The Atlantic Charter was a statement of post-war goals after an Allied victory. It was issued on August 14, 1941, by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
On August 14, 1941, American President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill jointly released a statement known as the Atlantic Charter. It was released after a covert summit between the two leaders took place in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland, on board the British battleship HMS Prince of Wales.The Charter was a declaration of ideals that the Allied powers sought to achieve following the defeat of Nazi Germany rather than a formal treaty. The proposal urged the promotion of free trade, democracy, and international economic cooperation.The Atlantic Charter also emphasised the value of all peoples' right to self-determination and advocated for the disarmament of nations that are aggressing. The Charter upheld everyone's right to make their own decisions and denounced territorial expansion by force.
learn more about Atlantic Charter here:
https://brainly.com/question/15214103
#SPJ1
Please write at least 2 sentences per image to describe what they represent/
The table gives average annual salaries for four jobs.
Based on this information, how much more money would a store manager earn than a painter over 10 years?
Responses
$33,600
$184,100
$297,000
$481,100
Job Average Annual Salary
Nurse $57,390
Painter $31,050
Lawyer $79,160
Store Manager $60,750
Answer:1 B 2 is D
Explanation:
i’ll give brainliest if correct
In line with the conditions of the land treaties signed with the U.S. government in 1855 and 1863, Chief Joseph collaborated with the federal government in 1873 to guarantee that his people may continue to reside on their land in the Wallowa Valley.
Chief Joseph gave his speech for what reason?Legend has it that Chief Joseph replied to the general, stressing the value of preserving human equality. He responded incredulously, "The Great Spirit gives one kind of men the power to command what must be done to another kind of men. Howard intended to lead a cavalry campaign to drive the Wallowa Nez Perce off their land.
What effects did Chief Joseph's surrender have?Ten years later, the Nez Perce were relocated to an eastern Washington reservation. Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce's surrender put an end to a decade-long standoff between Indians and the United States administration in the Far West. According to the report, the government forced practically all western Indians to reside on government-run reservations.
Learn more about Chief Joseph: https://brainly.com/question/4375167
#SPJ1
How did Abraham Lincoln win the presidential election of 1860?
Responses
A. He won a clear majority of the popular vote.
B.Three other candidates failed to win a majority of the popular vote.
C.He won over southern voters by promising not to interfere with slavery.
D.Three other candidates split the slave-state vote and failed to win more than one free state.
Answer:I think is D
Explanation:
Who where the first people to ask for equality in Saint-Domingue
orkrkrkkkekrkrkekjejsjssjsjdjdjdjdjdsjdjdmdmdmdmdndndnßsjsjsjsjsjsjsjsjsjsksksksmsmsmnxndejekdmddneksksmxm
What is the largest source of revenue for most states?
O A.
O B.
O C. sales taxes
O D. income taxes
inheritance taxes
property taxes
Rese
Answer:
Explanation:
incame
what is the tactical goal of terrorism
Answer:political objectives were well known and unchangeable and were pursued by groups
Explanation:Terrorism may well be one word, but its forms are multiple and accordingly the ways to combat it differ. In recent history, we have been exposed to “tactical terrorism,” whose political objectives were well known and unchangeable and were pursued by groups with a place and a stake in their own countries. By contrast, Al Qaeda has introduced strategic terrorism, perpetual confrontation with the enemy being anyone who is “different.” Furthermore, the political objectives change frequently, since they are not what matters; for strategic terrorism, the perpetual confrontation is more important than any political objective per se.
buenos alres is the capital of chille true or false
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
If you had a goal of understanding the economic life of a typical American suburban family, which theoretical approach from economic anthropology would you find most valuable?
Neoclassical Economics vs Substantivism
If the goal is to understand the economic life of a typical American suburban family, the Substantivist approach from economic anthropology would likely be more valuable than the Neoclassical Economics approach.
What is the Neoclassical Economics approach?Neoclassical Economics emphasizes individual rationality and market exchange as the primary mechanisms for economic activity, while Substantivism challenges this assumption by arguing that economic behavior is shaped by social and cultural factors, rather than just individual preferences and market forces.
In the case of a typical American suburban family, the Substantivist approach would allow for a more holistic analysis of the family's economic practices, taking into account their cultural values, social relations, and everyday practices that shape their economic decisions.
This approach would also help to uncover the role of non-market exchanges such as gift-giving, informal sharing, and household production, which may be significant in suburban households.
Learn more about economic anthropology at:
https://brainly.com/question/30046142
#SPJ1
What caused people to seriously fear a communism uprising in America
Answer: The Russians.
Explanation:
The fear of communism spread throughout Europe and America after communism itself started to spread.
Which event is often considered the beginning of the modern-day conflict between Israelis and Palestinians
Answer:
Many like to say the strife began with the extraordinary 1967 Six-Day War, and Israel’s conquest of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, eastern Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.
Explanation:
Describe Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan's view of the stock market circa 2000.
Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, expressed alarm about the stock market's explosive rise, particularly in the technology sector, in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
How did the Federal Reserve react to the meltdown of the banking system?The Fed used a four-pronged approach to address the situation. The banking industry was first overrun with liquidity. Second, it made use of the emergency powers granted to it during the Great Depression in order to lend to financial institutions other than banks.. Third, the funding rate was swiftly reduced to zero.
Was the financial crisis brought on by Alan Greenspan?He thereafter oversaw a protracted economic and financial market boom in the 1990s, being known as Washington's resident guru. Greenspan introduced extremely low interest rates in the early 2000s.
To know more about Federal Reserve visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/25181969
#SPJ1
how did railroads immediatley change the country
Answer:
C. They transported people and goods more quickly.
Explanation:
Remember, other than walking the main methods of transportation were horseback, horse drawn wagons and coaches, ocean going sailing ships, rivers (which presented a LOT of problems before locks and dams and before harnessing the -power of steam) and canals drawn by mules, horses or donkeys on a towpath pulling the canal boat with a horse.
Then came the railroad. It was a revolution. We could cross mountains that could not be crossed by rivers or canals. We could go faster, farther and how an exponentially greater amount of freight and/or people. Every town wanted a railroad. Big important towns got 2 or 4 railroads. It revolutionized commerce and provided transportation for the industrial revolution which was happening at the same time for the same reason, Steam power. This was true for the US, Canada and Europe at first. Within a few years most country of any significance had a railroad while they become even more common in the US, Canada, and Western Europe.
How did Hitler Justify taking over Austria and the Sudetenland
Answer:
To the Allies, Germany justified its demands by asserting that the population of the Sudetenland were ‘ethnically German’, and therefore the annexation of this land would simply be returning these people to their ‘home’ country.
when was zhadrung
born
Tenpai Nyima and Sonam Pelgyi Buthri gave birth to Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyal in 1594 at the Ralung monastery in Tibet.
Who is Zhabdrung ?Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyal is an immediate reincarnation of Kunkhyen Pema Karpo and the 12th lineage holder of Drukpa Kagyu. Zhabdrung Rinpoche alongside his 30 specialists required two days to arrive at the Bhutan-Tibet line.
Zhabdrung is said to have been greeted by nearly all of the Lams and protecting deities at Pangrizampa in Thimphu.
In many significant ways, Zhabdrung's arrival in the 17th century is responsible for the formation of Bhutan as a single nation. Under the banner of Drukpa religious supremacy, Zhabdrung promoted political unity in the nation through territorial unification.
Lam Kha Nga ruled most of western Bhutan, but there were pockets of eastern Bhutan ruled by different people. At that time, Bhutan lacked a monarch. Thus, in his work towards binding together the country, Zhabdrung previously crushed Lam Kha Nga and brought their area of rule under him. He then happened to vanquishing the eastern locale and at last brought the country under one rule.
Zhabdrung repelled five major external threats of Tibetan invasion in addition to fostering political unity. He brought Drukpa political rule to the nation by 1656. Zhabdrung is given for the country's adoption of the Choesi dual system of government. The Chief Abbot, or Je Khenpo, was in charge of religious matters under this system, and the desi, the temporal head, was in charge of political matters.
To learn more about reincarnation visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28894316
#SPJ1
Complete question -
when was zhadrung born ?
The Dred Scott decision:
D was probably popular with Northern
states
A brought both sides of the slavery issue
together
C gave Dred Scott's children their
freedom
B said that Congress could not limit
slavery in the new
territories
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
Japanese cuisine tends to rely on all of the following except?
Compare the Assyrian lands with Babylonia.
