Answer:
B.
They did not worship many gods or emperors.
Explanation:
WHO IS THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE USA
Answer:
Joe Biden is the current president of the usa
Explanation:
Consider Martin Luther King jr. statement that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”
why is such a belief necessary to maintain democratic society
Answer:
Chances for growth,Combined decision making,Fewer chances of misuse of power,Equal rights to all,Ability to express themselves, Enhanced economic growth
Explanation:
why is it important on what's happening to Haiti right now
list two ways that Peter Stuyvesant improved the living conditions in new amsterdam?
Answer:
Peter Stuyvesant passed laws to improve life in New Amsterdam. Fires were a problem. The people were told to get rid of thatched roofs, wooden chimneys, and haystacks because they could cause fires. He appointed fire wardens to check to be sure the fire laws were being followed. He also set a speed limit at broadway.
Explanation:
I need help its urgent pls help fast!
Answer:
?
Explanation:
what grade are u in?
rhe doctor give new life to patient
Answer: You can consult:
they cure our diseases and stops the growth of the particular diseases. If the doctor didn't cure our diseases then the diseases can kill us. so they give us a life by curing our diseases
Explanation:
I'm not sure but hope it helps.
Explanation:
"doctors give a new life to patients" as they cure our diseases and stops the growth of the particular diseases. If the doctor didn't cure our diseases then the diseases can kill us. so they give us a life by curing our diseases.
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
Why did Congress pass the Volstead Act to go along with the Eighteenth Amendment?
Answer:
The Eighteenth Amendment was the product of decades of efforts by the temperance movement, which held that a ban on the sale of alcohol would ameliorate poverty and other societal issues. ... Shortly after the amendment was ratified, Congress passed the Volstead Act to provide for the federal enforcement of Prohibition.pls mark me as brainliest
how are direct and indirect different?
Direct speech describes when something is being repeated exactly as it was – usually in between a pair of inverted commas.
Indirect speech will still share the same information – but instead of expressing someone's comments or speech by directly repeating them, it involves reporting or describing what was said.
2. According to the Code of Hammurabi, what was
most highly valued in Mesopotamian society?
What was the least valued? Explain your answers.
Answer:
BIGGNER
Explanation:
IHHH WIBU:V
ANSWERR BY✏
SUGIONI REALL☠
Activity
Write a newspaper article about how voting restrictions impacted African Americans during this era.
Answer:
Explanation:
A terrible and bloody Civil War freed enslaved Americans. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution (1868) granted African Americans the rights of citizenship. However, this did not always translate into the ability to vote. Black voters were systematically turned away from state polling places. To combat this problem, Congress passed the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870. It says:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Yet states still found ways to circumvent the Constitution and prevent blacks from voting. Poll taxes, literacy tests, fraud and intimidation all turned African Americans away from the polls. Until the Supreme Court struck it down in 1915, many states used the "grandfather clause " to keep descendents of slaves out of elections. The clause said you could not vote unless your grandfather had voted -- an impossibility for most people whose ancestors were slaves.
This unfair treatment was debated on the street, in the Congress and in the press. A full fifty years after the Fifteenth Amendment passed, black Americans still found it difficult to vote, especially in the South." What a Colored Man Should Do to Vote", lists many of the barriers African American voters faced.
The fight for African American suffrage raged on for decades. In the 1930s one Georgia man described the situation this way: "Do you know I've never voted in my life, never been able to exercise my right as a citizen because of the poll tax? ... I can't pay a poll tax, can't have a voice in my own government."
Demonstrators marching in the street holding signs during the March on Washington, 1963
Many brave and impassioned Americans protested, marched, were arrested and even died working toward voting equality. In 1963 and 1964, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. brought hundreds of black people to the courthouse in Selma, Alabama to register. When they were turned away, Dr. King organized and led protests that finally turned the tide of American political opinion. In 1964 the Twenty-fourth Amendment prohibited the use of poll taxes. In 1965, the Voting Rights Act directed the Attorney General to enforce the right to vote for African Americans.
The 1965 Voting Rights Act created a significant change in the status of African Americans throughout the South. The Voting Rights Act prohibited the states from using literacy tests and other methods of excluding African Americans from voting. Prior to this, only an estimated twenty-three percent of voting-age blacks were registered nationally, but by 1969 the number had jumped to sixty-one percent.
Read the excerpts below and answer the question that follows.
Haiti
"I saw a lot of people crying for help, a lot of buildings collapsed, a lot of car damage, a lot of people without help, people bleeding."
He said he had seen a cinema, a supermarket, a cybercafe and an apartment building, all of which had crumbled in the quake.
Mr. Pedre said he could feel aftershocks every 15 to 20 minutes, lasting from three to five seconds each. The darkness, he said, was compounding the fear and worry people were feeling.
"There is no electricity, all the phone networks are down, so there's no way that people can get in touch with their family and friends," he said.
“Haiti quake witnesses speak of devastation.” BBC News. British Broadcasting Corporation, 13 Jan. 2010. Web. 22 Jun. 2011. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8455735.stm
Chile
A massive earthquake has hit central Chile and killed at least 214 people, the interior minister says.
The 8.8 quake caused widespread damage, destroying buildings, bridges and roads in many areas. Electricity, water and phone lines were cut.
Chilean President Michele Bachelet said that altogether two million people had been affected.
“Massive Earthquake Strikes Chile.” BBC News. British Broadcasting Corporation, 28 Feb. 2005. Web. 7 Jul. 2011. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8540289.stm
Based on the excerpts above, what conclusions can we draw about the 2010 earthquakes in Haiti and Chile?
A.
The earthquake in Chile was more destructive and caused more damage.
B.
It will cost more money to repair damages in Haiti because more buildings were affected.
C.
Both countries suffered damage to infrastructure and modes of communication, losing phone lines, electricity, and cable.
D.
Although people were afraid in both countries, the damage was limited to buildings and infrastructure in both places.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
We do not know for sure that the Earthquake in Chile was more destructive because the account with Haiti informed using stories and first-hand accounts while the one about Chile used data. We don't have first hand accounts from Chile and we don't have data from Haiti, so we cannot draw a conclusion about which one had more damage, which one will cost more to repair, etc.
We also see that many people died and were injured ("A massive earthquake has hit central Chile and killed at least 214 people", a lot of car damage, a lot of people without help, people bleeding.") , cars were damaged, and more. This demonstrates that damage was not limited to buildings and infrastructure in both locations.
We can conclude that C. both countries suffered damage to infrastructure and modes of communication, losing phone lines, electricity, and cable.
Chilean Earthquake: "The 8.8 quake caused widespread damage, destroying buildings, bridges and roads in many areas. Electricity, water and phone lines were cut."
Haitian Earthquake: "He said he had seen a cinema, a supermarket, a cybercafe and an apartment building, all of which had crumbled in the quake. Mr. Pedre said he could feel aftershocks every 15 to 20 minutes, lasting from three to five seconds each. The darkness, he said, was compounding the fear and worry people were feeling. 'There is no electricity, all the phone networks are down, so there's no way that people can get in touch with their family and friends,' he said."
Have a wonderful day and keep on learning! :D
The effects of earthquakes on Haiti and Chile were C. Both countries suffered damage to infrastructure and modes of communication, losing phone lines, electricity, and cable.
What happened to Chile and Haiti due to earthquakes?In Haiti, the 2010 Earthquake led to massive loss of life and widespread infrastructural damage such that Haiti has never fully recovered.
Chile also suffered such infrastructural damage as modes of communication and critical transport routes were damaged.
Find out more on the 2010 Haiti Earthquake at https://brainly.com/question/5218341.
#SPJ2
The Dust Bowl represented a disaster in terms of economics, environment, and health. explain
Answer:
Prices paid for crops dropped sharply and farmers fell into debt. In 1929 the average annual income for an American family was $750, but for farm families if was only $273. The problems in the agricultural sector had a large impact since 30% of Americans still lived on farms. The Dust Bowl of the 1930s was one of the worst environmental crises to strike twentieth century North America. Severe drought and wind erosion ravaged the Great Plains for a decade.
Explanation: The Dust Bowl was a period of severe dust storms that greatly damaged the ecology and agriculture of the American and Canadian prairies during the 1930's severe drought and a failure to apply dry land farming methods to prevent the eolian processes (wind erosion) caused the phenomenon. The Dust Bowl caused farmers to have to conduct extensive deep plowing of the soil on the Great Plains. This caused the displacement of the native grasses that normally trapped soil and moisture g periods of drought and high winds. The Dust Bowl was pretty much like, The natural balance of life and climate in the dust bowl is a delicate one. It is largely created by the region's short grasses, grass-eating animals, and unpredictable wet and dry periods. During the mid 1800's, huge cattle and sheep herds did great damage to the region And What Stopped it was While the dust was greatly reduced thanks to ramped up conservation efforts and sustainable farming practices, the drought was still in full effect in April of 1939. In the fall of 1939, rain finally returned in significant amounts to many areas of the Great Plains, signaling the end of the Dust Bowl.
How did the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor change the public’s opinion about the war?
Answer:
The attack on Pearl Harbor changed the public's opinion about the war in that the attack convinced Americans that force was necessary to stop Japan's aggression.
Explanation:
Before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Americans were divided about whether or not to enter the war. After World War I ended in 1919, many Americans became isolationists. Isolationism is the belief that the U.S should stay out of distupes between foreign nations. Both Europe and Asia were far away from the U.S. Millons of Americans believed the country could "go it alone" and not get involved in the war.
But Pearl Harbor changed things. The attack shocked Americans, Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor united them. Overnight, the U.S had become a major player in World War II. Isolationism was no longer an option.
(sorry if it's bad. if I'm gonna be honest, I'm just a kid. just starting middle school this year so...)
Which historical text typically provides varying viewpoints about a given topic?
Answer:
A historian's commentary if you are talking about a modern take on the past, if not a newspaper or other opinion piece from the time of the historical event.
can someone go answer my question I asked in engish
Answer:
ok i gotchu
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
ok i got it
How did the colonists combat starvation?
Answer:
(I assume you are talking about Jamestown and the "Starving Time")
They traded with the Natives for food, but soon that would fail when the Native Americans got sick from the diseases the English settlers had. They had ships deliver supplies to them, but the third ship failed to arrive before winter. There were new arrivals, and it was hard to feed all of them.
The colonists ate shoe leather and even ate up to seven horses brought from England. Some even resorted to cannibalism. Some did farming, but it was not enough to feed the entire colony, and it ended up failing.
How do scoietes live?
Answer:
Societies live in peace and harmony. The people of society also live in harmony helping others. They maintain peace in society in order to live together in a wholesome way.
What traditions blended to form the new medieval culture
it was the Greco-Roman, Germanic and Christian traditions
Which statement is true about modern scientists?(1 point)
They come from different backgrounds.
They come from different backgrounds.
They all work in laboratories.
They all work in laboratories.
They have limited interests.
They have limited interests.
They have the same sets of skills.
They have the same sets of skills.
ASAP PLS
Answer:
they come from different backgrounds
The correct option is A. Modern scientists come from different backgrounds.
A scientist is someone who methodically acquires data and uses it to form hypotheses, test those assumptions, and further knowledge and understanding.
What is a diverse scientist?The term "diversity in science" refers to the development of potential and the complete inclusion of excellence across all socioeconomic spectrums. Both those with typically underrepresented backgrounds and those with traditionally well-represented backgrounds are included in this.
Modern science is a method of investigating an occurrence or a particular feature by creating and doing a thorough investigation of the subject at hand so that it may be predictably categorized and, if it is a process, can be mathematically modeled.
Collaboration and problem-solving are essential for scientific advancement. Groups with diverse backgrounds and specialties are more likely to be creative and inventive. Science advances by questioning, and scientists with differing viewpoints frequently pose diverse questions.
Thus, A is the best choice. Modern scientists have a variety of backgrounds.
Learn more about Modern Scientists here:
https://brainly.com/question/6064031
#SPJ2
5 things most Americans agree with
they think they`re the best
it`s a free country (which it`s not)
they take great pride in their history
not most, but many say that america is the healthiest country
they aren`t as technologically advanced as most americans may say
The sinking of what ship by a German U-boat was the first event that would lead to the U.S. entering World War I?
Answer:
The sinking of the Lusitania by a German submarine was the event that pulled the US into World War I.
Select all the correct answers.
Study the illustration and the information provided about it. Then answer the question that follows.
Ancient Egypt was mostly mountains and deserts. But the people depended on agriculture for their food. Therefore, a lot of effort went toward making sure that crops received enough water to thrive.
Which two conclusions are most likely true about the system that ancient Egyptians used to bring water to their crops?
Ancient Egyptians depended on the Nile River to create a water system for agricultural purposes.
Ancient Egyptians were technologically advanced enough to create a system to bring water to farms.
Ancient Egyptians were able to develop a complex yet reliable watering system.
Ancient Egyptians mistreated their workers by making them carry heavy containers of water.
Ancient Egyptians gave up hunting and turned to agriculture for their daily food requirements.
Answer:
Ancient Egyptians were technologically advanced enough to create a system to bring water to farms.
Ancient Egyptians were able to develop a complex yet reliable watering system.
Explanation:
I took the test
The correct options are 2). Ancient Egyptians were technologically advanced enough to create a system to bring water to farms and 3). Ancient Egyptians were able to develop a complex yet reliable watering system.
What was ancient Egypt popular for?Ancient Egypt was one of the greatest and most powerful civilizations in the history of the world. It lasted for a very long period that was around 3000 years from 3150 BC to 30 BC. In the Ancient time, Egypt was known as the Kemet, that means the black land.
Ancient Egypt was very popular for its achievements which may include the surveying and construction techniques that enhances and supported the building of monumental pyramids, temples etc. It was located along the Nile River in northeast Africa.
Basically, the Nile river was the major source of the wealth for the ancient Egypt as it provided the fertile soil that led to the agricultural development.
Learn more about ancient Egypt here:-
https://brainly.com/question/1705438
#SPJ2
What impact did the developments in technology and transport have on Britain’s place in the world during the Industrial Revolution?
Answer:
Railways lowered the cost of transporting many kinds of goods across great distances. These advances in transport helped drive settlement in the western regions of North America. They were also essential to the nation's industrialization. The resulting growth in productivity was astonishing.
Explanation:
Roughly how many miles does the Kalahari Desert cover from
north to south? Use the map scale for guidance.
A 1000 miles
B 250 miles
500 miles
750 miles
highlight any three effects of the introduction of Christianity in Egypt
Answer:
Christianity Egypt in the middle of the first century AD, and with the entry of St. Mark in Alexandria in 65 AD, the first Coptic Church was established in Egypt. At the end of the third century AD, Christians were persecuted by Emperor Diocletian. The Copts took the year in which Diocletian ascended the throne (284 AD) as the beginning of the Coptic calendar.
i think this is useful
Identify the major figures, their faiths, and dates, that led to colonization of the Northern Colonies, including how each was organized and developed as a result of that faith, as well as including a description of the relationship between Church & State, and how each colony's economy was shaped.
Answer:
Explanation:
hope this helps lol its b
Which situation is an example of a citizen participating in the political process
Answer: Voting
Explanation: A citizen of a nation can participate in the political process by choosing those who represent them and would best reflect their interests.
Answer: A citizen researches the candidates running for office
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
Which sentence describes a cause of the decline of the Roman Republic?
• A.
There was a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion.
B. in Numerous floods In Italy destroyed most of the farms.
The growing gap In wealth between the social classes caused tension and Instability.
O D. The one-year term for consuls was too short for them to do anything useful.
O E.
There was major disagreement between the eastern and western sides of the republic.
Reset
Next
Answer: I think it's A
Explanation:
The sentence that describes a cause of the decline of the Roman Republic is "There was a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion." Since 324 BC, the Roman Republic began to have many difficulties and crises that represented the path to the end of the Republic.
Example of the government “banning speech or gatherings” and explain the government’s reasoning.
A good example of the government “banning speech or gatherings” and explain the government’s reasoning is "When the government prohibits any form of action by a group advocating the secession of Texas from the United States."
The explanation for the government reasoning is that "The government has the authority to stop any form of action by any person or group of individuals who are seen as a threat to national security or unity.
Hence, any act that is against the constitution of the United States concerning the speech and action of individuals or groups of people against the established authorities may be sanctioned by law.
Therefore, a good example of the government “banning speech or gatherings” and explain the government’s reasoning is "When the government prohibits any form of action by a group advocating the secession of Texas from the United States."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14664226
What is national heritage?
Answer:
National heritage means Items of especially historical or cultural significance handed down from generation to generation of a nation as a whole.
MARK AS BRANLIESTAnswer:
The things that do not belong to a person, community or group but belong to the nation are known as national heritage .