what is the numerical value of the product of the lengths of all diagonals of a regular hexagon of side length $1$?

The calculated value of the angle x is 58 degrees

from the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The triangle

Using the sum of opposite external angles, we have the following equation

114 = 56 + x

When the like terms are evaluated, we have

x = 114 - 56

Evaluate

x = 58

Hence, the value of x is 58

Read more about angles at

https://brainly.com/question/28293784

#SPJ1

The probability that the arborist will break a saw chain on a day in which he spends 1/2 of his time climbing, 3/8 limbing, and 1/8 felling and bucking is 0.007

We are given the probabilities of an arborist breaking a saw chain in a day's work are 0.004 for a small climbing saw, 0.008 for a medium limbing saw, and 0.04 for a large felling and bucking saw.

The time that he spends on each saw are 1/2 of his time climbing, 3/8 limbing, and 1/8 felling and bucking.

Let us find the probability that he will break a chain when he uses the small climbing saw.

P(small climbing saw) = 1/2P(Break a chain using small climbing saw) = 0.004

Using the medium limbing saw: P(medium limbing saw) = 3/8P(Break a chain using medium limbing saw) = 0.008

Using the large felling and bucking saw: P(large felling and bucking saw) = 1/8P(Break a chain using large felling and bucking saw) = 0.04

Now, to find the probability that he will break a chain on a day, we use the weighted average. Probability is a weighted average because the probability of breaking the saw chain is different for each saw that he uses.

Hence, the probability that he breaks a saw chain when he uses each saw is weighted according to how much time he spends on that saw.

P = P(small climbing saw)* P(Break a chain using small climbing saw) + P(medium limbing saw) * P(Break a chain using medium limbing saw) + P(large felling and bucking saw) * P(Break a chain using large felling and bucking saw)P = (1/2 * 0.004) + (3/8 * 0.008) + (1/8 * 0.04)P = 0.007

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The correct answer would be option (A).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 5

Step-by-step explanation:

length = x

Width=x-2
Area=lw

15=(x)(x-2)

15=x^2-2x

0=x^2-2x-15

Quadratic formula:

X=-15

X=5

the length is 5 because the length can’t be negative

Answer:

infinitely many solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

When you put the equations in desmos, the lines are the same therefore it has infinitely many solutions.

Answer:

✔️ c) infinitely many

Step-by-step explanation:

The lines which are parallel are given below :

Line b is parallel to line f, line b is parallel to line d, line c is parallel to line e, line c is parallel to line d and line d is parallel to line f.

Line b is parallel to line f  because they both have a pair of alternate angles that are congruent which is 89.5 degrees and 90.5 degrees.

Line b is parallel to line d because they both have a pair of alternate angles that are congruent at 89.5 degrees.

Line c is parallel to line e because they both have a pair of alternate angles that are congruent at 91.5 degrees.

Line c is parallel to line d because they both have a pair of alternate angles that are congruent: 89.5 degrees.

Line d is parallel to line f since they have corresponding angles of 89.5 degrees and 90.5 degrees, respectively

Therefore, the correct answer is :

Line b is parallel to line f, line b is parallel to line d, line c is parallel to line e, line c is parallel to line d and line d is parallel to line f.

To know more about congruent

https://brainly.com/question/12413243

#SPJ4

An American rapper, is known for his poetic, and complex lyrical style.

Kendrick Lamar is a highly talented storyteller, however, some people may not like his music when he raps quickly as it can be unpleasant.What are the aspects of Kendrick Lamar's music?

An American rapper, is known for his highly poetic, socially conscious, and complex lyrical style.

However, his musical talent has been highly praised by critics and   audiences alike.

Learn more about Kendrick Lamar

brainly.com/question/30636712

#SPJ11

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's C. isnnxixiab

Answer: K

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

k

Answer:

A=61

B=57

C=61

Step-by-step explanation:

The sun of the three angles must give us 180 degrees. so the sum of these three angles is giving us 179 wrong degrees.

The length of the segment UN is 11.05 units.

For any pair of points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂), the distance between the two points is given by the formula:

distance = √( (x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)²)

Here we know that the points are:

U = (3, -5)

N = (2,6)

The distance between these two points is then:

distance = √( (3 - 2)² + (-5 - 6)²)

distance = √122 = 11.05

The length of the segment is 11.05 units.

Learn more about distances at:

https://brainly.com/question/7243416

#SPJ1

Answer:

-cd+3c+8d

Step-by-step explanation:

4cd - 5cd + 3c + 8d

Combine like terms

(4cd - 5cd) + 3c + 8d

-cd+3c+8d

Answer:

3c + 8d - cd

Step-by-step explanation:

Now we have to,

→ Simplify the given expression.

The expression is,

→ 4cd - 5cd + 3c + 8d

Let's simplify the expression,

→ 4cd - 5cd + 3c + 8d

→ 3c + 8d + 4cd - 5cd

→ (3c) + (8d) + (4cd - 5cd)

→ 3c + 8d + (-cd)

→ 3c + 8d - cd

Hence, answer is 3c + 8d - cd.

Answer:

The answer to your problem is 53 in ^2

Hope it helps

The series, based on the general terms, can be found to be arithmetic. The indicated sum is - 544.

To determine if the series is arithmetic or geometric, we must first find the common difference (arithmetic) or common ratio (geometric).

Term 1 (p=1): 19 - 2(1) = 17

Term 2 (p=2): 19 - 2(2) = 15

Term 3 (p=3): 19 - 2(3) = 13

There is a common difference of -2 so this is arithmetic.

The formula for the sum of an arithmetic series is:

Sum = (n x (a1 + an)) / 2

The series is: ∑ (p = 1 to 34) (19 - 2p)

To find the last term, we plug in p = 34:

an = 19 - 2(34)

= 19 - 68

= -49

The sum is therefore:

Sum = (34 x (17 + (-49))) / 2

Sum = -544

Find out more on arithmetic series at https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ1

Answer:

“change” or “the change”

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of any number raised to the power of 0 is always 1, irrespective of the value of x, as long as x is not 0. So, x^0 = 1.

Answer:c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: I think this is a triangle because there are 3 angles.

All triangles have the entire sum 180*

(5x) + (4x + 10) + (10x-5) = 180

x = 175/19

Answer -  1750/19     (Decimal: 92.105263)

Step-by-step explanation:

10 (175/19)

10/1 * 175/19

10  175

1      19

= 1750

    19

The set of ordered pairs (2,1), (3,3), (4,6), (2,3) is NOT a function because the input value of 2 corresponds to both the output values of 1 and 3.

For a set of ordered pairs to be a function, each input (x-value) must correspond to only one output (y-value). Therefore, if there exists an input (x-value) that corresponds to more than one output (y-value), then the set of ordered pairs is NOT a function.

Let's check each set of ordered pairs:

Therefore, the set of ordered pairs that is NOT a function is (2,1), (3,3), (4,6), (2,3).

To learn more about function Click here:
brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ4

For the Yoko Fund, the Treynor ratio is 6.0%, although none of the answer choices provided is a close approximation, we can choose option c. 6.750

The Treynor ratio measures the excess return earned by an investment per unit of systematic risk (i.e., beta). It is calculated as the difference between the return of the investment and the risk-free rate, divided by the investment's beta.

The formula for the Treynor ratio is:

Treynor Ratio = (Return of the Investment - Risk-Free Rate) / Beta

In this case, the return of the Yoko Fund is 11.2%, the risk-free rate is 3.1%, the beta is 1.20, and we are given the standard deviation of the Yoko Fund's returns, which is 17.5%.

Using the formula, we get:

Treynor Ratio = (11.2% - 3.1%) / 1.20

= 6.0%

Therefore, the Treynor ratio for the Yoko Fund is 6.0%.

None of the answer choices is exactly equal to 6.0%, but the closest one is (c) 6.750.


To know more about Treynor ratio refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28180396#

#SPJ11

Answer:

First, we need to calculate the daily interest rate on the credit card. We can do this by dividing the annual percentage rate (APR) by the number of days in a year:

Daily interest rate = APR / 365

Daily interest rate = 0.2445 / 365

Daily interest rate = 0.00067 or 0.067%

Next, we can calculate the interest that will accrue over the course of one month, which is approximately 30 days:

Interest = Balance * Daily interest rate * Number of days

Interest = $1,359 * 0.00067 * 30

Interest = $27.42

Adding the interest to the outstanding balance, we get:

Balance after one month = $1,359 + $27.42

Balance after one month = $1,386.42

Therefore, the balance on the credit card after one month will be approximately $1,386.42.

The least common multiple (LCM) of two or more integers is the smallest positive integer that is a multiple of all of them. In other words, it is the smallest number that is divisible by each of the given numbers without leaving a remainder. [tex]3(5/8) + 2(3/8) = 6.[/tex]

To add the mixed numbers 5 3/8 and 3 2/8, we need to convert them to fractions with a common denominator. Since both have a denominator of 8, we can add the whole numbers to the fractions to get:

[tex]5 3/8 = 5 + 3/8 = 40/8 + 3/8 = 43/8[/tex]

[tex]3 2/8 = 3 + 2/8 = 24/8 + 2/8 = 26/8[/tex]

Now we can add these fractions:

[tex]5 3/8 + 3 2/8 = 43/8 + 26/8 = 69/8[/tex]

So the sum of  [tex]5 3/8[/tex] and [tex]3 2/8[/tex]  as a fraction is [tex]69/8[/tex]  .

The LCM is often used when adding or subtracting fractions with different denominators, since we need to find a common denominator to perform the operation. To do this, we can find the LCM of the denominators and use it as the common denominator.

To write equivalent fractions with a common denominator, we need to find the least common multiple of the denominators, which in this case is 8.

For [tex]3(5/8)[/tex]  :

[tex]3(8/8) + 5/8 = 24/8 + 5/8 = 29/8[/tex]

For [tex]2(3/8):[/tex]

[tex]2(8/8) + 3/8 = 16/8 + 3/8 = 19/8[/tex]

To add these fractions, we simply add their numerators:

[tex]3(5/8) + 2(3/8) = 29/8 + 19/8 = 48/8 = 6[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]3(5/8) + 2(3/8) = 6.[/tex]

Learn more about integer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15276410

#SPJ1

Answer:

126305.622 is the town's population after 2 years on percentage  7.4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

you will asume this rate is constant. so put it into y=mx+b form y=1.74*2+109,500

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Lets assume this is a right triangle.

If you use pythagorean theorem, lets assume the tower is the longest line on the triangle.

If this is true, lets say that 9^2 (distance from end of slide to base of tower) + x^2 (length of slide) = 23^2 (height of tower)

we get the length of the slide is 21.2 meters.

the speed of the car was 5.33 meters per second. Speed = 10 / 2.32 = 4.31 meters per second (rounded to two decimal places) .

a. To find the speed of the car, we use the formula

Speed = Distance / Time

If the car raced 8 meters in 1.5 seconds, we can substitute these values in the formula to get:

Speed = 8 / 1.5 = 5.33 meters per second (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the speed of the car was 5.33 meters per second.

b. The record time of 10 meters in 2.32 seconds gives us a speed of:

Speed = 10 / 2.32 = 4.31 meters per second (rounded to two decimal places)

Comparing this to the speed of the car that raced 8 meters in 1.5 seconds, we see that the car that raced 8 meters was faster, with a speed of 5.33 meters per second compared to the record time of 4.31 meters per second. This suggests that the car that raced 8 meters was well-designed and well-built, and was able to travel a greater distance in a shorter amount of time.            

It is important to note, however, that one data point is not enough to draw a firm conclusion about the superiority of one car over another. It is possible that the car that raced 8 meters had a lucky run, or that the car that set the record had a mechanical issue or was not driven to its full potential. To truly compare the performance of different cars, we would need to collect data from multiple trials and multiple cars, and analyze the data using statistical methods to determine which cars consistently perform better.

To know more about  speed click here:

brainly.com/question/28224010

#SPJ4

The action potential "jumps" from node to node, allowing it to travel faster and with less energy loss than if it had to propagate along the entire length of the axon.

Part D: When the membrane potential of a neuron begins returning to normal, resting levels, the cell membrane experiences hyperpolarization.

During hyperpolarization, the membrane potential becomes more negative than the resting potential, making it more difficult to trigger an action potential.

Part E: Saltatory conduction allows for faster and more efficient conduction because action potentials are confined to the Nodes of Ranvier.

The Nodes of Ranvier are small gaps in the myelin sheath that covers the axon of some neurons. Because the myelin sheath insulates the axon, action potentials can only occur at the nodes, where the membrane is exposed. This means that the action potential "jumps" from node to node, allowing it to travel faster and with less energy loss than if it had to propagate along the entire length of the axon.

To know more about Cell Membrane:

https://brainly.com/question/13524386

#SPJ11

Answer: i am certain that the answer is -6

This is impossible because the third column does not depend on the first two columns.

The third column's values are linear combination of the first two columns. the third column of the matrix as a linear combination of the first two columns, This can be seen by the fact that the third column has values which don't fit the pattern of the first two columns. For example, the first value in the third column (21) is not equal to an any linear combination of the first two columns. Thus, it is impossible to write the third column as a linear combination of the first two columns.

Learn more about linear combination here:

https://brainly.com/question/30888143

#SPJ4

Unpacking the expression we have,

[tex](\sqrt{x})(\sqrt[4]{x})[/tex]

Its better to work with this in terms of exponents so we rewrite the expression as [tex]x^{\frac{1}{2}}*x^{\frac{1}{4}}[/tex]. (cause [tex]\sqrt[n]{x}=x^{\frac{1}{n}}[/tex]) This can be a little tricky when learning it for the first time.

Then by the exponent sum rule  [tex]x^{\frac{1}{2}}*x^{\frac{1}{4}}=x^{\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}}=x^{\frac{3}{4}}[/tex] (more straightforward, you probably know this from class).

I assume this is what you mean by rational exponent form. But you could also write it as [tex]\sqrt[4]{x^3}[/tex].

This formula generates the sequence 0, -1/2, 2/3, -3/4, 4/5, -5/6, 6/7, ...

Notice that the sequence alternates between positive and negative terms and that the denominators of each term increase by 1 while the numerators increase by 1 or -1. To find the explicit formula, we can write it in terms of its general form:

a1 = 0

a2 = -1/2

a3 = 2/3

a4 = -3/4

a5 = 4/5

a6 = -5/6

a7 = 6/7

We can see that the numerator of each term is equal to its index number, n, if n is even and equal to -n if n is odd. The denominator of each term is equal to n+1 for all terms.

Using this observation, we can write the explicit formula for the sequence as:

an = (-1)^(n+1) * n / (n+1)

where (-1)^(n+1) is equal to -1 if n is odd and 1 if n is even. This formula generates the sequence 0, -1/2, 2/3, -3/4, 4/5, -5/6, 6/7, ...

To learn more about sequence visit: https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11