What were the critical turning points in the realignment

Answer:

A political realignment, often called a critical election, critical realignment, or realigning election, in the academic fields of political science and political history, is a set of sharp changes in party ideology, issues, party leaders, regional and demographic bases of power of political parties, and the structure.

Explanation:

I hope this helps because i know about this myself

A government promoting the involvement of Allman government emerged in what country

________ is considered complete as a result of catchall provisions found in most of this type of law systems.

Sarah grows rosebushes that she decided to sell online. She ships them using an airline. If a rosebush dies, to whom is the carrier liable?


It is liable to both the principal and the buyer.


It is only liable to the buyer.


It is only liable to Sarah, the principal.

It has no liability.

You ___ turn left on a red light if you are in the left-most lane of a one-way street, you're turning into the left-most lane of a one-way street, and no nearby sign prohibits the turn

If you can right out something at least 150 words or 200 ill mark you brainliest

PROJECT: ACADEMY COMPARISONS

If you are interested in a career in corrections, you will train to become a cadet at a Corrections Training Academy. This project will get you started on your research for your own educational and career pathway. Training academies are not exactly alike. Doing comparison studies on course offerings and training programs, academy settings and facilities, specialties, and instructors models, can be helpful in determining your next move after high school.

For this project, you’ll compare two corrections training academies, focusing primarily on how the use of force is taught. This means what study courses are taught on the legalities of the use of force, the procedures and policies that are offered, along with hands-on firearms training, equipment training, simulated interaction with inmate role players, DART locker training, and other areas related to the use of force, such as self-defense training.

Choose two academies, and explain why you chose them specifically. Then research their course offerings. This can include contacting them for course catalogues or additional information, or even visiting them if in your area. As a student interested in a career in corrections, it is appropriate for you to call, write, contact, and ask for information and possibly book a visitor appointment.

Compare training in the use of force, weapons, self-defense, legalities, and policies and procedures. Then create a PowerPoint presentation with your findings. Show introductory material on the two academies, their environment, capacities, settings, and so on.

Present specific comparisons on their course and training programs related to the use of force. Demonstrate basic knowledge of the equipment and firearms. Contrast training objectives and requirements. Analyze these requirements against state requirements. Do they exceed state goals, and if so, in what way?

After you present your introductory information and comparison studies on courses and training programs, explain the examination, inspection, certification, and graduation process at each academy.

In conclusion, give your view of the similarities and differences between the two academies. Present your findings on which one you would choose and why. These reasons can be personal to your career pathway, such as location or specific programs or methods you are interested in learning.

I need to play a prosecutors role for imitative court. Any tips?

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!! Im not sure if its A. Please tell the right answer and no fake answers please! Thanks!