Which are correct representations of the inequality –3(2x – 5) < 5(2 – x)? Select two options. x < 5 –6x – 5 < 10 – x –6x + 15 < 10 – 5x A number line from negative 3 to 3 in increments of 1. An open circle is at 5 and a bold line starts at 5 and is pointing to the right. A number line from negative 3 to 3 in increments of 1. An open circle is at negative 5 and a bold line starts at negative 5 and is pointing to the left.

Laptop- 44, Tablet- 94, Desktop- 62, Percentage of tablets- 47%.

To calculate the percentage of devices that are tablets, we need to find the proportion of tablets among all devices. In this case, there are 94 tablets out of a total of 200 devices (44 laptops + 94 tablets + 62 desktops).

To find the proportion, we divide the number of tablets by the total number of devices: 94/200 = 0.47.

To convert this proportion to a percentage, we multiply by 100: 0.47 * 100 = 47%.

47% of the devices owned by the local company are tablets.

This means that nearly half of the devices fall into the tablet category, making it a significant portion of their device inventory.

It's important to note that this calculation assumes the given numbers accurately represent the actual device distribution and that there are no missing or unaccounted devices.

By determining the percentage of tablets, we gain insight into the composition of the device inventory, which can be useful for decision-making and resource allocation within the local company.

Learn more about percentage

brainly.com/question/13450942

#SPJ11

Answer: The probability of getting heads on a fair coin is 1/2, and the probability of rolling an even number on an eight-sided fair die is 4/8 = 1/2. Therefore, the probability of getting both heads and an even number is:

P(heads and even number) = P(heads) x P(even number) = (1/2) x (1/2) = 1/4

The probability of getting tails on a fair coin is also 1/2, and the prime numbers less than 4 are 2 and 3. The probability of rolling a 2 or a 3 on an eight-sided fair die is 2/8 = 1/4. Therefore, the probability of getting tails and a prime number less than 4 is:

P(tails and prime number less than 4) = P(tails) x P(prime number less than 4) = (1/2) x (1/4) = 1/8

So the probability that Oscar gets heads and an even number is 1/4, and the probability that Oscar gets tails and a prime number less than 4 is 1/8.

Step-by-step explanation: can i get brianliest :D

Numerator: e^(1 + ln ∞) * (1/∞) = e^(1 + ∞) * 0 = 0, Denominator: 1 + e^∞ = ∞. So, the limit of the expression is: lim (x→∞) [e^(1 + ln x) / ln (1 + e^x)] = 0/∞ = 0

To find the limit of the given function, let's first rewrite the terms using the provided limit notation:

lim (x→∞) [e^(1 + ln x) / ln (1 + e^x)]

To solve this limit, we will apply L'Hôpital's rule, which states that if the limit has the form 0/0 or ∞/∞, we can find the limit by taking the derivative of the numerator and denominator with respect to x:

Numerator: d(e^(1 + ln x))/dx = e^(1 + ln x) * d(1 + ln x)/dx = e^(1 + ln x) * (1/x)
Denominator: d(ln(1 + e^x))/dx = (1/(1 + e^x)) * d(e^x)/dx = (1/(1 + e^x)) * e^x

Now, we will find the limit of the new expression:

lim (x→∞) [(e^(1 + ln x) * (1/x)) / ((1/(1 + e^x)) * e^x)]

Simplify the expression by canceling out the e^x terms:

lim (x→∞) [(e^(1 + ln x) * (1/x)) / (1 + e^x)]

Now, let's substitute x→∞:

Numerator: e^(1 + ln ∞) * (1/∞) = e^(1 + ∞) * 0 = 0
Denominator: 1 + e^∞ = ∞

So, the limit of the expression is:

lim (x→∞) [e^(1 + ln x) / ln (1 + e^x)] = 0/∞ = 0

to learn more about numerators click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30396141

#SPJ11

The first derivative of the implicit function given by x^(2/3) + y^(2/3) = 14 can be found using implicit differentiation. We take the derivative of both sides with respect to x and use the chain rule to differentiate the terms involving y:(2/3)x^(-1/3) + (2/3)y^(-1/3) * dy/dx = 0Then, we solve for dy/dx:dy/dx = -(x/y)^(1/3)This is the first derivative of the implicit function. To evaluate it at a specific point, we need to substitute the coordinates of that point into the equation above.

For more similar questions on topic

https://brainly.com/app/ask?q=

#SPJ11

The continuous compound rate of decay of this isotope is approximately 1.41%.

In order to find the continuous compound rate of decay of the radioactive isotope, we can use the formula:

N(t) = N0 * e^(-λt)

Where N(t) is the amount of the isotope present at time t, N0 is the initial amount of the isotope, λ is the continuous decay constant, and t is the time elapsed (in this case, 6 years).

We are given that 91.9% of the isotope is still present after 6 years, so:

0.919 = e^(-λ * 6)

To solve for λ, we can take the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(0.919) = -6λ

Now, we can solve for the decay constant:

λ = -ln(0.919) / 6 ≈ 0.0141

So, the continuous compound rate of decay of this isotope is approximately 1.41%.

To learn more about isotope, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/21536220

#SPJ11

61.93% of the surveyed Maryland households purchase at least one prepared meal per week from the grocery store.

A national grocery chain is considering expanding their selection of prepared meals, and they believe that 67 percent of households purchase at least one meal per week from the grocery store. In a survey conducted in Maryland, 641 out of 1,035 households purchase at least one meal per week at the store.
To determine the percentage of Maryland households purchasing at least one prepared meal per week, follow these steps:
Divide the number of households purchasing at least one meal per week (641) by the total number of households surveyed (1,035).
Multiply the result by 100 to get the percentage.
Here's the calculation: (641 / 1,035) x 100 = 61.93%
So, 61.93% of the surveyed Maryland households purchase at least one prepared meal per week from the grocery store.

Learn more about surveyed here, https://brainly.com/question/196770

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Find area of all shapes and add

A(biggest rectangle) = Lw =  6*3 =18   there are 2 of those A=36

A(long skinny rectangle = Lw = 2*6 =12  there are 2 of those A=24

A(smallest) = Lw = 2*3=6 there are 2 of those A=12

Add it all up

A=36+24+12 = 72

I checked it 5 times.  I keep getting 72

The measure of angle PQR is 90 degrees.

Since PR is the diameter of the circle, it follows that angle POR is a right angle, i.e., it measures 90 degrees.

By the inscribed angle theorem, the measure of angle PQR is half the measure of angle POR. Thus,

angle PQR = 1/2 * angle POR

= 1/2 * 90

= 45 degrees.

However, this is not the final answer since angle PQR is not a stand-alone angle, but rather a part of a right-angled triangle PQR.

Since the three angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees, and we already know that angle PQR is 45 degrees, it follows that:

angle PRQ + angle PQR + angle QPR = 180 degrees

Since angle PQR = 45 degrees, we have:

angle PRQ + 45 + angle QPR = 180 degrees

Rearranging, we get:

angle PRQ + angle QPR = 135 degrees

Since angles PRQ and QPR are complementary angles (together they form a right angle), their sum is 90 degrees. Therefore,

angle PRQ + angle QPR = 90 degrees

Substituting this into the previous equation, we get:

90 degrees = 135 degrees

This is a contradiction, and hence our assumption that angle PQR measures 45 degrees is false.

Therefore, we conclude that angle PQR must measure 90 degrees, since it is the only angle that can satisfy the given conditions.

Learn more about inscribed angle theorem

brainly.com/question/5436956

#SPJ11

We have evidence to suggest that the true percentage of college degrees in mathematics is different from 1%.

The null hypothesis is a type of hypothesis that explains the population parameter and is used to examine if the provided experimental data are reliable.

To test the claim that the percentage of college degrees in mathematics is not 1%, we can use a hypothesis test. Let's assume the null hypothesis is that the true percentage of college degrees in mathematics is 1%, and the alternative hypothesis is that it is different from 1%.

- Null hypothesis: The percentage of college degrees in mathematics is 1%.

- Alternative hypothesis: The percentage of college degrees in mathematics is different from 1%.

We can use a binomial distribution to model the number of graduates with math degrees in a sample of 12,317. Under the null hypothesis, the expected number of graduates with math degrees is:

Expected value = sample size * probability of math degrees = 12,317 * 0.01 = 123.17

Since we are testing at a 0.10 level of significance, the critical values for a two-tailed test are ±1.645 (using a standard normal distribution table).

The test statistic can be calculated as:

z = (observed value - expected value) / standard deviation

The standard deviation of the binomial distribution can be calculated as:

√(sample size * probability of success * (1 - probability of success))

So,

standard deviation = √(123.17 * 0.01 * 0.99) = 1.109

The observed value is 148.

The test statistic is:

z = (148 - 123.17) / 1.109 = 22.38

Since the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than 1.645, we can reject the null hypothesis at the 0.10 level of significance.

Therefore, we have evidence to suggest that the true percentage of college degrees in mathematics is different from 1%.

Learn more about null hypothesis on:

https://brainly.com/question/28042334

#SPJ4

The approximate probability that someone might answer the next call E.J. makes is 0.25 or 25%. The correct answer is C. 0.25.

To find the approximate probability that someone might answer E.J.'s next call, we'll use the information provided and follow these steps:

1. Calculate the total number of calls made: answered calls (40) + unanswered calls (120).
2. Find the proportion of answered calls to the total calls.
3. Express the proportion as a probability (as a percentage or fraction).

Let's do the calculations:

1. Total calls = 40 (answered) + 120 (unanswered) = 160 calls
2. Proportion of answered calls = 40 answered calls / 160 total calls = 1/4
3. Probability = 1/4 = 0.25 (as a decimal) or 25% (as a percentage)

So, the approximate probability that someone might answer the next call E.J. makes is 0.25 or 25%. The correct answer is C. 0.25.

Learn more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ11

The analogy that best represents the bold letters for each question is related to relationships and cross-sections.

Some analogies are given below:

Explanation: The relationship between happy and sad is that they are opposite emotions.

Similarly, up and down are opposite directions, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between a cat and a kitten is that a kitten is a young cat.

Similarly, a puppy is a young dog, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between circle and sphere is that a circle is a two-dimensional shape, while a sphere is a three-dimensional shape that has a circular cross-section.

Similarly, a square is a two-dimensional shape, while a cube is a three-dimensional shape that has a square cross-section, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between the oven and baking is that an oven is a tool used to bake food.

Similarly, a grill is a tool used to grill food, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between mother and father is that they are the parents of a child.

Similarly, a daughter and a son are the children of their parents, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between a book and a chapter is that a book is divided into chapters.

Similarly, a play is divided into acts, so the analogy holds.

To learn more about “analogy” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/13978016

#SPJ11

Answer:

x^9√x

Step-by-step explanation:

It seems that the question provided is not clear and has some typos or formatting issues, making it difficult to understand the exact problem you need help with. Please rephrase or clarify the question, and I'll be more than happy to help you!

To find W,(1,0), we need to use the formula for the partial derivative of F with respect to u at (6,7) and (6,-7) and plug in the given values:

F_u(6,7) = 6,0(6,7) = -5
F_u(6,-7) = 6,0(6,-7) = -7

Now we can use these values to solve for W,(1,0) using the formula:

W,(1,0) = F(6,t) - F_u(6,7)(1-6) - F_u(6,-7)(1-6)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

W,(1,0) = F(6,t) - (-5)(-5) - (-7)(-5)
W,(1,0) = F(6,t) + 30

We still need to find F(6,t). To do this, we use the formula for the partial derivative of F with respect to s at (1,0) and plug in the given values:

F_s(1,0) = 1,0(6,0) - 7,0(1,0) - 9,0(1,0)
F_s(1,0) = -7

Now we can use F_u(6,7), F_u(6,-7), and F_s(1,0) to solve for F(6,t) using the formula:

F(6,t) = F_u(6,7)(6,t-7) + F_u(6,-7)(6,t+7) + F_s(1,0)(t)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

F(6,t) = (-5)(6,t-7) + (-7)(6,t+7) + (-7)(t)
F(6,t) = -77t - 188

Now we can substitute this value of F(6,t) into our formula for W,(1,0) to get the final answer:

W,(1,0) = -77t - 188 + 30
W,(1,0) = -77t - 158

Learn more about partial derivative here: brainly.com/question/29652032

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The horizontal distance between (16, -24) and (-3, -24) is 19 units.

Explanation:

We can calculate the horizontal distance by finding the difference between the x-coordinates of the two points.

Horizontal distance = difference in x-coordinates = (-3) - 16 = -19

However, the distance is negative, which doesn't make sense as distance is always positive. So we take the absolute value of the difference to get the actual distance.

|Horizontal distance| = |-19| = 19

Therefore, the horizontal distance between the two points is 19 units.

