What is the domain of the following relation: Is this relation a function? Why or
why not?
R: {(1, 2), (2, 2), (-1, -2), (-3, 4)}?

It's not clear what the pattern is supposed to be for the digits in the givne number. It looks like the repeating block should be 846, but it could just as easily be 84684.

Assume the first case, and let x = 7.846846846... . Then

1000x = 7846.846846846...

Subtract x from this to cancel the repeating decimal part, then solve for x :

999x = 7846 - 7 = 7839

x = 7839/999 = 871/111

If instead you meant the second case, let x = 7.846848468484684... . Then

10⁵ x = 784,684.846848468484684...

Solve for x :

99,999 x = 784,684 - 7 = 784,677

x = 784,677/99,999 = 261,559/33,333

Maybe you meant something else altogether?

Answer:

[tex]A(k) = 55k[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]1kg = P55[/tex]

Required

Determine the cost of k kilogram

[tex]1kg = P55[/tex]

Multiply both sides by k

[tex]k * 1kg = P55 * k[/tex]

[tex]k\ kg = 55 k[/tex]

Representing this as a function:

[tex]A(k) = 55k[/tex]

1 yard = 3 feet.

100 yards x 3 = 300 feet.

300 feet x 3/4 = 225 feet.

The answer is 225 feet.

Answer:

225 ft hope it helps

Answer:

∑ (-1)ⁿ⁺³ 1 / (n^½)

∑ (-1)³ⁿ 1 / (8 + n)

Step-by-step explanation:

If ∑ an is convergent and ∑│an│is divergent, then the series is conditionally convergent.

Option A: (-1)²ⁿ is always +1.  So an =│an│and both series converge (absolutely convergent).

Option B: bn = 1 / (n^⁹/₈) is a p series with p > 1, so both an and │an│converge (absolutely convergent).

Option C: an = 1 / n³ isn't an alternating series.  So an =│an│and both series converge (p series with p > 1).  This is absolutely convergent.

Option D: bn = 1 / (n^½) is a p series with p = ½, so this is a diverging series.  Since lim(n→∞) bn = 0, and bn is decreasing, then an converges.  So this is conditionally convergent.

Option E: (-1)³ⁿ = (-1)²ⁿ (-1)ⁿ = (-1)ⁿ, so this is an alternating series.  bn = 1 / (8 + n), which diverges.  Since lim(n→∞) bn = 0, and bn is decreasing, then an converges.  So this is conditionally convergent.

Answer:

Y= 43, x=137, z=137 total is 360

Option A)

Yes, Fraction 37/8 is a rational number because the decimal form of the number is terminal.

.

A Rational Number is any number that can be expressed as a fraction or ratio of two integers.

For example, 3/4, 8.75, 2, and -6 are all considered rational numbers.

Note that integers, or "whole numbers", are rational numbers. This is because they can be expressed as fractions.

For example, 2 can be rewritten as 2/1, or 200/100. -6 can be rewritten as -6/1, 6/-1, or -12/2.

Many non-integer, or decimal numbers, are also rational numbers.

For instance, 8.75 can be rewritten as 8 3/4, 875/100, or 1750/200. This also includes repeating decimal numbers like 0.3333333..., which can be rewritten as 1/3.

Fraction = 37 /8

Numerator = 37

Denominator = 8

Both are integer

The fraction of 37 divided by 8  = 37/8 is a Rational Number because both the numerator and denominator are integers.

Learn more about Rational Numbers: brainly.com/question/24398433

#SPJ1

Answer:

let Elijah age be a

Then

2*a + 17 =47

2a=47-17

2a=30

a=15

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]x^{2}[/tex]  

I hope this helps!

Answer:

27

Step-by-step explanation:

Im guessing the ratio for a cirlce could be 1/2 or more

uplod the pic so i can solve the problem

Answer:

1,289 divided by 22 is 58 r13

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

F(d) = 30 + 0.50d

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Charges = P8.00 ---- first 4 km

Additional = P0.50

Required

Write a function to address the scenario.

Represent the whole distance covered with d.

First,we need to determine the total charges for the first four hours.

Charges = 8.00 * 4

Charges = 32.00

Next, we determine the charges for additional distance.

Charges = 0.50 * (d - 4)

d - 4 is the remaining distance after the first 4.

Charges = 0.50d - 2

The function is then written as;

F(d) = 32 + 0.50d - 2

F(d) = 32 - 2 + 0.50d

F(d) = 30 + 0.50d

Answer: x ≤ 15

Step-by-step explanation: All we need to do is divide both sides by 1/3, so1/3x / 1/3 and 5/ 1/3 = 15. So x  ≤ 15.

