You buy tomatoes in 25 pounds cases. One portion of salad requires.75 ounces of tomatoes. How many portions can be made with one case

Answer:  

C is the answer

Given :   dilation with a scale factor of 3

To find :  Which statement is true

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution: A dilation is a transformation that produces an image that is the same shape as the original, but is a different size

if Dilation factor  N then image Size is multiplied  by  N

if Scale factor  < 1 then image get reduced

if scale factor > 1  then image get enlarged

scale factor = 1 lead to Same size image

Here is given that Scale factor of 3

=> image will be enlarged to 3 times the original image

Hence correct option is :

C)Each side in the pre-image is multiplied by three to find the corresponding side length in the image

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation: Edge Unit Test

Thus, the probability for the outcome of either purple or orange: P(purple or orange) = 57/97.

a choice that is made at random (entirely by chance, with no predictability). Every person in the population under study need to have an equal probability of getting chosen. Every person who is under investigation has an equal probability of being chosen at random for the sample.

Given bag with balls:

probability = favourable outcome / total outcome

P(purple) = 28/97

P(orange) = 29/97

Thus,

P(purple or orange) = 28/97 + 29/97

P(purple or orange) = 57/97

Thus, the probability  for the outcome of either purple or orange ball : P(purple or orange) = 57/97.

know more about the random selection

https://brainly.com/question/13219833

#SPJ1

Answer:

3rd choice:  when b>1

Step-by-step explanation:

For this function, a is the starting value (initial amount).  b is the decay or growth factor.  If b>1, then the function is a growth function.

FYI, if 0 < b < 1, then it is a decay function.

The index forms are simplified to;

1. [tex]5^6^\sqrt{2}[/tex]

2.[tex]3^5\sqrt{3}[/tex]

3.  [tex]2^2^\sqrt{25}[/tex]

It is important to note the following about the rules of index forms;

From the information given, we have that;

[tex]5^\sqrt{2}[/tex] × [tex]5^\sqrt{50}[/tex]

Add the exponents, we have;

[tex]5^\sqrt{2} ^+ 5\sqrt{2}[/tex]

Then, we have;

[tex]5^6^\sqrt{2}[/tex]

2. [tex]3\sqrt{12}[/tex] × [tex]3^\sqrt{27}[/tex]

We have;

[tex]3^2^\sqrt{3} + 3\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Add the exponents

[tex]3^5\sqrt{3}[/tex]

3. [tex]2^2^\sqrt{25}[/tex]

Learn more about index forms at: https://brainly.com/question/15361818

#SPJ1

The measure of the angle is 36.9^o. Option B.

A right triangle is a form or type of triangle in which the measure of one of its internal angles is 90^o. As such, either the trigonometric functions or Pythagorean theorem can be applied to determine any of its properties as the case may be.

From the details given in the question, we can deduced that;

Sin θ = 3/5

       = 0.6

So that,

θ = Sin^-1 0.6

  = 36.87

θ = 36.9^o

The measure of the angle is 36.9^o. Option B.

Learn more about right triangles at https://brainly.com/question/29869536

#SPJ1

The given identity (P+1/P-1 + P+1/P+1)-(P-1/P+2 + P+1/P-2)=-4(2p² + 1)/(p²-4) (p² - 1) is proven below

Given the following equation

(P+1/P-1 + P+1/P+1)-(P-1/P+2 + P+1/P-2)=-4(2p² + 1)/(p²-4) (p² - 1)

We start by simplifying the left-hand side of the equation:

(P+1/P-1 + P+1/P+1)-(P-1/P+2 + P+1/P-2)= [(P²+1)/(P(P-1))] + [(P²+1)/(P(P+1))] - [(P²-1)/((P+2)P)] - [(P²+1)/((P-2)P)]

Next, we have the following steps to simplify the expression

= [(P³ + P² + P + 1)/(P(P²-1))] - [(P³ - 3P)/(P(P²-4))]

= [(P³ + P² + P + 1)(P²-4) - (P³ - 3P)(P²-1)]/[(P(P²-1))(P(P²-4))]

= [(P⁵ - 3P³ + P³ - 3P² + P² - 4P + P² - 4P - 4 + P³ - 3P)/(P⁴ - 5P² + 4)]

= [P⁵ - 2P³ - 6P² - 8P - 4]/[(P²-4)(P²-1)]

= -4(2p² + 1)/(p²-4) (p² - 1)

Hence, the given identity is proven.

Learn more on proving identity

https://brainly.com/question/24496175

#SPJ1

The feasible region on the attached graph of the inequalities created with MS Excel indicates that the maximum value of g = 8·x + 12·y is 100

The feasible region is the region on the graph of the inequalities that satisfies the specified constraints.

The specified equations obtained from the constraints in slope intercept form are;

y = -0.5·x + 7; The region below the graph is shaded

y = -0.75·x + 9; The region below the graph is shaded

x = 0; The region to the right of the line x = 0 is shaded

y = 0; The region above the line y = 0 is shaded

The point of intersection of the graphs can be found from the equation; -0.5·x + 7 = -0.75·x + 9

Which indicates that at the intersection, x = 8, and y = -0.5×8 + 7 = 3

The corner points are; (0, 0), (0, 7), (8, 3), (12, 0)

The value of the function g for each of the feasible region are therefore;

g(0, 0) = 8 × 0 + 12 × 0 = 0

g(0, 7) = 8 × 0 + 12 × 7 = 84

g(8, 3) = 8 × 8 + 12 × 3 = 100

g(12, 0) = 8 × 12 + 12 × 0 = 96

Please find attached the graph of the inequalities showing the feasible region created with MS Excel

Learn more on the graph of inequalities here: https://brainly.com/question/29638667

#SPJ1

Answer:

The correct statement is "The ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Kim is the same as the ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Angela".

The correct answer option is option A

How to solve ratio?

Mangos Used Smoothie Size

Angela 1 9 oz

Kim 3 27 oz

Bri 4 36 oz

Check the given options to determine which statement is correct;

The ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Kim is the same as the ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Angela.

Kim = 27 : 3 = 9 : 1

Angela = 9 : 1

True

The ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Kim is 1:9, and the ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Bri is 4:27.

Kim = 27 : 3 = 9 : 1

Bri = 36 : 4 = 9 : 1

False

The ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Angela is higher than the ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Kim.

Angela = 9 : 1

Kim = 27 : 3 = 9 : 1

False

The ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Bri is 9:1, and the ratio of smoothie size to mangos used for Angela is 4:36.

Bri = 36 : 4 = 9 : 1

Angela = 9 : 1

False

Therefore, Kim and Angela has equal ratio of smoothie size to mangoes used.

Using two column proof we have been able to show that AB ║ EC

by definition of alternate interior angles

A two-column proof is defined as a two-column table labeled with statements on the left-hand side and reasons on the right-hand side.

The two column proof of the given diagram is as follows:

Statement 1: ΔADE is an Isosceles Triangle

Reason 1: Given

Statement 2: ∠DEA ≅ ∠DAE

Reason 2: Properties of Isosceles Triangles

Statement 3: ∠ADE = 20°

Reason 3: Sum of angles in a triangle

Statement 4: ∠BAD ≅ ∠EDA

Reason 4: Congruent Angles

Statement 5: ∠BAD and ∠EDA are alternate angles

Reason 5: Alternate angles are congruent

Statement 6: AB ║ EC

Reason 6: Definition of alternate interior angles

Read more about Two Column Proof at: https://brainly.com/question/18286984

#SPJ1

Answer:

270

Step-by-step explanation:

I am showing my mental math, hope this helps you:

45 x 6 is the same as 4 x 6 = 10s place value and 5 x 6 = 1s place value:

4 x 6 = 24

5 x 6 = 30

Therefore, the answer is:

2 (4 + 3) 0

270

The value of the expression 45 x 6 is 270.

We have,

To calculate the product of 45 multiplied by 6, you can follow these steps:

- Start by multiplying the units digits of the two numbers: 5 x 6 = 30.

- Write down the units digit of the result, which is 0, and carry over the tens digit, which is 3.

- Multiply the tens digit of the first number by the second number: 4 x 6 = 24.

- Add the carried-over value from step 2 to this result: 24 + 3 = 27.

- Write down the tens digit of the result, which is 7, and carry over the hundreds digit, which is 2.

- Multiply the hundred digit of the first number by the second number: 4 x 6 = 24.

- Add the carried-over value from step 5 to this result: 24 + 2 = 26.

- Write down the hundred digit of the result, which is 6.

- Combine the hundreds, tens, and units digits together: 6, 7, 0.

- The final product of 45 multiplied by 6 is 270.

So, 45 x 6 = 270.

Thus,

The value of the expression 45 x 6 is 270.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ6

Answer: the answer to be smart is to learn

Step-by-step explanation:

if you learn then you can understand the u are not smart

a. The perimeter of the paddock is 120 meters

b. The cost of the wire will be $600

a. To find the missing sides and calculate the perimeter of the paddock, let's analyze the given sketch.

The length of the missing side on the left can be determined by subtracting the known length of 10m from the total height of 20m. Therefore, the left side has a length:

20m - 10m = 10m.

The missing side on the right is equal in length to the known side of 40m.

Now we can calculate the perimeter by adding up all the side lengths:

Perimeter = 10m + 40m + 20m + 10m + 40m

= 120m.

b. To calculate the cost of the wire, we need to multiply the perimeter of the paddock by the cost per meter of fencing wire, which is $5/m.

Wire Cost = Perimeter × Cost per meter

= 120m × $5/m

= $600.

To learn more about perimeter follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/6465134

#SPJ1

To enlarge the photo proportionally so that it is as wide as the computer screen, we need to find the scaling factor. The scaling factor is the ratio of the width of the computer screen to the width of the photo:

Scaling factor = 1024 ÷ 640 = 1.6

We can then use this scaling factor to find the new dimensions of the photo:

New width = 640 × 1.6 = 1024 pixels

New height = 300 × 1.6 = 480 pixels

Therefore, the new dimensions of the photo are 1024 × 480 pixels.

2a. We cannot enlarge the photo proportionally so that it is as tall as the computer screen because the aspect ratio of the photo is different from the aspect ratio of the computer screen. The aspect ratio of the photo is 640 ÷ 300 ≈ 2.13, while the aspect ratio of the computer screen is 1024 ÷ 768 ≈ 1.33. This means that if we enlarge the height of the photo to match the height of the computer screen, the width of the photo will be too wide to fit on the screen.

b. We cannot correct the difficulty in (a) by scaling the width of the photo by a factor of 1024 ÷ 640 and the height by a factor of 768 ÷ 300 because this would change the aspect ratio of the photo. The aspect ratio of the photo would become 1024 ÷ (640 × 1024 ÷ 640) ≈ 1.6, which is the same as the aspect ratio of the computer screen. However, the height of the photo would be scaled by a factor of 768 ÷ 300 ≈ 2.56, which would make the photo too tall to fit on the screen.

To enlarge the photo proportionally, we need to scale it up by the same factor in both dimensions. Since we want to scale it so that its width matches the width of the screen, we can find the scaling factor by dividing the screen width by the photo width:

scaling factor = screen width / photo width = 1024 / 640 = 1.6

Now we can use this scaling factor to find the new height of the photo:

new height = photo height x scaling factor = 300 x 1.6 = 480 pixels

Therefore, after the photo is scaled up proportionally, its measurements are 1024 x 480 pixels.

2a. We can't enlarge the photo proportionally so that it is as tall as the computer screen because its aspect ratio (the ratio of its width to its height) is different from the aspect ratio of the screen. The photo's aspect ratio is 640/300 = 2.13, while the screen's aspect ratio is 1024/768 = 1.33. Enlarging the photo so that its height matches the screen's height would require stretching the photo vertically, which would distort the image.

2b. Scaling the width of the photo by a factor of 1024/640 and the height by a factor of 768/300 would not correct the difficulty in part (a) because it would not change the aspect ratio of the photo. The aspect ratio of the photo would still be 2.13, which is different from the aspect ratio of the screen. The photo would still need to be stretched vertically to match the screen's height, which would distort the image.

Answer:

Therefore, the customer saved $2,448.45.

Step-by-step explanation:

To answer this question, we need to use the percentage discount formula to find the original price and the amount saved.

Let x be the original price of the product. Then, after applying the 12% discount, the price becomes 0.88x. If the total is over $10,000 after this discount, then an additional 3% discount is applied on the remaining balance, which means the final price becomes 0.97 * 0.88x.

We are given that the final price is $13,500, so we can set up an equation and solve for x:

0.97 * 0.88x = 13,500 x = 13,500 / (0.97 * 0.88) x = 15,948.45

Therefore, the original price was $15,948.45.

The amount saved is the difference between the original price and the final price:

15,948.45 - 13,500 = 2,448.45

The shaded area of the portion as shown in the diagram is 78.04 cm².

Area is the region bounded by a plane shape.

To calculate the shaded area of the portion, we use the formula below

Formula:

Where:

From the question,

Given:

Substitute these values into equation 1

Learn more about area here: https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

Complete question: A 7 cm times 5 cm rectangle sits inside a circle with a radius of 6 cm. Calculate the area of the shaded portion.

Answer:

7e+6

Step-by-step explanation:

biggest answer

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

let the mid-point of DE be ( x , y )

x = (8+4)/2 = 6

y = (6+10)/2 = 8

the mid- point of DE is ( 6 , 8 )

Answer: Sure, here's how to solve the system of equations:

1. Start with the first equation: 3x = y - 2

Solve for y by adding 2 to both sides: y = 3x + 2

2. Substitute the value of y from the first equation into the second equation:

6x = 4 - 2y

6x = 4 - 2(3x + 2) (substitute y = 3x + 2)

6x = 4 - 6x - 4

12x = 0

3. Solve for x by dividing both sides by 12: x = 0

4. Substitute the value of x from step 3 into either equation to solve for y:

y = 3x + 2

y = 3(0) + 2

y = 2

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is (x, y) = (0, 2).

hope this helpsss :D

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiplying row 1 of the matrix by  1 / 4 would give a resultant matrix of [ 1 / 2    0 | 3 / 4 ]

[ - 1     5   | 4 ].

The question wants to multiply the first row of the matrix alone, with the fraction, 1 / 4.

First step is then to multiply the first row by the fraction of 1 / 4 :

( 1 / 4 ) x 2 = 1 / 2

( 1 / 4 ) x 0 = 0

( 1 / 4 ) x 3 = 3 / 4

The results acquired can then be input into the matrix which would then give a resultant matrix of :

[ 1 / 2   0 | 3 / 4 ]

[ - 1     5   |    4   ]

Find out more on matrices at https://brainly.com/question/28992335

#SPJ1

Answer:

circle graph titled New York City visitor's transportation, with five sections labeled walk 40 percent, bicycle 8 percent, car service 15 percent, bus 10 percent, and subway 27 percent.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the correct percentages, we need to calculate the percentage of visitors who used each mode of transportation out of the total number of visitors, which is the sum of all the numbers in the table:

Total number of visitors = 120 + 24 + 45 + 30 + 81 = 300

Percentage of visitors who walked = (120 / 300) x 100% = 40%

Percentage of visitors who used a bicycle = (24 / 300) x 100% = 8%

Percentage of visitors who used a car service = (45 / 300) x 100% = 15%

Percentage of visitors who used a bus = (30 / 300) x 100% = 10%

Percentage of visitors who used the subway = (81 / 300) x 100% = 27%

Therefore, the circle graph that correctly represents the data in the table is:

circle graph titled New York City visitor's transportation, with five sections labeled walk 40 percent, bicycle 8 percent, car service 15 percent, bus 10 percent, and subway 27 percent.

The conversion of 2,000 Swiss francs to United States dollars and from United States dollars into Dutch guilders (Holland) based on Wednesday's currency exchange rate is D. ƒ4,032.

The exchange rate represents the unit rate at which one currency is exchanged for or converted to another.

Exchange rate conversions rely on the mathematical operations of division or multiplication.

1 CHF = $1.12

2,000 CHF = $2,240 ($1.12 x 2,000 CHF)

On Wednesday April 26, 2023, $1.00 =  ƒ‎1.80

$2,240 = ƒ4,032 ($2,240 x ƒ1.80)

Thus, we can conclude that 2,000 CHF (Swiss francs) are worth 4,032 Dutch guilders.

Learn more about exchange rates at https://brainly.com/question/2202418.

#SPJ1

Answer:

14/16 = 0.875

Using the table feature of a graphing utility  the intensity of an earthquake with an amplitude of 200,000 micrometers for 0.5 seconds would be 2.16 x 10¹⁴ joules/second/meter².

First, note that the   intensity of an earthquake with an amplitude of 200,000 micrometers for 0.5 seconds can be calculated using the formula..

I = (1/2)ρv²

Here I   Intensity

ρ = density of the medium - this is a constatnt

v = velocity of the S-waves

If we used a graphing tool

a coumun ffor v will be created

a column for the formula for velocity will also be created.

The formula for velocity is

V = A/ T

A = amplitude

T = time or period in seconds


Since A = 200,000 micrometers; and

T = 0.05 secons

v = 200,000 / 0.5

v = 400,000 micrometer/sec

Back o the table, we ahve to add another oclumn for V²

then enter the values for V²

V² = 400,000²
v² = 160,000,000,000 micrometer²/sec²


Nowe we add another column which is

I = 1/2(pv²)

I = 2.16 x 10¹⁴ joules/second/meter².


learn more about graphing utility:
https://brainly.com/question/29180622
#SPJ1

The first 5 terms of the sequence are 1/3, 2/3, 4/3, 8/3 ans 16/3

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The sequence is generated by using gn = 2(gn-1)

Such that g1 = 1/3 and n is a whole number greater than 1.

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

The sequence means that we multiply the current term by 2 to get the next term

So, we have the following representations

a(2) = 2 * 1/3 = 2/3

a(3) = 2 * 2/3 = 4/3

a(4) = 2 * 4/3 = 8/3

a(5) = 2 * 8/3 = 16/3

Hence, the first 5 terms of the sequence are 1/3, 2/3, 4/3, 8/3 ans 16/3

Read more about sequence at

https://brainly.com/question/30499691

#SPJ1

Answer:

Compound Interest Formula: A = P (1 + R/100)^t

A = 1000 (1 + 10/100)^10

A = $2593.74

Please mark my answer as Brainliest if you found it helpful.

Answer:

Sure, I can help you with that.

Given:

   * The box is 24 inches long.

   * The width of the box is seven inches less than the height.

   * The volume of the box is 2,880 cubic inches.

To solve:

   * Complete the equation that models the box's volume in terms of its height, x, in inches.

   * Determine if the height of the box can be 15 inches.

Solution:

Let's define the following variables:

* $h$ = the height of the box (in inches)

* $w$ = the width of the box (in inches)

* $l$ = the length of the box (in inches)

We are given that  l=24 and w=h−7. We can use these values to find the volume of the box:

[tex]V = lwh = 24(h - 7)h[/tex]

We can simplify this expression to get the following equation:

[tex]V = 24h^2 - 168h[/tex]

To determine if the height of the box can be 15 inches, we can substitute 15 for $h$ in the equation and see if we get a positive value for the volume.

[tex]V = 24(15)^2 - 168(15) = 2160 - 2490 = -330[/tex]

Since the volume is negative, the height of the box can't be 15 inches.

Therefore, the equation that models the box's volume in terms of its height, x, in inches is [tex]$V = 24x^2 - 168x$[/tex]. Consequently, the size of the box can't be 15 inches.

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

The only answer is height = 15 because the -8 will be rejected