Option D is the correct option. The “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our country’s oldest buildings.
When I completed the homework and looked up the answers because none of them were correct, I discovered that 4, 5, and 6 were the appropriate answers. you're invited. Tysm! To correct logical errors and increase clarity, sentences need to be added, deleted, or altered. But occasionally, the author or speaker does mean to provide a weak case, usually in an effort to persuade readers' judgments or undermine their opponent. Knowing them and being able to see them is the greatest method to keep from using logical fallacies in your own writing. According to Aristotle, a verbal error occurs when the language employed is unclear or inaccurate, and a material fallacy occurs when an argument uses flawed or misleading data.
To know more about writing refer :
brainly.com/question/9511978
The complete question is :
How could the writer improve the underlined sentence to remove the logical fallacy
A) Everyone who appreciates our country’s oldest buildings should forget the architectural philosophy “out with the old, in with the new.”
B) Anyone who accepts the “out with the old, in with the new” architectural philosophy is a menace to society.
C) Some people have embraced the “out with the old, in with the new” philosophy, as the number of applications for demolition permits hit a record high this year.
D) The “out with the old, in with the new” approach to architecture is clearly a result of people who no longer care about our country’s oldest buildings.
#SPJ1
Why would a narrator use different dialect than the rest of the characters?
In a book I am reading, the narrator uses a dialect that is fancier than the rest of the characters southern dialect, which makes the narrator seem more educated.
Why did the author use this literary choice?
Answer:
Using a different dialect for the narrator than the characters can serve several literary purposes. One reason is to create a contrast between the narrator and the characters, which can help to highlight the differences in their social or educational backgrounds. In the case of the book you are reading, the narrator's fancier dialect compared to the other characters' southern dialect could suggest that the narrator is from a more privileged or educated background than the characters, and may view the world and events of the story differently because of this.
Another reason for using a different dialect for the narrator is to establish a distinct narrative voice. By using a different dialect or register for the narrator, the author can give the narrative a unique tone or style that sets it apart from the characters' dialogue. This can be especially effective in first-person narratives, where the narrator's voice is crucial in shaping the reader's understanding of the story.
Overall, using a different dialect for the narrator than the rest of the characters can serve as a literary device to add depth to the story and create contrast between characters, as well as to establish a unique narrative voice.
Answer:
To showcase a perspective above the characters and storyline. Meaning, the narrator is above all.
Explanation: