The natural resource that Turkey is making difficult to obtain for Syria and Iraq is water resources, as there are conflicts in these regions related to the use of water from the Tigris Euphrates river basin.
This water resource coming from the Tigris Euphrates river basin is shared between Turkey, Syria and Iraq. Turkey's unilateral irrigation plans change the flow of rivers, providing the country with greater resources in relation to others, which intensifies political conflicts between the countries.
Water scarcity has increased the crisis in eastern countries, making a large part of the population choose to leave their country of origin in search of better living conditions in foreign countries.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/19920929
Why did the British overthrow the Burmese monarchy and make Burma a British colony?
Select one:
a. Britain wanted to protect India and they wanted a land route to China.
b. Britain wanted direct access to their colonies in Vietnam.
c. Burma had large oil resources that Britain needed.
d. Britain was asked to aid Burma and set up an independent country.
Answer: The answer is D.
Christians and Jews interacted with the Islamic government by -
Select one:
converting the area solely to Christianity.
forcing Islamic people to move out of areas previously conquered by Judaism.
migrating to regions that consisted solely of people that shared their beliefs.
serving as officials, scholars and bureaucrats.
Answer:
c seems the most logical
Explanation:
if I'm correct please give me brainliest
Phillis wheatley is celebrated in american history as:
Answer:
The first black woman poet of note.
Explanation:
What other institution within Europe used this form of justification to gain power over others? Do you agree that this was a valid justification for ruling over an empire or country?
Which of these was not a key difference between Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention?
Wanting to protect states’ interests vs. a government with strict rules
Having more, larger cities vs. having fewer, smaller cities
Wanting to protect agriculture vs. protect industries
Having many enslaved people vs. using less enslaved labor
The factor which was not a key difference between Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention is; Wanting to protect agriculture vs. protect industries.
The Constitutional ConventionAmong others, the three major disagreements faced by the delegates include: Liberty versus strong national government, large states versus small states, and slavery. The nominated delegates solved the Liberty versus strong national government by creating the framework.
On this note, Wanting to protect agriculture vs. protect industries was the missing key difference.
Read more on the constitutional convention;
https://brainly.com/question/606222
Answer:
C - Wanting to protect agriculture vs. protect industries
Explanation:
EDGE 2022
9. Who were elected to represent the interests of plebeians in the Roman
Republic?
A. Tribune
B. Senator
C. Consul
D. Pontifex Maximus
It’s not C I took the test and got it wrong on penn
Answer:
A tribune it is correct for pennfoster
Explanation:
which European is credited with arthritis and the Age of Exploration
Answer:
prince henry the navigator
Should santa be arrested for breaking and entering millions of times
Answer:
The most common crime Santa is accused of is breaking and entering, but this particular charge is not actually a crime in California. ... Fortunately for Santa, he cannot be charged with either of these crimes in the Golden State
Explanation:
Answer:
hahaha are right
they should arrest him
How do the three branches of the US government limit each other’s powers?
A. through popular sovereignty and federalism
B. through the House and Senate
C. through amendments and articles
D. through checks and balances
Answer:
D. through checks and balances
Explanation:
What is the Definition of Encroachments?
Ahm, I do not know how to explain it but here's the answer.
"Intrusion on ones territory, rights, and other things amongst those lines."
how did the constitution fix the problems of articles of confederation?
Answer:
The constitution created an actual federal government. A big problem that the articles of confederation had was that there was no federal government to solve problems between the states. Additionally, there was no way for the federal government to raise funds. Finally, the articles barely connected the states, and each state just wanted to maintain its own power.
The constitution solved these problems because it made a stronger federal government. The federal government now has the power to solve problems between the states and tax the citizens. This allowed the government to function correctly and protect the security of the nation.
By 1900, around 100,000 black families owned land in the Deep South
-True
-False
ILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Read Isaiah 53:6. Select the best description.
Speaks of Jesus being accused of wrong, but He refused to defend Himself. He remained quiet.
Describes the physical mutilation that would occur at the time of the Crucifixion.
Describes the purpose of the death of Christ.
Foretells that the death of Jesus will not be in vain but that God will be satisfied with its results.
Tells us that Jesus was an offering for sin.
Speaks of the world's need of a Savior.
Answer:
Explanation:
Preface
One thing I think we should make very clear. When you are working on a quotation, you should confine yourself to that quotation and nothing unless you are dealing with the clarification of a pronoun -- which you are not in this verse.
All of the answers given are true, but only one of them is true for 53:6. I'm going to quote it from 2 different Bibles. KJV says.
All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
The second one comes from the Good News Bible -- which I use for my own study purposes.
All of us were like sheep that were lost, each of us going his own way. But the Lord made the punishment fall on him, the punishment that all of us deserved.
I always choose the Good News Bible when I want to know what something means, but isn't the prose of KJV much more beautiful? So which answer is the one you want? It's very tempting to pick Foretells that the death of Jesus will not be in vain. Strictly speaking, I wouldn't pick it. It says nothing about God being satisfied -- in either version.
The next one begins with "Tells us that Jesus was an offering ..." It is only marginally better, but it is better. The problem with this one is that phrase at the end "The punishment that all of us deserved." That opinion offered by Isaiah is extremely important. Isaiah is a prophet and a prophet's words are to be taken seriously. They have the closest contact with God.
