Answer:
C
Explanation:
i said so
Explanation:
(D)Wealthy citizens and rulers is the correct I think if no so sorry
Briefly explain one specific impact women had on American independence prior to the American revolution
I had that answer on a test. The attached image might help
I need help, my teacher gave me a study guide but i literally got stuck on the third question of it.
Answer: Number 3 is the answer
Explanation:
Personal letters, even ones such as Wheatley's that were later published in
newspapers, offer a rare opportunity to hear women's voices from the past. What
distinguishes Wheatley's and Adams's writing from the rhetoric of Patrick Henry,
Thomas Jefferson, and Tom Paine? What do their letters reveal about how women
were expected to behave in early America?
The distinguishing factor between Philis Wheatley's and Abigail Adam's letters from the rhetoric of Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and Thomas Paine is the humility in their tone.
They were praying, begging, and imploring men to match their words with their actions. They urged freedom fighters to remember those who suffered neglect in the fight for freedom. For example, Wheatley used an occasion of her personal letter to Rev. Occum to point out "the contradiction between the colonists' demands for freedom from Britain and the colonists' determination to uphold black slavery" in their backyards.
Abigail Adams also urged her husband, John Adams, that the American male politicians then clamoring for freedom should not forget the freedom deserved by women. In her reasoning, America cannot claim victory over British oppression when the men were not ready to extend the same rights to their wives, mothers, and sisters, and by implication, the slaves.
The rhetoric of Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Jefferson showed that they were only interested in gaining freedom for the white men. They also showed that women had low regard. Women during those years were homemakers with only bedroom voices.
Thus, the personal letters of Philis Wheatley and Abigail Adams show the low place accorded women by American Founding Fathers. There was no single Founding Mother among the crowd!
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/2008415 and https://brainly.com/question/3347124
What was the number one disease brought by Spanish explorers to the new world from Europe?
A: Small Pox
B: Measles
C: Chicken Pox
Answer:
Letter A.
Explanation:
Europeans brought deadly viruses and bacteria, such as smallpox, measles, typhus, and cholera, for which Native Americans had no immunity (Denevan, 1976). On their return home, European sailors brought syphilis to Europe.
After Hitler broke the Munich Pact, what became clear to the rest of Europe?
Answer:
C. He was starting for wwII
Explanation:
Identify the causes of the Opium Wars.
what was the main role of the US women who served in Europe during World War I
Answer:
Replacing the men who were in the war and contributing to socio-economic and political development.
Explanation:
With millions of men away from home, women filled manufacturing and agricultural positions on the home front. Others provided support on the front lines as nurses, doctors, ambulance drivers, translators and, in rare cases, on the battlefield.
How do Amendments 9 and 10 limit the power of the national government?
Answer:
Whereas the Ninth Amendment provides that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other unenumerated rights retained by the people, the Tenth Amendment clearly reserves to the states those powers that the Constitution neither delegates to the federal government nor prohibits to the states. The Tenth Amendment does not impose any specific limitations on the authority of the federal government; though there had been an attempt to do so, Congress defeated a motion to modify the word delegated with expressly in the amendment. It thus does not grant states additional powers, nor does it alter the relationship that exists between the federal government and the states. It merely indicates that the states may establish and maintain their own laws and policies so long as they do not conflict with the authority of the federal government.
Explanation:
Drag and drop the tiles to match the topics to the Supreme Court cases.
limits freedom
of speechsupports antitrust
regulationprotects workers
rights
IF YOU DONT KNOW THE ANSWERS DONT COMMENT SIMPLE AS THAT. IF U DO I WILL REPORT U
Answer:
In Lochner v. New York (1905) = protecting workers rights
In Schenck v. United States (1919) =limits freedom of speech
In Northern = supports antitrust
Explanation:
In Northern = Supports antitrust,
In Schenck v. United States (1919) =Limits freedom of speech,
In Lochner v. New York (1905) = Protecting workers rights.
What is Antitrust?Antitrust means preventing or controlling trusts or other monopolies, and so promoting fair competition in business.
What is Freedom of speech?Freedom of speech in general terms means right to speak freely.
What is Protecting?Preserve or guarantee by means of formal or legal measures.
To learn more about Schenck v. United States (1919)
https://brainly.com/question/9498281
#SPJ2
Explain the vicious cycles
Answer:
a sequence of reciprocal cause and effect in which two or more elements intensify and aggravate each other, leading inexorably to a worsening of the situation.
Explanation:
hopes that ig is helpful and u will mark brainliest
The decline of the Roman Empire was partly caused by _____ .
dishonesty and violence
good government
lack of interest
losing many wars
Answer:
Invasions by Barbarian tribes
The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.
Explanation:
here is your answer hope you will enjoy and mark me as brainlist
thank you
What are the pros and cons of signing statements?
Answer:
cons
once you have signed it you can change it back
pros
its in writing and if the person at the other side of the signing changes there mind they cant change the statements
so sorry if this didnt help or i read it wrong
MWhich of these statements regarding the settlement of Texas is NOT accurate?
Which of the statements regarding the settlement of texas is not accurate?
A) Anglo settlement in Mexico started only after Texas became an independent republic.
B) The Spanish began to explore Texas before the first English colony was founded in Virginia.
Many Anglos settled in Texas in the early 1800s in order to acquire land at a very low cost.
D) The Mexican government hoped Anglo settlers would help to bring prosperity to the region specifically and to the country in general
The False statement as regards settlement of Texas here is that: B: The Spanish began to explore Texas before the first English colony was founded in Virginia
The Spanish Colonial era in Texas can be regarded as era that spring out with the system of missions as well as presidios, which is set up in order to spread Christianity as well as establishment of control over the region. The first Spanish-speaking settlers started develop around 1718 in San Antonio River in during this period of establishment of mission and presidio (fort). As times goes on Many Anglos decided to settled in Texas so that they can acquire land at a very low cost and that was around 1800s.
Therefore, option B is correct
Learn more at:
brainly.com/question/13878114?referrer=searchResults
I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST THE FIRST TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION☺️
Answer:
which language is this ???
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens ... nor
deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
- United States Constitution
Amendment XIV
No person shall be denied the equal protection of the
laws; nor shall any person be denied the enjoyment of his
civil or political rights.
-Constitution of Michigan of 1963
Article I, Section 2
Which conclusions can you make from comparing
these passages? Check all that apply.
Michigan cannot ignore the US Constitution.
Michigan's citizens do not have equal protection
The US Constitution does not apply to states.
Both constitutions contain some of the same
fundamental ideas.
The US Constitution does not protect rights.
Answer:
A & D
Explanation:
Because Mexico is a________ democracy, the president's role
and powers are separate from the legislative branch.
presidential
parliamentary
Answer: presidental democracy
Explanation:
This is because the president is head of both state and goverment unlike some other states.
What is detailed in this speech?
o
A
the causes of the Quasi-War
B
the causes of the Barbary Wars
O
0
С
the causes of the War of 1812
D
the causes of the Revolutionary War
Answer:
Abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz
BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Olmec civilization
A) Had poor architectural skills.
B) Left behind mysterious stone sculptures.
D) Was not able to trade because of its geographic isolation.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What was one of the effects of mansa Musa’s pilgrimage to Mecca?
Answer:
He forged new diplomatic and economic ties with other Muslim states
Explanation:
Europe as the "caboose" to the "Asian economic train"?
Answer:
simple the answer is a i took quiz
Explanation:
Leonardo designed many machines hundreds of years in advance of their time, machines that were perfectly designed except for the fact that they lacked a means of
Answer:
Explanation:
Which type of propaganda is being used in the poster?
A. appeal to fear
B. bandwagon
C. card-stacking
D. stereotyping
What are the potential consequences of using the Feudal system in Europe during the period 1200 - 1450 C. E.?
Answer:
. Political decentralization was caused by invasions of groups like the Seljuk Turks and political decentralization lead to the development of the Manorial system and Feudalism in Europe
Explanation:
Helpppppppppppppppppppppppp plzzzzzzzzzzzzz thx
Answer: The answer is D
Explanation: Because the colonies first people who tried to settle with a European nation in creating colonies of North, South and Middle East America as well.
Study the table. What statement is supported by the table? Household income defines an individual’s political ideology. Household income may be a weak indicator of political ideology. The influence of household income on political ideology changes by year. The influence of household income on political ideology differs by gender.
The table supports that the household income is not able to strongly define the political ideology.
What is household income?Household income is an aggregate of the total income earned by all the members in the family during a particular financial period.
The political ideologies are least under the influence of the household income. They may affect ideologies of an individual, but hardly have any connection with respect to gender or changing periodically.
Hence, option B states correctly that the household income is a weak indicator of the political ideology.
Learn more about household income here:
https://brainly.com/question/15153261
#SPJ2
Answer:
Household income may be a weak indicator of political ideology (B)
Explanation:
Cuz
Between 1910-1940, the African American population increased by
% in Chicago
Answer: 40%
Explanation:
The type of writing the Mayans used was called
Answer:
hieroglyphics or hieroglyphs
Explanation:
How did Louis XIV use art and monumental
architecture to legitimize his rule?
Louis XIV use art and monumental architecture to legitimize his rule through displaying his political power through them.
Louis XIV was one of the absolute power-wielding monarch of French and known as the Sun-King.
Louis XIV uses arts art and architecture to display his political power to their empire as well as to other empires.
In other word, the art and architecture employed by Louis XIV does depicts the ruler ideals for people to see and appreciate.
Learn more about Louis XIV here
brainly.com/question/17375874
Please help me.
Explain it to me in easy and simple word But please include every point
Explanation:
In Albania,Ali Pasha ruled as he pleased 1788-1822 until got killed by the Ottomans.Price-Bushoo of Montenegro was successful and was the one who drove the turks from his small mountainous princedom.
Serbia rose against the janissaries and achieved independence in 1878.The leaders for an independent Greece were a mixtyre of chiefs, educated merchants and Orthodox priest.The war againinst the Turks began in 1821,lasted 9 years and lead to many deaths.The island of Chios(1822) was emptied because either they were killed or turn to slaves by the turks
As the historian, how do you assess the credibility of the two accounts?