Assyria was a mountainous region with a militaristic culture, while Babylonia was a fertile region with a rich cultural heritage and a focus on agriculture, with different political structures and geographical features.
What is the Comparison between the Assyrian lands with Babylonia?Assyria and Babylonia were both ancient Mesopotamian civilizations located in what is now modern-day Iraq, but they had distinct differences in their geography, culture, and political structures.
Assyria was a mountainous region to the north, with a militaristic culture and an empire that frequently engaged in warfare to expand its territory. Babylonia, on the other hand, was a more fertile region to the south, with a focus on agriculture and a rich cultural heritage, including the development of early writing systems and legal codes.
Babylonia was also ruled by a series of dynasties, while Assyria was more centralized under a series of powerful kings.
Learn more about the Assyrian lands with Babylonia on:
https://brainly.com/question/18104178
#SPJ1
How was education different for Aztec boys and girls?
Answer:
Aztec boys and girls received different educations, depending on their social class. Boys from the nobility attended calmecacs, which were religious schools that taught them about the gods, history, and government. They also learned how to fight and use weapons. Girls from the nobility attended telpochcallis, which were schools that taught them how to cook, clean, and weave. They also learned about the gods and history.
Boys and girls from the commoner class attended telpochcallis. Here they learned how to farm, fish, and hunt. They also learned about the gods and history.
All Aztec children were taught to be loyal to the gods and to their country. They were also taught to be brave and to fight for their people.
Explanation:
How does Oakes define Abraham Lincoln's behavior toward racial equality?
A. Lincoln was clear about his support for racial equality.
B. Lincoln cratered to the biases of the people and thus behaved like a spineless
politician.
C. Lincoln detested blacks and intended to have the federal government colonize
them in Africa.
D. Lincoln intended to impose racial equality only in the South to punish
Southerners for seceding from the Union.
Answer: A. Lincoln was clear about his support for racial equality.
Explanation:
how did british rule contribute to the rise of nationalism
The British rule contributed significantly to the rise of nationalism in many of the countries they colonized. Here's how:
1. Introduction of Western education: The British introduced Western education in their colonies, which gave people access to new ideas and thoughts, that inspired them to question the colonial system, and paved the way for the growth of nationalist movements.
2. Development of modern communication and transportation: The British invested in modern communication and transportation systems in their colonies, which made it easier for people from different regions to connect, share ideas, and work together for a common cause.
3. Exploitation of resources: The British exploited the resources of their colonies for their gains, which led to impoverishment of many countries, underdevelopment, and humiliations. The exploitation led to anti-colonial protest movements that triggered a sense of nationalism or nation-building in many colonized countries.
4. Alienation from their rich cultural heritage: British rule alienated people from their rich cultural heritage, leading to the birth of a sense of cultural nationalism that sought to revive and conserve ancient traditions.
5. Formation of political organizations: British rule helped coalesce diverse sections of people in their colonies into political organizations that united around a common goal - independence.
These factors, combined with the internal dynamics of each colonized society, contributed to the rise of nationalist movements that fought against British rule and laid the foundation for the independent nation-states we know today.
sincerely, answered by luhvlii ♡ :: as an A+ student, I want to make sure other students can succeed as well, so in my free time: i answer questions like yours on Brainly! if you could click the thanks heart, give me brainliest by clicking the crown, and rate my answer 5 stars, it would be appreciated! have a luhvlii day (ᵔᴥᵔ)
india is an important _______ country in the world
India is an important "emerging" country in the world
What opinion is given about Lincoln 2nd inaugural speech
The major goal of Lincoln's second inauguration address was to argue that both the South and the North had responsibility for the sin of slavery.
What is the significance of your inauguration?
What does it mean to be inaugurated Inauguration is the process of officially inducting someone into a post. It can also refer to the official procedure of bringing something into use. A ceremony in which a person or item is inaugurated is sometimes referred to as an inauguration. The Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies is in charge of organizing the inauguration (JCCIC). The swearing-in ceremony, the inaugural address, and the pass in review are all part of the inaugural festivities.
To know more about slavery visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/9331183
#SPJ9
how do you think Joseph McCarthy and HUAC's investigations have gone too far and are ruining the lives/careers of innocent people?
Joseph McCarthy and House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) were infamous for their investigations into supposed communist infiltration in the US government and other sectors during Cold War era.