Let's say we add 'x' red candies and 'y' blue candies to the bag to create the desired ratio of 3 to 2:

Then, the total number of red candies in the bag will be 5 + x, and the total number of blue candies will be 1 + y.

According to the problem, the ratio of red candies to blue candies should be 3 to 2:

(5 + x) / (1 + y) = 3/2

Cross-multiplying this equation, we get:

2(5 + x) = 3(1 + y)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

10 + 2x = 3 + 3y

2x - 3y = -7

We want to find the least number of red and blue candies that can be added to the bag to satisfy this equation.

One way to do this is to try different values of x and y that satisfy the equation until we find the smallest possible values that work.

For example, we can start by setting x = 1 and y = 2:

2(5 + 1) = 3(1 + 2)

12 = 9

This doesn't work, so let's try another set of values, x = 4 and y = 5:

2(5 + 4) = 3(1 + 5)

18 = 18

This set of values works, so we have found the least number of red and blue candies that can be added to the bag to create a ratio of 3 to 2 for the number of red candies to the number of blue candies:

We need to add 4 red candies and 5 blue candies to the bag to create a ratio of 3 to 2 for the number of red candies to the number of blue candies.

To know more about least number refer here

https://brainly.com/question/13872311#

#SPJ11

According to the given information in the question to find the length of side v in triangle VWX, we can use the Law of Sines. the length of side v is approximately [tex]281.8[/tex] cm.

image for "define centimeters in high-level mathematics." A centimeter is a metric unit used to quantify small distances and the object's length. Cm is used to represent it in writing.

It can also be described as the measure of length in the current metric system, referred to as the International System of Units (SI). It is equal to one-hundredth of a meter.

which states that:

[tex]a/sin(A) = b/sin(B) = c/sin(C)[/tex]

where a, b, and c are the lengths of the sides of the triangle, and A, B, and C are the opposite angles.

In this case, we know the length of side w (600 cm), and the measures of angles V and W.

To find the length of side v, we can use the Law of Sines with sides v and w and angle V:

[tex]v/sin(V) = w/sin(W)[/tex]

[tex]v/sin(26^\circ) = 600/sin(80^\circ)[/tex]

[tex]v = (600 \times sin(26^\circ))/sin(80^\circ)[/tex]

[tex]v \approx 281.8 cm[/tex] (rounded to the nearest 10th of a centimeter)

Therefore, the length of side v is approximately [tex]281.8 cm[/tex].

Learn more about centimetres here:

https://brainly.com/question/23366076

#SPJ1

In the scenario you mentioned, the part of the Federal Reserve's congressional mandate that is triggered is both price stability and maximum sustainable employment.

The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate from Congress which consists of:

1. Price stability: This objective aims to maintain a stable inflation rate, ensuring that the purchasing power of money remains relatively constant over time. Price stability helps households and businesses make informed decisions regarding investments and consumption.

2. Maximum sustainable employment: This objective focuses on maintaining a high level of employment while avoiding unsustainable economic growth that could lead to high inflation. Achieving maximum sustainable employment involves minimizing unemployment while not causing inflation to rise significantly.

In the scenario you mentioned, the Federal Reserve would need to carefully balance its monetary policy to ensure that both objectives, price stability and maximum sustainable employment, are achieved. This might involve adjusting interest rates or using other monetary policy tools to influence economic activity, employment levels, and inflation.

To know more about "Federal Reserve' refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19273629#

#SPJ11

It will take the population 10.5 years to reach 25,000

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Inital population, a = 15000

Rate of increase, r = 5%

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

The function of the situation is

f(x) = a * (1 + r)ˣ

So, we have

f(x) = 15000 * (1 + 5%)ˣ

When it reaches 25000, we have

15000 * (1 + 5%)ˣ = 25000

Divide both sides by 15000

(1 + 5%)ˣ = 1.67

Take the logarithm of both sides

x = log(1.67)/log(1 + 5%)

Evaluate

x = 10.5

Hence, the number of years is 10.5

Read more about exponential function at

brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

If he put 40 red balls, 55 purple balls, 45 yellow balls, and 60 green balls into the ball pit. while his sister is playing, one ball rolls out of the pit. Therefore, the probability that the ball that rolled out of the pit is red is 0.2.

The probability of selecting a red ball from the ball pit can be found by dividing the number of red balls by the total number of balls in the pit.

Total number of balls = 40 + 55 + 45 + 60 = 200

Probability of selecting a red ball = Number of red balls / Total number of balls

Probability of selecting a red ball = 40 / 200

Probability of selecting a red ball = 0.2

Therefore, the probability that the ball that rolled out of the pit is red is 0.2.

To learn more about “probability” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The velocity with which a ball reaches the ground when it is dropped

from a height of 64 m is 35.44m/sec

From the information given, we have that the equation representing the velocity of the ball is expressed as;

V = 4.43√h

Given that the parameters of the formula are;

Since the height of the ball from the ground is 64m, we have to substitute the value, we have;

V = 4.43√64

Find the square root of the value

V= 4.43(8)

Now, multiply both the values to determine the velocity, we get;

V = 35.44m/sec

Learn about velocity at: https://brainly.com/question/25749514

#SPJ1

Answer: The given polynomial is -2x³.

a) To write the polynomial in standard form, we arrange the terms in descending order of degrees:

-2x³

b) The degree of a polynomial is the highest exponent of the variable in the polynomial. In this case, the degree of the polynomial is 3.

c) The lead coefficient is the coefficient of the term with the highest degree. In this case, the lead coefficient is -2.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the height of a model of the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse given that the scale used is 8 inches to 30 feet. This means that for every 8 inches on the model, the actual lighthouse is 30 feet tall. Therefore, the height of the model is 4.67 feet.

The actual lighthouse is 210 feet tall. To find the height of the model, we need to use a proportion. We can set up the proportion as:

8 inches / 30 feet = x inches / 210 feet

We can cross-multiply to get:

8 inches * 210 feet = 30 feet * x inches

Simplifying, we get:

x inches = (8 inches * 210 feet) / 30 feet = 56 inches

However, the question asks for the height of the model in feet, so we need to convert 56 inches to feet by dividing by 12:

56 inches / 12 inches per foot = 4.67 feet

Therefore, the height of the model is 4.67 feet.

To learn more about “height” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/12446886

#SPJ11

If x² + bx - 9 is factorable, then the possible values for b are -6 and 6.

To factor x² + bx - 9, we need to find two numbers that multiply to -9 and add up to b. We can write this as (x + a)(x + b) = x² + bx - 9. Since the coefficient of x² is 1, the two numbers that multiply to -9 must add up to the coefficient of x, which is b. We can find the factor pairs of -9 to see which ones add up to b:

-1 and 9 add up to 8

-3 and 3 add up to 0

-9 and 1 add up to -8

3 and -3 add up to 0

1 and -9 add up to -8

9 and -1 add up to 8

Only -6 and 6 add up to b, so the possible values for b are -6 and 6. Therefore, x² - 6x - 9 and x² + 6x - 9 are both factorable.

learn more about factor pairs here:

https://brainly.com/question/28672630

#SPJ4

To find the length of border needed to put around a rectangular room, you can follow these steps:

Measure the length and width of the room using a tape measure or ruler. Let's say the length is L and the width is W.

Determine the type and width of the border you want to put around the room. Let's say you want to use a wallpaper border that is 6 inches wide.

Calculate the length of the border needed for the top and bottom of the room.

This can be done by adding the width of the room to twice the width of the border. So the length of the top and bottom borders would be:

Length of top/bottom borders = 2(W + 6 inches)

Calculate the length of the border needed for the left and right sides of the room. This can be done by adding the length of the room to twice the width of the border. So the length of the left and right borders would be:

Length of left/right borders = 2(L + 6 inches)

Add up the length of all four borders to get the total length of border needed to put around the room:

Total length of border = 2(W + 6 inches) + 2(L + 6 inches)

Simplifying the above equation, we get:

Total length of border = 2L + 2W + 24 inches

So the total length of border needed to put around the room is 2L + 2W + 24 inches.

To know more about length of border refer here

https://brainly.com/question/13193145#

#SPJ11

To find the equation of the plane, we first need to find two vectors that lie on the plane. We can do this by taking the differences between the three given points:

$\vec{v_1} = \begin{pmatrix}6 \\ 0 \\ 3\end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}6 \\ 0 \\ 3\end{pmatrix}$

$\vec{v_2} = \begin{pmatrix}-3 \\ -1 \\ 5\end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}-3 \\ -1 \\ 5\end{pmatrix}$

Now we can find the normal vector to the plane by taking the cross product of these two vectors:

$\vec{n} = \vec{v_1} \times \vec{v_2} = \begin{pmatrix}6 \\ 0 \\ 3\end{pmatrix} \times \begin{pmatrix}-3 \\ -1 \\ 5\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}3 \\ -27 \\ 6\end{pmatrix}$

Next, we can use the point-normal form of the equation of a plane:

$(\vec{r} - \vec{a}) \cdot \vec{n} = 0$

where $\vec{a}$ is a point on the plane and $\vec{n}$ is the normal vector.

We can choose any of the three given points as $\vec{a}$. Let's use $(0, 0, 0)$:

$(\begin{pmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}) \cdot \begin{pmatrix}3 \\ -27 \\ 6\end{pmatrix} = 0$

Simplifying, we get:

$3x - 27y + 6z = 0$

This is the equation of the plane.
To find the equation of the plane passing through points (0, 0, 0), (6, 0, 3), and (-3, -1, 5), first find two vectors in the plane and then compute their cross product to obtain the normal vector of the plane. Finally, use the normal vector and a point on the plane to find the equation of the plane.

Vectors in the plane:
V1 = (6, 0, 3) - (0, 0, 0) = (6, 0, 3)
V2 = (-3, -1, 5) - (0, 0, 0) = (-3, -1, 5)

Cross product (normal vector N):
N = V1 x V2 = (0*(-5) - 3*(-1), 3*(-5) - 6*5, 6*(-1) - 0*(-3))
N = (3, -15, -6)

Equation of the plane using the normal vector and a point on the plane (0, 0, 0):
3x - 15y - 6z = 0

So, the equation of the plane is 3x - 15y - 6z = 0.

Learn more about matrix here: brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

By  null hypothesis there is sufficient evidence at the 5% significance level to purchase the proposed panels.

To determine if there is sufficient evidence to purchase the proposed panels, we can perform a hypothesis test. Let's define the following:

- p: the proportion of all panels that produce an efficiency rating greater than 20%

- p0: the proportion specified in the proposal, which is p0 = 0.18

- n: the sample size, which is n = 140

- x: the number of panels in the sample that produce an efficiency rating greater than 20%, which is x = 32

We want to test the null hypothesis H0: p <= p0 against the alternative hypothesis Ha: p > p0. The significance level is alpha = 0.05.

We can use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution since both np0 and n(1-p0) are greater than 10, where np0 is the expected number of panels that produce an efficiency rating greater than 20% under the null hypothesis.

Under the null hypothesis, the test statistic z is approximately:

z = (x - np0) / sqrt(np0(1-p0))

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (32 - 140*0.18) / sqrt(140*0.18*0.82) ≈ 1.96

The critical value of z at alpha = 0.05 with a one-tailed test is 1.645. Since our calculated z value is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence at the 5% significance level to purchase the proposed panels.

To know more about null hypothesis refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252?#

#SPJ11

The correct answers are:True, True, False.

The first statement is true. The initial investment is represented in the formula as the coefficient of the growth factor[tex](1+0.05)^t[/tex].

The second statement is true. The growth factor in the formula is (1+0.05), which represents a 5% increase or a multiplier of 1.05.

The third statement is false. The annual interest rate is not 50%. The growth factor (1+0.05) represents a 5% increase, but the actual annual interest rate is 5%, not 50%.

Therefore, the correct answers are:

True

True

False

To know more about Interest visit:

brainly.com/question/28792777

#SPJ1

Answer 1 inch per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1 inch per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent inches burned per hour

The equation to finding the rate of the candle burning:

3x=3

For those who dont know, whenever you have a variable with a term, its basically multiplying, and we want to do the opposite to get x by itself, so we divide

x=3/3

Which can be simplified as:

x=1

Where x is the inches burned per hour, which equal 1

The E is enclosed by the planes z = 0 and z = x + y + 5

Why will E is enclosed by the planes z = 0?

The evaluate the triple integral ∫∫∫_E eˣ dV, where E is enclosed by the planes z = 0 and z = x + y + 5, and by the cylinders x² + y² = 4 and x² + y² = 9,

Follow these steps:

Learn more about enclosed planes.

brainly.com/question/30706126

#SPJ11