Answer:
A. Libraries became more common .
Explanation:
The House of Wisdom influenced the establishment of other libraries in the later century that were used for personal purposes (Durant, 1942). The House of Wisdom also contributed significantly to the flourishing of authors and writers. The established of other libraries such as the Royal Library led to the creation of employment opportunities.
Answer:ancient greek knowledge was preserved
Which three statements are correct about the Pendleton Act?
-It covered 15 percent of civil service appointments.
-There was strong support for it in Congress.
-It required people to pass a test proving their competence.
-It is an early example of government reform.
-Most Gilded Age presidents supported its goals.
In the case at hand, the final three options are entirely accurate that is It required people to pass a test proving their competence. It is an early example of government reform. Most Gilded Age presidents supported its goals
The Pendleton Act is what?When a young job seeker assassinated President James A. Garfield in January 1883, the Pendleton Act was passed.
Jobs were previously assigned based on acquaintances and friendships. The system was referred to as "spoils." Numerous deserving people lost their jobs as a result.
By enacting this law, merit-based hiring was guaranteed. They were required to sit for competitive exams from which the top applicants were picked and hired.
Chester Arthur, the president who succeeded Garfield, promoted it as a type of reform movement. The Pendleton Act was enhanced by the presidents who succeeded Chester.
To know about Pendleton Act visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ1
HELP!! In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
the fictional case of United States v. Fields. Remember, you are serving as a Supreme
Court justice. Your opinion must summarize the facts of the case, state your decision,
and cite precedent to support your ideas.
Abel Fields was a 39-year-old resident of a city in California. In 2011, he attended a city meeting about public safety. He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him the knowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues. During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had received the Purple Heart, a prestigious medal.
Each of Fields’s claims was false. He had never served in the military, and he had never received a medal.
He was prosecuted and convicted under the Stolen Valor Act. Because he was found guilty, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000.
The Court ruled in this case that states must demonstrate that a person made a false statement with malice. A deliberate decision to cause harm is called malice.
What was the opinion of the Supreme Court in the fictitious case United States v. Fields?The following is stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court, which describes your decision in the United States sector:
The fictional Supreme Court of the United States v. Fields
Keep in mind that you are a judge at the High Court.
The facts of the case, your decision, and a quote from the presentation should all be included in your opinion.
The decision was upheld on Fields' appeal to the Ninth Regional Court of Appeal.
He contended that the Taken Courage Act was unlawful and that his right to opportunity of articulation had been abused.
His case was upheld by the Ninth Regional Court of Appeal.
Under Section 6 of the 1891 Court of Appeals Act, 26 Stat. 828, the certiorari will not be granted because the error book will not lie, and it can only be granted where the error book does not exist.
But only in serious cases, when there is a conflict between state courts' decisions or those of state courts in different circuits, or when something affects this country's relations with other countries or is in the public interest.
To learn more about Supreme Court visit :
https://brainly.com/question/3570835
#SPJ1
1.) What was Richeza’s family background? Why was it important?
2.) How did the German and Polish rulers resolve their war?
3.) What was the significance of the names Casimir and Gertrude in eleventh century Poland?
4.) How is Richeza portrayed in medieval Polish sources? What is the significance of this?
5.) What sort of charitable works was Richeza involved in?
6.) What is the significance of Richeza’s seal? What does this reveal about her position as queen?
7.) What is your overall opinion of Richeza? What strategies did she employ to advertise her authority as queen?
1)Ans:- Rachel was the ancestress of the Northern Kingdom, which was called Ephraim after Joseph's son. After Ephraim and Benjamin were exiled by the Assyrians, Rachel was remembered as the classic mother who mourns and intercedes for her children.
2)Ans:- World War II or the Second World War, often abbreviated as WWII or WW2, was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945. The vast majority of the world's countries, including all of the great powers, fought as part of two opposing military alliances: the Allies and the Axis.
3)Ans:- Gertrude-Olisava (c. 1025 – 4 January 1108), was Grand Princess consort of Rus' by marriage ... returning when Casimir I the Restorer, Gertrude's brother established ...
4)Ans:- She subsequently played an important role in mediating a peace settlement between Poland and the Holy Roman Empire.
5)Ans:- She founded the order of Missionaries of Charity, which became noted for building homes for orphans, nursing homes for lepers and hospices for the terminally ill in Calcutta. Mother Teresa's organization also engaged in aid work in other parts of the world. Asasira Caroline and 614 others like this.
6)Ans:- Tradition describes her as unusually beautiful.
7)Ans:- The first act passed by the House of Commons in February 1559 joined together a bill of supremacy, establishing Queen Elizabeth I as head of the church, with one of uniformity, dealing with the type of faith and service.
IM DOING CANADA
3. In early 2022, the GDP per capita of the United States was $59,312. How does this
compare with your selected country? What does it tell you about standard of living
in your selected country versus the United States? Respond to these questions
using at least three to five sentences.
4. Examine the information you have researched. Decide whether you recommend
this country for your family's new home. Write down the reasons you do or do not
recommend it.
5. Save your worksheet in one file to turn in. Use the name
"Country Recommendation your name" for your file to turn in.
Answer:
GDP is determined by the average income
Explanation:
Answer GDP is determined by the average income
earned per person in a given area in a specified year. The Jamaica GDP per capita is around 4800.00 USD. Hence, the standard of living in Jamaica is very low when compared.
What is the effect of low GDP?
When GDP slows down, the effects are as
follows:
1. lead to fears of a recession
2. layoffs and unemployment 3. declining business revenues and
4. consumer spending.
The GDP is a means to determine the economic growth and where is challenging.
Therefore, the standard of living of Jamaica when compared to America is very low and this means that, Jamaica will be experiencing poor healthcare, unemployment, and even poverty.
Help me pls and thank u
What major Union strategy was completed at the end of the siege of Vicksburg and why?
Answer:
capture of the Mississippi River, splitting the Confederacy in two
Explanation:
May 1863
Confederate General Pemberton:
held the high ground & had a strong defensive position:
July 4, 1863
after several failures & long siege, Grant captured Vicksburg
major turning point : Union controlled entire Mississippi River : cut the Confederacy in half & denied them a vital supply route.
boosted Union morale
gave President Abraham Lincoln a much-needed victory,
war had not been going well for the Union up to that point.
key part of the Union's overall strategy
What are the characteristics of limited government?
Answer:
A limited government is one where legalized force is restricted through delegated and enumerated authorities. Countries with limited governments have fewer laws about what individuals and businesses can and cannot do.
Explanation:
What is one way the events of the vietnam war affected American society?
What is one way the outcome of the vietnam war affected American society?
Answer both questions in atleast 4 sentences
Answer:
One way the events of the Vietnam War affected American society was the significant increase in anti-war movements and protests. Many Americans believed that the war was unnecessary and unjust, and these sentiments led to widespread protests and rallies. The war also led to a deepening political and cultural divide in the country, as those who supported the war clashed with those who opposed it. The war also had a significant impact on the mental health of many veterans, leading to a greater awareness of the issue of post-traumatic stress disorder.
The outcome of the Vietnam War also had a lasting impact on American society. The defeat in the war led to a loss of confidence in the government and the military, as well as a sense of disillusionment among many Americans. The war's cost in terms of money and lives was also staggering, and it contributed significantly to inflation and economic instability in the 1970s. Additionally, the war led to a shift in American foreign policy, with a greater emphasis on diplomatic solutions and cooperation with other countries.
The white ethnic revival of the 1970s meant that many European Americans began embracing ______.
a. the Black freedom movement
b. their distinct cultural heritage
c. a shared identity as white Americans
d. the cause of immigration reform
For this discussion forum, begin by reading the following statement and decide whether you agree or disagree with the statement:
“The Bill of Rights does not really affect me in my daily life.”
And why
I respectfully disagree with statement that the Bill of Rights does not affect individuals in their daily lives.
What was the Bill of Rights?The Bill of Rights refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which were adopted in 1791. It was created to protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government. The amendments guarantee various rights, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as the right to bear arms and a fair trial. They also prohibit the government from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, and protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. Additionally, the Bill of Rights reserves certain powers to the states and the people and establishes limits on the federal government's ability to interfere in the governance of the states.
To learn more about Bill of Rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30191600
#SPJ1
How is the value of currency determined?
please help me, ty!
I will give brainlyist!
Currency value is determined by total supply and demand. A variety of factors, including interest rates, inflation, capital flow, and the money supply, have an impact on supply and demand.
How Does Currency Work?The majority of our daily transactions involve the use of currency, whether we use credit cards or paper bills. Indeed, money is the engine that drives economies worldwide. Paper money or coins that are in circulation are referred to as currency. However, when looking at the total amount of money in circulation, currency is only one aspect of the economy.
Without a doubt, most cash today exists as acknowledge cash or as electronic records put away in data sets in banks or monetary establishments. Still, currency is the mainstay of every day business, and that's what we'll examine in greater detail here.
To learn more about currency visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14372075
#SPJ1
If you convinced your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political
concern, what would this situation be an example of?
If you convinced your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political concern, this situation would be an example of exercising your freedom of speech and political expression.
What is freedom of speech?Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to express their opinions, thoughts, and ideas without censorship or fear of retribution from the government or other powerful entities. It is protected by many constitutions and international human rights agreements, and is essential for the functioning of a democratic society. Freedom of speech includes the right to express controversial, unpopular, or even offensive opinions, as long as they do not directly harm others or incite violence. However, limitations may be placed on freedom of speech in certain circumstances, such as to protect national security or public safety, or to prevent hate speech or defamation.
To know more about freedom of speech, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31030676
#SPJ9
PLEASE HELPPP
A car was valued at $45,000 in the year 1991. The value depreciated to $12,000 by the year 2000.
A) What was the annual rate of change between 1991 and 2000?
r=-------------Round the rate of decrease to 4 decimal places.
B) What is the correct answer to part A written in percentage form?
r=------------%
C) Assume that the car value continues to drop by the same percentage. What will the value be in the year 2003 ?
value = $----------------Round to the nearest 50 dollars.
Answer:
Explanation:
A) To find the annual rate of change between 1991 and 2000, we can use the formula:
r = (Vf/Vi)^(1/n) - 1
where r is the annual rate of change, Vf is the final value, Vi is the initial value, and n is the number of years.
Plugging in the values given, we get:
r = (12000/45000)^(1/9) - 1
r = -0.0901
So the annual rate of change is -0.0901.
B) To express the rate of change as a percentage, we can multiply it by 100:
r = -0.0901 * 100
r = -9.01%
So the correct answer to part A in percentage form is -9.01%.
C) Assuming that the car value continues to drop by the same percentage, we can use the formula:
V = Vi * (1 + r)^n
where V is the final value, Vi is the initial value, r is the annual rate of change, and n is the number of years.
Plugging in the values given, we get:
V = 12000 * (1 - 0.0901)^3
V = 12000 * 0.729
V = 8748
Therefore, the value of the car in the year 2003 will be $8,750.
If not for Julius Caesar, would the Roman republic have given away to the Roman Empire
It is difficult to say with certainty whether the Roman Republic would have given way to the Roman Empire if Julius Caesar had not played a role in Roman politics. However, it is clear that Caesar's actions had a significant impact on the course of Roman history.
Caesar's military conquests and political maneuvering led to the collapse of the Roman Republic and the establishment of the Roman Empire. However, it is worth noting that the conditions that led to the collapse of the Republic, such as political corruption, social unrest, and military instability, existed long before Caesar's time.Furthermore, other figures in Roman history, such as Pompey, Crassus, and Octavian, played significant roles in the transition from Republic to Empire. It is possible that if Caesar had not emerged as a dominant figure, another leader might have risen to fill the power vacuum and led Rome in a similar direction.
To learn more about Roman click the link below:
brainly.com/question/15722709
#SPJ1
related literature that discussed the difference and effect of educational level on the price of purchased primary vehicle and with citation
Answer:
One study conducted by Turrentine and Kurani (2007) found that individuals with higher educational levels tend to purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles, which may be attributed to their greater awareness of environmental issues and the long-term cost savings associated with fuel efficiency. Another study by Gillingham and Palmer (2014) also found that higher education levels are positively correlated with the likelihood of purchasing a hybrid or electric vehicle.
Explanation:
What government or governments were the Reconstruction Amendments primarily intended to restrain and why?
Compromise of 1850
1. Why was this compromise needed?
2. What was the burning issue that divided the north and
south?
3. What were the five bills passed under the Compromise
of 1850?
The Compromise of 1850 was package of five bills that aimed to resolve the issues related to slavery and territorial expansion in the United States.
What was the Compromise of 1850?The Compromise of 1850 was a set of legislative measures passed by the United States Congress in an attempt to resolve various disputes related to slavery and territorial expansion. The compromise included several provisions, such as the admission of California as a free state, the establishment of the territories of New Mexico and Utah, the abolition of the slave trade in Washington D.C., and the implementation of a more stringent Fugitive Slave Act. The Compromise of 1850 was controversial and did not fully resolve the issue of slavery, but it temporarily defused tensions between Northern and Southern states. It also helped delay the onset of the American Civil War for a few years.
To learn more about Compromise of 1850, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29761975
#SPJ1
is imperialism is consistent with ideals of American democracy.
Answer:
Yes, it is.
Explanation:
American imperialism refers to the expansion of American political, economic, cultural, media, and military influence beyond the boundaries of the United States.
Answer:
This group believed that imperialist countries often govern people against their will. The empire established by Spain was a good example of this situation. For example, the people of the Philippines didn’t want to be ruled by Spain.
The United States was a country that established its government and its reputation by fighting against Great Britain, which ruled the people and didn’t follow the will of the people it ruled. The Anti-Imperialist League felt that if the United States was going to pursue an imperialist policy, it would be violating one of its founding principles: that government should be based on the consent of the governed. For example, when the United States took over the Philippines after the Spanish-American War, the people of the Philippines didn’t want the United States to rule them. As a result, American imperialist policy was inconsistent with the ideals of democracy and inconsistent with the concept of a government based on democratic principles. It was also inconsistent with the ideals of the American Revolution. The British colonists fought for their freedom because the British government didn’t listen to their wishes and concerns. If the United States became imperialist, it would be viewed as a country that was not any different than Spain or Great Britain.
A new kind of democracy
The founding generation of American statesmen was an exclusive class: with the exception of John Adams, every US president until 1824 was an elite slaveholder from Virginia. Born into wealth and raised to be masters of others, they saw themselves as belonging to a better class of people that were naturally suited to leadership. Many of them were alarmed by how eagerly ordinary Americans embraced the democratic spirit of the Revolution. They even sought to rein in the political influence of the masses when framing the US Constitution.
But the revolutionary ideals of equality and democracy had captured the imagination of the American people, who embraced the notion that political participation should be for everyone, not just property-owning elites. During the first half of the nineteenth century, barriers preventing white men from participating in politics fell across the United States. None of the new states entering the Union required white men to own property in order to vote, and by the Civil War, all but one of the original thirteen states had eliminated property requirements. Voters, not state legislatures, began to choose presidential electors.
This expansion of the franchise has been dubbed Jacksonian Democracy, as the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 became symbolic of the new “politics of the common man.” The older generation of politicians looked on in horror when Jackson’s inauguration turned into a stampede, breaking china and furniture in the White House.
Choose an historical or personal event that you know something about. In an essay style of your choice, write about this event from a different perspective than your own. How would this person tell the story?
The past tense is frequently used by authors of personal tales since they typically describe personal events. This aids in division.
What format should a personal essay follow?A personal essay is a concise work of autobiographical nonfiction that is written with intimacy and in a conversational tone. is sometimes referred to as a personal statement. According to author Annie Dillard, the personal essay is a type of creative nonfiction that is "all over the map" and "there's nothing you can't do with it."
A short narrative can be a personal essay, right?Essays are nonfiction, it's true, but they resemble short stories more than they do academic writing. Simply said, a personal essay is a true short tale. Essayists must use color they must work within the bounds of reality, but they must also employ many of the same tools as a short story writer: Don't tell, just show.
To know more about personal event visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/18153047
#SPJ1
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(05.03 LC)
Which statement is true regarding the structure of the U.S. government?
The president has the most power in the country.
States have more power than the national government.
Each state has an executive branch that works together as the central government.
The central government is divided into three separate branches.
The statements which are true regarding the structure of the U.S. government are-
a. The president has the most power in the country.c. Each state has an executive branch that works together as the central government.d. The central government is divided into three separate branches.Therefore, the correct answers are option a, c and d.
Government?The officials that make up the governing body of a political unit and who make up the organization as a whole are examples of the body of people who compose government.
How is the American government constrained?The separation of powers in the U.S. Constitution led to limited government: "horizontal" separation of powers divided authority across the three institutions of government (legislature, executive, and judiciary), each of which serves as a check on the other; and "vertical" separation of powers (federalism)
To know more about Government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
How did Franklin Roosevelt's presidency change the U.S. government?
Answer:
The way that Franklin Roosevelt's presidency changed the U.S. government was by making it more active in the economy.
Explanation:
When Franklin Roosevelt became the president, the United States had an economy that was suffering heavily from the Great Depression which had made millions unemployed and caused poverty rates to spike.
The government at the time believed in limited interference in the economy because they believed the economy would eventually adjust.
Franklin Roosevelt went against that and invested heavily in the economy as well as passing regulations to control the economy more. This set the stage for current U.S. government interference in the economy.
Learn more at https://brainly.com/question/28376656
Answer:
Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency had a significant impact on the U.S. government, particularly in the following ways:
1. The New Deal: FDR's New Deal programs, which were a series of social and economic reforms aimed at lifting the country out of the Great Depression, greatly expanded the role of the federal government in American life. The New Deal initiatives included the creation of Social Security, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), and the Works Progress Administration (WPA).
2. Expansion of Executive Power: Through his leadership during World War II, Roosevelt greatly expanded the power of the executive branch. He also used his executive power to issue numerous executive orders, which helped shape the U.S. government's response to various national and international crises.
3. Judicial Reform: Roosevelt's efforts to reform the U.S. Supreme Court, through the introduction of the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, sparked intense controversy and public debate. Although the bill ultimately failed to pass, it helped shift the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches of the U.S. government.
In summary, Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency had a significant impact on the U.S. government by expanding the role of the federal government through the New Deal, increasing the power of the executive branch, and sparking important public debates about the role of the judiciary.
Why did Marie Antoinette, King Louis XVI, and Robespierre sent to guillotine? Why did the guillotine appeal to revolutionaries?
Marie Antoinette, King Louis XVI, and Robespierre were all sent to the guillotine during the French Revolution. Each of them had different reasons for being executed.
Marie Antoinette was the wife of King Louis XVI and was accused of being a traitor to the revolution. She was seen as a symbol of the corrupt monarchy that the revolutionaries were trying to overthrow. Additionally, her extravagant lifestyle and rumored affair with a Swedish count also contributed to her unpopularity.
King Louis XVI was seen as the ultimate symbol of the old regime and was accused of being a traitor to the revolution. His attempts to resist the changes demanded by the revolutionaries, as well as his failed escape attempt, led to his downfall and execution.
Robespierre, on the other hand, was a prominent figure in the revolution and one of its leaders. He was known for his radical views and his role in the Reign of Terror, a period of violence during which thousands of people were executed. However, Robespierre's popularity waned, and he was eventually arrested and executed by the same system he had helped to establish.
The guillotine appealed to the revolutionaries for several reasons. First, it was seen as a more humane method of execution compared to other methods used in the past, such as hanging, burning at the stake, or beheading with an axe or sword. The guillotine allowed for a swift and relatively painless death.
Second, the guillotine was also seen as a symbol of equality and justice, as it was used to execute people from all walks of life, including members of the nobility and clergy. This was in contrast to the old regime, where the rich and powerful often received lenient treatment compared to the poor and powerless.
Finally, the guillotine was also a powerful symbol of the revolution itself. Its use demonstrated the power of the revolutionary government and its commitment to justice and equality. It also served as a warning to anyone who opposed the revolution that they too could face the same fate.
When the players of both team commit an offence at the same time in volleyball, it is called (A)Two foul (B)Double foul (C)Foul Foul (D) Twice foul
Answer:
(B) Double foul.
Explanation:
When the players of both teams commit an offense at the same time in volleyball, it is called a Double Foul.
Therefore, the correct answer is (B) Double foul.
Answer:When two opposing players break the rules at the same time, it is called a double foul. When a player makes numerous or successive illegal contacts, it is referred to as a double hit. When a player transgresses the serving area or centerline limits, it is considered a foot faul
Explanation: Easy
Do you agree or disagree with the recent calls to end filibuster? Why?
(including former presidents Obama and Trump, and now president Biden)
There are political considerations for and against ending the filibuster, therefore the decision is up for debate. Opponents view it as crucial for minority rights, while supporters regard it as blocking critical legislation.
What is the president's opinion of Roe v. Wade?I'll keep fighting to defend a woman's right to make her own decisions. The only way to properly ensure a woman's freedom to choose in every state is for Congress to reinstate the protections of Roe v. Wade in federal law.
What does the State of the Union address aim to accomplish?The State of the Union Address is a yearly speech made by the president of the United States to a joint session of Congress at the start of the majority of calender years.
To know more about minority rights visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/641030
#SPJ1
How does the Third Amendment protect Americans with regard to their
homes?
O A. The government can't take people's homes without paying them a
fair market price.
• B. The government can't force people to accommodate soldiers in
their homes.
C. The government can't regulate what people say in the privacy of
their own homes.
• D. The government can't enter people's homes without permission.
SUBMIT
Answer:
B. The government can't force people to accommodate soldiers in
their homes.
Explanation:
This was created to protect homeowners from having to let soldiers live with them. The British passed the Quartering Act that made colonist have to share their homes with British soldiers and that angered the colonists.
Students of different races attend a school function together. Which of the following U.S. Supreme Court decisions made this image from an American classroom possible throughout the nation?
Our Constitution defines "persons" as including both in- and out-of-school students. They have inherent rights that the State is obligated to uphold.
Does the US consider education to be a fundamental right?Yes! A free public education is a right of every child residing in the United States. Furthermore, regardless of their race or ethnicity, all children must be given equal access to education under the Constitution.
In regards to separate schools, what decision did the US Supreme Court make?Racial segregation in public schools is against the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Brown v. Board of Education. In 1954, a court ruled that having separate educational facilities for white and African American pupils was fundamentally unfair.
To know more about Constitution visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
This 1912 cartoon depicts *
Efforts to contain the boxer rebellion
Tension in pre World War One Europe
Reaction to the Bolshevik revolution
Responses to the rise of the Weimar Republic
Answer: Boxer Rebellion
Explanation:
What choices did Americans face in the elections of 1920 and 1924, and what directions did they choose?
The elections of 1920 and 1924 were significant events in American political history, as they marked a shift in political ideology and the direction of the country.
Why is it so?In the election of 1920, Americans faced a choice between Republican candidate Warren G. Harding and Democratic candidate James M. Cox. Harding campaigned on a platform of "normalcy," which promised a return to pre-war American values and a focus on domestic issues. Cox, on the other hand, campaigned on a platform of progressive reform and internationalism.
The American people chose Warren G. Harding in a landslide victory, with 60% of the popular vote. Harding's victory was seen as a rejection of progressive reform and international involvement, and a desire to return to more traditional American values.
Other factors -candidate Calvin Coolidge, Democratic candidate John W. Davis, and Progressive candidate Robert M. La Follette. Coolidge campaigned on a platform of limited government and free enterprise, while Davis advocated for progressive reform and international cooperation. La Follette, meanwhile, campaigned on a platform of progressive reform and opposition to big business.
The American people chose Calvin Coolidge in a landslide victory, with 54% of the popular vote. Coolidge's victory was seen as a reaffirmation of Harding's policies and a continuation of a return to traditional American values and limited government.
To know more about challenges faced by America in 1920s -
https://brainly.com/question/1014849
#SPJ9
How did the American revolution, food shortages, absolutism, and the enlightenment ideas contribute to the French Revolution.
Due to poor harvests, there was a low supply of bread and severe food shortages throughout the nation. Due to the high demand for bread and the scarcity of it, bread prices rose as well. The 3rd Estate became more agitated and tense as a result.
How American revolution contributed to the French Revolution?
The French people realized that long-lasting change was possible and that a revolution might succeed, even against a powerful military force. Several experts feel that this inspired them to revolt.
The French people's dislike of the king's power and Louis XVI's absolute monarchy were the second and primary causes of the French Revolution, respectively. A form of governance known as an absolute monarchy involves a supremely strong king or queen ruling society.
Due to the peasants' refusal to sell grain throughout the war, food shortages grew worse and had a direct impact on internal politics. The events of February 1917, which resulted in the overthrow, were sparked by the lack of food in St. Petersburg and the city's ongoing bread lines throughout the winter of 1916–1917.
Learn more about American revolution :
https://brainly.com/question/9053584
#SPJ1
How were early American Indian groups able to meet their needs prior to European arrival in North America?
Answer: hunting, fishing, and gathering.
Explanation: