A toy manufacture has designed a new part for use in building models. The part is a cube with side length 14 mm and it has a 12 mm diameter circular hole cut through the middle. The manufacture wants 9,000 prototypes. If the plastic used to create the part costs $0. 07 per cubic millimeter, how much will the plastic for the prototypes cost?

If she sells 280 items and raises $540, then Susan raises $300 from selling lemonade.

To determine how much money Susan raises from selling lemonade, we'll set up a system of equations using the given information.

Let x be the number of lemonade cups and y be the number of brownies sold. We know:

1. x + y = 280 (total items sold)
2. 2.50x + 1.50y = 540 (total money raised)

First, we'll solve for x in equation 1:

x = 280 - y

Now, substitute this expression for x in equation 2:

2.50(280 - y) + 1.50y = 540

Simplify and solve for y:

700 - 2.50y + 1.50y = 540
-1.00y = -160
y = 160

Now that we have the number of brownies (y), we can find the number of lemonade cups (x):

x = 280 - 160
x = 120

Finally, calculate the money Susan raises from selling lemonade:

Money from lemonade = 120 * $2.50 = $300

So, Susan raises $300 from selling lemonade.

More on selling: https://brainly.com/question/29250593

#SPJ11

To find u × v, we use the cross product formula:

u × v = | i    j    k |
           | 2    0    6 |
           | 4    7   -5 |

Expanding the determinant, we get:

u × v = (0*-5 - 6*7) i - (2*-5 - 6*4) j + (2*7 - 0*4) k
u × v = -42i - 22j + 14k

To find v × u, we use the same formula but switch the order of u and v:

v × u = | i    j    k |
           | 4    7   -5 |
           | 2    0    6 |

Expanding the determinant, we get:

v × u = (7*6 - (-5)*0) i - (4*6 - (-5)*2) j + (4*0 - 7*2) k
v × u = 42i + 18j - 14k

Finally, to find v × v, we again use the cross product formula with v as both inputs:

v × v = | i    j    k |
           | 4    7   -5 |
           | 4    7   -5 |

Expanding the determinant, we get:

v × v = (7*(-5) - (-5)*7) i - (4*(-5) - (-5)*4) j + (4*7 - 7*4) k
v × v = 0i - 0j + 0k
v × v = 0

So the cross product of v with itself is the zero vector.
To find u × v, v × u, and v × v, we'll use the cross product formula:

u × v = (u_yv_z - u_zv_y)i + (u_zv_x - u_xv_z)j + (u_xv_y - u_yv_x)k

Given u = 2i + 6k and v = 4i + 7j - 5k, we have:

u_x = 2, u_y = 0, u_z = 6
v_x = 4, v_y = 7, v_z = -5

Now, calculate u × v:
(0 * (-5) - 6 * 7)i + (6 * 4 - 2 * (-5))j + (2 * 7 - 0 * 4)k
= (-42)i + (34)j + (14)k

u × v = -42i + 34j + 14k

Next, calculate v × u:
(7 * 6 - (-5) * 0)i + ((-5) * 2 - 4 * 6)j + (4 * 0 - 7 * 2)k
= (42)i + (-34)j + (-14)k

v × u = 42i - 34j - 14k

Finally, calculate v × v:
(7 * (-5) - (-5) * 7)i + ((-5) * 4 - 4 * (-5))j + (4 * 7 - 7 * 4)k
= (0)i + (0)j + (0)k

v × v = 0i + 0j + 0k

In summary:
u × v = -42i + 34j + 14k
v × u = 42i - 34j - 14k
v × v = 0i + 0j + 0k

Learn more about cross product formula here: brainly.com/question/30404174

#SPJ11

The new regression coefficient is about 0.663, viz. lesser than the previous regression coefficient by 0.297. Thus, a single outlier creates a significant drop in the correlation

Changing A to (1,12) gives below scatterplot and regression parameters

(check image)

2. In this case, r is about 0.766, a drop of 0.194 which is substantial, but lower than the previous drop. The regression coefficient changed much more when the outlier was in the middle of the scatterplot. This happens because the data series itself is increasing.

So the effect of 10 points in a middle point is much more of an outlier compared to when this 10-point increase happens for the highest value of x. Hence, the r value drops more in the former case.

3. r can become negative if drop the point B to a highly negative y-value. Consider taking it to (4, -50). Then we get the following regression parameters

We obtain r = -0.275. Since the expected y-value was highest for point B, so changing it drastically to a large negative value leads to a negative correlation between the two variables.

4. With only two points that are parallel to neither of the axes, the correlation coefficient is always exactly either 1 or -1. The correlation is 1 if the slope of the line joining the two points is positive, and -1 if the slope is negative.

That is, there is always either a perfect positive correlation or a perfect negative correlation. This is so because there is always a unique line joining two points, which leads to a perfect correlation between them. Even by differing the pairs, this relation shall always hold true.

5. If the points are parallel to the X axis, we should obtain r=0, because it indicates no relation between the variables. So points (1, 2) and (3, 2) lead to r=0. This can be verified using any calculator.

A vertical line also leads to r=0. Since the y value does not change, so no correlation can be established. Actually, it is just like flipping the x and y variables, and we know flipping does not change the correlation coefficient. So we should obtain r=0 even for a vertical line.

Read more about regression here:

https://brainly.com/question/17004137

#SPJ1

the value of y is -5/8. So, In part (a), we found that the rational function f(x) = (5x + 20)/(x^2 - 20) had a vertical asymptote at x = -2√5 and x = 2√5, a horizontal asymptote at y = 0, an x-intercept at (-4, 0), a y-intercept at (0, -1), and a hole at (-4, 5/18).

To find the value of y when x = -6, we simply substitute -6 for x in the function:

f(-6) = (5(-6) + 20)/((-6)^2 - 20)

We simplify this expression by first multiplying 5 and -6 to get -30, and then adding 20 to get -10 in the numerator. In the denominator, we evaluate (-6)^2 to get 36, and then subtract 20 to get 16. So, we have:

f(-6) = -10/16

This fraction can be simplified by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 2:

f(-6) = (-10/2)/(16/2) = -5/8

Therefore, when x = -6, the value of y is -5/8.

To know more about rational function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20850120#

#SPJ11

To find g(x), the translation 1 unit left of f(x) = x², we need to replace x with (x+1) because moving left means we need to subtract 1 from x. Therefore, g(x) = f(x+1) = (x+1)².

To write g(x) in the form a(x-h)² + k, we need to expand (x+1)² first. Using the formula (a+b)² = a² + 2ab + b², we get:

g(x) = (x+1)² = x² + 2x + 1

Now we can write g(x) in the vertex form by completing the square. We add and subtract (2/2)² = 1 to the expression to get:

g(x) = x² + 2x + 1 - 1 + 1
    = (x+1)² + 0

Therefore, g(x) = (x+1)² + 0 is the vertex form of g(x), where a=1, h=-1, and k=0. This means that the vertex of the parabola g(x) is (-1,0), and it opens upwards. The translation 1 unit left of f(x)=x² results in a horizontal shift of the parabola to the left by 1 unit without changing its shape or orientation.

To know more about find g(x) refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28440771#

#SPJ11

Answer:

y = 12x

Step-by-step explanation:

First let's find the total cost of feeding all the meerkats per day:

8*1.5 = 12

That means it costs $12 to feed all the meerkats each day. Now we can construct our equation

Let y = cost

Let x = days

y = 12x

This equation tells us the cost for feeding the meerkats an x number of days

The value of the missing side is 58. 75

To determine the value of the missing side, we need to know the different identities and their ratios.

These trigonometric identities are;

We have their ratios as;

sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse

tan θ = opposite/adjacent

cos θ = adjacent/hypotenuse

We have that the;

Angle = 57 degrees

Adjacent = 32

Hypotenuse side = x

Then, we have;

Substitute the values for the cosine identity, we get

cos 57 = 32/x

cross multiply

x = 58. 78

Learn about trigonometric identities at: https://brainly.com/question/7331447

#SPJ1

If Peter changed more pounds into dollars than he changed into francs then Peter changed £6,168 more into dollars than into francs.

First, we need to find out how much money Peter changed into euros:

(3/10) × £20,160 = £6,048

Next, we need to find out how much money Peter changed into dollars, rupees, and francs combined:

£20,160 − £6,048 = £14,112

We can use the ratios to find out how much of this total amount goes to each currency:

- Dollars: (9/16) × £14,112 = £7,932

- Rupees: (5/16) × £14,112 = £4,420

- Francs: (2/16) × £14,112 = £1,764

We can see that Peter changed more pounds into dollars than into francs. To find out how many more, we can subtract the amount changed into francs from the amount changed into dollars:

£7,932 − £1,764 = £6,168

To know more about dollars refer to

https://brainly.com/question/2202418#

#SPJ11

The dimensions are;

Length = 7 meters

Width = 5 meters

The area of a rectangle is expressed as;

Area = length × width

From the information given, we have that;

Length = 2w - 3

Area = 65

Substitute the values

65 = (2w - 3)w

expand the bracket

65 = 2w² - 3w

solve the quadratic equation;

2w² + 13w - 10w - 65

Factorize the terms

w(2w + 13) - 5(2w + 13)

w = 5

Substitute the value

Length = 2w - 3 = 2(5) - 3 = 7

Learn about area at: https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

Applying the concept of combination, the number of different sandwiches that can be created is determined as: D. 6.

To determine the number of different sandwiches that can be created with two different meats, we can use the concept of combinations.

In this case, we need to choose 2 meats out of 4 options. The number of combinations of 2 items that can be chosen from a set of 4 items is given by the formula:

nCr = n! / r!(n-r)!

where n is the total number of items, r is the number of items to be chosen, and the exclamation mark (!) denotes the factorial function.

In this case, we have:

n = 4 (since there are 4 meat options)

r = 2 (since Regan wants to choose 2 meats)

Therefore, the number of different sandwiches that can be created is:

4C2 = 4! / 2!(4-2)! = 6

This means there are 6 different ways to choose 2 meats out of 4, and hence 6 different sandwich options.

Learn more about combination on:

https://brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ1

At a significance level of 0.05, the critical value is typically chosen as 1.96 for a two-tailed test. Comparing this critical value with the obtained p-value of 0.067, which is greater than 0.05, indicates that the result is not statistically significant.

At 0.05 level of significance, when we fail to reject the null hypothesis, it means that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. In this case, the null hypothesis states that the mean filling weight of the population is equal to 20 ounces. Since the data does not provide strong evidence to suggest otherwise, we conclude that the mean filling weight is not significantly different from 20 ounces.

Hence, the answer is (b) "Not significantly different than 20 ounces."

Learn more about level of significance: https://brainly.com/question/15414435

#SPJ11

A plane rose from take-off and flew at an angle of 11° with the ground, the horizontal distance the plane had flown when it reached an altitude of 500 feet is approximately 2755.3 feet.

To solve this problem, we can use trigonometry. We know that the angle between the ground and the plane's path is 11°, and the altitude of the plane is 500 feet. Let x be the horizontal distance the plane has flown.

We can use the tangent function, which is defined as the ratio of the opposite side to the adjacent side of a right triangle, to find x. In this case, the opposite side is the altitude (500 feet) and the adjacent side is x. So we have:

tan(11°) = 500/x

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides by x and then divide by tan(11°):

x = 500 / tan(11°)

Using a calculator, we get:

x ≈ 2755.3 feet

Therefore, the horizontal distance the plane had flown when it reached an altitude of 500 feet is approximately 2755.3 feet.

More on distance: https://brainly.com/question/31103579

#SPJ11

To convert to polar coordinates, we need to express x and y in terms of r and θ. We have:

x = r cos θ

y = r sin θ

Also, we need to change the limits of integration. The region of integration is the circle centered at the origin with radius 8, so we have:

-π/2 ≤ θ ≤ π/2 (for the upper half of the circle)

0 ≤ r ≤ 8

Now we can express the integrand in terms of r and θ:

[tex]x^2 + y^2 = r^2[/tex] (by Pythagoras)

[tex]20(x^2 + y^2) = 20r^2[/tex]

So the integral becomes:

∫-π/2π/2∫[tex]08r^3 cos^2 θ sin θ dr dθ[/tex]

We can simplify cos^2 θ sin θ using the identity cos^2 θ sin θ = (1/3)sin^3 θ, so we get:

∫-π/2π/2∫[tex]08r^3 (1/3)sin^3 θ dr dθ[/tex]

The integral with respect to r is easy to evaluate:

∫0^8r^3 dr = (1/4)8^4 = 2048

The integral with respect to θ is also easy to evaluate using the fact that sin^3 θ is an odd function:

∫-π/2π/2(1/3)[tex]sin^3[/tex] θ dθ = 0

Therefore, the value of the iterated integral is:

2048(0) = 0

The volume of the solid is zero. This makes sense because the integrand is an odd function of y (or sin θ) and the region of integration is symmetric with respect to the x-axis.

Learn more about polar coordinates

https://brainly.com/question/11657509

#SPJ4

The margin of error at the 99% confidence interval is 1.39%. Interpretation: we can be 99% confident that the true proportion of viewers under 30 in the population falls within the range of 30% ± 1.39%.

To calculate the margin of error at the 99% confidence interval, we can use the formula:

Margin of error = z* × √(p × (1 - p) / n)

where z* is the critical value (2.576 for a 99% confidence interval), p is the sample proportion (0.30), and n is the sample size (5000).

Margin of error = 2.576 × √(0.30 × (1 - 0.30) / 5000) ≈ 0.0139 or 1.39%

The interpretation of this result is that we can be 99% confident that the true proportion of viewers under 30 in the population falls within the range of 30% ± 1.39%. In other words, if we were to conduct the survey multiple times, we would expect the proportion of viewers under 30 to fall within this interval 99 out of 100 times. This information is useful for understanding the level of uncertainty in the survey results and can help guide decision-making based on the findings.

Learn more about margin of error here: https://brainly.com/question/29328438

#SPJ11

If 400 people attended a concert 10 percent of the people came from Scotland 25 percent of the people came form Wales, there were 60 more people from Wales than from Scotland.

To find out how many more people came from Wales than Scotland at a concert with 400 attendees, we'll first calculate the number of people from each region.

1. Determine the number of people from Scotland:
Since 10% of the people came from Scotland, we'll multiply the total attendees (400) by 10% (0.10).
400 * 0.10 = 40 people from Scotland.

2. Determine the number of people from Wales:
Since 25% of the people came from Wales, we'll multiply the total attendees (400) by 25% (0.25).
400 * 0.25 = 100 people from Wales.

3. Calculate the difference between the number of attendees from Wales and Scotland:
Subtract the number of people from Scotland (40) from the number of people from Wales (100).
100 - 40 = 60 more people from Wales than Scotland.

In conclusion, at the concert with 400 attendees, there were 60 more people from Wales than from Scotland.

To know more about percent, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30908449#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use a system of equations to solve the problem.

We know that Bonnie bought a total of 12 bottles, so:

p + a = 12

We also know that Bonnie spent a total of $15, so:

1p + 1.75a = 15

We can solve this system of equations by substitution or elimination. Here, we'll use substitution:

p = 12 - a (from the first equation)

1(12 - a) + 1.75a = 15 (substituting p in the second equation)

12 - a + 1.75a = 15

0.75a = 3

a = 4

So Bonnie bought 4 bottles of apple juice. We can find the number of bottles of pineapple juice by substituting a=4 into the first equation:

p + 4 = 12

p = 8

Therefore, Bonnie bought 8 bottles of pineapple juice and 4 bottles of apple juice.

The derivative of f(x) is -3/4.

To find the derivative, use the definition of a derivative:

f'(x) = lim h→0 [f(x + h) - f(x)] / h

Substitute f(x) = √(4x + 3) into this definition:

f'(x) = lim h→0 [√(4(x + h) + 3) - √(4x + 3)] / h

Multiplying by the conjugate of the numerator:

f'(x) = lim h→0 [(√(4(x + h) + 3) - √(4x + 3)) * (√(4(x + h) + 3) + √(4x + 3))] / [h * (√(4(x + h) + 3) + √(4x + 3))]

Expanding the numerator, we get:

f'(x) = lim h→0 [(4(x + h) + 3) - (4x + 3)] / [h * (√(4(x + h) + 3) + √(4x + 3)) * (√(4(x + h) + 3) + √(4x + 3)))]

f'(x) = lim h→0 [4h] / [h * (√(4(x + h) + 3) + √(4x + 3)))]

Canceling out the h terms, we get:

f'(x) = lim h→0 4 / (√(4(x + h) + 3) + √(4x + 3)))

Now, we can evaluate the limit as h approaches 0:

f'(x) = 4 / (√(4x + 3) + √(4x + 3))

f'(x) = 4 / (2√(4x + 3))

f'(x) = 2 / √(4x + 3)

Therefore, the derivative of f(x) is -3/4.

Learn more about derivative

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The amplitude of the current I is 16.9 Amperes

To find the amplitude of the current I in the given circuit with an alternating current E(t) = 120sin(12t), inductance L = 0.31 H, resistance R = 7 ohms, and capacitance C = 0.029 F, we need to determine the impedance (Z) of the circuit first.

The impedance Z can be calculated using the formula:

Z = √((R²) + (XL - XC)²)

Where XL is the inductive reactance, and XC is the capacitive reactance. XL can be calculated as:

XL = 2πfL

And XC can be calculated as:

XC = 1/(2πfC)

Here, f is the frequency of the alternating current, which can be determined from the given function E(t) = 120sin(12t) as:

f = 12/(2π) = 1.91 Hz

Now, we can calculate XL and XC:

XL = 2π(1.91)(0.31) = 3.74 ohms

XC = 1/(2π(1.91)(0.029)) = 2.89 ohms

Next, we can find the impedance Z:

Z = √((7²) + (3.74 - 2.89)²) = √(49 + 0.72) = 7.1 ohms

Finally, we can find the amplitude of the current I using Ohm's law:

I = E(t)/Z

Since we're looking for the amplitude, we only need the maximum value of E(t), which is 120 V:

I = 120/7.1 = 16.9 A

Learn more about current at

https://brainly.com/question/2333610

#SPJ11

The distance along the ground between the building and the sculpture is approximately 27.98 feet. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the answer is 27.98 feet.

From the problem statement, we know that angle BAC is 25 degrees and AC is 60 feet. We want to find AB, which is the horizontal distance between A and B.

We can use trigonometry to find AB. Let's use the tangent function:

tan(25) = AB / AC

Solving for AB, we get:

AB = AC * tan(25)

Substituting the values we know, we get:

AB = 60 * tan(25)

Using a calculator, we get:

AB ≈ 27.98 feet

Therefore, the distance along the ground between the building and the sculpture is approximately 27.98 feet. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the answer is 27.98 feet.

Learn more about trigonometry at https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

A reasonable estimate for the amount of flour and sugar combined is approximately 0.36 kg.

To determine a reasonable estimate for the amount of flour and sugar combined, we first need to add the fractions 1/4 and 2/9. To do this, we need to find a common denominator. The least common multiple of 4 and 9 is 36. We can convert 1/4 to 9/36 by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by 9. We can also convert 2/9 to 4/36 by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by 4. Now we can add the fractions:

9/36 + 4/36 = 13/36

So Ellen mixed 13/36 kg of flour and sugar combined. To convert this to a decimal, we can divide the numerator by the denominator:

13 ÷ 36 ≈ 0.36

Therefore, a reasonable estimate for the amount of flour and sugar combined is approximately 0.36 kg.

To know more about reasonable estimate, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/23707423#

#SPJ11

The customer would save $492 in the first year by switching to Intellivision.

The customer would save $207 in the second year by switching to Intellivision.

For the third year, it would be cheaper to stick with ElectroniSource.

To calculate the savings for the first year, we need to find the total cost for ElectroniSource and compare it to the flat fee from Intellivision for all three services.

The savings for the first year by switching to Intellivision would be:

$1,632 - $1,140 = $492

Therefore, the customer would save $492 in the first year by switching to Intellivision.

After the first year, Intellivision raises the rates by 25%. So the new flat fee for the second year would be:

$95 + ($95 x 25%) = $118.75

The savings for the second year by switching to Intellivision would be:

$1,632 - $1,425 = $207

Therefore, the customer would save $207 in the second year by switching to Intellivision.

For the third year, Intellivision raises the rates by 16% compared to the second year. So the new flat fee for the third year would be:

$118.75 + ($118.75 x 16%) = $137.78

Therefore, for the third year, it would be cheaper to stick with ElectroniSource, which costs $1,632 for the year, compared to Intellivision, which costs $1,653.36 for the year.

Find out more on savings at https://brainly.com/question/9153521

#SPJ1

The function that models this situation is f(n) = -3n + 24.

To find the function, we need to analyze the relationship between the number of meals dispensed (n) and the amount of pet food remaining (f(n)).

1. Observe the change in f(n) when n increases by 1 meal. From n=1 to n=3, f(n) decreases from 21 to 15, a change of -6. From n=6 to n=7, f(n) decreases from 6 to 3, a change of -3.
2. The decrease in f(n) is not constant, so the function is not linear. However, the decrease becomes smaller as n increases.
3. Consider the average rate of change in f(n) per meal: (-6/2) = -3, (-3/1) = -3.
4. Since the average rate of change is constant, the function is linear.
5. The function has the form f(n) = -3n + b. To find b, plug in the value of n and f(n) from the table: 21 = -3(1) + b, which gives b = 24.
6. Therefore, the function that models this situation is f(n) = -3n + 24.

To know more about rate of change click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31226174#

#SPJ11

2x²t + 7xy

    To simplify, we will combine like terms.

    Given:

5xy - x²t + 2xy + 3x²t

    Reorder like terms:

5xy + 2xy + 3x²t - x²t

    Combine like terms:

    ➜ 5 + 2 = 7

    ➜ 3 - 1 = 2

7xy + 2x²t

    Reorder by degree:

2x²t + 7xy

10mL of the baraclude oral solution to the patient.

To determine the amount of the oral solution of baraclude (entecavir) to administer, we need to use the following formula:

Amount to administer (mL) = Desired dose (mg) / Strength (mg/mL)

In this case, the desired dose is 0.5mg and the strength is 0.05mg/mL. Plugging in these values, we get:

Amount to administer (mL) = 0.5mg / 0.05mg/mL = 10mL

Therefore, you will administer 10mL of the baraclude oral solution to the patient.
Hi! To calculate the number of mL to administer, you need to consider the prescribed dose and the strength of the oral solution. The order is for Baraclude (entecavir) 0.5mg PO daily, and the solution's strength is 0.05 mg/mL.

To find the required mL, divide the prescribed dose by the solution's strength:

0.5 mg (prescribed dose) ÷ 0.05 mg/mL (solution's strength) = 10 mL

You will administer 10 mL of Baraclude (entecavir) oral solution daily.

To know more about required mL click here:

brainly.com/question/14143257

#SPJ11

Solving real-life problems involving mean or expected value can be quite useful in various situations, such as finance, statistics, and decision-making.

To begin, identify the problem that requires the calculation of mean or expected value.

The mean is the average of a set of numbers, while expected value is the anticipated result based on probability distribution.

Next, collect the necessary data for the problem.

In calculating the mean, gather all values in the data set.

For expected value, you'll need the probability of each outcome and its corresponding value.

To calculate the mean, add all the values together and divide by the total number of values. For expected value, multiply each outcome's value by its probability and then sum up the results.

Once you have the mean or expected value, apply it to the real-life problem to make informed decisions or predictions. This can help in areas such as budgeting, risk assessment, and determining the likelihood of future events.

Learn more about expected value at

https://brainly.com/question/15042834

#SPJ11

The 25 fluid ounces is greater than one pint is correct statement .

Relation between fluid ounces and pint ,

There are 16 fluid ounces in one pint.

Conversion of fluid ounces to pint

This implies that,

1 fluid ounces is equal to  one by sixteen pint.

To be precise,

25 fluid ounces is equal to 25 / 16pints

⇒  25 fluid ounces is equal to 1.5625.

However, since 1.5625 is greater than 1,

This implies that 25 fluid ounces is greater than 1 pint.

So, 25 fluid ounces is greater than 1 pint.

Because 25 is greater than 16.

And 1 pint is not greater than 25 fluid ounces.

Therefore, the 25 fluid ounces is greater than one pint.

learn more about pint here

brainly.com/question/31293288

#SPJ4

We can prove that 25k² + 15k is an even integer whenever 5k - 3 is an integer by considering two cases: when k is even and when k is odd.

Let's assume that 5k - 3 is an integer. Then, we can write k as k = (5k - 3 + 3)/5 = (5k - 3)/5 + 3/5. Since (5k - 3)/5 is an integer, we can write it as (5k - 3)/5 = n, where n is an integer. Thus, we have k = n + 3/5.

Now, we can substitute this expression for k into 25k² + 15k as follows:

25k² + 15k = 25(n + 3/5)² + 15(n + 3/5)

Expanding the square, we get:

25(n² + 6n/5 + 9/25) + 15n + 9 = 25n² + 45n/5 + 34/5

Simplifying, we get:

25k² + 15k = 5(5n² + 9n) + 34/5

Since 5n² + 9n is an integer, we can write it as m, where m is an integer. Thus, we have:

25k² + 15k = 5m + 34/5

Now, we can consider two cases:

Case 1: k is even. In this case, k can be written as k = 2p, where p is an integer. Substituting this expression into 5k - 3, we get:

5k - 3 = 5(2p) - 3 = 10p - 3

Since 10p is even, we can conclude that 10p - 3 is odd. Therefore, m must be odd, since 5m + 34/5 is even. Thus, 25k² + 15k is even, since it can be written as 5m + 34/5, where 5m is even and 34/5 is even.

Case 2: k is odd. In this case, k can be written as k = 2p + 1, where p is an integer. Substituting this expression into 5k - 3, we get:

5k - 3 = 5(2p + 1) - 3 = 10p + 2

Since 10p is even, we can conclude that 10p + 2 is even. Therefore, m must be even, since 5m + 34/5 is even. Thus, 25k² + 15k is even, since it can be written as 5m + 34/5, where 5m is even and 34/5 is even.

In both cases, we have shown that 25k² + 15k is an even integer whenever 5k - 3 is an integer. Therefore, the statement is proved.

To know more about integer, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15276410#

#SPJ11