SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ITS DUE TDY

Answer:

Hey mate.....

Explanation:

This is ur answer....

The development of agriculture resulted in people creating permanent settlements. Ancient people started to domesticate animals (the cow and pig for example) and invent new tools, like the plow, which made farming easier. Since there was a surplus of food in the villages, many people could pursue other jobs.

Hope it helps!

Brainliest pls!

Follow me! ◇

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's B

Explanation:

it was used to record a variety of information such as temple activities, business and trade. *Sorry if it's incorrect.*

Answer:

B - All people should be treated equally.

Answer:

B) All people should be treated equally.

Second answer is also B) They were often not invited to participate in white churches.

☆
EDGE2022; Good Luck :D!!!

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Most Logical Answer

Answer:

Robinson Crusoe

Explanation:

Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe is a narrative where the main character, Robinson Crusoe goes onto a ship, goes exploring, and ends up on an island because of his ship getting destroyed.

Answer:

Habitaron en el sur del estado de Veracruz y noroeste de Tabasco

Explanation:

:)

Answer:

Your sense of self refers to your perception of the collection of characteristics that define you.

Explanation:

Sense of self depends on not only recognizing your strengths but also believing in your capabilities to use them to achieve your goals. Having a good handle on your talents and maximizing them in your day-to-day life often means you have a healthy sense of self.

I hope this helps you in any shape or form.

Answer:

C. constitutional is the answer

Answer:

The Spanish used the system to get free labor from the indigenous people as a form of tribute. The indigenous people would provide agricultural labor or work in textile mills, but the most common form of labor was working the mines. This also contributed to the declining population of indigenous people.

Answer:  After Napoleon's defeat, the Congress of Vienna was convened in 1814–15 to set new boundaries, re-create the balance of power, and guard against future French hegemony. It also dealt with international problems internationally, taking up issues such as rivers, the slave trade, and the rules of diplomacy.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

In 1794, farmers from Western Pennsylvania rose up in protest of what they saw as unfair taxation and provided the new nation, and George Washington, with a looming crisis.

please mark as brainliest it helps

Whiskey was being taxed is the people protest is the Whiskey Rebellion. Hence, option D is correct.

The Whiskey Rebellion served as the federal government of the United States' first significant test. This rebellion enforced the notion that the new government had the authority to impose a certain tax that would apply to citizens of all states.

The Whiskey Rebellion provided the fledgling American government with its first opportunity to exercise federal power militarily within state boundaries as authorities moved into western Pennsylvania to put down a rebellion of settlers opposing the whiskey tax.

Farmers in Western Pennsylvania revolted in 1794 over what they perceived as excessive taxes, creating a crisis that threatened the fledgling country and George Washington.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more details about Whiskey Rebellion, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/478473

#SPJ2

Answer:

1) Both worked for civil rights.

2) Both worked against poverty.

3) Both had the ability to unite people of different backgrounds.

Both of these men were extremely well spoken and had the ability to deliver their message in a way that millions of Americans can relate to. They used their abilities in order to improve American society throughout the 1950's and 1960's.

Explanation:

Your answer should be - (1.) Both worked for civil rights.

Both worked against poverty.

Both had the ability to unite people of different backgrounds.

Answer:

I was just wondering maybe the answer could be stone tools

Your answer - Management theory that examines work flows in order to increase economic efficiency, particularly labor productivity. This management philosophy, created by Frederick Winslow Taylor, was prominent in the United States' industrial industries in the 1880s and 1890s.

Hope that helps

Answer:

Corn can be used in a variety of household cleaners.

Some types of corn feed people and some types feed animals.

Explanation:

Here are the reason the other 2 are false -

1. Corn can be used as an ingredient in toothpaste and peanut butter -

Toothpaste is although extracted from corn, peanut butter is extracted from roasted peanuts, not corn.

2. Corn from the Midwest is sent to Japan and South Korea -

Approximately 14.3 percent of corn production is exported to over 73 different nations. The top three maize export destinations for the United States were Mexico (31%), Japan (25%), and Colombia (9%). Although it is sent to Japan, but it isn't to South Korea.

3. Corn can be used in a variety of household cleaners -

Many household cleaners, including glass cleaners, contain extracted corn in their solutions.

4. Some types of corn feed people and some types feed animals -

Field corn is used to feed animals, while sweet corn is used to feed people, or humans.

Thank You! Please Mark Brainliest! (Sorry for the delay!) :)

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

you need to list the following

Explanation:

Answer:

the rosenbergs?

Explanation:

Answer:

A.)

Explanation:

It’s Election Day in the United States, and as the day unfolds, all eyes will be on the men and women streaming into the polls to cast their ballots. News broadcasts will be devoted to counting up all the votes cast, and trying to divine who came out to vote and why.But American elections aren’t actually about the people who vote. They’re about the people who don’t. Politicians are almost always chosen by less than a majority of the population. Laws and practices that exclude large numbers of potential voters determine who wins and who loses.That’s by design. Voter exclusion is hard-wired into what is, on close inspection, a very undemocratic system of governance. The U.S. Constitution placed the selection of presidents in the hands of “electors,” not the people, and it offered no clear protections for a citizen’s right to vote. In the original Constitution, states retained enormous latitude to determine who went to the polls and who did not.And although amendments eventually extended voter protection to black Americans, women and people 18 and over, even these guarantees were only partially enforced. Communities nationwide used poll taxes, literacy tests, inconvenient voting locations and onerous registration requirements to discourage voting by particular groups, especially African Americans and other minorities.The real fraud in American voting is not illegally cast votes but legally blocked ones. Our history has taught us all too well how to keep people away from the polls, despite their constitutional rights. Even a half-century after the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, tens of thousands of citizens are denied the franchise because of insufficient proof of identity, felony convictions or other state stipulations — all of which are designed today, as they were in the past, to keep certain people from casting their ballots.“Certain people” means, most obviously, people of color, who are told they are not welcome as voters at every stage in the process, from demeaning rhetoric about their “fake” votes to convoluted registration processes to intimidation at the polls. For many Mexican Americans, it feels safer just to stay home. That’s why states such as Texas have electorates that remain dominated by white votes even as their populations become rapidly more diverse.But “certain people” also means those without access to wealth. The mobilization of money for elected office makes dominant groups even more powerful. The sheer scale of wealth in the hands of several billionaires has allowed them, and their political action committees (PACs), to smother competitors. As the rich have become so much richer, they have made their votes count more, and the votes of others count less. Donald Trump began his presidential campaign as a critic of big political donors, but he and his supporters in the Republican Party benefited from their money in the election.By the time poor citizens vote, the candidates have already been vetted by the wealthy donors who are necessary for any person running to have a chance. That means Election Day is really about choosing among candidates handpicked by the super wealthy (say, Trump or Hillary Clinton), rather than candidates who reflect the needs and experiences of citizens.And this dominance by wealth becomes more true with each successive electoral cycle. As candidates require more and more money for advertising and social media, the influence of money grows. Parties have always chosen elites, but now fundraising crowds out other qualities of leadership. You cannot run if you cannot bring in big bucks, immediately.Gerrymandering likewise nullifies votes, erecting exclusionary boundaries between voters and their representatives. During the decennial district-drawing process for national, state and local representatives, the politicians in power choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Incumbent legislators make certain that their districts are dominated by like-minded citizens, and they limit the power of opposition groups by splitting their presence among as many districts as possible.Although gerrymandering goes back to the earliest days of the republic, it has never distorted electoral outcomes as much as it does today. Wisconsin and Texas are two of many states where elected representatives are far more Republican than the voters. That is because Republican majorities in both legislatures set it up that way, exaggerating and entrenching their power with the lines they drew across the landscape. New computer technologies have turned this process into a precise science, limiting voter choice wherever possible.These structural roadblocks make clear how little say citizens have in who represents them. The system is indeed “rigged,” but the rigging benefits the powerful, the wealthy and the extremes — not the vast majority of Americans.Trump’s presidency is a result of this system.  

Answer:

The Sugar and Stamp Acts. The Sugar and Stamp Acts of 1764 and 1765, intended to raise revenue in Great Britain, led to increased resistance from the colonies.

Explanation:

CAN YOU GIVE ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

The 1820 Quincy Report exposed how paupers were treated within the state of Massachusetts. Written by Senator Josiah Quincy III (as seen in the painting on the left), the report was an attempt to improve the methods used to treat the impoverished.

Answer:

D. first conflict of the Civil War

Explanation:

because that is where it first begin and had started the war ok

Answer:

The main difference is the presence of knowledge which made Africa, Asia, and the Middle East more developed and modern during the Middle Ages as compared to Europe because in Europe no importance was given to the knowledge by the people which leads to the development of other nations as compared to dark age of the Europe. Other parts of the world experienced “golden ages” during a time when most of the Europe struggled through the Dark Ages because of knowledge which enables other nations to made better their lives.

The controversial issue about the territorial disputes between the people's republic of china and the republic of the Philippines was caused by the " illegal occupation of some of China's islands and reefs in the South China Sea."

The Republic of China claimed that some coastal islands like the Philippines are illegally occupying their territories.

To solve these territorial disputes, the Philippines seek arbitration while China seeks bilateral negotiation.

With none of the countries yielding a method to solve the issue, territorial disputes continue to exist.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the cause of the controversial issues on the territorial disputes between China and the Philippines can be resolved if both are willing to come to terms.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20263720

Answer: C

Explanation: Once the governor receives a bill, he can sign it, veto it, or do nothing. If he signs it, the bill becomes law. *If he does nothing, the bill becomes law without his signature.* If he vetoes the bill, and the Senate and House of Representatives do nothing, the bill “dies.

Answer:

shared cultural heritage