Answer:
Option C is the best choice
Explanation:
During the 1950s, the status of women's education in the United States was still impacted by gender-based discrimination and inequality. Thus, option D, "Women received the same education as men no matter whether they went to private or public schools" is not a correct statement.
Option A, "Only women from wealthy families could pursue an education with a private tutor," might have been true for a small minority of wealthy families who could afford private tutoring, but it was not the case for the majority of women.
Option B, "Federal protections guaranteed an equal education to all genders in private schools but not in public schools," is not an accurate statement either. During the 1950s, there were no federal protections that guaranteed an equal education to all genders in either public or private schools.
Option C, "Federal protections guaranteed an equal education to all genders in public schools but not in private schools," is the closest to the correct answer. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, and that all students, regardless of gender or race, had the right to an equal education in public schools. However, this ruling did not apply to private schools, which were not subject to federal regulation.
Therefore, the best statement that describes the status of women's education during the 1950s is C: "Federal protections guaranteed an equal education to all genders in public schools but not in private schools
Answer: C. Federal protections guaranteed an equal education to all genders in public schools but not in private schools.
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT one of the five relationships that Confucius taught about?
Based on the concept of Confucius on relationships and the available options, the correct answer is option C. Employer and Employee.
What is the Five Relationships Confucius taught about?According to Confucius, there are major five cardinal relationships existing among humans. These relationships are the defining factors in the society.
Confucius in his assessment came up with the following five relationships which are the following:father and son, husband and wife, ruler and subject, older brother and younger brother,friend and friendHence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Employer and Employee relationship.
Learn more about Confucius here: https://brainly.com/question/5603877
#SPJ1
Answer options are:
A. Husband and wife,
B. Ruler and subject,
C. Employer and employee
D. Older brother and younger brother,
E. Friend and friend
How did nation-states bring order to the industrial cities?
Select one:
O A. demolishing rural farms for industrial parks
OB. taking private property for public use
OC. creating popularly elected city councils
OD. Increased sanitation and redesigning city streets
PLS HURRY TIMED!!! Hume felt that causal claims were the most valid.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
he does not believe in cause and effect and was skeptical of
many enslaved Jews worked in private companies and were killed by people who knew them. Why is this point important?
The fact that many enslaved Jews worked in private companies and were killed by people who knew them highlights personal and human nature of the atrocities committed during the Holocaust.
What are atrocities?Atrocities are acts of extreme cruelty, violence, or brutality that cause suffering and harm to individuals or groups. These acts can take many forms, including but not limited to, genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, crimes against humanity, torture, ra-pe, and murder. Atrocities are often committed by individuals or groups in positions of power or authority against those who are perceived as weaker or different. They can be motivated by a range of factors, such as ideology, religion, nationalism, or personal gain. Atrocities have devastating effects on their victims and can have lasting impacts on societies and communities. It is important to acknowledge and condemn atrocities and work towards preventing them from occurring in the future.
To learn more about atrocities, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30984268
#SPJ1
what led to the creation of the Bantustans in south Africa
Answer:
Also known as “homelands” in official parlance, the bantustans were set up in an attempt to legitimize the apartheid project and to deprive black South Africans of their citizenship by creating ten parallel “countries”, corresponding to state designated ethnic group.
In 2-4 complete sentences, analyze the decision-making process an immigrant
that might make when coming to Europe. Why would a person want to move
there? Why would they not?
The decision-making process an immigrant that might make when coming to Europe person want to move thee because fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, because was perceived as land of economic opportunity.
What drives migration to Europe?A greater standard of life, better employment prospects, higher earnings, and educational chances are all pull factors. A bigger number of people will probably move to nations with better prospects if the economic climate is unfavourable and appears to be on the verge of deteriorating further.
What motivates people to move abroad?Some individuals relocate in quest of employment or other financial possibilities, to be closer to their families, or to pursue their education. Some people relocate to avoid danger, persecution, terrorism, or human rights abuses.
To know more about decision-making process visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/19901674
#SPJ1
Jewish expectations for the Messiah
Why do you think that officials decided to conduct the Nuremberg Trials rather than simply
executing the accused? Was this the right thing to do? Explain.
Answer:
The officials wanted to show the world that people will be held accountable for their actions during war (war crimes), no matter how important or high-ranking they are.
it's your opinion about whether this was the right thing to do.