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

To solve this type of question, you must take square of variable"X" to right side making it ±squareroot. As it is a quadratic equation it will have two values (±).

Given;

[tex] {x}^{2} = 16[/tex]

Taking (square) to right side. It becomes ± square root.

[tex]x = + - \sqrt{16} [/tex]

[tex]x = + - \sqrt{ {4}^{2} } [/tex]

Cancel square and square root.

[tex]x = + - 4[/tex]

Therefore, X = ±4

Hope it helps...

Answer:

There are two I results found which is x=4 and x=-4

Step-by-step explanation:

Step by Step Solution:

More Icon

Rearrange:

Rearrange the equation by subtracting what is to the right of the equal sign from both sides of the equation :

                    x^2-(16)=0  

Step by step solution :

STEP

1 :

Trying to factor as a Difference of Squares:

1.1      Factoring:  x2-16  

Theory : A difference of two perfect squares,  A2 - B2  can be factored into  (A+B) • (A-B)

Proof :  (A+B) • (A-B) =

        A2 - AB + BA - B2 =

        A2 - AB + AB - B2 =

        A2 - B2

Note :  AB = BA is the commutative property of multiplication.

Note :  - AB + AB equals zero and is therefore eliminated from the expression.

Check : 16 is the square of 4

Check :  x2  is the square of  x1  

Factorization is :       (x + 4)  •  (x - 4)  

Equation at the end of step

1 :

 (x + 4) • (x - 4)  = 0  

STEP

2 :

Theory - Roots of a product

2.1    A product of several terms equals zero.  

When a product of two or more terms equals zero, then at least one of the terms must be zero.  

We shall now solve each term = 0 separately  

In other words, we are going to solve as many equations as there are terms in the product  

Any solution of term = 0 solves product = 0 as well.

Solving a Single Variable Equation:

2.2      Solve  :    x+4 = 0  

Subtract  4  from both sides of the equation :  

                     x = -4

Solving a Single Variable Equation:

2.3      Solve  :    x-4 = 0  

Add  4  to both sides of the equation :  

                     x = 4 and/or x=-4

Answer:

yaa , when X=15, y = 3;

here the value of X is five times the value of y

so when X= 10

then. y =X/5 = 10/5= 2

so the value of y will be 2

hope you like the answer

Answer:

x=17

Step-by-step explanation:

These are corresponding angles, meaning they have the same measure. We must set them equal to each other.

Hope this helps :-)

Answer :pink i think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

yes!

Answer:

Y=1/4x-3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

I got this answer right on my questions

Answer

The answer is A

Answer:

It is A. my friend

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

<A=<C=45°

Step-by-step explanation:

you can see in the picture above

Answer:f(x, y) = e

−xy. For the interior of the region, we find the critical points:

fx = −ye−xy

, fy = −xe−xy, so the only critical point is (0, 0), and f(0, 0) = 1.

For the boundary, we use Lagrange multipliers.

g(x, y) = x

2 + 4y

2 = 1 ⇒ λ∇g = h2λx, 8λyi, so setting ∇f = λ∇g we get

−ye−xy = 2λx and −xe−xy = 8λy. The first of these gives e

−xy = −2λx/y,

and then the second gives −x(−2λx/y) = 8λy ⇒ x

2 = 4y

2

. Solving this

last equation with the constraint x

2 + 4y

2 = 1 gives x = ± √

1

2

and y = ±

1

2

√

2

.

Now f

± √

1

2

, ∓

1

2

√

2

= e

1/4 ≈ 1.284 and f

± √

1

2

, ±

1

2

√

2

= e

−1/4 ≈ 0.779.

The former are the maxima on the region and the latter are the minima.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

if youre trying to find the number then the number is 1

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation would be x/16+1/4=5/16

well we want to make everything have the same denominator and 16 is the LCD ( least common denominator ) so you would multiply 1/4 by 4/4 to get 4/16.

this means x/16+4/16=5/16 and and 4+1=5 so 1 is the answer

Answer:

a=2s-b-c

Step-by-step explanation:

2s=a+b+c

a=2s-b-c

Answer:

2s-c-b =a

Step-by-step explanation:

s = ( a+b+c)/2

Multiply each side by 2

2s = ( a+b+c)/2 *2

2s = a+b+c

Subtract c from each side

2s -c = a+b+c-c

2s -c = a+b

Subtract b from each side

2s-c-b = a+b-b

2s-c-b =a

Answer:

D. 1.061 + 4.899

Step-by-step explanation:

1061 + 4899     149              149

———————————  =  ———

   1000         25                     25

149          

——— = 5.96000

 25            

If this helps please mark brainliest. Have a great day!

This question was not written completely

Complete Question

At one point the average price of regular unleaded gasoline was ​$3.39 per gallon. Assume that the standard deviation price per gallon is ​$0.07 per gallon and use​ Chebyshev's inequality to answer the following.

​(a) What percentage of gasoline stations had prices within 3 standard deviations of the​ mean?

​(b) What percentage of gasoline stations had prices within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean? What are the gasoline prices that are within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean?

​(c) What is the minimum percentage of gasoline stations that had prices between ​$3.11 and ​$3.67​?

Answer:

a) 88.89% lies with 3 standard deviations of the mean

b) i) 84% lies within 2.5 standard deviations of the mean

ii) the gasoline prices that are within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean is $3.215 and $3.565

c) 93.75%

Step-by-step explanation:

Chebyshev's theorem is shown below.

1) Chebyshev's theorem states for any k > 1, at least 1-1/k² of the data lies within k standard deviations of the mean.

As stated, the value of k must be greater than 1.

2) At least 75% or 3/4 of the data for a set of numbers lies within 2 standard deviations of the mean. The number could be greater.μ - 2σ and μ + 2σ.

3) At least 88.89% or 8/9 of a data set lies within 3 standard deviations of the mean.μ - 3σ and μ + 3σ.

4) At least 93.75% of a data set lies within 4 standard deviations of the mean.μ - 4σ and μ + 4σ.

​

(a) What percentage of gasoline stations had prices within 3 standard deviations of the​ mean?

We solve using the first rule of the theorem

1) Chebyshev's theorem states for any k > 1, at least 1-1/k² of the data lies within k standard deviations of the mean.

As stated, the value of k must be greater than 1.

Hence, k = 3

1 - 1/k²

= 1 - 1/3²

= 1 - 1/9

= 9 - 1/ 9

= 8/9

Therefore, the percentage of gasoline stations had prices within 3 standard deviations of the​ mean is 88.89%

​(b) What percentage of gasoline stations had prices within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean?

We solve using the first rule of the theorem

1) Chebyshev's theorem states for any k > 1, at least 1-1/k² of the data lies within k standard deviations of the mean.

As stated, the value of k must be greater than 1.

Hence, k = 3

1 - 1/k²

= 1 - 1/2.5²

= 1 - 1/6.25

= 6.25 - 1/ 6.25

= 5.25/6.25

We convert to percentage

= 5.25/6.25 × 100%

= 0.84 × 100%

= 84 %

Therefore, the percentage of gasoline stations had prices within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean is 84%

What are the gasoline prices that are within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean?

We have from the question, the mean =$3.39

Standard deviation = 0.07

μ - 2.5σ

$3.39 - 2.5 × 0.07

= $3.215

μ + 2.5σ

$3.39 + 2.5 × 0.07

= $3.565

Therefore, the gasoline prices that are within 2.5 standard deviations of the​ mean is $3.215 and $3.565

​(c) What is the minimum percentage of gasoline stations that had prices between ​$3.11 and ​$3.67​?

the mean =$3.39

Standard deviation = 0.07

Applying the 2nd rule

2) At least 75% or 3/4 of the data for a set of numbers lies within 2 standard deviations of the mean. The number could be greater.μ - 2σ and μ + 2σ.

the mean =$3.39

Standard deviation = 0.07

μ - 2σ and μ + 2σ.

$3.39 - 2 × 0.07 = $3.25

$3.39 + 2× 0.07 = $3.53

Applying the third rule

3) At least 88.89% or 8/9 of a data set lies within 3 standard deviations of the mean.μ - 3σ and μ + 3σ.

$3.39 - 3 × 0.07 = $3.18

$3.39 + 3 × 0.07 = $3.6

Applying the 4th rule

4) At least 93.75% of a data set lies within 4 standard deviations of the mean.μ - 4σ and μ + 4σ.

$3.39 - 4 × 0.07 = $3.11

$3.39 + 4 × 0.07 = $3.67

Therefore, from the above calculation we can see that the minimum percentage of gasoline stations that had prices between ​$3.11 and ​$3.67​ corresponds to at least 93.75% of a data set because it lies within 4 standard deviations of the mean.