Discuss the differences between individualizing items of evidence and associative items of evidence?

Gitlow v. New York was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in 1925 that established the principle of selective incorporation, which is the idea that certain provisions of the Bill of Rights are applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In Gitlow v. New York, the Court considered the case of Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist who had been arrested and convicted under New York's criminal anarchy law for distributing left-wing literature. Gitlow argued that his right to free speech, which was protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, had been violated.

The Supreme Court agreed with Gitlow and ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment "incorporated" the freedom of speech guarantee of the First Amendment, thereby making it applicable to the states. This decision had significant implications for the protection of individual rights and liberties in the United States, as it paved the way for the selective incorporation of other provisions of the Bill of Rights over time.

To know more about incorporation click here:

brainly.com/question/814339

#SPJ4

There are several factors that can make it easier for employees to win discrimination lawsuits, but one of the most important is evidence.

Evidence can take many forms, including documentation of discriminatory actions, witness testimony, and statistical data that shows patterns of discrimination. When employees have strong evidence to support their claims of discrimination, they are more likely to be successful in court. Additionally, having a clear and comprehensive anti-discrimination policy in place can also strengthen an employee's case. This policy can serve as evidence that the employer was aware of the discriminatory behavior and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it. Overall, having solid evidence and a strong anti-discrimination policy can significantly increase the likelihood of success in a discrimination lawsuit.

To know more about lawsuits click here:

brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ4

In Act III of The Crucible, Proctor's main purpose in bringing Mary Warren to court is to prove that the accusations of witchcraft are false and to save his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, from being convicted.

Mary Warren, who is one of the girls accusing people of witchcraft, had previously admitted that their accusations were false, but she is now too afraid to speak out against the other girls. Proctor believes that if Mary Warren testifies in court and tells the truth, the accusations will be exposed as fraudulent and his wife will be cleared of any wrongdoing.However, Mary is afraid of Abigail and the other girls and eventually breaks down, claiming that Proctor is the devil's man. Proctor's attempt to expose the truth is thwarted, and he is ultimately arrested for witchcraft himself.

To know more about witchcraft click here:

brainly.com/question/8159939

#SPJ4

Answer:

e. only a and c.

Explanation:

In the landmark case Roe v. Wade (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy extends to an abortion, and that the Constitution protects a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. However, the Court also ruled that the right to an abortion is not absolute, and that the state has a legitimate interest in regulating abortion to protect the health of the mother and the potential life of the fetus. The Court established a trimester framework for evaluating state abortion regulations, with greater state restrictions on abortion permitted as the pregnancy progresses.

The Supreme Court used its power of judicial review to strike down part of an act of Congress for only the second time in Marbury v. Madison (1803). In this case, William Marbury was appointed as a justice of the peace by President John Adams during the last days of his presidency.

However, the commission papers were not delivered to Marbury before the end of Adams' presidency, and the new President, Thomas Jefferson, ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver the commission. Marbury then filed a lawsuit against Madison, seeking a writ of mandamus that would require Madison to deliver the commission. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, declared that the portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that gave the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus was unconstitutional, and therefore Marbury's lawsuit could not be granted. This case established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.

To know more about Supreme Court click here:

brainly.com/question/844146

#SPJ4

#the supreme court used its power of judicial review to strike down part of an act of congress for only the second time in which of the following cases?

The mission of this organization, which fervently supports the Second Amendment by educating "responsible American gun owners to prevent danger, save lives, and keep their loved ones safe," is timely given that society has recently experienced issues due to the misuse of guns rather than their proper use for defense.

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states that no one's right to keep and bear arms shall be infringed because a well-regulated militia is vital to the security of a free State.

Its objective is to protect an individual's right to own a handgun for non-military uses and to use such a weapon for legal purposes such as self-defense within the home.

Despite the fact that the United States Constitution enables individuals to acquire and possess firearms, we do not agree that there are organisations that focus on training citizens to use weapons since we consider that this is a measure that may generate danger in society. Additionally, we think that the state should have the legal ability to use guns to protect its citizens. It should also give them with security.

Learn more about second amendment: https://brainly.com/question/29894002

#SPJ1

One impact of third parties in American politics is that they can serve as a "spoiler" or influence the outcome of an election.

In a winner-takes-all system like that used in most U.S. elections, a third-party candidate who receives even a small percentage of the vote can potentially swing the election in favor of one major party or the other. This can happen if the third-party candidate attracts voters who might otherwise have supported one of the major-party candidates.

Third parties can also help bring attention to issues and ideas that may be ignored by the major parties, and can serve as a check on the power of those parties. However, third-party candidates often face significant barriers to entry, such as difficulty in getting on the ballot and lack of media coverage, which can limit their ability to have a significant impact on the political process.

To know more about elections click here:

brainly.com/question/29760616

#SPJ4

Answer:

Questioned document examiners can be called upon to investigate a variety of cases related to documents, including:

1. Forgery: when a document is suspected to have been forged or manipulated

2. Fraud: when a document is suspected to be fraudulent or to contain fraudulent information

3. Document alteration: when a document has been altered from its original form

4. Disputed wills: when the legitimacy of a will is in question

5. Anonymous letters or threats: when a document is suspected to be authored by an unknown person

6. Counterfeit currency: when a document is suspected to be counterfeit or fake, such as banknotes or checks

These are just some examples of the types of cases that may require the expertise of a questioned document examiner.

Answer:

Georgia's license law was unconstitutional and Worcester's conviction should be overturned.

Explanation:

On review of the case, the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia ruled that because the Cherokee Nation was a separate political entity that could not be regulated by the state

We can match the jobs to the tasks associated with it in the following way:

A mediator is a professional trained to act as a neutral facilitator during a mediation process. He is usually an impartial third party in a mediation.

Mediation is a process in which parties discuss disputes, and the mediator helps them to reach an agreeable settlement.

A mediators play a role in some of these situations:

Learn more about a mediator at brainly.com/question/30501868.

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. The type of transfer from Carrie to Jen is an assignment. An assignment occurs when a party transfers a contractual right to another party. The assignment of the right to payment is valid as long as it is not prohibited by the original contract or by law. In this case, the contract between Roger and Carrie did not prohibit the assignment of the right to payment, and there is no law that prohibits it, so the transfer is valid.

2. The type of transfer from Roger to Kyle is an assignment. When a contract is assigned, the new assignee steps into the shoes of the original party and assumes all rights and obligations under the contract. An assignment can be valid unless the contract prohibits it or the obligations that are being assigned have already been performed. In this case, the contract between Roger and Carrie did not prohibit assignment, and the obligation to have Carrie teach had not yet been performed. Therefore, the transfer is valid.

3. The type of transfer from Carrie to Mary is a delegation. A delegation occurs when a party transfers their obligation to another party. The general rule is that obligations under a contract are not transferable unless the contract specifically allows it. In this case, there is no mention of delegation in the original contract, so the transfer could be invalid. However, if the obligation being delegated is for services that are personal in nature, such as teaching, the delegation may be invalid. In this case, the court would need to determine if teaching is a personal service.

The term that has the following definition-- the illegal practice of refusing to offer credit or insurance in a community based on a discriminatory basis is redlining.

Redlining is a practice that is considered to be discriminatory, illegal, and unethical. It refers to a financial institution's or insurance company's refusal to provide credit or insurance services in a specific area, either geographic or demographic, based solely on that area's racial and ethnic makeup or economic class.

The United States' history of redlining can be traced back to the 1930s, when the federal government began mapping out neighborhoods in metropolitan areas and categorizing them as "safe" or "risky" for investment. These maps' markings determined who would have access to mortgages, insurance, and other financial services. The term "redlining" is derived from the practice of drawing a red line on a map around specific areas.

Areas that were marked in red were considered to be high-risk areas, and financial institutions refused to offer credit or insurance to people living in those areas. This resulted in those areas remaining poor and segregated, as people were unable to acquire property or gain access to economic opportunities. Redlining had a long-term impact on communities, particularly those made up of Black and Hispanic people.

Homeownership was difficult to achieve, which meant that wealth could not be built through property ownership. When homeownership and property values fell, these neighborhoods lost vital tax revenue, making it difficult for communities to fund education, infrastructure, and other necessary public services. Redlining made it harder for people living in segregated areas to access quality healthcare, good jobs, and safe housing. Redlining remains a critical issue in many areas.

To know more about redlining, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28245308#

#SPJ11

The answer is "true." A contract entered into by an intoxicated person can be either voidable or valid.

When a person is intoxicated, their judgment may be impaired, and they may not fully understand the terms and implications of a contract. In such cases, the contract may be considered voidable, meaning that the intoxicated person has the option to either affirm or reject the contract. However, if the intoxicated person was still capable of understanding the nature and consequences of the contract despite their intoxication, the contract may still be considered valid. Ultimately, the determination of whether a contract entered into by an intoxicated person is voidable or valid will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the applicable laws and regulations.

To know more about voidable click here:

brainly.com/question/30471036

#SPJ4

Confucian scholars and the emperor had disagreements because the scholars adhered to the traditional teachings of right conduct and setting a good example rather than enforcing strict rules and they disapproved of the government.

To learn more about conflict, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/846617

The U.S. Supreme Court case that involved a family suing a school system saying the segregation of schools was unfair and was hurting children was Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

The Brown v. Board of Education case was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that American state laws that established segregation in public schools are unconstitutional. It was a pivotal moment in the civil rights movement that challenged racial segregation in the United States.In 1951, Oliver Brown, a black father in Topeka, Kansas, tried to enroll his daughter, Linda Brown, in the white-only Sumner Elementary School.

The school system denied Linda's enrollment due to her race, which required her to attend the black-only Monroe Elementary School. The Browns, along with twelve other Topeka families, filed a lawsuit against the Board of Education of Topeka Public Schools.

You can learn more about Brown v. Board of Education (1954) at

https://brainly.com/question/11960172

#SPJ11

Collateral promises made in connection with a primary agreement, contracts for the sale of goods over $500 under the UCC, and contracts where one party has reasonably relied on the other's promise.

Collateral promises refer to promises made by a third party to guarantee the performance of a primary obligation between two parties. These promises can be oral or written and are often made to provide additional security to a creditor. Collateral promises are an exception to the Statute of Frauds, which requires certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. In such cases, the collateral promise can be enforced even if the primary agreement is not in writing. However, for the collateral promise to be enforceable, it must be made in connection with the primary obligation and must be for the benefit of the promisor. Collateral promises are common in loan agreements, where a third party agrees to be responsible for the debt of the borrower if they default.

Learn more about Collateral promises here:

https://brainly.com/question/26985573

#SPJ1

Article 7 of the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Code of Ethics states that real estate agents must disclose to their clients any financial benefits they receive from the transaction.

This includes compensation from both the buyer and the seller, as well as any referral fees or compensation from other parties. The disclosure must be made in a timely and complete manner, and the agent must obtain the client's informed consent before accepting any compensation. This helps to ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, as clients are able to make fully informed decisions about their transactions with all relevant information disclosed to them by their agent.

To know more about National Association of Realtors click here:

brainly.com/question/31226349

#SPJ4

The Geneva Conventions are a set of international treaties that establish the standards for humanitarian treatment during war.

The conventions have had a significant impact on the world by establishing protections for civilians, prisoners of war, and medical personnel during armed conflicts. The conventions have also helped to establish international norms and expectations for the behavior of combatants during war, including limits on the use of certain weapons and tactics. The conventions have been ratified by the vast majority of countries in the world, demonstrating a global commitment to the principles of humane treatment during armed conflict. Overall, the Geneva Conventions have played a critical role in promoting human rights and minimizing suffering during times of war.

To know more about humanitarian click here:

brainly.com/question/28248356

#SPJ4

This would be a civil lawsuit for property damage.

The neighbor is seeking compensation from Connie for the damage to their car that was caused by the fallen tree on Connie's property. The neighbor would need to prove that Connie was negligent in maintaining her property and that this negligence led to the damage to the car. The outcome of the lawsuit will depend on the evidence presented by both parties and the decision of the judge or jury.

Since Connie did not have insurance that covered this type of accident, she may be held personally responsible for the damages caused. The neighbor would need to provide evidence of the damage caused and the cost of repairs in order to successfully pursue this type of lawsuit.

To know more about lawsuit click here:

brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ4

1b. If you had to pay state unemployment tax in more than one state, you are a multi-state employer

1b. Check here

Complete Schedule A

Based on the information provided, Premium Court only paid state unemployment tax in one state, which is the District of Columbia (DC).

Therefore, they are not considered a multi-state employer.

The response to the given questions should be:

1a. If you had to pay state unemployment tax in one state only, enter the state abbreviation.

1a. DC

1b. If you had to pay state unemployment tax in more than one state, you are a multi-state employer

1b. Check here

Complete Schedule A

Leave this section blank, as Premium Court is not a multi-state employer.

Read more about tax here:

https://brainly.com/question/1775528

#SPJ1

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 authorized the Attorney General to send federal examiners to register qualified voters who had been denied the right to vote based on their race.

This provision was aimed at ending discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes that were used to prevent African Americans from exercising their right to vote. The Act also included provisions that prohibited jurisdictions with a history of discriminatory voting practices from making changes to their voting laws without approval from the federal government. The goal was to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their race, had equal access to the ballot box.

To know more about discriminatory   click here:

brainly.com/question/6185037

#SPJ4

The finding that does little to help the nurse determine the legal sanity of the defendant is The defendant's emotional state is anxious or fearful.

What is the role of forensic nursing?

Forensic nursing is a medical specialty that encompasses a wide range of healthcare roles. These nurses assess and treat victims of violent and criminal acts. They serve as liaisons between the criminal justice system and healthcare providers. The role of the forensic nurse examiner is to assess the medical needs of victims of violence and provide evidence for legal cases.

This is accomplished by gathering medical data and other evidence and presenting it to legal authorities. The forensic nurse examiner assesses the mental state of victims as well as defendants in a case to help determine the circumstances surrounding the event.

What is legal sanity?

The ability of an individual to understand and appreciate the nature and consequences of their conduct is referred to as legal sanity. In other words, legal sanity refers to a person's state of mind at the time a crime was committed. Legal sanity is an important component of criminal law since it is necessary for a person to be sane at the time of the crime to be held responsible for their actions.What finding does little to help the nurse determine legal sanity of the defendant?The defendant's emotional state is anxious or fearful is the finding that does little to help the nurse determine the legal sanity of the defendant.

To know more about forensic nurse examiner refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22925514

#SPJ11

Law regulates the structure and administration of government agencies and their relationships with citizens, employees, and other governments is Public Law. (B)

Public law regulates the structure and administration of government agencies and their relationships with citizens, employees, and other governments. It covers areas such as constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, and international law.

Public law establishes the power of the government and ensures the protection of individual rights. It sets out the roles and responsibilities of government bodies, defines the limits of their authority, and establishes procedures to ensure the fair and equitable enforcement of laws.

It also governs the relationships between governments and citizens, as well as between governments and other governments.(B)

To know more about Public Law click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31145481#

#SPJ11

Charges of discrimination or unfair termination are frequently included in lawsuits brought against performance management.

To learn more about lawsuits, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/27880380

Explanation:

I would strongly advise the person to prioritize her safety and wear her seatbelt, regardless of whether it may cause some wrinkles on her dress.

While looking presentable is important for a wedding, the safety of the driver and passengers is even more crucial. In the event of a collision, not wearing a seatbelt could lead to serious injuries or even fatalities, which are much more significant than the appearance of the dress.

To avoid or minimize any wrinkles caused by the seatbelt, the person can try adjusting the seatbelt height, using a seatbelt pad, or bringing a handheld steamer or iron to the wedding to touch up her dress if necessary. It is important to remember that safety should always come first, and that there are ways to mitigate any potential damage to clothing.

14th amendment due process protections related to the civil rights act of 1968 forbids states from denying any person "life, liberty or property, without due process of law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

On July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was approved, granting citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States," which included recently freed former slaves. In addition, it forbids states from denying any person "life, liberty or property, without due process of law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The 14th Amendment, which is more frequently cited in court cases than any other amendment due to its explicit mention of the role of the states, significantly increased the protection of civil rights for all Americans.

Learn more about 14th Amendment at:

brainly.com/question/29793577

#SPJ4

Civil rights can be strengthened by both a presidential administration's actions and by rulings in the Supreme Court. Each plays a distinct role in promoting and protecting civil rights in the United States.

1. Presidential administration's actions: The executive branch, led by the president, has the power to create policies and enforce laws that can have a significant impact on civil rights. For instance, a president can issue executive orders that further civil rights protections, allocate resources towards enforcement, or promote social equity through various government programs.

Additionally, the president has the power to appoint leaders to key positions within the government, such as heads of agencies, who can also work towards advancing civil rights. In these ways, a presidential administration can play a crucial role in strengthening civil rights.

2. Rulings in the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court, as the highest court in the United States, has the power to interpret the Constitution and determine the legality of laws and government actions. Through their rulings, the Supreme Court can set important legal precedents that establish or uphold civil rights protections.

Landmark cases such as Brown v. Board of Education, which ended racial segregation in public schools, demonstrate the significant impact the Supreme Court can have on civil rights.

In conclusion, both a presidential administration's actions and rulings in the Supreme Court contribute to strengthening civil rights. While the president and their administration can implement policies and programs that advance civil rights, the Supreme Court's role in interpreting the Constitution and establishing legal precedents is equally important in ensuring the protection and promotion of these rights.

To know more about Civil rights refer here: https://brainly.com/question/21057720#
#SPJ11

Democratic is a form of government in which power is held by the people, who vote to elect their representatives.

Since "democracy" is derived from the Greek words "demos," which means "people," and "kratos," which means "power," democracy can be defined as a form of government that is based on the will of the people. The ability of the people to choose their leaders is the primary characteristic of a democracy. So, in a sense, a democracy is a form of popular rule. The fundamental tenet is that by taking part in the creation of these rules, people rule themselves. democracy in our governments.

Since the people elect their representatives as Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs), they hold the primary power in a democracy. The members of the ruling party then form the government, with some of them being named ministers.

Learn more about democracy at:

brainly.com/question/13158670

#SPJ4