1. What will the government likely do with the tax rate during times of great prosperity?
OIt will keep taxes the same.
It will raise the tax rate.
O It will raise taxes for some but not for others.
It will lower taxes.
During times of great prosperity, the government will likely lower taxes.
During times of great prosperity, the economy is strong, and there is more revenue being generated through various means such as increased business profits and higher employment rates. This can lead to a budget surplus, where the government has more money than it needs to meet its spending obligations. In such a scenario, the government may decide to lower taxes to stimulate the economy further, encourage more spending, and keep the momentum going.
Lowering taxes can also be a way for the government to reward individuals and businesses for their contributions to the strong economy, and to promote economic growth.
To know more about taxes, click here
https://brainly.com/question/30194756
#SPJ1
Why did FDR see raising taxes and increasing welfare spending as an increase in Freedom, and why did Hoover see it as restricting freedom?
FDR saw raising taxes and increasing welfare spending as an increase in freedom because he believed that a government's responsibility was to ensure the welfare of its citizens.
He believed that providing assistance to the less fortunate would help to create a more equal society, where everyone had access to the resources necessary to achieve their goals. FDR's New Deal programs, which included social security, unemployment benefits, and public works projects, were designed to provide this assistance.
Hoover, on the other hand, saw raising taxes and increasing welfare spending as restricting freedom because he believed that a government's primary responsibility was to protect the rights of individuals and businesses to pursue their own interests. Hoover believed that government intervention in the economy, even in the form of social welfare programs, would lead to a loss of individual freedom and a more oppressive government. He believed that the free market, left to its own devices, would ultimately provide for the welfare of all citizens.
To know more about taxes here
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
#SPJ1
What arguments might the dissenters have put forward in their opinion about the amish children case?
What happened to the Amish family that lost another child? CNN about 15 years ago, an Amish family in the raster US was hit by an unexplainable tendency.
There should be proper support for the children in the development of education and welfare of the state in the later 1680s James 11 courted the dissenters in the hope that they would support religious toleration for Roman Catholics and protestants. there will the full support from the government for development of the education.
we want to make a case for the children for medical that can stand up to heavy use but are also not too heavy. also, education plays a major role every citizen should make sure that every child gets proper education to develop the child.
to know more details about child rights ;
https://brainly.in/question/44323170
Wisconsin v. Jonas Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), is the case in which the United States Supreme Court determined that Amish children could not be forced to attend school past the eighth grade.
What is the significance of this case?The fundamental right of parents to religious freedom was determined to outweigh the state's interest in educating their children. The case is frequently cited as support for parents' right to educate their children in settings other than traditional private or public schools.
3 Amish students from three various families decided to drop out of New Glarus High School with in New Glarus, Wisconsin, public school at the end of eighth grade due to their parents' religious beliefs.
To know about religious freedom visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29783580
#SPJ1
Which of the following pairs of countries have long
disputed the territory known as the Kashmir Region?
A.Israel and Palestine
B.The United States and Mexico
C.Kuwait and Iraq
D.India and Pakistan
Answer:
India and Pakistan
Explanation:
What two economic moves did President Nixon make in 1971?
- He took the United States off the gold standard.
- He established wage and price controls administered by the federal government.
- He raised interest rates.
- He lowered corporate taxes.
30 POINTS
trace the course of the Women's Movement in the period of 1877 to the present.Present both sides of the argument of supporters and those who opposed the movement
Note that the Women's Movement since 1877 has undergone several changes. supporters argue for equal right and opportuniteis oponnets argue against social and cultural changes.
What was the Women's Movement in the period of 1877 about?Following the war, women renewed their campaign throughout the Reconstruction period (1865-1877), emphasizing voting as the means to achieving larger rights and changes. Black and white reformers came together to seek universal suffrage, which included voting rights for both women and African American males.
The objective of the early women's rights movement contained much more than just the ability to vote. Their broad objectives included equal access to school and work, marital equality, and a married woman's right to her own property and salary, custody of her children, and control over her own body.
Learn more about women's rights movement:
https://brainly.com/question/461813
#SPJ1
Fill in the blanks to explain what
some Native people have done at Mount Rushmore since 1970.
Since 1970, Native American activists have disapproved the presence of Mount Rushmore, which was built onto land from water that is thought-out protected by the Lakota Sioux family.
What is the significance?Every year, on July 4th, a group of Native American activists gather at Mount Rushmore to hold watch and protest against the memorial.
They view the monument as a letter of colonialism and misery and call for the return of the Black Hills to the Lakota Sioux family. In recent age, skilled have also existed calls to remove the memorial altogether and return the land to the Lakota Sioux.
Read more about colonialism here:
https://brainly.com/question/30236272
#SPJ1
The highway department built a highway from the mainland United States to Alaska. Which of the following does this represent?
A.
reshaping the land through the normal life cycle
B.
reshaping the land through biological activities
C.
reshaping the land by returning essential materials
D.
reshaping the land through technology
By 2045, The USA will be even more diverse. Whites will no longer be in the majority.
How do you think that might affect our country?
Answer:
The projected increase in diversity in the United States by 2045 is likely to have both positive and negative effects on the country.
On the positive side, greater diversity can lead to increased cultural understanding and appreciation, as well as more opportunities for cross-cultural collaboration and innovation. It can also help to reduce prejudice and discrimination, as people are exposed to more diverse perspectives and experiences. Additionally, the presence of more diverse voices in government, business, and other areas of society can help to create more equitable policies and practices.
On the negative side, there may be increased tension and conflict as different cultural and ethnic groups struggle to assert their identity and maintain their cultural heritage. It could also lead to more political polarization, as different groups compete for power and resources. Moreover, demographic shifts can lead to economic and social changes, such as the need for more resources and services to support an aging population or changing job market demands.
Overall, it will be important for the United States to find ways to promote understanding and cooperation among different groups, while also ensuring that everyone has access to the resources and opportunities they need to succeed. It will require continued efforts to address systemic inequality and promote inclusivity, as well as a willingness to embrace and celebrate the rich diversity that makes the United States a unique and vibrant society.
Put the following events in their proper order with 1 being the first thing that happened and 10 being the last event.
The first Christian emperor, Constantine the Great, who rebuilt Byzantium as the imperial capital, is at the top of the list.
What is the Roman Emperor's order?It was during the reign of Constantine that the key features of what is now known as the Byzantine state began to take shape: a Roman polity with its capital at Constantinople, a Greek East-dominated culture, and Christianity as the official religion.
Following the division of the Roman Empire in 395, the Byzantine Empire served as the direct legal continuation of the eastern half. Up until Theodosius I in 395, the emperors listed below were either the sole or joint monarchs of the entire Roman Empire. Up until 476, the Western Roman Empire still existed.
To know about Roman Emperor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17326184
#SPJ1
What was the government affected Aztec society by
3. Which of the following events made it possible for the Allies to push forward against German forces? Select all that apply.
Battle of Britain
surrender of France
liberation of Paris
D-Day invasion
crossing at the Rhine
The Battle of Britain and the liberation of Paris came next, which enabled the Allies to advance against the German forces. So, choices (A) and (C) are the right answers.
What do you know about German forces?In 1871, while Germany was being united under Prussian rule, an army was formed that was armed, structured, and trained according to a single philosophy and was always under one command. The German land forces were officially referred to as the Deutsches Heer (German Army) from 1871 until 1919.
The main army was disbanded after Germany lost World War I and the German Empire collapsed. The German land troops were referred to as the Reichsheer (Army of the Empire) from 1921 and 1935 and as the Heer between 1935 and 1945. In contrast to the Heer, the Waffen-SS was not a division of the Third Reich's Heer, one of its two ground divisions during World War II.
Learn more about German forces, from :
brainly.com/question/9239138
#SPJ2
You will need to compare and contrast the documentary with the “history” portrayed in the film?
Peter Jackson’s documentary on WW1, they shall not grow old
Joyeux Noel, My Boy Jack, War Horse, Passchendaele, Co. K
The objective and subject matter of a documentary and a feature film differ from one another. In contrast to feature films, which attempt to entertain audiences, documentaries aim to educate, inform.
What distinguishes a film from a documentary?A feature film typically uses actors to tell a story, but a documentary typically uses actual people in real life events. Of course, actors sometimes act out "reenactments" in documentaries, and "clips of genuine events" are sometimes used in movies.
What is the primary distinction between a documentary and a regular narrative movie?Real life serves as the foundation of all documentaries. They can only accurately depict non-fictional, real-world events. Yet, fictional stories are frequently told in narrative films.
To know more about documentary visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28216484
#SPJ1
Help me answer this two questions please!!!!!
1)
Some of the successes of Reconstruction efforts included:
Ratification of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which abolished slavery, granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to African Americans, and gave them the right to vote.
Establishment of the Freedmen's Bureau, which provided education, housing, and medical care to newly freed slaves.
Creation of public schools in the South to provide education to African American children.
Reconstruction policies resulted in the election of many African Americans to public office, including two U.S. Senators and fourteen Congressmen.
limitations include:
Resistance from Southern whites who opposed equal rights for African Americans. This resistance led to the rise of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist groups that used violence and intimidation to maintain white supremacy.
Economic hardship in the South, which was devastated by the war and struggled to rebuild its infrastructure and economy.
Political corruption and mismanagement, including the "carpetbagger" and "scalawag" politicians who were accused of exploiting the South for their own gain.
Limited resources and funding for Reconstruction efforts, which were often hindered by political opposition in the North.
It should have continued longer because it would have also given the South more time to recover from the devastation of the war and to establish a more stable and prosperous economy.
2)
The U.S should have had a moral obligation to help rebuild and stabilize countries that have been affected by wars involving U.S. military intervention. Reconstruction efforts can help to restore infrastructure, rebuild communities, and create conditions for sustainable peace and stability. *This is an opinion tho*
!!!PLEASE HELP!!! I WILL GIVE A BRAINLIST!!!
For this assignment, you will read the article "Seneca Falls Convention" at History.com. Then, you will write short answers to questions, using evidence from the article and the lesson to support your ideas.
To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all of the questions completely.
This assignment is worth 30 points.
Answer each question in at least three sentences. Your answers should include a topic sentence that directly responds to the question, as well as two supporting detail sentences that cite evidence from the lesson or the "Seneca Falls Convention" article.
This part of the assignment is worth 30 points.
1. Describe the Seneca Falls Convention. When and where was it held, and why was it necessary? (3 points)
2. How did the abolition movement influence the organizers of the Seneca Falls Convention? (3 points)
3. Describe who Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott were, including their importance to the Seneca Falls Convention. (3 points)
4. What was the Declaration of Sentiments? Who wrote it, and why? (3 points)
5. What is suffrage? Why did some women at the convention argue against women's suffrage? (3 points)
6. Why did the women at the Seneca Falls Convention create the Declaration of Sentiments? How was this document similar to the Declaration of Independence? (3 points)
7. According to the article "Seneca Falls Convention," how did news about the Seneca Falls Convention spread throughout the nation? What was the reaction? (3 points)
8. Describe who Frederick Douglass was, including his influence on the Seneca Falls Convention and the Declaration of Sentiments. (3 points)
9. What fact from the article "Seneca Falls Convention" did you find new or surprising? What does this fact help you understand about the importance of the Seneca Falls Convention? (3 points)
10. What happened in the movement for women's rights after the Seneca Falls Convention? How long did it take for women to be granted suffrage? (3 points)
Answer:
1. The Seneca Falls Convention was a women's rights convention held on July 19-20, 1848, in Seneca Falls, New York. It was the first women's rights convention in the United States and was necessary because women did not have basic rights such as the right to vote or own property.
2. The abolition movement influenced the organizers of the Seneca Falls Convention because they saw parallels between the oppression of slaves and the oppression of women. Many of the organizers were involved in both movements and believed in the principles of equality and justice for all.
3. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott were both organizers of the Seneca Falls Convention and important figures in the women's rights movement. Stanton wrote the Declaration of Sentiments and was a leading voice in the movement for women's suffrage. Mott was a Quaker minister and abolitionist who had been advocating for women's rights for decades.
4. The Declaration of Sentiments was a document written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and signed by attendees of the Seneca Falls Convention. It called for women's suffrage and other basic rights, such as the right to own property and earn wages. The document was modeled after the Declaration of Independence and was meant to show that women were equal citizens who deserved the same rights as men.
5. Suffrage is the right to vote. Some women at the convention argued against women's suffrage because they believed that it was too radical a demand and would detract from the other important issues that the women's rights movement was advocating for.
6. The women at the Seneca Falls Convention created the Declaration of Sentiments to declare that women were equal citizens who deserved the same rights as men. This document was similar to the Declaration of Independence in that it laid out a list of grievances and called for fundamental rights and freedoms.
7. News about the Seneca Falls Convention spread through newspapers and word of mouth. The reaction was mixed, with some people supportive of the women's rights movement and others ridiculing and criticizing it.
8. Frederick Douglass was a former slave and abolitionist who attended the Seneca Falls Convention and gave a powerful speech in support of women's rights. He was a close friend and ally of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and other women's rights activists.
9. One fact from the article that may be new or surprising is that the Seneca Falls Convention was organized in only a few days. This fact helps to underscore the urgency and passion behind the women's rights movement at the time.
10. After the Seneca Falls Convention, the women's rights movement continued to grow and gain momentum. It took over 70 years for women to be granted suffrage with the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920. Throughout the 20th century, the movement continued to fight for equal rights and opportunities for women in all areas of life.
We elect a U.S. Senator for how many years?]
Answer: from my understanding I think its every 2 years
Explanation:
Interpret the evidence
1. What information in these documents confirms commonly held belies about teenagers in the 1950s?
2. What information in these documents challenges the conventional wisdom about teenagers in the 1950s?
3. Documents 25.5 and 25.7 speak specifically to teenagers. How do they differ, either in tone or in content, from those written about teens (Document 25.6) or by teens (Document 25.8)?
4. What do Documents 25.6 and 25.8 tell us about generational differences?
5. How much do these documents tell us about racial differences among teenagers in the postwar era?
6. What do Documents 25.5 and 25.10 reveal about gender roles and expectations within teenage culture in the 1950s?
Put It in Context
How do these documents show the way teenagers shaped the larger post-World War II society?
These records provide insight into the attitudes of youths in the 1950s and the perceptions of them in the larger post-World War II society.
Write about a document.
A document is a carefully arranged collection of data and facts. It is available as a printed document, a web page, or an electronic document, and may be accessed in both analog and digital formats. Documents can contain a variety of content types, including text, photos, audio, video, and others.
The notion that teenagers in the 1950s were disrespectful and disruptive is supported by Document 25.5. By stressing their major contributions to society, such as their dedication to duty and patriotism, Document 25.7 challenges long-held assumptions about teens in the 1950s. The disparities between the generations may be seen in papers 25.6 and 25.8, where the former emphasizes the need for adults to be sympathetic and understanding toward adolescents while the latter reflects the more upbeat view of the teens themselves. In the 1950s, males were supposed to be more energetic and daring than girls, according to documents 25.5 and 25.10, which also reflect gender norms and expectations among youth society.
These records demonstrate how 1950s youth contributed significantly to the greater post-World War II society and helped shape a new phase of American culture.
What social changes resulted from the Second World War?As productivity increased and millions more men and women entered the workforce, unemployment practically disappeared. The need for labor opened up new opportunities for women, African Americans, and other minorities. To work in the various war factories that sprung up around the nation, millions of people abandoned their homes.
Learn more about post-World War II society: https://brainly.com/question/12205739
#SPJ1
Why did the United States government spend money to improve both the National Highway
System and the Interstate Highway System? How did the building of this system affect South
Carolina's economy?
The United States government spent money to improve both the National Highway System and the Interstate Highway System to improve transportation infrastructure and promote economic growth.
What was the National Highway System ?In 1956, two highway systems were established to interconnect cities and transportation hubs throughout the nation; The National Highway System and the Interstate Highway System.
South Carolina's economy was greatly affected by this development, as the construction of new highways created job opportunities and infused economic growth into the state, particularly in the sphere of construction. Additionally, a better transportation infrastructure facilitated easier transport of goods for businesses and granted access to untapped markets, intensifying overall economic activity within the region.
Find out more on the National Highway System at https://brainly.com/question/9841952
#SPJ1
To whom does the term party-in-government refer?
Question 42 options:
a)
county organization which act as work horses for elections
b)
party identifiers who have been elected to office
c)
third-party representation in local government
d)
the parties' platforms as they inform policy
Answer: b) party identifiers who have been elected to office
Explanation: The term party-in-government refers to the elected officials and officeholders who belong to a particular political party. These individuals are known as "party identifiers," as they have declared their affiliation with a particular party and run for office under that party's banner. When a political party wins an election, the elected officials from that party become the party-in-government. They are responsible for implementing the party's platform and policies, and for making decisions on behalf of the party and the constituents they represent. The party-in-government is a crucial component of the political system, as it determines the direction and priorities of the government and influences the policies and legislation that are enacted.
The term party-in-government refers to party identifiers who have been elected to office. The Option B.
Who does the term party-in-government refer to?This means individuals who are elected officials and also identify with a particular political party.
Whether members of executive or legislative branch, they are representatives of their party and expected to advance the party's agenda through actions in government.
In essence, the party-in-government plays an important role in shaping public policy because they have the power to introduce and pass legislation, make appointments and set the agenda for political debates.
Read more about party-in-government
brainly.com/question/19298043
#SPJ1
how did japan change people?
Japan has undergone significant changes throughout its history, and these changes have had a profound impact on its people and culture. Some of the key ways that Japan has changed its people include:
Modernization: Japan underwent a period of rapid modernization during the Meiji Restoration in the late 19th century. This included adopting Western-style institutions and technologies, such as railroads, telegraph lines, and a modern legal system. This modernization had a significant impact on Japanese society and culture, as it transformed the country from a feudal society to a modern industrialized nation.
World War II: Japan's involvement in World War II had a profound impact on its people, both during the war and in its aftermath. The war brought widespread destruction and suffering, and many Japanese people were forced to confront the brutal realities of war and imperialism. In the postwar era, Japan underwent significant social and cultural changes, including a shift towards a more pacifist and democratic society.
Overall, Japan's history of modernization, war, economic growth, and demographic change has had a profound impact on its people, shaping their attitudes, beliefs, and values, and transforming the country's society and culture.
Please help me solve this question for my Humanites class upon a selected artwork choose.
Overview: Miró moved from Barcelona to Paris in 1920, determined to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital. Nevertheless, he remained deeply attached to his native Catalonia, and returned each summer to his family's farm in the village of Montroig. In 1921, he determined to make a painting of this farm, a painting that he came to regard as one of the key works in his career.
The Farm represents a brilliant amalgamation of an intense, even primitive realism with the formal vocabulary of cubism. The painting is a compendium of separate details, each carefully observed and precisely described. This detailed realism, however, is matched by a tendency to simplify forms into abstract, geometric shapes.
Moreover, space in The Farm is defined by a ground plane that tilts sharply upward, while individual forms are similarly tilted, so that they sit silhouetted, parallel to the picture plane.
By the mid-1920s, Miro had abandoned the realist manner of The Farm and had created a surrealist style of automatism and abstraction.
Elements from The Farm continued to appear in his work, however, and the intensity of vision found in this painting remained a standard for all of his later art.
Question:
Social, Historical, and/or Cultural Origin
Briefly describe the Cultural Origins and/or the Social and Historical relevance of your selected artwork
Website:
https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.69660.html
Answer:
The Farm, painted by Joan Miró in 1921, has cultural origins that are deeply rooted in the artist's personal history and the region of Catalonia, where he spent his summers. Miró was deeply attached to his native Catalonia and its culture, and this is reflected in the painting. The Farm can be seen as a representation of the rural Catalan landscape and its traditional way of life, which was under threat at the time due to rapid industrialization and modernization.
At the same time, Miró had moved to Paris in 1920 to participate in the artistic vanguard of the French capital, which was also a period of cultural and artistic ferment in Europe. The painting reflects the influence of the cubist movement in its formal vocabulary, but also shows a tendency towards abstraction and simplification of forms. This blending of traditional rural Catalan culture with avant-garde European artistic movements is a hallmark of Miró's work.
Overall, The Farm represents a complex fusion of personal, cultural, and artistic influences that reflects the historical and social context of early 20th century Europe. It can be seen as a statement on the changing nature of Catalan society and the tension between tradition and modernity, as well as a reflection of the broader artistic and cultural movements of the time.
NEED HELP WILL RATE WHAT IS THE ANSWER TO 1 and 2.
In overturning their previous decision, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the idea of "separate but equal" violated the "equal protection" clause in the 14th Amendment. Thus the correct option is A
To overturn a presidential veto, a 2/3 majority vote (66%) is needed by Congress. Thus the correct option is C.
An "equal protection" clause is a crucial component that protects people from discrimination based on their race, gender, religion, and other characteristics According to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
The president of the United States has the right to veto legislation passed by Congress. If a bill is vetoed by the president, it can still become law if Congress votes to override the veto. A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required.
Learn more about Supreme Court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ1