligence that occurs when a health care provider fails to provide the required care, resulting in harm to the patient. It can take a variety of forms, ranging from a failure to diagnose or treat a condition to an error during surgery.
When it comes to medical malpractice lawsuits, there are a number of factors to consider.
In general, the following requirements must be met:
the healthcare provider must owe a duty of care to the patient, there must be a breach of the standard of care,
and the breach must have caused harm to the patient.
The facts about medical malpractice are.
Medical malpractice as a body of law is unique to the United States.
Medical malpractice as a body of law is unique to the United States.
Medical malpractice law is the same in every state.
To know more about medical malpractice, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/25441985
#SPJ11
What is an example of select committees?
Answer:
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is an example of a select committee.
What is a select committee:
A select committee is when a group of MPs discuss issues in society. They also hold the government to account and scrutinize any laws they pass
what is the difference between consecutive and concurrent
If found guilty of multiple crimes, a person may be sentenced to either concurrent or consecutive terms of imprisonment.
What differentiates concurrent from consecutive?When a court sentences someone to serve two or more terms of custody, those terms are served one after the other. This is known as a consecutive sentencing plan. Contrarily, in a concurrent sentencing scheme, each sentence is served concurrently, and the offender is released following the completion of the sentence with the longest duration. While consecutive sentences are typically delivered one after the other, concurrent sentences are delivered simultaneously.
When sentences are served concurrently, the defendant is incarcerated for the entirety of each sentence. a series of sentences. When sentences are served consecutively, the offender must complete serving the sentence for one crime before beginning serving the sentence for any subsequent crimes.
Learn more about imprisonment at:
brainly.com/question/14309163
#SPJ4
Criteria and Procedure Regarding Intemperate Use and Lack of Fitness in Eligibility and Disciplinary Matters
Answer:
The criteria and procedures regarding intemperate use and lack of fitness in eligibility and disciplinary matters may vary depending on the specific context, such as the organization, institution, or sport involved. However, here are some general guidelines:
Intemperate Use: This refers to the use of substances, such as drugs or alcohol, to a degree that impairs an individual's ability to perform their duties or responsibilities. Ineligibility and disciplinary measures may be taken if an individual is found to have engaged in intemperate use.
The criteria for intemperate use may include:
Evidence of substance abuse or addiction, such as drug tests, medical records, or witness statements.
Evidence of behavior that is consistent with substance abuse or addiction, such as missed work or school, erratic behavior, or conflicts with others.
Evidence of impairment, such as poor performance, accidents, or injuries.
The procedures for addressing intemperate use may include:
Counseling or treatment programs aimed at helping individuals overcome substance abuse or addiction.
Suspension or termination of employment or membership in an organization or sport.
Legal consequences, such as fines or criminal charges, depending on the severity of the offense.
Lack of Fitness: This refers to an individual's inability to meet the physical or mental requirements of their duties or responsibilities. Ineligibility and disciplinary measures may be taken if an individual is found to be unfit.
The criteria for lack of fitness may include:
Evidence of medical or psychological conditions that prevent an individual from performing their duties or responsibilities.
Evidence of poor physical or mental health, such as frequent absences or decreased performance.
Evidence of behavior that is inconsistent with the requirements of the job or role, such as safety violations or inability to complete tasks.
The procedures for addressing lack of fitness may include:
Medical or psychological evaluations to determine the individual's ability to perform their duties or responsibilities.
Accommodations or adjustments to the job or role to help the individual perform their duties or responsibilities.
Termination of employment or membership in an organization or sport if the individual is unable to perform their duties or responsibilities, even with accommodations or adjustments.
Explanation:
division of power between national and state governments
National and state administrations' respective levels of authority the idea that power should be split between the federal government and the states, as stated in the U.S. Constitution in particular.
The Indian Parliament alone has the constitutional authority to establish new states and union territories. It may accomplish this by declaring the creation of new states or union territories, dividing up territory within an existing state, or combining two or more states or union territories, whole or in part.
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively, the authority to act as the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the federal government.
Read more about state governments at
https://brainly.com/question/14570325
#SPJ4
Using F. R. C. P. As your guide, please explain the different requirements for serving a summons, subpoena, or complaint as opposed to serving pleadings and other documents such as motions.
Please cite the appropriate rule provisions
Answer:
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.), there are different requirements for serving a summons, subpoena, or complaint as opposed to serving pleadings and other documents such as motions. The following are the requirements for each type of document:
Summons: According to Rule 4 of the F.R.C.P., a summons must be served with a copy of the complaint. The summons must be served within 90 days after the complaint is filed with the court. The service of the summons must be made by a non-party who is at least 18 years old and not a party to the action.
Subpoena: Rule 45 of the F.R.C.P. governs the service of subpoenas. A subpoena must be served on the person named in the subpoena. The service of the subpoena may be made by a non-party who is at least 18 years old and not a party to the action.
Complaint: Rule 5 of the F.R.C.P. governs the service of complaints. A complaint must be served on each defendant along with a summons. The service of the complaint may be made by a non-party who is at least 18 years old and not a party to the action.
Pleadings and other documents such as motions: Rule 5 of the F.R.C.P. governs the service of pleadings and other documents such as motions. The service of these documents may be made by mail, electronic means, or in person. The service may be made by a party or a non-party.
Explanation:
It's important to note that the requirements for serving a summons, subpoena, or complaint are more stringent than those for serving pleadings and other documents such as motions. For example, the service of a summons must be made in person, while the service of pleadings and other documents may be made by mail or electronic means.
Overall, the F.R.C.P. provides detailed guidance on the proper methods for serving various legal documents in a civil action, and it's important to follow these rules to ensure that the service is legally valid.
kai files a suit against lana based on one of lana's statements that kai alleges is fraudulent. to give rise to fraud, the statement must be one of
In a case whereby kai files a suit against lana based on one of lana's statements that kai alleges is fraudulent to give rise to fraud, the statement must be one of fact.
What is fact in law?Fact is fundamental finding based on research or experimentation. All lies are real under certain situations. Retesting some facts with more accurate tools may reveal that they are false. Law: A logical connection between two or more objects that is based on a number of verified assumptions and facts.
According to this clause, a fact is in question if it "results necessarily from the existence, non-existence, character, or extent of any right, liability, or disability asserted or denied in any suit or process, either by itself or in combination with other facts.
Learn more about fraud at:
https://brainly.com/question/14365386
#SPJ1
for the defendant to be liable in a negligence case, it must be proven that the defendant's conduct actually caused the injury. this is referred to as
For the defendant to be obligated in a carelessness case, it should be demonstrated that the respondent's direct caused the injury. this is alluded to as the factual cause. option (A) is correct.
A defendant might be seen as obligated to an offended party for perpetrating a misdeed on the off chance that the activity was (a) purposeful, as on account of wrongdoing; or (b) inadvertent yet careless because the respondent didn't satisfy his obligation of care to the offended party.
In strict liability cases, the respondent is consequently liable for the harm brought about by the litigant. The offended parties don't have to demonstrate that the respondent's careless or crazy conduct caused their wounds. All things considered, they need just demonstrate that a particular occasion ended up recovering damages. Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about defendant:
https://brainly.com/question/26831854
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
For the defendant to be liable in a negligence case, it must be proven that the defendant's conduct actually caused the injury. This is referred to as
a. factual cause.
b. duty of due care.
c. proximate cause.
d. breach.
the drug propanolol has been approved by the fda for use in treating anxiety. (True or False)
The given statement "The drug propanolol has been approved by the fda for use in treating anxiety is false as Propranolol is not approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in patients with anxiety.
A beta-blocker is propranolol. The heart and circulation (blood flow through arteries and veins) are impacted by beta-blockers.
Tremors, angina (chest pain), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart rhythm disorders, and other heart or circulatory conditions are all treated with propranolol. Additionally, it lessens the intensity and frequency of migraine headaches and is used to treat or prevent heart attacks.
Off-label usage of propranolol is occasionally used to treat specific types of anxiety, such as performance anxiety. The symptoms of physical performance anxiety, such as dry mouth, nausea, a rapid heartbeat, or trembling hands, can be treated with propranolol. The FDA has approved it to treat a wide range of other conditions, including tremors and high blood pressure.
Learn more about drug propanolol at:
brainly.com/question/15579006
#SPJ4
a person who has consented to be detained by another cannot recover for the tort of false imprisonment. true or false?
Answer: That's true. A person who has given their agreement to being detained by another person is not entitled to compensation for false imprisonment.
Explanation:
is that nothing the lawyer can do if the other party's bodily injury coverage is low and does not have money in nj?
If the other party's bodily injury coverage is low and they don't have money to cover damages, there may be limited options, but consulting with a lawyer and exploring all options is recommended. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage on the injured party's policy may help.
If the other party's bodily injury coverage is low and they do not have enough money to cover the damages, there may not be much a lawyer can do to recover the full amount of damages. However, there may be some options available, such as pursuing a claim against the other party's assets or negotiating a settlement.
It is important to consult with a lawyer to understand the specific circumstances and explore all available options. Additionally, if the injured party has uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage on their own insurance policy, that coverage may help compensate for damages.
To know more about injured party's policy:
https://brainly.com/question/15312531
#SPJ4
was the beneficiary ever in immigration proceedings?
In Form I-130, the respondent will reply Yes if their parent had ever been in an immigration proceeding that had deportation as its subject.
How to respond to the promptThe above prompt is one of the questions that must be replied to when filling the Form I-130. If a child is filling this form for their parent, they should reply yes, if the parent in question had ever been in a court for a deportation proceeding.
Apart from deportation, cases of removal and rescission will also be grounds for answering the affirmative to this question. If the parent had never been in such a proceeding, then the answer will be No.
Learn more about immigration proceedings here:
https://brainly.com/question/28772648
#SPJ1
State legislatures ______ override gubernatorial vetoes.
a. always
b. often
c. rarely
d. never
State legislatures have the power to override gubernatorial vetoes, but the frequency with which they do so varies by state and by political circumstances.
The ability of the legislature to override a veto is typically outlined in state constitutions or laws and requires a supermajority vote of the legislature, usually two-thirds or three-fifths of the members.
The likelihood of a veto override depends on factors such as the political makeup of the legislature, the popularity of the vetoed bill, and the relationship between the governor and the legislature. In some cases, overrides are common and occur routinely, while in others they are rare and occur only in exceptional circumstances.
Therefore, the answer to this question would be either "often" or "rarely," depending on the specific circumstances and political dynamics in a given state. It is not accurate to say that state legislatures always or never override gubernatorial vetoes, as this varies by state and situation.
To know more about legislatures click here:
brainly.com/question/530410
#SPJ4
Did I do these correctly and what's the answer for question 7.
A conditional sentence is a sentence that allows an offender to serve their sentence in the community, rather than in jail.
What is sentence?A sentence is a group of words that expresses a complete thought. It typically contains a subject and a verb and conveys a statement, question, command, or exclamation.
In order to impose a conditional sentence, the sentencing judge must first decide that a jail sentence of less than two years is appropriate for the offence, and then must determine that the sentence can be served in the community in a way that is consistent with the fundamental purpose and principles of sentencing. This two-stage process ensures that an offender is not given a sentence that is too lenient for the offence and that the sentence is in line with the overarching principles of criminal justice.
To learn more about sentence
https://brainly.com/question/28143259
#SPJ1
what is it called if a person cannot be sued for defamation for any false statements made, regardless of intent or knowledge of their falsity?
The legal principle that protects a person from being sued for defamation for any false statements made, regardless of intent or knowledge of their falsity, is known as "absolute privilege."
This doctrine applies to certain individuals, such as government officials and legislators, who must be able to freely express themselves without fear of legal reprisal. Absolute privilege typically applies to statements made during official proceedings, such as legislative debates or court hearings, and is intended to promote free speech and ensure that important public discussions are not chilled by the threat of litigation. However, it is important to note that absolute privilege is not absolute and may be limited in certain circumstances, such as when the statement is made with actual malice or outside the scope of official duties.
To know more about absolute privilege click here:
brainly.com/question/15017387?
#SPJ4
Rhianna owns a two-thirds interest in the ANTI Partnership and a 75-percent interest in the LOUD Partnership. In the current year, ANTI sells property to LOUD at a loss of $10,000. Later in the same year, LOUD sells the same property to an unrelated party for a $2,000 gain.
What is the amount of gain or loss recognized by ANTI and LOUD on the sale of this property?
The sale to LOUD resulted in a loss of $6,667 for ANTI. With an adjusted basis of $6,667 and a gain of $2,000, LOUD realised a gain of $2,000 on the transaction.
What profit or loss is expected to be recorded when the equipment is sold?The carrying value of an asset is its initial purchase price less all accrued depreciation and any cumulative impairment charges. Remove this carrying sum from the asset's sale price. It is a gain if the remainder is positive. It is a loss if the remaining is negative.
How do you record a sale's gain or loss?Debit assets by recording depreciation and cash received. The original cost and any profits from the sale are taken into account. as asset credit. You can also record losses as debit. If done correctly, credit and debit cancel out.
To know more about resulted visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29670723
#SPJ1
patrick held a baseball bat to eric's head to compel him to sign a contract advantageous to patrick. this contract was entered under:
The contract entered into by Eric under duress. Duress refers to a situation in which one party compels the other party to enter into a contract by threatening or using force against them.
In this case, Patrick used physical force by holding a baseball bat to Eric's head to coerce him into signing the contract. Duress is a recognized defense to the enforcement of a contract, and a contract entered into under duress is generally considered voidable at the option of the party who was coerced. If Eric can prove that he was forced to sign the contract under duress, he may be able to seek a remedy to avoid the contract or have it set aside.
To know more about contract click here:
brainly.com/question/15052365
#SPJ4