What was Cold War?The Cold War was period of political and the military tension between Western powers, led by the United States, and Eastern powers, led by the Soviet Union, that lasted from end of World War II in 1945 until collapse of Soviet Union in 1991. The two superpowers engaged in an arms race and a battle for global influence, but never engaged in direct military conflict. The period was marked by proxy wars in various parts of the world, such as Korea and Vietnam, and the development of nuclear weapons. The Cold War ended with fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.
To learn more about Cold War, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9761139
#SPJ1
what did you learn about apartheid? what effects did it have on people?
In South Africa, there was a system of institutionalised racial segregation known as apartheid.
what is apartheid?The need for social transformation is brought up in the study of apartheid history. It encourages tolerance and understanding while promoting social responsibility, conflict resolution, and community service.
During the time when the white minority ruled South Africa, there was an oppressive political and social system known as apartheid. It imposed racial discrimination against people of colour, primarily based on their skin tone and facial characteristics. Between 1948 and the beginning of the 1990s, this was a thing in the twentieth century. Apartheid was a form of government in South Africa that divided people into groups on the basis of race until it was overthrown in 1994.
To know about apartheid visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3811942
#SPJ1
What is the purpose of the 1st Amendment right of Free Speech?
Answer:
The First Amendment's guarantee of free speech is one of the most significant and widely discussed rights in the Constitution. This stops the government from punishing persons criminally or civilly based on what they say or write.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please mark me as brainiest!
Why do you think anthropologists photograph remote tribes from helicopters rather than interacting with them directly?
Anthropology is the study of what makes people human. Anthropologists investigate all the various dimensions of the human experience from a holistic perspective.
What are Anthropologists?The study of anthropology focuses on what makes humans human.
Holism is the approach that anthropologists use to explore all the varied facets of the human experience.
They look to the past through archaeology to understand how and what mattered to human groups hundreds or thousands of years ago.
A person who studies anthropology is known as an anthropologist.
The study of human characteristics within existing and past communities is known as anthropology.
Societal norms and values are investigated by social, cultural, and philosophical anthropologists.
Economic anthropology examines how people behave economically, while linguistic anthropology examines how language influences social life.
Therefore, anthropology is the study of what makes people human. Anthropologists investigate all the various dimensions of the human experience from a holistic perspective.
Know more about Anthropology here:
https://brainly.com/question/1799013
#SPJ1
What is the correct answer to the New Orleans January 1803 Debate where the choice is yours?
Option 1: Negotiate to buy New Orleans from the French
Option 2: Attack the Spanish and seize New Orleans immediately
Option 3: Declare war on France
Option 4: Take no action for the present
Answer:
option 1: negotiate to buy new Orleans from the french
German unification in the 19th century marked the beginning of the
Second Reich.
First Reich.
Third Reich.
Oktoberfest.
Answer:first reich
Explanation:
6. Write a short essay summarizing the process of judicial interpretation in the federal court system. Your essay should describe how the process of judicial review works, as well as the role judicial activism and judicial restraint play in the process. Finally, describe why it is important that the federal judicial system is independent of the other branches of government.
Answer:
The process of judicial interpretation in the federal court system is a crucial aspect of the American legal system. At its core, this process involves interpreting the Constitution, federal statutes, and common law to resolve disputes and determine the legality of government actions. The process of judicial review is central to this interpretation, as it allows the Supreme Court and other federal courts to strike down laws and executive actions that violate the Constitution.
Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two competing theories about how judges should interpret the law. Judicial activism holds that judges should use their positions to promote social change and protect individual rights, while judicial restraint holds that judges should defer to elected officials and limit their role in policymaking. Both theories have their supporters and critics, and the balance between them can have important implications for American law and society.
One reason why the independence of the federal judiciary is so important is that it allows judges to make impartial decisions without fear of political retaliation. This independence is enshrined in the Constitution, which provides that federal judges may only be removed for “high crimes and misdemeanors.” This protection from political pressure allows judges to make tough decisions based on the law, rather than political considerations.
Overall, the process of judicial interpretation in the federal court system is a complex and nuanced one, involving a wide range of legal theories and precedents. By understanding this process and the role of judicial review, as well as the competing theories of judicial activism and judicial restraint, we can gain a better appreciation for the role of the judiciary in American society and the importance of its independence.
mark me as brainliest, hope this helps!