Option C is fully implemented. South reconstruction is complete.
What is the 1877 compromise?The 1877 Compromise was an informal agreement between southern Democrats and supporters of Republican Rutherford Hayes to settle the outcome of the 1876 presidential election, and it marked the end of the Reconstruction era.
Immediately following the 1876 presidential election, it became clear that the race's outcome was largely dependent on disputed returns from Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina—the only three states in the South with Reconstruction-era Republican governments still in power.
Early in 1877, as a bipartisan congressional commission debated the outcome, supporters of Republican Party candidate Rutherford Hayes met in secret with moderate southern Democrats to negotiate acceptance of Hayes' election.
To know more about south reconstruction visit :
https://brainly.com/question/7815941
#SPJ1
What makes The Boston Tea Party an ironic incident? What is Ironic about 60 colonists, dressed as American Indians, standing up to a foreign invader (The British)?
The British Empire faced two crises in 1765 that led to the Boston Tea Party: the British East India Company's financial difficulties and a raging argument over how much control, if any, Parliament should have over the British American colonies in the absence of democratic representatives.
What makes The Boston Tea Party an ironic incident?
The Boston Tea Party was a political demonstration that took place at Griffin's Wharf in Boston, Massachusetts, on December 16, 1773. 342 chests of tea that had been imported by the British East India Company were dumped into the harbor by American colonists who were disgruntled and outraged with Britain for enforcing "taxation without representation."
When they learnt of the Boston Tea Party, the majority of the British Parliamentarians were indignant. They gave a quick and stern reply. The Coercive Acts, a group of laws approved by Parliament in early 1774, are generally known as such.
Patriot colonists saw the Boston Tea Party as a legitimate act of protest and civil disobedience against unfair laws and regulations, and they thought it was justified. The Tea Act of May 1773, which tacitly sought to induce the colonists to buy more tea, and its repercussions were followed by the protest.
Learn more about Boston Tea Party:
https://brainly.com/question/1403110
#SPJ1
What were the most serious international crises between 1905 and 1913?
The most serious international crises between 1905 and 1913 include the First Moroccan Crisis (1905-1906), the Bosnian Crisis (1908-1909), the Agadir Crisis or Second Moroccan Crisis (1911), and the First Balkan War (1912-1913).
The most serious international crises between 1905 and 1913 include the following: Moroccan Crisis (1905–1906): In 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany visited Morocco and expressed his support for Moroccan independence. This prompted France, which had economic interests in Morocco, to send its own troops to the country. This led to a diplomatic crisis between Germany and France, which was resolved at the Algeciras Conference of 1906.
Bosnian Crisis (1908–1909): In 1908, Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina, which had been under the control of the Ottoman Empire. This angered Serbia and Russia, who felt threatened by Austria-Hungary's expansion. This crisis was resolved at the Berlin Conference of 1909.Agadir Crisis (1911): In 1911, Germany sent a gunboat to the Moroccan port of Agadir, which was already under French control. This sparked a diplomatic crisis between Germany and France, which was resolved by the Treaty of Fez. Anschluss Crisis (1913): In 1913, Austria-Hungary threatened to annex Albania, which had declared independence from the Ottoman Empire. Serbia and Russia protested, and war was narrowly avoided at the Conference of London.
Know more about crises here:
https://brainly.com/question/4031500
#SPJ11
Pls explain this. I’m having a hard time trying to understand what to even start with or write. And my grade is awful
The military alliance of the Cold War in Europe, as shown on a map, reflects the geopolitical context of the time period, which was characterized by tensions and competition between the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union.
How did the map shows the military alliance of the cold war?The map shows the division of Europe into two blocs: the Western Bloc, led by the United States and its allies, and the Eastern Bloc, led by the Soviet Union and its allies.
The Western Bloc, also known as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), was formed in 1949 and included the United States, Canada, and many Western European countries. The Eastern Bloc, also known as the Warsaw Pact, was formed in 1955 and included the Soviet Union and its satellite states in Eastern Europe.
The tension between the two blocs was further heightened by the presence of nuclear weapons, which could be used to devastating effect in the event of a conflict. In conclusion, the military alliance map of the Cold War in Europe reflects the geopolitical context of the time period, in which the two superpowers competed for influence and control over the continent.
Read more about cold war
brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ1
What country was ordered to pay reparations after wwi?
Answer: Germany
Explanation:
Why did American officials make plans to invade Cuba?
Question 8 options:
They wanted to reinstate Batista, who had been overthrown in a revolution.
They were alarmed to see communism gaining a foothold in the Western Hemisphere.
They wanted to reestablish the control they had after the Spanish American War.
They wanted to keep foreigners from gaining a foothold on the island.
Explanation:
they want to stop religions of Muslims but unfortunately they failed
The Triple Entente was a political alliance formed between which countries? Select all that apply. - France - Great Britain - Russia.
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy created the Triple Entente as a political coalition. Please check all that apply. - Russia, France, and the United Kingdom.
The Triple Entente, an alliance of Russia, France, and Great Britain, formed the core of the Allied Powers in World War I. The Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance fought each other in the First World War. The Triple Entente consisted of Russia, France, and England. Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary were all members of the Triple Alliance.
The alliance was undoubtedly a component of Bismarck's strategy to diplomatically isolate France. Later, in 1887, Bismarck proposed the reinsurance treaty with Russia to prevent Russia from siding with France.
Read more about Triple Entente at
https://brainly.com/question/29760172
#SPJ4
what roles did minorities and women play in the armed forces during world war ii?
Minorities and women served in the military, naval force, and flying corps as medical attendants, pilots, mariners, and battle troops.
The 16 million people in the administrations included 1 million African Americans, alongside 33,000+ Japanese-Americans, 20,000+ Chinese Americans, 24,674 Native Americans, and around 16,000 Filipino Americans
Starting in December 1941, 350,000 ladies served in the US Military, during WWII. They had their parts of administration, including the Ladies' Military Helper Corps. Ladies worked side by side with men in manufacturing plants, runways, and on ranches. They fabricated parts for boats and airplanes and produced ammo.
Learn more about minorities:
https://brainly.com/question/15515081
#SPJ4
1 ptWhy did many immigrants to the United States have such an optimistic spirit?The voyage was usually an easy and encouraging one.Most immigrants were well-prepared and financially secure upon arrival.They believed better economic and personal opportunities awaited them.U.S. immigration policies welcomed people from all countries and backgrounds.
Many immigrants to the US have such a hopeful soul They believed better economic and personal opportunities awaited them. option (C) is correct.
The immigrants came to the US to begin new lives and secure positions. This might have impacted America to remain unbiased in the conflict since it might have caused worry for their homes, occupations, and travel to the US.
A few Americans expected that this convergence of settlers would take occupations, bring savage philosophies like disorder and socialism, and neglect to absorb them into American culture. These apprehensions kept on developing after The Second Great War, prompting endeavors to restrict the number of foreigners who could move to the US. Therefore, option (C) is correct.
Learn more about immigrants:
https://brainly.com/question/5635492
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Why did many immigrants to the United States have such an optimistic spirit?
(A)The voyage was usually an easy and encouraging one.
(B) Most immigrants were well-prepared and financially secure upon arrival.
(C) They believed better economic and personal opportunities awaited them.
(D) U.S. immigration policies welcomed people from all countries and backgrounds.
chicago experienced unemployment problems, poor schools and substandard housing during the early part of the 20th century, hence criminal behavior could be expected in these zones according to
The idea that social and economic conditions contribute to criminal behavior is a key concept in the field of criminology. This idea is often associated with the sociological theory of crime, which suggests that criminal behavior is influenced by social factors such as poverty, unemployment, and substandard living conditions.
In the case of Chicago during the early part of the 20th century, the high rates of unemployment, poor schools, and substandard housing in certain areas of the city could have contributed to higher rates of criminal behavior in those zones. These social and economic factors can create an environment in which criminal behavior is more likely to occur, as individuals may turn to illegal activities in order to survive or to improve their economic situation.
Furthermore, these conditions can also create a sense of social disorganization, where the breakdown of social institutions and the lack of social cohesion can lead to higher rates of criminal activity. This idea is often associated with the work of criminologist Robert Merton and his concept of "strain theory," which suggests that individuals who are unable to achieve socially accepted goals through legitimate means may turn to criminal behavior as a way to achieve those goals.
Overall, while social and economic conditions are not the only factors that contribute to criminal behavior, they are an important aspect of understanding why certain individuals or communities may be more likely to engage in illegal activities.
confucianism and buddhism both arrived in japan in what century? group of answer choices sixth century c.e. eighth century c.e. second century b.c.e. third century c.e.
Confucianism and Buddhism both arrived in Japan in the eighth century CE. Buddhism is a major religion that was founded in India in the 6th century BCE by Siddhartha Gautama, who is also known as the Buddha.
Buddhism has spread to numerous countries throughout Asia and beyond, with several regional varieties. The aim of Buddhism is to attain enlightenment and liberation from the cycle of rebirth and suffering.
Confucianism is a Chinese moral and ethical system that was established by Confucius in the 5th century BCE. Confucianism is more concerned with social order, and its principles emphasize ethical governance, familial loyalty, respect for one's elders, and the development of personal virtues such as benevolence and filial piety.
Confucianism, unlike Buddhism, is not a religion. Buddhism and Confucianism came to Japan in the 8th century AD, specifically in 710 CE.
During this period, the two religions were seen as complementary to one another, and there were no significant disputes between them. The spread of both Buddhism and Confucianism in Japan was influenced by Korea and China.
To know more about Confucianism and Buddhism, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30656904#
#SPJ11
which country ruled vietnam before it obtained independence?
Answer: Chinese empire
Explanation: Vietnam would remain a part of the Chinese empire for over 1000 years. It was in 938 AD that Ngo Quyen defeated the Chinese and gained independence for Vietnam. Vietnam was then ruled by a succession of dynasties including the Ly, Tran, and the Le dynasty.
Undivided India refers to the modern courtiers of ______, _______ and _______. Approximately _______ million joined the war effort with the allies in return for emancipation from British rule if the war was successful
Undivided India refers to the modern countries of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Approximately 2.5 million joined the war effort with the allies in return for emancipation from British rule if the war was successful.
What is Patriation?
Patriation refers to the process of bringing a country's constitution under the control of its own government, rather than having it be subject to the laws and regulations of another country or external authority. It is typically used to describe the process by which a former colony or territory gains full control over its own constitutional affairs, often involving the drafting or amendment of a new constitution and the transfer of legal authority from the former colonial power to the newly independent government.
Undivided India refers to the period before the partition of India in 1947, when the region was a single political entity under British colonial rule. At that time, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh did not exist as separate countries but were part of a larger British Indian Empire.
Learn more about Patriation from given link
https://brainly.com/question/12181038
#SPJ1
Write a response to Zinn's chapter. Try to avoid writing "in my opinion" or using a sentimental or romantic tone. Instead, write a short assessment in which you respond thoughtfully, analytically to the chapter.
In Zinn's chapter, he writes about Andrew Jackson's presidency and the elimination of Native Americans. He argues that Jackson's presidency was a major reason for his Indian Removal Act of 1830.
Andrew Jackson told the natives that they would be able to stay in their new territory "so long as the grass grows or water flows." Jackson had to use to support the expulsion of Native Americans One argument was that they could not learn to assimilate into American society.
The natives countered them by developing a written language that mimicked the structure of American society. Jackson felt no need to protect the natives just because he was president, so he left it to the state governments to decide what they wanted to do with them.
There was no way to stop the state from forcing the expulsion of Native Americans so that they could profit from the land. Instead of blocking this, Jackson encouraged it by signing the Indian Removal Act of 1830. It pleased the next president.
Know more about Native Americans here:
https://brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ4
11. Kristallnacht, November 9 –10, 1938, where Nazi storm troopers violently attacked Jewish homes, businesses, synagogues (Jewish churches) throughout Germany, Austria, and the recently occupied Sudetenland. Struck fear throughout Jewish communities, Arrested 30,000 sent to Concentration camps, and then even blamed them for the violence, fining them 1 billion marks. What does Kristallnacht mean?
The night of November 9–10, 1938, when German Nazis assaulted Jews and their property, is known as Kristallnacht also known as the "Night of Broken Glass" or the "November Pogroms".
Ironically, the name Kristallnacht alludes to the glass debris that was left behind in the streets following these pograms.
On November 10, violence persisted throughout the day and for many more days in certain regions.
What is known about Adolf Hitler's early life?Young Adolf spent the most of his boyhood in Linz, the nation's capital, when his father, Alois, resigned from his position as a state customs agent.
He struggled in high school and ultimately dropped out since he didn't want to become a public servant like his father.
To know more about Hitler visit:
brainly.com/question/12778492
#SPJ1
for the better part of a century, from where did most americans get some of their entertainment and most of their news?
Why do u think Smithers added his postscript To the People of Texas & All Americans in the World
Travis' letter was revised in 1836 by Smither, who urged soldiers to assemble at Gonzales in his postscript. An emissary between the Mexican army and the Gonzales citizens during the 1835 dispute over the cannon was Smither, a native of Alabama and future mayor pro tem of San Antonio.
What is meant by Mexican army? The armed forces of the United Mexican States are known as the Mexican Armed Forces. In colonial Mexico, the Spanish crown created a permanent military in the eighteenth century. Armed forces had a significant political role following Mexico's declaration of independence in 1821, with army generals acting as presidents of state. Mexico has been placed 15th out of 138 countries since 2005, when the evaluation of the world's powers began in terms of weapons, military budget, active military personnel, civilian reservists, and the status of their land, air, and naval forces. The land and air component of the Mexican Armed Forces, sometimes referred to as the National Defense Army, is known as the Mexican Army (Ejército Mexicano). Mexican military.To learn more about Mexican army, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24895744
28 Identify two uses of the wheels among the Sumerians (2 marks]
One difference of economic development between northern and southern U.S. states during the early nineteenth century was —
the growth of the factory system in the North
the support of international tariffs by the South
the growth of ship-building industries in the South
the decline of entrepreneurial innovations in the North
One difference in economic development between Northern and Southern U.S. states during the early nineteenth century was the growth of the factory system in the North. Hence, option A is correct.
Cotton production was crucial to both the agriculturally and manufacturingly based northern and southern economies. The demand for slavery was motivated by Southerners' desire for uncompensated labour to gather their valuable cotton. Since the industrial revolution did not demand for the employment of slave labor, people in the North opposed it. The dispute was what started the war.
The economic disparity was undoubtedly a factor in the Civil War, but it was neither the main cause nor the only one. The war was a result of numerous circumstances. It would be like saying that one professional football club will always win because its players are taller if one solely focused on the various economies.
To learn more Civil War, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ4
Which statement best summarizes Reaganomics? In other words, what best describes Ronald Reagan's economic policy going into the 1980s?
A. Fight economic recession by transferring the powers of state governments over the economy to the federal government.
B. Fight the decline in American manufacturing by encouraging more free trade with other nations.
C. Fight high inflation and unemployment by reducing taxes, government regulations and labor union rules.
D. Fight unemployment by spending borrowed money on federal government projects.
The option C is the best statement that best summarizes Reaganomics, that is Fight high inflation and unemployment by reducing taxes, government regulations and labor union rules.
The definition of Reaganomics that best captures the economic philosophy is C. Combat rising inflation and unemployment by decreasing taxes, government regulations, and labour union restrictions. By lowering taxes, decreasing regulations, and fostering free market competition, Ronald Reagan's economic strategy of the 1980s, often known as supply-side economics or trickle-down economics, sought to spur economic development. The rationale for this strategy was that it would encourage firms to spend more, provide more employment, and eventually increase economic development.
To learn more about Reaganomics
https://brainly.com/question/4404145
#SPJ1
What were the laws of segregation meant to do? Rose parks
Answer: The laws of segregation were meant to separate coloureds from whites.
Explanation: It was also to give whites more rights.
who is the only us president to be buried in washington dc
Which best describes Vladimir Lenin's vision for Russia?
Professional revolutionaries would seize power for the working class.
The Red Army would achieve victory over Germany in World War I.
An alliance with Britain and France in World War I would help defeat Germany.
An alliance with Britain and France in World War I would help defeat Germany.
Vladimir Lenin's vision for Russia is that professional revolutionaries would seize power for the working class.
The correct answer is Professional revolutionaries would seize power for the working class.
The Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin envisioned that professional revolutionaries would take power for the working class. He had a clear vision of socialism, which he believed would only be attainable through a proletarian revolution.
Let's look at some of the important events that occurred during the Russian Revolution: February Revolution (1917) – Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown and replaced by a provisional government. October Revolution (1917) – Lenin and the Bolsheviks took power in a coup, establishing a communist government in Russia.
Civil War (1918-1921) – Communist forces, known as the Red Army, fought against anti-communist forces, known as the White Army. The Red Army was victorious, and the Soviet Union was established in 1922 under Lenin's leadership. The communist government implemented policies designed to benefit the working class and eliminate capitalist exploitation.
Lenin's vision of a socialist society was finally realized in Russia, albeit at a significant cost in terms of human lives and economic devastation.
For more such questions on Vladimir Lenin, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/12347219
#SPJ11
part 2 of module 4 discussed how historical events can shape the attitudes of people in one country towards people from other countries. this includes relationships between countries' leaders. you were asked to read one article about the positive views of russia's leader vladimir putin towards one 2016 u.s. presidential candidate, who is that candidate that putin likes so much?
The 2016 US presidential candidate that Russian President Vladimir Putin likes so much is Donald Trump.
Putin has been vocal in his admiration of Trump since the 2016 election campaign, even going so far as to call him "an absolute leader in the presidential race." Putin has praised Trump's economic policies, his calls for better relations with Russia, and his criticisms of US foreign policy.
Putin has also been critical of Hillary Clinton and her policies, suggesting that Trump is the only candidate who can achieve better relations between the two countries. Putin's admiration for Trump has been seen as part of a wider strategy to weaken America's standing in the world, with Putin looking to reassert Russian power in the face of US hegemony.
To know more about Vladimir Putin, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12691266
#SPJ4
President Harding did which of the following regarding immigration?
A. Limited it
B. Stopped it
C. Removed quotas on it
D. Expanded it
Answer:
A. limited it
Explanation:
i had this same question
How can we best use our words to address issues related to genocide and human rights?
Answer:
The weight of history hangs heavy on our words when we speak of genocide and human rights. We must choose them carefully, wielding them with the precision of a surgeon's scalpel. Our words must cut through the fog of denial and apathy, exposing the raw wounds left by atrocities committed in the name of hate. They must bear witness to the suffering endured by those who have been marginalized and oppressed. And they must offer hope for a better future, one in which justice and equality are not just ideals but realities. Our words can be a powerful force for change, inspiring action and raising awareness. But they can also be a weapon of destruction, used to dehumanize and demonize those who are different from ourselves. The responsibility that comes with using our words in this context is immense, but so too is the potential for good. It is up to us to wield this power wisely.Explanation:
brainlet would be nice
historical essay : democratic systems versus totalitarian systems.
Totalitarianism and democracy are two forms of government that are quite distinct from one another. A democracy is a form of government in which the people themselves are the source of authority and power. A single-person reign over everything is known as totalitarianism.
What is democratic systems versus totalitarian systems?
A kind of government known as totalitarianism aims to have complete control over the lives of its people. Strong central rule that uses force and repression to try to manage and control every area of a person's life is what distinguishes it. Individual freedom is not allowed.
The consolidation of authority in a single center and the use of force to thwart the rise of resistance are always the fundamental features of authoritarian leadership. In contrast to earlier kinds of despotism, totalitarianism uses governmental authority to impose an official ideology on its people. The primary distinction between totalitarian and authoritarian governments is that the former completely controls residents lives and liberties, whilst the latter grants some degree of personal autonomy.
Learn more about totalitarian:
https://brainly.com/question/14502003
#SPJ1
HELP ME PLEASE AND THANK YOU
Answer:
He meant the separation of the North and the South. Lincoln did not want the South to secede from the Union.
what was life like for Japanese immigrants living in Hawaii?
Answer: Most Japanese immigrants were put to work chopping and weeding sugar cane on vast plantations, many of which were far larger than any single village in Japan. The workday was long, the labor exhausting, and, both on the job and off, the workers' lives were strictly controlled by the plantation owners.
which of these countries did not participate in the northern seven years war?
The Kingdom of Sweden and a coalition of Denmark-Norway, Lübeck, and Poland-Lithuania battled in the Northern Seven Years' War, also known as the Nordic Seven Years' War, the First Northern War, or the Seven Years War in Scandinavia, between 1563 and 1570.
King Frederick II of Denmark's displeasure with the breakdown of the Kalmar Union and King Eric XIV of Sweden's determination to topple Denmark's hegemonic position served as the driving forces behind the war. Both forces were worn out by the time the conflict ended, and many men were lost. As a result, the Treaty of Stettin resulted in a deadlock in which neither side gained any new territory.
The united kingdom did not participated in the northern seven years war.
To read more about The United Kingdom click here
https://brainly.com/question/1350528
#SPJ4
5. Write a three-paragraph argumentative essay answering this question:
Would the U.S. government be better if it were a more direct
democracy?
Your argument should include a clear claim supported by evidence and should
address possible objections to your argument.
If the United States government were a more direct democracy, it would be better. Because of this, popular sovereignty no longer holds power. Until the middle class changes it, it is primarily an oligarchy.
Is the United States government a direct democracy?A representative democracy is the United States of America. This indicates that citizens elect our government. In this government, people vote for their representatives. These officials represent the views and concerns of citizens in government.
There is a lot of money in politics, and corruption is always present where there is money. Our politicians are not to be trusted. That is a problem. There is a problem when there are two candidates for president and the majority of the country votes against either of them or for the lesser of two evils. Our representatives no longer represent us.
To learn more about democracy visit :
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ1