In 1896, Winston Churchill argued in an article in The Saturday Review that it would be better for Spain to keep control of Cuba rather than to let the rebels succeed, as he believed that a victory by the rebels could lead to the establishment of a black republic in which the black population would have a predominant share in the government. Churchill argued that this would be a grave danger, given that two-fifths of the insurgents in the field were negroes. He suggested that the United States should intervene in Cuba to prevent this outcome and to ensure that Spain remained in control of the island. It is worth noting, however, that Churchill's views on imperialism evolved over time, and he later became a vocal opponent of British imperialism in India and elsewhere.
What was the biggest reform movement of the 19th century?
Answer:
The biggest reform movement of the 19th century in the United States was the abolitionist movement, which sought to end the practice of slavery. The movement emerged in the early 1800s and gained momentum throughout the century, with the publication of influential works such as "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe and the founding of organizations such as the American Anti-Slavery Society. The movement culminated in the Civil War, which led to the abolition of slavery with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1865. The abolitionist movement was a significant and transformative social movement that challenged the deeply entrenched institution of slavery and helped to advance the cause of civil rights and social justice in the United States.
Explanation:
how many barracks were in auschwitz?
Answer: 174
Explanation:
who is the female physician credited with the invention of the apgar score? in what year?
Answer: Virginia Apgra, early 1950's
Explanation: In the early 1950's, Virginia Apgar created the apgar score.
Which individual successfully fought to end the slave trade?
answer choices.
A. John Locke.
B. Napoleon Bonaparte.
C. William Wilberforce.
D. Woodrow Wilson.
The individual who successfully fought to end the slave trade is William Wilberforce. The correct answer is option C.
Wilberforce was a British politician who dedicated much of his life to ending the transatlantic slave trade. He successfully fought to pass the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act of 1807, which outlawed the trade in Britain and its colonies. He played a major role in the passage of the Slave Trade Act of 1807, which abolished the trade in slaves in the British Empire.
He was a British politician, philanthropist, and a leader of the movement to abolish the slave trade. William Wilberforce was a prominent British politician and philanthropist who was instrumental in the abolition of the British slave trade. He was a member of the British parliament from 1780 until 1825 and dedicated his life to ending the slave trade in Britain and the British Empire.
To know more about William Wilberforce, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/18909820#
#SPJ11
economic interests in which territory led the united states into the spanish-american war?
The Spanish-American War was initiated in 1898 as a result of Cuba's struggle for independence from Spain, which began in February 1895.
The United States and Spain came to a peace deal in Paris on December 10, 1898, which recognized Cuba's independence, granted the United States Puerto Rico and Guam,
While being protected by the navy during the Spanish American War, the United States was able to widen its commercial zone of influence, which greatly aided in the development of the country as an important economic force on the world stage. This had a clear connection to the earlier statement. Before the war, there was no distinct commercial fleet in the United States.
To know more about Spanish-American war visit :
brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ4
identify one push factor and one pull factor related to
economics
Economic activity includes the creation and consumption of products, the provision of services, and the allocation of assets based on cost and demand. International economic growth, as well as other societal phenomena, depend on both push and pull forces.
Negative circumstances like poverty, environmental deterioration, joblessness, poor wages, an inadequate quality of living, taxes that are excessive, and a dearth of goods and amenities are examples of economic push factors, which cause people to move.
Economic push factors which occurs when the best and brightest depart a country because of a dearth of chances, also create issues for the nation from which people are migrating.
People are drawn to a certain place by economic pull forces. Good circumstances known as "pull factors" include the availability of jobs and possibilities for careers, high salaries and an excellent standard of living, cheap taxes, and ample amount of assets and amenities.
how could alliances be changed to pervent world war 1
Answer:
allianves could be changed to prevent world war 1 if austria-hungary and serbia had an alliance and the act reffered as a terrorist act
Explanation:
Which phrase used by the president was specifically chosen to convince the public to support the war? “facts of yesterday†“unprovoked and dastardly attack†“have already formed their opinions†“a state of war has existedâ€
The phrase "unprovoked and dastardly attack" was specifically chosen by the president to convince the public to support the war. (Option 2)
In his speech, the president used the phrase "unprovoked and dastardly attack" to describe the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. This phrase was carefully chosen to create a sense of outrage and injustice in the minds of the American public and to convince them that the United States had been wronged and that military action was necessary.
The president also emphasized that "a state of war has existed" since the attack, which further reinforced the need for action and rallied support for the war effort.
Learn more about war
https://brainly.com/question/197175
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Which phrase used by the president was specifically chosen to convince the public to support the war?
facts of yesterdayunprovoked and dastardly attackhave already formed their opinionsa state of war has existedHow did President Harding take action to restore the U.S.
economy after World War I? Select all that apply.
A He forgave the loans that the Allies owed to the United
States.
B
He tried to manage world debts to the benefit of the
United States.
C He forbid U.S. investors to give loans or send money to for-
eign countries.
D
He enacted tariffs to protect U.S. buinesses.
Answer:
the answer will be
Explanation:
d because he did infact protect u.s buinesses
PLEASE HELP ME
1. How would you describe the attitude of the narrator toward elite New York society?
-
2. Why do you think Wharton uses words such as ¨pressed,¨ ¨expected,¨ ¨obliged,¨ ¨forced,¨ and ¨plunged¨?
-
3. How does the young girl described in the excerpt contrast with those around her?
-
4. How does the author foreshadow that problems will arise for the young girl depicted in the excerpt? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
-
5. Why do you think Wharton´s novel reflected overall trends in society?
In this section, the narrator's stance towards the upper crust of New York society could be characterized as critical or satirical.
Which other queries have answers?The author suggests through the use of language like "the facts of life" and "plunged overnight" that difficulties will occur for the little girl represented in the sample. These statements imply that the young girl may have difficulty navigating these hurdles since she is likely to be exposed to unpleasant or challenging reality for which she is unprepared. Furthermore, it is possible that these difficulties are made worse by the pressures and restrictions of her socioeconomic class, as suggested by the description of the social standards and expectations of upper-class New York society.
To learn more about author's attitude visit:
brainly.com/question/2314093
#SPJ1
which people did kennedy inform about the cuban missie crisis? hoover, truman, eisenhower apush
Explanation:
In September, Kennedy delivered two explicit warnings to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev regarding the buildup of what were being called "defensive" Soviet arms in Cuba.
wrap it up with a final sentence or 2 of your own choosing (give the reader something to think about? discuss the benefits of republics in general? note our debt to rome for our form of government?something totally different)
also the paper is on ancient roman republic
the American political system has been influenced by the Roman Republic. Slave uprisings in the Americas and in ancient Rome, such as the Haitian Revolution.
Do you believe the Roman Republic's success was more due to its military or its system of government?Because they are the ones who create the army and direct them in their duties, the Roman republic owed its success more to their system of administration. How did Rome increase its domain while retaining control over it? By defeating Hannibal and Carthage, Rome enlarged its domain.
how the provinces impacted the Roman economy as a whole?Access to raw materials was provided by the provinces, and the distribution of manufacturing units was essential to the Roman economy. These resources made Rome feasible. Rome was independent.
To know more about Roman Republic's s visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/930637
#SPJ1
Which of the following did the Soviet Union (USSR) not achieve
before the United States?
First artificial satellite in space
First man in space
First woman in space
First man on the moon
Answer:
Explanation:
The Soviet Union (USSR) did not achieve the first man on the moon before the United States.
In what way did America change between 1800 and 1850?
Answer:
Between 1800 and 1860, the United States underwent a period of increased territorial expansion, immigration, economic growth, and industrialization.
I need help with this
Answer:
I think it might be A not 100 percent sure though so I don't recommend using this answer if you don't have to
Explanation:
Colonies after WWI had increased demands for
what after participating?
Answer:
Independence/self-rule
Explanation:
Many colonized countries, particularly in Africa and Asia, had been forced to contribute troops and resources to the war effort, yet were still denied basic political rights and freedoms by their colonial rulers. The war also exposed the contradictions and hypocrisies of European imperialism, as the rhetoric of freedom and democracy used to mobilize the war effort was not extended to colonial subjects. As a result, many colonial subjects became more aware of their own oppression and began to demand greater autonomy and self-determination. These demands for independence ultimately led to the dismantling of many colonial empires in the decades following World War I.
Write a PEEL paragraph about the murder of Emmett Till
The murder of Emmett Till in 1955 is a horrific and tragic event that serves as a stark reminder of the deep-seated racism and violence that existed in the American South during the era of Jim Crow. Using the PEEL paragraph structure, we can examine this event in more detail:
Point: The murder of Emmett Till was a brutal and racially motivated crime that shocked the nation.
Evidence: Till, a 14-year-old African American boy from Chicago, was visiting family in Mississippi when he was brutally beaten and murdered by white supremacists. His body was found in a nearby river, and it was later discovered that he had been shot in the head, beaten, and tortured before his death.
Explanation: The murder of Emmett Till was a clear example of the deep-seated racism and violence that pervaded the American South during the era of Jim Crow. Till was targeted simply because of his race, and his killers believed that they could act with impunity due to the systemic discrimination and oppression of African Americans in the region.
Link: This tragic event serves as a stark reminder of the importance of confronting and combating racism and prejudice in all forms. While progress has been made since the era of Jim Crow, it is clear that there is still much work to be done in creating a more just and equitable society for all people.
what was distinctive about european colonial empires during the 19th how did the industrial revolution shape the character of 19th century? specifically, century european imperialism? what contributed to changing european views of asians and africans?
European colonial empires during the 19th century were characterized by the intense competition between European powers for control over territories in Africa, Asia, and the Americas.
The Industrial Revolution shaped the character of 19th-century European imperialism by providing European powers with the technological and economic means to exert their dominance over other regions.
The changing European views of Asians and Africans were influenced by a variety of factors. These factors contributed to the construction of racist and stereotypical images of non-European peoples.
The Explanation to Each AnswerThe 19th century was a period of intense competition between European powers for control over territories in Africa, Asia, and the Americas, which resulted in the establishment of vast colonial empires that would shape the course of world history.Learn more about european colonization https://brainly.com/question/19482514
#SPJ11
example of Tigsik (native language /bicol)
Answer:
example of Tigsik (native language /bicol)
Answer:
An example of a Tigsik in the Bicolano language:
Original Bicolano Text:
Nin huli na kung huli, sasakay pa rin ako sa gilid ng tren. Ang mahalaga'y makarating sa paroroonan nang ligtas at maaga.
English Translation:
Even if I'm late, I will still ride on the side of the train. What's important is to arrive at the destination safely and early.
Explanation:
A Tigsik is a form of poetry in the Bicol region that consists of quatrains or stanzas with seven syllables per line. It often features nature themes and reflects the daily life and experiences of the Bicolano people.
why does hoover believe that the future of freedom is at stake in the election of 1936? how does his definition of freedom differ from that of roosevelt?
Herbert Hoover believed that the future of freedom was at stake in the election of 1936 because he saw President Roosevelt's New Deal policies as a threat to individual freedom and economic liberty. In Hoover's view, the New Deal represented an expansion of federal power that would lead to government overreach, bureaucratic control, and a loss of individual autonomy. He believed that the New Deal would create a dependence on government and undermine the values of self-reliance and individual responsibility that were essential to American democracy.
Hoover's definition of freedom differed from that of Roosevelt in several key ways. For Hoover, freedom was primarily about individual rights and economic liberty. He believed that the government should play a limited role in the economy, and that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests and build their own businesses without undue interference from the government. Hoover's vision of freedom was rooted in a traditional laissez-faire approach to economics and a belief in the power of the market to regulate itself.
In contrast, Roosevelt's definition of freedom was more expansive, and focused on the role of government in protecting and promoting the well-being of all citizens. Roosevelt believed that freedom meant more than just individual rights and economic liberty, and that the government had a responsibility to ensure that all citizens had access to basic necessities like food, shelter, and healthcare. Roosevelt's New Deal policies were aimed at providing a safety net for those in need, and creating a more equitable society where all citizens had the opportunity to thrive.
The Renaissance and the Reformation are often described as eras that had many great advancements. In your opinion, what were the most important changes and advancements that occurred? How did those changes impact European culture, politics, or religion? Would you say that the Renaissance and Reformation was a time of progress in Europe? Why or why not?
The Renaissance and Reformation were both significant periods in European history that marked major changes in culture, politics, and religion. The Renaissance was a period of intellectual and cultural revival that began in Italy in the 14th century and spread throughout Europe, while the Reformation was a religious movement that emerged in the early 16th century and challenged the authority of the Catholic Church.
Some of the most important changes and advancements that occurred during these periods include the rise of humanism, the development of new artistic styles, the invention of the printing press, and the proliferation of Protestant denominations. Humanism, which emphasized the study of classical literature and the value of human reason, had a profound impact on European culture and education, while new artistic styles like perspective and realism transformed the visual arts.
The invention of the printing press, which allowed for the mass production of books, played a major role in the spread of knowledge and ideas, making it easier for people to share information and communicate across long distances. The Reformation, which challenged the authority of the Catholic Church, led to the proliferation of Protestant denominations and a diversification of religious beliefs across Europe.
These changes had a significant impact on European culture, politics, and religion. The rise of humanism and new artistic styles led to a flowering of artistic and intellectual creativity, while the printing press helped to disseminate new ideas and knowledge more widely. The Reformation challenged the political and religious authority of the Catholic Church and helped to usher in new forms of religious belief and practice.
Overall, I believe that the Renaissance and Reformation were times of progress in Europe. These periods marked major changes and advancements in culture, politics, and religion, and helped to lay the groundwork for many of the ideas and institutions that we take for granted today. While there were certainly many challenges and setbacks during these periods, I believe that the overall trajectory was one of progress and growth.
Answer:
The Renaissance and the Reformation are frequently characterized as periods of significant progress. The most significant changes and advancements that took place during these eras are of great interest. The impact of these changes on European culture, politics, and religion is also a topic of discussion. The question of whether the Renaissance and Reformation were a time of progress in Europe is a matter of debate. This essay will explore the most significant changes and advancements that occurred during these periods and their impact on European culture, politics, and religion, as well as the question of whether they were a time of progress in Europe.
Explanation:
plato
in what ways did colonization and the institution of slavery impact sustainability and agriculture in this country?
Colonization and the institution of slavery had significant and long-lasting impacts on sustainability and agriculture in the United States. Here are a few ways in which they influenced the development of agriculture and the environment:
Land use changes: Colonization and slavery led to significant changes in land use patterns, with large tracts of land being cleared for agriculture and the establishment of plantations. The need to cultivate crops like cotton, tobacco, and sugar cane to meet European demand led to deforestation, soil depletion, and soil erosion. These practices disrupted local ecosystems and altered the composition and productivity of the soil.Soil degradation: The intensive farming practices used on plantations, which relied heavily on monoculture and the use of chemical fertilizers, led to soil degradation and the depletion of soil nutrients. This, in turn, reduced soil fertility and led to declining crop yields over time.Loss of biodiversity: The clearing of land for agriculture and the introduction of non-native crops and animals also led to the loss of biodiversity. The replacement of native plants and animals with monocultures of cash crops, like cotton and tobacco, reduced the diversity of plant and animal species in the landscape.Overuse of natural resources: The plantation economy relied heavily on the exploitation of natural resources, such as timber and water, which were used for fuel, building materials, and irrigation. This led to the overuse and depletion of these resources, which had long-term impacts on the environment.Labor exploitation: The institution of slavery allowed for the exploitation of human labor to build and maintain the plantation economy. This labor was often coerced and forced, and workers were not compensated fairly for their work. The use of slave labor contributed to the exploitation of natural resources and the degradation of the environment.Overall, colonization and the institution of slavery had profound impacts on agriculture and sustainability in the United States. These legacies are still being felt today, with ongoing debates around land use, resource management, and environmental justice
Learn more about colonization here brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ4
Imagine that you are living in the South and you want to buy farming equipment. You
can buy from a Northern company for $25 a tool, but you can buy the same tool from a
British company for $15. Britain is also a major market for southern cotton. With these
factors in mind, which company would you do business with and why?
If we had to select based on profit, we would choose a British firm, but anyone who loved their country would prefer a Northern company.
Describe the Tariff Act of 1828.Aiming to protect western and northern agricultural products from foreign import competition, the tariff increased the cost of imported goods, which in turn increased living expenditures in the South and decreased manufacturer profits in New England.
The Tariff of 1828, commonly referred to as the Tariff of Abominations, marked a large rise in rates on manufactured goods (up to 50%), but it also distinguished for the first time the products that were regularly imported into the industrial states of New England.
The Tariff of 1828, sometimes known as the Tariff of Abominations, was enacted to protect industrial goods from foreign import competition, and this is how the Nullification Crisis of 1832–1833 came to be.
Learn more about The Tariff of 1828: https://brainly.com/question/7354155
#SPJ1
From 1945 to 1960 and beyond, the united states and the soviet union were in a cold war; however, military intervention resulted in a kinetic event in ________________. this event found us serviceman being classified as casualties because of the conflict.
The Korean War, which lasted from 1950 to 1953, was the military action that produced a kinetic event during the Cold War.US military personnel were considered casualties because of their participation in the fight.
Between 1945 and 1991, what war did the United States and the Soviet Union fight?As both nations were impacted by World War II and emerged as powerful global powers, competition between the USSR and the US increased. Following the fall of the Axis forces, a political and ideological rivalry between the US and the USSR marked the start of the Cold War.
How did the USA and the Soviet Union react to the post-World War II economic crisis in Europe?Fanning the flames of Communist terror Congress enacted the Economic Cooperation Act in March 1948, approving financing that would eventually amount to nearly $12 billion for the reconstruction of Western Europe in response to the precipitous decline of European economy in the winter of 1946–1947 and the American expansion.
To know more about Cold War visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ1
Suppose an entrepreneur developed a way to extract more valuable natural resources
from a country's land. How would this event affect that country's production possibilities
frontier?
If an entrepreneur developed a way to extract more valuable natural resources from a country's land, this event could potentially shift the country's production possibilities frontier outward.
What is the production possibilities frontier ?The production possibilities frontier (PPF) represents the maximum output that an economy can produce given its available resources and technology. The PPF shows the trade-off between producing different goods or services, and it assumes that the economy is operating at maximum efficiency.
If the entrepreneur's new extraction method allows the country to produce more valuable natural resources, this would increase the country's potential output and expand its production possibilities. This would shift the PPF outward, indicating that the economy is capable of producing more goods and services than it could before.
Find out more on the production possibilities frontier at https://brainly.com/question/12101823
#SPJ1
which of the following accurately characterizes both the american and french revolutions? group of answer choices both granted political equality to all people. both emancipated slaves in their territories as part of the revolution. both introduced republican forms of government. both avoided written documents, preferring informal agreements on fundamental rights.
The following accurately that characterizes both the American and French Revolutions is Both introduced republican forms of government. The correct answer is: c.
The American and French Revolutions both brought about radical political changes, introducing republican forms of government in both countries and replacing monarchical systems of rule.
What is a republican form of government?
A republican form of government is a political system in which the country is ruled by elected representatives. This type of government is based on the principles of a democratic government, where the people hold the power of the state through the electoral process.
In this type of government, the head of the state is not a monarch or a dictator, but rather an elected official, who represents the people. The American and French Revolutions both introduced republican forms of government.
In the United States, the Constitution established a republic in which the people are the source of political power, and they elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. In France, the revolutionaries overthrew the monarchy and established a republic in which the people had a say in how the country was run.
To know more about republican form of government, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12704966#
#SPJ11
roman empire map when it was the largest
Answer:
Explanation:
117 CE
The Roman Empire reached its greatest extent in 117 CE, under the emperor Trajan.
hope this helps boy!
explain the role of three leaders in the mayan society
Answer:
There were rulers, councils, or just general lords.
What were some important people from the Mayan civilization?
Not a comprehensive list but some rulers that must be mentioned.
Jasaw Chan K'awiil
He is known as the one responsible for bringing Tikal back to life after a long period of Calakmul dominance. He is known as the greatest king of Yax Mutal (believed to have been the Maya name for Tikal). He also was behind many building projects in Tikal. Perhaps the most famous temple of this city, Temple I or The Temple of the Great Jaguar is associated to him as his tomb was found within the temple.
Pakal ascended to the throne of Palenque at the early age of 12 and died still being a king at the age of 80, having the longest known regnal period in Maya history. At the time, his contemporaries may not have not had big expectations from him, yet, he is the most famous of all Maya rulers.
He is known for expanding the city of Palenque, in the western side of the Maya area, he transformed Palenque into one of the great urban centers of Mesoamerica in the late classic period. His building projects, such as the Temple of the Inscriptions are one of the best examples of Maya engineering, architecture and art. King Pakal is also known for his tomb, which is the most elaborate Maya tomb yet discovered.
Spearthrower Owl
Archaeologists gave the name Spearthrower Owl to visually describe this enigmatic character found in non-Maya glyphs. He and another ruler Siyah K'ak represent an important moment in Maya history as they tell us of the entrance of Teotihuacan-style culture into the Maya area. It was from this point that we start to see Mexican influence in the Maya lowlands (central Peten region in Guatemala). There is a debate among Maya experts on the significance of this, but the general belief is that this represents a strong political authority that the powerful Teotihuacan in central Mexico had at some point in the Maya area.
K’inich Yax K’uk Mo’
The founder of the Copán dynasty (modern day western Honduras). He was not native to Copán and it is believed that he came from the vicinity of Tikal or an area with Teotihuacan influence further west . Other than being the founding father of Copán, he is also famous for his goggles, which are associated with the Teotihuacano rain god, Tlaloc, therefore, his association with foreign (Mexican) origins.
which of the following was a difference between the british government and the colonial governments in america? group of answer choices women could vote in britain. a larger proportion of men could vote in britain than could vote in the colonies. there was no aristocratic class of nobles in the colonies. the colonies did not have their own governments.
The American government held that colonial legislatures were equal to and independent of Parliament, contrary to the British government's claim that Parliament had unrestricted authority.
What differences existed between the administrations of the American colonies?The American colonies enjoyed direct representation through assemblies, which set them apart from other British colonies in terms of government. The way the Native Americans behaved during Pontiac's Rebellion gave a pointer to the bloody warfare that would later accompany colonial expansion.
What distinctions between colonial taxes did the British government and American colonists see?The British administration argued that the colonists should pay for the war's expenses because they had fought in it in part to oppose colonial interests. The colonists countered that because they didn't have any representatives in Parliament, they shouldn't be taxed.
Learn more about American government: https://brainly.com/question/10890181
#SPJ1
do you think jackson’s dismantling of the bank promoted democracy? why or why not?