But you still have to get rid of the purpose of the death of Christ. I'm not convinced that this is the wrong answer. These kinds of questions are not mathematics, where you underline one thing and that is your answer. I wouldn't pick it because I don't like the word purpose. I think it implies that Jesus had a job. His life was not a job. It seems a terribly cold rendition of 53:6
So I've given you three choices. The correct answer is one of the three. I told you the one I would pick. I don't care what Edge has to say. That's the math answer as though the other 2 have no virtue at all. You pick. That's what literature is all about.
Answer:
the first one a)
Explanation:
How did the Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, help lead to the start of World War II?
Question 1 options:
The treaty led to the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany due to resentment and economic hardships within the country
The treaty did not lead to World War II
The treaty led to the Great Depression, causing economic hardships across the globe.
The treaty blamed England for the start of World War I and caused tensions between countries in Europe.
Answer:
The treaty led to the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany due to resentment and economic hardships within the country
Explanation:
I took the test! Hope this helps :)
Why was the Battle of Austerlitz important?
Answer:
The Battle of Austerlitz (also known as the Battle of the Three Emperors) was a major engagement in the Napoleonic Wars during the War of the Third Coalition. ... Despite difficult fighting in many sectors, the battle is often regarded as a tactical masterpiece. Austerlitz effectively brought the Third Coalition to an end.
Explanation:
hope it helps you
in 1860 and 1861, president james buchanan asserted
What was the name of the white supremacist group that emerged during Reconstruction and targeted African American
Answer:
the Ku Klux Klan
Explanation:
What is the emergence of a new society?
Answer:
The emergence of global society is, in my view, nothing less than the evolution of a new system at a higher level of integration.
Explanation:
Help! I’ve been on this test for 1-2 hours!
Answer:
Please send a question this is not a question.
Explanation:
The first colonies were are hard time there was a lot of forts going on in that time to protect from an Indian attack.
I will give brainliest 100 points if answer question " Since justices on the California Supreme Court serve for 12 years and are required to be confirmed by the public (in a general election and at the end of their term), provide an explanation of whether you believe that justices on the US Supreme Court should also be confirmed by the public". Please provide an example. Thanks
Answer:
Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, so if one court does something they will need to tell the other courts because most courts would consider others a team and also they would need to be confirmed by people because they court could think that they are doing something good but the people don't like it and what they are trying 2 do. Also they need to be confirmed by the public is because if the court is trying to help they need to see what others are thinking about it
Explanation:
mykaren clark
Answer:
beep bop boop
Explanation:
What are the arguments for and against electing judges rather than executive appointment or
legislative selection?
Answer:
The job of the judge should be the center of this discussion. Is the judge just the “mouth of the law” an interpreter of statutes, regulations? Or are they policymakers who let their own ideology and political views influence their decisions?
The fact is that if a judge is elected with a certain agenda, the cases he decides will most likely follow it, people like it or not. This can be a pro or a con to an elected judge.
For the ones who cherish the law above politic agenda, this is a huge con, the law should be the one that dictates what and how the judge should decide, not his political beliefs.
Explanation:
what title was frequently assigned to elvis presley?
Answer:
Elvis Aron Presley ( January 8, 1935 – August 16, 1977), often known simply as Elvis and also called "The King of Rock 'n' Roll" or simply "The King", was an American singer, musician and actor.
Explanation:
which year did mccormick begin producing its famous pumpkin pie spice
Was Sargon a great leader of Akkadia? Why or why not
Answer:
the reason why he was a great leader is
Explanation:
When Sumerians rebelled, the Akkadians in power ruthlessly crushed the rebel leaders. Sargon's reign provided stability. He built roads and irrigation canals, extended trade routes and encouraged science and the arts. ... After his death, Sargon's legends grew and all of Mesopotamia revered him almost as a god.
Were Federalists FOR or AGAINST ratification of the
Constitution? Why?
Answer:
Explanation: A clash erupted over ratification, with the Anti-Federalists opposing the creation of a strong national government and rejecting ratification and the Federalists advocating a strong union and adoption of the Constitution.
Answer:
Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution.
Explanation:
The Anti-Federalists wanted the Articles of Confederation, but with changes. They feared a government superior to the states.
Someone please help will mark as brainliest
Answer:
sure :)
Explanation:
What cause the dust bowl economics?
Answer:
The Dust Bowl was caused by a combination of factors including economic distress, prolonged drought, exceptionally high temperatures, poor agricultural methods, and wind erosion as a consequence of these practices.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
in your opinion, could the outcome of the case have been politically motivated? Explain.
Answer:
Dred and Harriet Scott had no political motivation to pursue freedom. No one questioned their legitimate right to their freedom based on extended residence in free areas. That uncertainty had been resolved with the Missouri Supreme Court's 1824 decision in Winny v. ... Louis Circuit Court; only one resulted in freedom
Explanation:
Explain: Why did Europeans look to African slaves and not Native Americans slaves as a source of labor in the New World?
Answer:
The picture attached has the answer.
Hope this helps!
Which phrase best describes the goal of this amendment?
To limit the power of the federal government
To restrict civil liberties
To restrain the power of judicial activists
To limit due process rights
The goal of this amendment is to limit the power of the federal government, as if sculpting the boundaries of authority to create a balanced civic landscape. Therefore, option A is correct.
An amendment is a change or addition to the rules that guide our society, similar to editing a book to make it clearer or adding a new tool to a toolbox.
It's a way to update our laws so they match our changing world. Just like updating a computer program to fix bugs or add new features, amendments keep our legal system working smoothly and fairly, adapting it to the needs and values of the present and future.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ3